First volley fired in the Mayoral/City Council “Stop the Treason” Campaign in Carlsbad, CA

CITIZENS SPEAK OUT ABOUT THE TREASON COMMITTED BY OBAMA AND OTHER PUBLIC OFFICIALS

by Neil Turner

Lady Justice carries a scale in her left hand which "weighs" the pros and cons of a case, and in her right hand the double-edged sword symbolizes Reason and Justice

(Jul. 28, 2010) — Eight patriots appeared at the Carlsbad City Council meeting at 6:00 pm on Tuesday, July 27, 2010 at the Council Chambers at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, Carlsbad, CA.  We met beforehand so all could get to know each other, and agreed to give a round of supportive applause at the end of the presentation.

About 20 minutes into the meeting, after discussing and voting on five or six agenda items, Mayor Lewis called for “Public Comment,” and Mr. Turner was first.

The five-member council listened in attentive silence to the three-minute presentation (no anger, yawning, or eye-rolling), and the American Grand Jury Presentments/Indictments of January 18, 2010 were “served,” together with a copy of the presentation.

All this was done in conformance with California’s Brown Act (check for your State and City rules concerning this):

Public Comment

In conformance with the Brown Act, no Council action can occur on items presented during Public Comment. A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Council on items that are not listed on the Agenda.  Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each.  If you desire to speak during Public Comment, fill out a SPEAKER CARD* and place it in the clear tray on the wall adjacent to the Deputy City Clerk.  If there are more than five (5) speakers, the remaining speakers will be heard at the end of the agenda just prior to Council Reports. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.

In the next few days, a video of the meeting will be posted at the link below, at the tab: (Watch council meetings):

Meetings and Agendas

Which will take you to:

The City of Carlsbad encourages community members to watch City Council meetings and provides options:

  • Come in person: The City Council meets on most Tuesday evenings at 1200 Carlsbad Village Drive, starting at 6 p.m.  Check the city’s events calendar for the current schedule.
  • Watch online: City Council meetings are streamed live on the city website and can be watched at a later date too.  Looking for a specific agenda item?  Just click on the topic to see that part of the meeting.
  • Watch on TV: City Council meetings play live on the city’s Time Warner cable channels 24 and 126, and they replay throughout the week.  Check the schedule for times. (Friday at 5:00 am; Saturday at 9:00 am and 8:00 pm; and Sunday at 10:00 am on Time Warner cable channels 24 and 126)
  • Access through podcasts: Download a video or audio podcast from iTunes or watch on an MP3 player.

A personal video will be available on YouTube in the next few days of the presentation, with a slow pan of the council-members listening in rapt silence.

NOTE:  I do not expect this Council to take action on this anytime soon, but it is one more publicly-recorded serving of charges of Election Fraud and Treason against Pelosi, the DNC, and Barack Hussein–the Long-legged MacDaddy–Obama.  All who receive it and fail to act become chargeable with 18 U.S.C. §4: Misprision of Felony; and they were so notified in the presentation.

With only 999 more to go, this will be the BHO Crime Syndicate’s “death knell by a thousand cuts.”

The rest is up to you, the Constitution-loving patriots of America.

Neil B. Turner
Citizens for the Constitution
NBTurner@Earthlink.net

P.S.  For a small “speaking fee” (plus transportation costs), I will be willing to give this presentation (and take questions) before any City Council or Commission or public venue anywhere within our Constitutional Republic, including Wasilla, AK.  Thomas Paine costume not included, but will consider wearing one.

For more information on the “Stop the Treason” campaign, please go here.

——————————–

Editor’s Note: The definition of Misprision of Felony is as follows:

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the U.S., conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the U.S. 18 USC Misprision of felony, is the like concealment of felony, without giving any degree of maintenance to the felon for if any aid be given him, the party becomes an accessory after the fact.

4 Responses to "First volley fired in the Mayoral/City Council “Stop the Treason” Campaign in Carlsbad, CA"

  1. bill   Monday, August 2, 2010 at 9:39 PM

    In response to Mr.Neil Turner speaking to the City Council of Carlsbad Ca. on July 27,2010. I viewed the Podcast after downloading this colossal 127 Megabyte file
    located at this link : http://carlsbad.granicus.com/VPodcast.php?view_id=6
    To my idea ,this presentation by Mr. Turner at the respective times of 00:15:00
    to 00:19:30 was supposed to be excerpted to You Tube but so far I haven’t seen it.Does anyone know if this will be done,as I believe every American Citizen should
    view this .Thanks

  2. Vet's Wife   Saturday, July 31, 2010 at 12:03 AM

    @ A pen:
    You say (quote) “When the courts refuse to hear these cases they are in open violation of the constitution and no amount of technical standing can protect them from being held accountable.” (end quote)
    Okay, so we know the Courts are guilty, we know Pelosi, the DNC, and Obama are guilty, we know everyone (Councils, law enforcement, etc.) who receive this information and refuse/fail to act are guilty……so, my question would be WHO CAN or WILL hold them accountable?

    MacPUBLIUS says (quote) “§ 2382 is what compels us to do our duty as United States Citizens regarding the crime of treason” (end quote), but let’s face it…at the first attempt (or even just an “alleged” attempt) of any “ordinary” United States Citizen trying to do his/her duty, and take action to hold someone accountable, we would have Martial Law implemented within hours or maybe even minutes.
    Please feel free to disagree, but personally I have given up on the hopes that anyone in this current administration will ever be held accountable for anything, and neither will their “bought-and paid for” Judges.

  3. MacPUBLIUS   Wednesday, July 28, 2010 at 5:47 PM

    Since the alleged crime is treason, would it not make sense that Misprision of Treason also applies? Here is what the US Code says:

    United States Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 115
    § 2381. Treason – Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
    § 2382. Misprision of Treason – Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.

    Note: § 2382 is what compels us to do our duty as United States Citizens regarding the crime of treason. That is why it is so despicable that Federal Judges keep dismissing us for lack of standing. They are all co-conspirators to Obama’s treason! MacPUBLIUS
    ——————
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: There is a link to the definition of Misprision of Felony at the bottom of the piece.

  4. A pen   Wednesday, July 28, 2010 at 10:19 AM

    And there lies the treason, “cognizable by a court of the U.S” . When the courts refuse to hear these cases they are in open violation of the constitution and no amount of technical standing can protect them from being held accountable. This includes members of the Supreme Court who have voted not to conference on the information sworn to by an officer of the court. We know there are five who stand against the constitution and we must know who they are.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.