IF KELLY NEEDS AN EDUCATION IN THE CONSTITUTION, WHAT DID SHE LEARN IN LAW SCHOOL?
January 3, 2011
Dear Editor:
The following letter was sent to Fox News anchor Megyn Kelly in response to her recent report on Lt. Col. Terrence Lakin’s court-martial and the underlying issue of the “birthers.”
Megyn;
I sincerely hope that you read this fully, as your ‘fair and balanced’ report on the Obama “birther’ issue was biased and unprofessional.
The fact remains that Barack Hussein Obama has not established his credentials as required by the United States Constitution, for the Presidency.
Worse then that fact alone is the media, including Fox News to disregard the basic facts and misrepresent that “just being born in the US’ is qualification enough to be eligible for the Presidency.
Per the United States Constitution;
The term citizen is, however the term citizen is also used in the United States Constitution as in Article I – The Legislative Branch
No Person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the Age of twenty five Years, and been seven Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State in which he shall be chosen.
“a Citizen of the United States”
Section 3 – The Senate
No person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.
” been nine Years a Citizen of the United States”
Section 1 – The President
No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
“natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution”
House = Citizen
Senate = Citizen
President = Natural Born Citizen
The distinction is clear between a citizen and a natural born citizen, and Obama fails that as a British subject as stated by himself.
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.”
That is why the only thing they focus on is birth location, not the Constitutional requirement of a ‘Natural Born Citizen’, but then again Obama has not even establish that he was born in Hawaii, he was only registered in Hawaii. Registered and Born are different, like claims and facts.
Now you exclaim Neil Abercrobie as an authoritive source without realizing the conflicting information. The newly elected Gov of Hawaii, Neil Abercrombie has stated the biggest fopaux concerning the unblessed nativity of Barack Hussein Obama in that, as he stated ”Maybe I’m the only one in country that could look you right in eye right now and tell you, ‘I was here when that baby was born”…
So I wonder when Abercrombie was in Kenya, cause not only is he like he says ‘the only one in ‘THIS’ country?’ but it conflicts with the Ambassador to Kenya’s statement that the place that the newly elected President was born at was already a monument and that they we’re planning on placing a plaque there, which coincides with the Kenyan Government official stating “If America was living in a situation where they feared ethnicity and did not see itself as a multiparty state or nation, how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America?”
So Abercrombie, is either lying that he was there when Obama was ‘BORN’ in Hawaii, or else Abercrombie was in Kenya when Obama was born.
Seeing an infant is not the same as seeing him born, just as claiming you were born in Hawaii.
Regardless of where Obama was born, he fails the Constitutional requirement of a Natural Born Citizen, based on a foreign father. His birth place is a distraction, and only those that believe that being born in country qualifies as being eligible for the Presidency, imagine Osama Bin Laden visiting here and getting a young girl pregnant. That child being even born here is not Constitutionally eligible. There is no difference between that and Obama Sr a foreign exchange student in Hawaii.
At the time of the adoption of the United States Constitution, citizenship flowed from the father, it was a brithright inheritance and children followed the condition of their fathers. It is that simple.
“When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Now, Barack Hussein Obama has a political prisoner, and thanks to the media [including FoxNews] a decorated military officer is imprisoned for asking the very eligibility questions that the citizens are demanding answered.
The military in denying Terrence Lakin a defense, the military railroaded a career military officer in order to protect an illegal undocumented foreigner, Barack Hussein Obama.
I maintain, that Barack Hussein Obama was never a US Citizen. Born in Kenya as his grandmother stated, and brought into the marriage between Barack Obama Sr. and Stanley Ann Dunham.
I have been investigating the Obama COLB issue since Aug 2008, I maintain a blog where I document the forgery and even have posted a video on YouTube detailing how to create an exact copy of the forgery.
My blog has detailed information and you are free to use it.
and my YouTube Channel
Fair and balanced Megyn, why not have others to actually debate the issue, instead of faux and biased reporting.
I would recommend CDR Kerchner and Mario Apuzzo as excellent sources to counter the lies and deceit of falsely claiming that an undocumented and illegitimate foreigner is eligible to the Office of the Presidency. In closing I would like to direct you to the CRO’s report that instructed Congress how to disregard the citizens questions during and after the campaign.
Kelly is just..another in a seemingly endless parade of interchangeable brain-dead Republican bottle-blondes. I swear, there must be some farm out in Utah where they breed these women, because a new one seems to pop up every other day.
Ms. Kelly should also read the new book: “Obama – Ineligible To Serve – Lies, Crimes and Deadly Ambition” (Amazon) as this explains ALL the LEGAL FACTS as to why Obama is ineligible to be President under the U.S. Constitution. It also explains the various lawsuits in easy to understand language!
reeltime,
You’ve lost me.
No where in Kim Wong Ark did the court declare anyone born within the jurisdiction of the United States without citizenship parents were themselves Natural Born Citizens. In fact, the Court was charged to determine whether of not Kim Wong Ark was a “Citizen” of the United States even though his parents were not. The Court determined He would be A “Citizen”, but would not go so far as to claim him a Natural Born Citizen.
Take a look at the Ankeny v Gov of Indiana appeal. It will answer all your questions about Kim Wong Ark.
http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/pdf/11120903.ebb.pdf
The main argument of the Ankeny case was that citizens are only born or naturalized, and that all born citizens are natural born citizens. The court failed to note that there are three classes of born citizens:
1. 14th amendment citizens – Persons born on US soil to alien parents domiciled here, according to the SCOTUS Wong Kim Ark case.
2. Statutory citizens – Persons born abroad to US citizens are citizens by federal statute.
3. Natural born citizens – Persons born on US soil to parents who are citizens.
All of the above are citizens, but each class has their citizenship bestowed through different circumstances. Some require the 14th amendment. Some require a statute. But natural born citizens require neither, for their citizenship is self-evident to all. The citizenship and allegiance of natural born citizens at birth is 100% American – these are the citizens that our Founding Fathers wanted for future presidents.
The Ankeny case is not a US Supreme Court case, and to date, the US Supreme Court has never characterized a natural born citizen as being anything less than a person born in the country to citizen parents.
Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States [] natural-born citizens.”
Right, the founders of our nation had a special requirement for president and vice-president which is that they be “natural born Citizens”, while other political offices only require that the person be a “Citizen”. The special requirement was to insure that anyone born within the borders, (anchor baby, child of British parents, etc), could be president of the newly formed nation.
Excuse me…but I don’t think so!
Actually, the Ark court said that every child born in England to alien parents was a natural-born subject. In England, alien parents suspended their native allegiances and owed temporary or local allegiance to the English king. This local allegiance was sufficient for the English-born children of alien parents to be referred as natural-born subjects.
Wong Kim Ark was born in the US to Chinese alien parents. In the US, alien parents do not suspend their foreign allegiances and they do not owe allegiance to the US. While declaring Mr. Ark to be a citizen, it was the lack of allegiance on the part of Ark’s parents that prevented the Ark court from declaring Mr. Ark a natural born citizen.
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Neither the 14th Amendment nor Wong Kim Ark make one a Natural Born Citizen
by Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
In defining what an Article II “natural born Citizen” is, we do not seek to read into the Constitution that which was not intended and written there by the Framers. Despite popular belief, the Fourteenth Amendment does not convey the status of “natural born Citizen” in its text nor in its intent. Some add an implication to the actual wording of the Fourteenth Amendment by equating the amendment’s “citizen” to Article II’s “natural born Citizen.” But nowhere does the 14th Amendment confer “natural born citizen” status. The words simply do not appear there, but some would have us believe they are implied. But the wording of the Amendment is clear in showing that it confers citizenship only and nothing more.
The intent and purpose of the amendment was to provide equal citizenship to all Americans either born on U.S. soil or naturalized therein and subject to the jurisdiction thereof. It does not grant “natural born Citizen” status. It only confers “citizen” status, as that is the exact word used by the Amendment itself and that is the same word that appears in Article I, II, III, and IV of the Constitution. It just conveys the status of “citizen,” and as we learned from how the Framers handled the Naturalization Acts of 1790 and 1795, being a “citizen” does not necessarily mean that one is a “natural born Citizen.”
Read the rest here: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/07/neither-14th-amendment-nor-wong-kim-ark.html
> So Abercrombie, is either lying that he was there when Obama was ‘BORN’ in Hawaii, or else Abercrombie was in Kenya when Obama was born.
Or the Kenyan government offical was lying. Just for completeness, that is also an option.
> At the time of the adoption of the United States Constitution, citizenship flowed from the father
Jedi Pauly, is that you? I thought NBC derived from *both* parents.
> I would recommend CDR Kerchner and Mario Apuzzo as excellent sources
However Mario does not agree with the “NBC comes from the father” theory.
Numerous Kenyan government officials have said he was born in Kenya. Again, I cite Mario Apuzzo, Esq., because he cites the initial sources in his summary, here http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2010/05/catalog-of-evidence-concerned-americans.html .
(3) The Kenyan Ambassador to the United States, Peter N.R.O. Ogego, confirmed on November 6, 2008, during a radio interview with Detroit radio talk-show hosts Mike Clark, Trudi Daniels, and Marc Fellhauer on WRIF’s “Mike In the Morning,” that “President-Elect Obama” was born in Kenya and that his birth place was already a “well-known” attraction;
(4) Ms. Odhiambo a Member of the Kenyan Parliament said in session and recorded in the official record of the Kenyan National Assembly on 5 Nov 2008 on page 3275 that Obama was a son of the soil of their country;
(big snip)
(29) A debate on the adoption of a new Constitution took place in the House of the National Assembly of Kenya on Thursday, March 25, 2010. The Official Report of that House, dated Thursday, March 25, 2010, provides the details of that debate. One of the speakers during that debate was The Minister for Lands, Mr. Orengo. Ironically, he expressed that “[i]f we do not live by the values and principles contained in this Constitution, all that is contained in this Constitution will be of no significance….” He continued saying that Kenyans must follow the rule of law and especially the Constitution, stating that the “unmaking of Kenya began by disregard and non-compliance of the law. We ended up in a dictatorship that we had to fight for so many years….” He further explained that under the new proposed Constitution, the “Executive authority of the President . . . is derived from the people….” He then explained that Kenya must overcome its problem of elements of its population excluding people from participating in Kenyan life because of ethnic factors. He asked that all Kenyans unite, regardless of ethnic or tribal affiliations, stating: “The other thing that we are addressing through devolution is exclusion. What has made us suffer as a nation is exclusion. Once people feel excluded, even when you want to employ a policeman or constable or you want to build a dispensary, it must come from the centre. In the colonial days, these things were being done on the ground and they could give bursaries and build roads. I commend devolution. Those who fear devolution are living in the past. They are being guided by their ethnic consideration and objectives. They are living in the past. If America was living in a situation where they feared ethnicity and did not see itself as a multiparty state or nation, how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America? It is because they did away with exclusion. What has killed us here is exclusion; that once Mr. Orengo is President, I know of no other place than Ugenya. That is why we were fighting against these many Presidencies in the past. I hope that Kenya will come of age. This country must come of age. People want freedom and nations want liberation, but countries want independence.” Mr. Orengo’s statement to the Kenyan Assembly in session is recorded in the official record/minutes of the Kenyan National Assembly meeting on the 25th of March, 2010, that the President of the USA was born in Kenya and is not a native born American. Scroll down to page 31 in the official record of the Kenyan Assembly meeting of 25 March 2010. There we have it clearly stated by a current member of the Kenyan Cabinet that Obama was born in Kenya and is not a “native American.” It is unbelievable that a high-ranking member of the Kenyan government would make such a matter-of-fact statement, given the debate that is raging in the United States about whether Obama was born in Hawaii or Kenya. The full report may be found at http://www.scribd.com/doc/30293518/Minister-in-Kenyan-National-Assembly-on-25-March-2010-states-Obama-born-in-Kenya-See-page-31. The speech of Mr. Orengo starts at page 29 and ends at page 31. The above quote is found on page 31;
(30) Another Kenyan Minister on April 14, 2010, made a statement about Obama’s origins and says that Obama should repatriate himself to Kenya. “What commitment did they make about compensation and more importantly, the biggest artefact [sic] in the USA today that belongs to this country is one Barrack Obama. How does he intend to repatriate himself or part of the money that is realized from all the royalties that he is attracting across the whole world?” Kenyan Minister Khalwale Asks When Obama Will Repatriate Himself @ Jefferson’s Rebels http://jeffersonsrebels.blogspot.com/2010/04/kenyan-minister-khalwale-asks-when.html;
It would be nice if one could , at least, if they’re going to make the effort to address these fools; compose a letter containing minimal grammatical and spelling errors.
Megyn Kelly should be reported to the “Bar” Ethics Committe and have her
License taken away………
And you seriously expect the Ethics Comittee, of all institutions, to support our position? If that were the case, we could have addressed them long ago to stand by our side.
They don’t teach the Constitution in law school and laugh when it is sited. She’s just keeping her job; there are a thousand of ways to sacrifice your virtue.
I have been done with fox many months ago—–watch only local news here and get all of my information from true sourced blogs — like right here!–and a few others.
Kelly should be ashamed of herself and next she needs to forfeit her law degree—she ignores our constitutional laws for convenience, and apparently cannot read.
Need I say more.
Megan Kelly aka Kendall is another “Faux News” fraud. Beck, O’Reilly and the rest of these frauds have ignored Obama’s ineligible issue, which is the most dangerous issue
America has ever faced. While we are being infiltrated with Communist Marxists, “Faux News” has become treasonous against the American people.
I no longer allow “Faux” news in my home, nor any of the other corrupt “Pravda” media.
Great Letter!!! I saw that report with Megyn Kelly and a vein poped out of my forehead I was so angry. The fact that she is a lawyer makes this report of hers incomprehensible and even more of an out rage. Can’t she read? Your points are dead on correct ,Natural Born Citizen and his dual citizenship is why he is not eligible, which he admits he is a dual citizen – game over- he’s not eligible. If one more media idiot or politican says “citizen” again in regard to Presidential qualifications I am going to have to go berserk and run crazy through the streets. I have never seen such colossal misinformation being disseminated ever! It is such an eye opener when you know the real truth and then see how a story is being reported by the media. We might as we be living in Soviet Russia. What about the thruth’s we don’t know? I hope that your letter didn’t immediately go into their trash heap. Send a copy to the entire letter to the new House of Representatives members, someone has to something about the freedom of the press we no longer enjoy.
Give up on Fox – They are lost like the the other main stream Kool aid drinkers in the media. The “Free Press” is dead (everywhere but on the internet).
ELmo
True Elmo All true No journalists on TV, nor has there been for quite some time.
Turn off the TV’s and have all Propaganda channels taken off by your cable companies.
No money, no ratings poof gone