Captain Pamela Barnett issues challenge to Bill O'Reilly

Mr. O’Reilly:

Your purported “no spin zone” was nothing but spin when you discussed the $20,000 fine Judge Land levied against attorney Orly Taitz. You and your guests made statements that were not true, and you neglected to mention significant points that would be important to the average viewer. Fox News Channel’s “We report, you decide” motto is meaningless if you distort a few facts and omit the rest.

You have clearly “gone soft” on Obama (as have Shepard Smith and a few others on Fox). Even Glenn Beck, who at least dares to go after Obama’s Marxism, stays away from the natural born citizen issue. Who got to you “folks?” Who has ordered you to avoid the issue of Obama’s eligibility, unless you can use it to ridicule his opponents?

The facts:

1. Obama’s long form birth certificate has not been made public. No one has seen it.

2. No court has ruled that Obama is a natural born citizen. No court has ruled that Obama was born in Hawaii. All of the Obama eligibility lawsuits are either pending or have been dismissed due to lack of standing or because of jurisdictional grounds. No case has been judged on the basis of merits… just technicalities. In other words, no judge has had the courage to address the main constitutional issue: “What does the U.S. Constitution mean by the term natural born citizen, and how must candidates prove they meet the requirements to serve?”

3. Although Judge Land dismissed one of Dr. Taitz’s lawsuits, she has another case that has not been dismissed and which has been scheduled for trial on January 26, 2010. Is that not relevant? Are not your viewers entitled to know about that upcoming trial? Needless to say, if George W. Bush had been the subject of a similar lawsuit the media would be all over it, 24 hours per day. Why does Obama get a pass? Do Democrats not have to follow the U.S. Constitution?

4. The short form certificate of live birth (COLB) that was posted on the Internet is believed to be a forgery. Even if it is not, your attorney guests Lis Wiehl and Kimberly Guilfoyle should know that a computer image of a document would not be accepted in a court of law as evidence if the actual paper document exists and could be produced in its place. (Even non-lawyers understand that.)

5. At the time of Obama’s birth, Hawaii provided birth certificates to infants born outside of Hawaii as long as the two parents had been residents of Hawaii for at least one year. Therefore, having a Hawaiian birth certificate proves nothing. Obama’s half-sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng, has a Hawaiian birth certificate even though she was born in Indonesia. You and your guests did not mention that. Why?

6. Obama has spent a small fortune (of someone’s money, not necessarily his) to fight legal challenges about his eligibility to serve as president. That tremendous expense could be avoided with the simple release of his long form birth certificate and his school records. Why spend over one million dollars to fight lawsuits when a payment of perhaps $12 can resolve the issue?

7. I have been in contact with a former classmate and friend of Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., and that contact believes the father of Obama was not the Kenyan student. (Hiding the identity of his real father may be the reason Obama will not release his long form birth certificate or school records.) I am sure there are other such person out there. Why did the media not seek them out for interviews during the campaign?

8. Contemporaneous writings of the Founding Fathers indicate they defined “natural born citizen” as a person born on U.S. soil to two U.S. citizen parents. Because Obama’s father was not a U.S. citizen (assuming his father was Obama, Sr.), Obama is not a natural born citizen – regardless of where he was born. (Your attorney guests, Wiehl and Guilfoyle, might want to do some research before making judgments about cases they have likely not read. I suggest they read The Law of Nations and the cases Shanks v. Dupont, Minor v. Happersett, United States v. Ward, United States v. Wong Kim Ark, and Keith v. United States.

9. Obama was, according to his half-sister, adopted by Indonesian Lolo Soetoro when his mother remarried. If that was the case, Obama became a citizen of Indonesia, which does not allow dual citizenship. If Obama applied for U.S. citizenship when he returned to the United States in or about 1970, he should release his naturalization papers. He refuses to do so. He is also keeping his passport records secret, possibly because they show that his 1981 trip to Pakistan, India, and Indonesia was mad with his Indonesian passport. (I suspect he never applied for U.S. citizenship after he moved back to the United States, and remains a citizen of Indonesia to this day.)

10. Records show that Obama has used more than one Social Security number, and the one he is currently using was assigned in Connecticut; it was originally assigned to a man who was born in 1890. Obama neither lived nor worked in Connecticut. Why then does he have a Social Security number issued in that state? Why is he using a dead person’s Social Security number? (The numbers are not reassigned after a person’s death.) Fraud is the most likely explanation. And if the reason is fraud, it may be because Obama was not an American citizen eligible to obtain a Social Security number legitimately. Like many non-citizens, he simply used the number of a dead American.

11. Americans who are suspicious of Obama’s past are not crazy, as you and your guests implied. They simply believe that someone who has shrouded his life in secrecy must have a reason for doing so, and we would like answers.

12. Anyone who has studied Obama’s life – as I have – would have serious doubts about not just his legitimacy, but his integrity and honesty. The job of the media is to be skeptical of government officials in order to keep them honest, not whitewash the truth to protect them. I took it upon myself to write a book, The Obama Timeline, to prove to the nation that Obama is a fraud. I would not have had to devote 4,000 hours to that project had the media done its job properly.

Your having implied that Captain Barnett is a coward is contemptuous. She has served in the U.S military (as have I), which is more than many politicians and media members have done. She deserves an apology from you… as does attorney Taitz.

If you do not take seriously those who doubt Obama’s eligibility to serve, you are free to ignore the issue. You did not have to bring up the case on your program. That you mentioned it without giving attorney Taitz the opportunity to defend her position is reprehensible. Either allow the other side to state her case – or don’t bring up the issue in the first place. Your segment was clearly meant only to ridicule people, not to have an objective discussion of the facts. Shame on you. If I want to watch someone being ridiculed without an opportunity for a defense, I can watch Bill Maher, John Daly, Keith Olbermann, and Chris Matthews.

I challenge you to invite Captain Barnett, Orly Taitz, and even me to your program and allow us an extended period of time to make our case against the current temporary resident of the oval office. To deny us that privilege means only one of two things: you are a fraud and have no allegiance to your self-described “no spin zone,” or you have executives carefully controlling what you can say. If it is the case of the former, I shall no longer watch your program. If it is the case of the latter, I shall no longer watch the Fox News Channel.

Don Fredrick
Author, The Obama Timeline
http://www.colony14.net

Dear Pamela:…Hello. Boy, Lady, do I love you! You are super! I’ve been supporting Orly now for months…and she’s had to put up with all the B.s. that the treasonous trash in America has thrown at her! And now you are stepping up, as well. Good for you. It’s too bad guys like O’Reilly and others don’t have the guts that [God gave a brass Kangaroo dipped in swiss cheese]! For him and others to talk about you and Orly or any of the FREEDOM FIGHTERS is a total disgrace! For a man to do this, it tells me that he’s already sold his soul for wealth and God is going to teach these people a lesson someday! And I can’t wait to see it! Also, if you do get on his show, this will be the highest rated O’Reilly Show ever!? I don’t have cable, so don’t know who else has been a guest? And what I’d love to see is as many of the military join this legal suit against Obama as possible! If he’s not legally the president, then, no military personnel should be required to go anywhere that this ILLEGAL ALIEN wants to send them! The Constitution is above his insanity! And thank you for having the courage to step up and be a real PATRIOT, like Orly and others, to show these: low-life, bottom-feeding, scum-sucking Treasonous-Trash just who the hell they think they’re dealing with!!! If Americans had the guts to speak up and not be intimidated about any of this, especially the AP News Source and other news services around the nation, America would be out of the woods in a matter of 24-48 hours! Take care and eat’em alive!!! Friend, Davey Crockett

In the law there is such a thing as a accessory to a crime, which is a felony. Dimwit moron O’Reilly is an accessory to the criminal usurpation of the American Presidency. He knowingly distorted the enormous depth of evidence while obfuscating the reputations of professional investigators and patriotic attorneys to the extreme of slander, libel with tortuous logic.

So I challenge ( along with over 100 and growing, of my battle tested brothers in arms), the panty waisted coward O’Reilly to confront us. That pompous bag of wind who never had the guts to take a bullet for America or serve one day in uniform but so comfortably distorts the truth to enable the tyrannical overthrow of America and the destruction of the Constitution and the American way of life, is nothing more than a disinformation tool and a traitor!

We’re on to you little Billy and when this whole thing blows up, and it will, I wouldn’t want to be you or any of the other anti-American complicit brown nosed media talking heads!

I have always believed that since Congress did not prove Obama’s birth right to become the President that there was in fact something being covered up. I know without a doubt that this man was placed in the White House to destroy this country. The question Glenn Beck posed was this, though we
know what the truth is, what are we (people) willing to do and to what extreme will we go to stop it? I am not advocating violence in any sort of way, but how far will we as a people be willing to go and at what cost to fix our broken country? It is not just about Obama’s legitimate right to Presidency, but all the damage him and his surrounding cronies are doing to this great nation!

Though many of us have protested it seems no one in Congress is listening or wanting to do what is right. I feel that it is about time for “We the People” to do more than yell about the problems….

“When in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britains a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

We need to address the problems of interests:

1) Prove the legitimate right to rule
2) He has repeatedly shown that he is supporting Marxism and not the Consitution and our freedoms which is an act of treason
3) He has allowed others who do not support the Constitution and its freedoms to take a seat in the White House which is another act of treason
4) He has stated his intentions to sign the climate bill treaty which is another act of treason by having this bill strip our nation of its sovereignty
5) He has usurped his authority of power by taking controll over companies that he deems is necessary because he bailed them out which also places a hardship on the nation due to over-taxation when “We the People” have shouted NO!
6) He is forcing our troops to defend themselves without the vital support needed to safe-guard them.
7) He has supported marxis groups that are intent to bring about tryanny to our nation…

I know that I have not written as eloquently as our fore-fathers about the transgressions and I am sure there are more to add but let us continue in thought….

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

I so Pledge to this end…what say ye?

Dear Captain Barnett,first,allow me to thank you for your service to our country!I(like yourself and others)belive this man(Obama)to be illegitimate.I don’t belive he was born within the(as he says)57 United States of America.Therefor,he was an illegimate candidate(under article 3).I also believe that his election(to POTUS)was largely engineered by an outlaw group(ACORN)!!

Like Bill O’Reilly, many shallow-minded Americans are so intimidated by black power that they would prefer to trash the Constitution rather than to displease Oprah. They fear that black anger would result in violence if Obuma were to forced from office, so to keep the peace they counsel silence about Obuma’s ineligibility and consequent unlawful tenure. Incredibly, they think such cowardice is in the nation’s best interest.

But would American blacks really want to riot for a half-white, British-born fraud who is not even an African-American as advertised? Obuma’s father was pure Kenyan and was never an American citizen. Obuma himself was born a British subject/citizen and may still owe allegiance to Queen Elizabeth. Moreover, Obuma shares nothing of the African-American heritage; not one drop of African-American blood runs in his veins.

If reason prevails when Obama resigns or is disqualified or impeached, black Americans will realize that their allegiance is not to half-African blood but to their own nation’s Constitution, under which they hold equal protection and enjoy all the benefits of a free society.

I also watched the debacle last night on O’Reilly. Both he and Weil should be totally embarassed and ashamed by their idiotic, illucid and untrue statements about the Barnett case. I was so mad that I wrote both lunatics a sharp letter about their lack of journalistic integrity and their lying to their audience. Weil, in particular, was such a dolt with her comments that she should be banned from television immediately and returned to the insane asylum she escaped from. I would venture that she has not researched the Constitution eligibility requirements to be POTUS let alone any background research for the “annointed one”. One particularly assinine statement she made was concerning the COLB posted online. Her statement that this was obvious proof and support for Obama as being born in the country settled the issue and she didn’t understand why the issue continued. If she had done any research at all she would have found that the posting has been proven to be a fraud and, further, the documentation in question with Hawaii is pending, not accepted. She would also learn that there are several eligibility requirements to be considered and the birth certificate is not one of them. She should be researching the father of the usurper.
If either of these loons, as O’Reilly likes to call others, were in the least bit honorable and truly cared about the truth, this issue would have warranted more research. The problem is that FOX is still controlled by an individual, Rupert Murdoch, who is a new world order believer and supporter of Obama. Until traitors such as Murdoch are removed from the reporting process the American people will be subjected to propaganda journalism such as we witnessed last night on what was supposed to be a “fair and balanced” outlet.

Thank you, Capt. Barnett, for issuing the challenge. I listened to the lies last night on O’Reilly. It was truly unbelievable. If O’Reilly and Fox News are the “Fair and Balanced” they claim to be, at least “allow” the truth to come out and let the chips fall where they may. Capt. Barnett, you are a true Patriot. Back O’Reilly into the corner he needs to be in, he and his 2 lawyers groupies.

O’Reilly’s own words:
“I don’t care”
and
“If I wanted to know I would find out tomorrow”

youtube.com/watch?v=FSVMlQOUVYc

Exposé detailing how the media was and currently still is complicit in witholding information about the fraudulent corrupt actions of Barack Hussein Obama AKA Barry Soetoro, the DNC, Nancy Pelosi and Howard Dean prior to the 2008 Presidential election.