TIME EXTENSION REQUEST DENIED
by Cody Robert Judy, ©2015
(Jul. 9, 2015) — This day has been a remarkable day of revelations for me I just can’t wait to get off my chest! First off, it was noticed on the Docket of the Court concerning Judy v. Obama 15A25, that United States Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor has ‘DENIED’ the APPLICATION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME in my request that the Court give me more time to pay the Court fees and prepare the Brief according to the U.S. Supreme Court printing guidelines because I didn’t have enough money to do that now, or at least wait until the Court had a chance to rule upon my Motion for Review and Reconsideration of my DENIED IFP also PENDING for a September 28th Conference Date.
Now the reason the APPLICATION FOR TIME EXTENSION was just a formality was that the Second CONFERENCE had already been scheduled for September 28th by the Court. My thoughts ever since the Court had denied my in forma pauperis (IFP) status was that they simply did so to buy more time to discuss it. That time would have necessarily disappeared if Justice Sotomayor had granted my APPLICATION FOR TIME, because what I proposed in that was actually “I wanna hurry this up and get it done during the summer” and by denying it Justice Sotomayer basically said, “We’d like to take some time on this and wait until September 28th where we have scheduled a “Long Conference” over it.”
We already know that the DENIAL of the Motion for IFP Status was not due to being ‘Frivolous,’ or as the Court Clerk said, it would have been noted as “Denied” Pursuant to Rule 39.8 of the Supreme Court Rules which states again:
“8. If satisfied that a petition for a writ of certiorari, jurisdictional statement, or petition for an extraordinary writ is frivolous or malicious, the Court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis.”
This was not stated on the Denial anywhere on the Order.
WHAT DOES THE SECOND “LONG CONFERENCE” MEAN RATHER THAN A “SHORT CONFERENCE”
What do I have to back up such unspoken communication? Well, I have the Court’s own CALENDAR to back it up! Pictured above is the Supreme Court of the United States Calendar. Many were surprised that anything would be happening during the Month of July because the Court is ‘Recessed’ at the end of June. So, let’s say that you thought they’d all gone home? Now you know we have Justice Sotomayor’s Ruling July 7th proving to you that they didn’t, even though they are indeed in Recess. I’ve stated before they use ‘Recess’ periods to go over Cases in developing and writing opinions as well as ruling on Motions and Applications of what are termed Active Cases.
They don’t want to formally call my case ‘Active’, because, and this is my own speculations but its based on a conservative and realistic considerations that are facts- we might lose Air Force One with Obama on it to a Foreign safe haven.
What I did with the Title Picture of this Post is to make a copy of what the Court’s Calendar looks like during the months of July, August, and September. It’s blank, compared to the Calendar on the right of that picture which is filled with all kinds of color coded squares marking days that the Court will do things and then giving you the code to know what is being done on those days.
You will notice Days marked with a RED BOX are given to ARGUMENT DAYS. Those marked with a GREEN BOX are given to what we call ‘CONFERENCES’, but they are under what is termed silently a “SHORT CONFERENCE”. Now how do we know that? Well, when I had my 1st Conference June 18th if you recall there were 177 Cases to get through that day. How long do you think the Justices can spend on one Case if they have 177 to go through in one day? Well, let’s just say they did it in six hours, thirty minutes of an eight-hour work day.
Read the rest here.
Mr. Judy, What makes you think Air Force One might be lost to a Foreign safe haven? Please answer this. Thank you.