Breaking: Georgia Judge Denies Obama’s Motion to Quash Subpoenas

GEORGIA BALLOT CHALLENGE WILL PROCEED WITH DISCOVERY

by Sharon Rondeau

Judge Michael Malihi has denied a Motion to Quash Subpoenas submitted by Barack Hussein Obama's attorney, Michael Jablonski

(Jan. 20, 2012) — 11:45 a.m., ET – Atty. Orly Taitz informed The Post & Email moments ago that Georgia Administrative Hearings Judge Michael Malihi has denied Obama counsel’s request to quash subpoenas requesting original documentation of Obama’s birth, aliases and social security number application, school records, and other records.

Taitz had written an Opposition to Obama counsel Michael Jablonski’s Motion to Quash the subpoenas she issued as a result of Malihi’s denial of Jablonski’s Motion to Dismiss in the challenge to the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to run for president in 2012.

Jablonski had claimed that the hearing scheduled for January 26, 2012 would cause Obama to “interrupt [his] duties as President of the United States” and that the subpoena was, “on its face, unreasonable.”

However, last night Obama sang a solo at The Apollo Theater in New York City.

The order from Judge Malihi reads, in part:

Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.

In support of his motion, Defendant argues that “if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States” to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia.  However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend.  Defendant’s motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing.  This may be correct.  But Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is “unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony…[is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation in the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced…

On her website, Taitz stated:

I feel extremely proud to be a part of this historic moment. I guess an American dream is still alive, as this subpoena was issued by an immigrant, who was raised in a communist dictatorship of the Soviet Union and came here with one suitcase with a couple of dresses, who had to study English, to study law at night, while working as a dentist  and raising a family with 3 children. Only in America is this possible.

Humbly,

Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

 

7 Responses to "Breaking: Georgia Judge Denies Obama’s Motion to Quash Subpoenas"

  1. "Zeb"   Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 3:50 PM

    The hole in the Constitution was created when no enforcement provisions for eligibility were put in. They were not put in because it was expected that candidates would be self regulating. Recall that politicians in the 18th century killed each in duels when their integrity was challenged. Politicians in the 21st century have no integrity to challenge.
    So it goes back to the Federalist, common law, and precedent to decide and that’s where we are with the usurper, who, like the others has no integrity.

  2. sandrabear   Tuesday, January 24, 2012 at 12:14 AM

    Obama won’t show up and he won’t submit the requested documents since he treats THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES as if it were toilet paper.

  3. Hank   Sunday, January 22, 2012 at 1:51 PM

    It puzzles me why we should have to prove he is ineligible, it makes far more sense (and I think it is what the Constitution says) that HE must prove he is eligible? This is about eligibility, that’s his responsibility, not mine.

  4. Kevin J Lankford   Saturday, January 21, 2012 at 12:54 PM

    I just hope this is not just another orchestrated farce like that perpetrated by
    donald trump. I do not think they are above arranging a hearing in a quiet little
    court in the pretense of having all issues addressed and put to rest and then
    announced to the world.

  5. ALEX   Saturday, January 21, 2012 at 10:26 AM

    JUDGE MALIHI IS THE FIRST HONEST JUDGE OUT OF SEVEN THAT WERE DISHONEST—JUDGE MALIHI HAS THE USA AND US CONSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS IN HIS HANDS—OBAMA MCCAIN AND LEVIN HAVE CONSPIRED TO DESTROY THE US COSTITUTION AND BILL OF RIGHTS WITH HR BILL 1540 OF NDAA ACT===THE RULE OF LAW SURVIVES—OBAMA NOW HAS TO PROVE WHO HE IS AND WHY HE IS USING A FAKE SOC SEC NUMBER 042-68-4425.

  6. GregNH   Friday, January 20, 2012 at 2:09 PM

    The judge did deny a quash of the subpoena for documents. He upheld the subpoena for Obama to APPEAR!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.