If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!


(Dec. 1, 2009)

Dear Mrs. Palin:

Congratulations on the successful launch of your new book, Going Rogue, and for writing the book on your own, unlike someOne who has to depend on a ghostwriter to get the job done.   I have not read the book yet, but from what I’ve read about the book and its enthusiastic reception I think I see where you are headed.

I believe you are going for the gold—white gold, that is, as in the White House—and I believe you are at a critical juncture in your career.  These lines from Robert Frost come to mind:

Two roads diverged in a wood, and I —
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.
—from “The Road Not Taken”

The 2009 Sarah Palin Calendar emphasized her all-American qualities

One path to the White House is long and circuitous, and it is the one prospective candidates usually travel by.  But you, Mrs. Palin, have a unique opportunity to straighten out the path and to transform it into a veritable freeway.  I urge you to take this transformative path today.

Your effort would be small, but you must have the courage to risk controversy in the interest of justice for the sake of our nation.  I know you have a strong, patriot heart, and I trust you to consider your options thoughtfully.

There is a little legal underbrush to get through on the more direct path to the presidency, and it involves clearing away the Democrat thorns we now face.  This means taking on Barack Obama now instead of waiting until 2012.  Your way to do that—and it is uniquely suited to you—has been laid out clearly by attorney Leo C. Donofrio at his weblog in an article entitled “Quo Warranto for ‘Interested Persons’ ” (October 8, 2009).

Congress long ago provided a way to simply ask of an office holder, “By what warrant (right) do you hold office?”  There is a harder way (Section 16—3502 of the Quo warranto statute in the District of Columbia Code) and an easier way (Sec. 16—3503, your way) to pose this question.  The place to do it is the D.C. District Court.  To quote Mr. Donofrio:

Section 16-3503 of the federal quo warranto statute allows an ‘interested person’ to approach the DC District Court concerning a quo warranto trial (by jury) without requiring the permission of the US Attorney General or the US Attorney for DC.  An ‘interested person’ may sign a ‘certified complaint’ which states facts and those facts must be sworn to under penalty of perjury.  Only facts may be sworn to, not allegations.  The ‘interested person’ gathers up all facts known to him/her and puts them in the petition, swears to them under oath and hands that in to the Court.  Pretty simple, folks.

Now the beauty of this for you, Sarah, is that once you have established that you are an interested person and have stated your factual reasons for questioning Obama’s right to hold office under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution (the natural born citizen clause), you are done.  Voila, you have done your duty to God and country.   As per Mr. Donofrio, “If the court is satisfied that the person issuing the petition is an ‘interested person’ then that person is not needed any longer for the trial.”  See how easy it is for you, Sarah, to relieve this nation of the injustice of a fraudulent election under which it now suffers?

Well, then,  are you an interested person?  Of course you are.  If Obama had not fraudulently claimed to be eligible for the presidency, you might well have a White House office right now and be deeply engaged in accruing presidential credentials which nobody could deny.

John McCain, who was born in Panama, will not question Obama’s eligibility because McCain himself was not eligible, despite the Senate resolution declaring him to be so.  That resolution has zero legal force vis a vis the Constitution.

Hillary Clinton could be an interested person but is not about to destroy her future in her party by challenging Obama’s eligibility.  Moreover, she herself violated the spirit and, I believe, the letter of the 22nd Amendment, which was intended to limit presidential power to two terms.  She and Bill were co-presidents, that being the basis for her campaign, and she and Bill (“my closest advisor”) are united in marriage, making them a legal UNITY.   Hillary, or more truthfully Billary, was not eligible either.

So it is up to you, Mrs. Palin, to petition the D.C. District Court to verify that Obama is eligible for office.   You are uniquely positioned to serve the nation in this way, as you clearly “have standing which is unique and special compared to the public at large.”  (Donofrio 10-08-2009)

Finally, what facts would you present to the court?  The minimum would be these:

1.  Obama has stated in his book and on the internet that his father was a British citizen and that British law governed his birth status.  This means that Obama swore falsely when on November 30, 2007, he signed the Arizona “Candidate Nomination Paper” (A.R.S. 16—242) declaring “I am a natural born citizen of the United States.”  It is impossible for the birth status of a natural born U.S. citizen to be governed by British law.

2.  Obama has never established as a fact that he was born in the United States despite an ongoing public outcry for him to show proof of his birthplace.  The unverified and possibly forged Certificate of Live Birth posted on the internet is not a genuine birth certificate and is wholly inadequate as the basis for a presidency.   It is possible that Obama is not even a U.S. citizen, much less a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution.

Many additional relevant facts could be assembled, but those are the essentials.  Sarah Palin, history has opened up a pathway for you above all others to take, and if you are wise and brave enough to take this path, it will become a six-lane highway for the army of patriots behind you.  Now is the time.  I pray you will step out boldly.

Good luck and Godspeed,

Harry Hunter