STAR BULLETIN EDITION OF AUG. 14TH, ON FILE AT BERKELEY IDENTICAL TO PUBLISHED IMAGES
by John Charlton
The birth announcement in the Aug. 14, 1961 edition of the Star Bulletin, as obtained by the citizen-investigator and released to The Post & Email. (Image enhancement by the Post & Email).
(Dec. 11, 2009) — The Post & Email has just received PDF files from a highly credible source, establishing that the birth annoucement in the Star Bulletin Edition of Aug. 14, 1961, for Barack Hussein Obama, is authentic.
The source of the electronic images is a patriot who collaborated with the now famous, Miss Tickly (TerriK), in the investigation of the responses of the Hawaii Department of Health, in regard to requests for information on Obama’s original vital records.
This citizen-investigator wrote the University library which held the mircofiche on Dec. 5th, and received a response, yesterday, Dec. 10th.
The citizen-investigator’s letter, to the Post & Email, read as follows:
I know your have embarked on your own quest for the truth given your involvement with UIPA requests and requests for assistance from the OIP.
I wanted to test the veracity of the Advertiser and Star Bulletin birth annoucements so I went on my own quest for the microfiche that might be located outside of HI. I located the microfiche at UC Berkeley (I know, the most liberal bastion in the world) for the Star Bulletin. The CA State Library has the Advertiser microfiche for August 1961 which I am still working on obtaining images from.
The pdf I have attached is from UCB hard copies that I received in the mail today. Unless the conspiracy extends to recalling all microfiche around the globe, I believe there was an announcement of Barry’s birth in the 8/14/61 HSB. See the attached file. I agree that this proves nothing other than in all likelyhood there was an annoucement.
You are free to use this however you want (personal info already redacted) but I believe in large part it debunks the notion that the announcements were somehow forged. To be honest, I was somewhat crestfallen that Barry’s birth appeared. I was looking for the smoking gun…
Also, I feel I have enough information to conclude the OIP and DoH is challenging concerned citizens such as myself to file a lawsuit to obtain information we have a legal right to. I would like to write an article to that effect but only if there is a chance you will publish it on your website.
Regards,
For the sake of history, The Post & Email is making available in zipped format (2.5 MB), the entire 5.2 MB file PDF, just as it was received from the citizen-investigator. The image of the crucial page above, was extracted from that archive. If you prefer, you can download the single and final PDF page of that archive, which contains the actual annoucement.
One thing is certain about Obama: the verification of the authenticity of the birth annoucment now establishes with greater certainty the legal paternity of Barrack Hussein Obama, Sr., over the child Barry. It does not provide evidence, in-and-of-itself, as to who the mother was, or whether the birth was recorded on account of a filing made by a hospital in the regular course of activities, or was triggered by an at-home-birth filing by Obama’s natural parents or relatives.
The confirmation that a British subject was the legal, declared father of Barack Hussein Obama, Jr., establishes more firmly the charge that he is ineligible for office, since to be president the U.S. Constitution requires that one be a natural born citizen, and no natural born citizen can have a foreigner as a parent.
See the tags at the end of this article for more information on these issues.
© 2009, The Post & Email, Inc. All rights reserved internationally, unless otherwise specified. To read more on our copyright restrictions, see our Copyright notice on the subheader of every page, along the left margin.
Possibly Related Posts:
I don’t know about the media ? they are in trouble and have their hands out for a chunk of the money they have siphoned off the taxpayers?But your point is taken?WE THE PEOPLE MUST KEEP THE PRESSURE UP ON ALL THE REPRESNTIVES THAT REFUSE TO HELP THE CITIZENS FIND THE TRUTH?and to keep this on the front burner so they can’t sweep it under the rugs with the rest of his crimes?
Did the sumpreme court open his Occidental college records and find that Barrack?Barry applied for and recieved a scholarship that was for the express use of “Foriegin Exchange students from the Fullbright Scholarship program.
This alone would be a smoking gun to prove that Obama?barry is a foriegniner and that he is a dual citizen of Kenya and Indoneasia.and He has never applied for or recieved or filled out any citizenship papers to be come a citizen of the United States?plus the fact that he traveled to Pakistan when he was 20 under the Indonesian passport that he was a citizen since the age of 5,where he attended school there as a Muslim and only a citizen of that country could attend school there,(Fyi:when a child is this (5yrs.)young and his parent marries an Indonesian citizen ,which Lolo Soetoro was any child is automaticly given citizenship status).No American with a reglion of christian couldn’t travel through this country,but A “Indonesian citizen/Muslim could have had stayed with Bin Laden and trained as a jihadists himself.If Obama/Barry Soetoro hasn’t anything to hide,Why won’t he admit where and who he stayed with while he traveled through this region?
These are the questions Obama/Barry needs to answer ?
[...] Post & Email published last week the story of the confirmation/finding of the Star Bulletin’s announcement by a different [...]
At the Sacremento Library in the CA History Room
Call/Volume:
ISSN: 1072-7191
CALL NUMBER: MICROFILM-GEN
VOLUME: 1961 Aug. 1-15 Available
The theory that Obama is just using the birth cert as a decoy to keep people off the real story, which is dual citizenship is one that I don’t buy into. It’s not a bad theory, just one that I don’t accept. There reason is twofold.
First, I don’t think we’ll ever get him taken out of office on the dual issue, even if it comes to a full discussion at the dc court level or even the supreme court. The people of this country don’t care about it, and the courts are political creatures, unfortunately. Besides telling us that the issue has been brought up in the wrong jurisdiction by people that don’t have standing, they’ve also said that “the people have spoken in the election”, that this is an effort to “unseat a president”, that ” the election is over”, and finally that it’s all a “fairy tale”. Now, does that sound like people that are really going to do anything if it’s just brought before the “right court” by people who have “standing”? In my opinion, we have as much reason to believe they’ll give it a fair hearing as we do that they’ll treat with respect the other constitutional issues like the interstate commerce clause and the general welfare clause, which is to say NONE!
On the other hand, what would make the politically charged courts move? Real evidence that O has committed fraud. Because that will rile the public up and the political judges would get a move on. And with the hawaii doh pulling the crap they’ve pulled, and Obama spending two million bucks to keep everyone in the dark, what more do we need to suspect shenanigans on the birth certificate?
We need to get the vital records, somehow, someway, and that is our real hope. In My Opinion.
I am a purist and believe that Obama must be accountable to prove that he is eligible to hold his office. Like millions of others I remain convinced that his birth certificate if it exists will question his eligibility but even more having a foreign born father not a US citizen should be grounds for immediate removal. But I also agree that Obama’s past in Illinois should be thoroughly investigated for fraud and other felonies without reliance on any law enforcement. VP Agnew had to resign when he was found accepting kickbacks when he was Governor of MD and that only took a law professor and three students who targeted Agnew. Whatever the means of removing Obama is justified.
If Obama/barry was borned on the 4th ofAugust, they had plenty of time to get back,from Mombassa,Kenya and put this in the paper by the 14th.
I must agree that Obama must be held accountable for all his past actions that would make him inelligable to hold this office?like the time he was a U.S.Senator and took time off to travel to kenya to inject himself into their election to get his COUSIN RAILA ODINGA elected,while there he took the oath of his grandfathers and Odinga’s ploitical party,He took the “LOU TRIBAL LOYALITY OATH” and there fore sworn alligence to this foriegin political party.frist a US Senator should not be campaigning for any one outside the United States.
When Raila Odinga didn’t get elected his ardent followers went on a ethenic cleasning and when they finally stopped they had killed 1500 people.This and his alliances with Toney Rezko and other crimmals he has been known to have done business with,and the connection to Acorn and other crimmal organizations,must be checked out?this should have been done when he was “VETTED” oops I forget everybody thinks he doesn’t need to pass any vetting process like Senator John McCain did?
I disagree. Do you really think that the most powerful man on the planet will be incapable of “producing” a piece of paper showing a Hawaiian birth? On the other hand, the piece of paper that he cannot produce is the one showing that his father was a US citizen. There are four
Continued … I somehow clicked submit to soon.
There are four US Supreme Court cases which will serve as precedent, with the 1874 Minor case being the most on-point. The definition of the term “natural born citizen” was known by our Founding Fathers who were very familiar with the writings of Vattel, who defined the term in his 1758 legal treatise as someone born in the country to citizen parents (plural).
It really doesn’t matter where he can produce a piece of paper from Hawaii which it is common nowledge that Hawaii acceppted all kinds of COlb’s at this time.
The fact that he was borned to a British /kenya citizen and he admits this in his book and Ann Dunham had lived and grown up in a terroitiry that wasn’t a state until 2 years before Barrack Obama /Barry Soetoro was borned.This fact that Ann Dunham had been living out side the United states and her being a minor when she had Barrack aka Barry she could not have given her citizenship to anyone.
The laws of a British /Kenyan citizen who marries a citizen from another country(who is a Minor) then the citizenship falls on the man’s citizenship of his country?These are the facts that we want Obama /Barry to prove he isn’t a British/kenyan/ Indonesian Naturalized citizen,but all the facts and some of these facts have been taken from his book “Dreams of My Father” and Obama /Barry even admits that the Contitution states that it takes (2) parents of the USA to be Natural Born Citizen?
I would like to make one more point. Please note this is not to ridicule or disparage anyone or shame anyone into action. It seems that many of the comments may be based on what people have read here or on other blogs. I am concerned that people are relying on the work of others to effect change, meaning only a handful of us are actually making inquiries at various agencies and libraries in an attempt to reveal the truth. The chances of uncovering the truth are slim to none unless we join forces in either an organized or unorganized effort and simply not take no for an answer. It requires time, energy, and persistence of all involved. Simply reiterating what one reads in blogsphere is a guarantee that we will fall short of the objective.
It is our only realistic chance of victory unless Mr. Donfrio and Pidgeon somehow pull off the QW miracle. We cannot however solely rely on their effort. In short I am asking those of you who have yet to contact your respresentatives in DC, make an inquiry at the DoH, research your local libraries, get involved in 9-12 project, etc to get involved. At some point it will become obvious that public interest far outweighs privacy.
The tide IS turning. Mr Obama has the lowest approval rating after 10 1/2 months in office of any President in history since polls have been kept. If this trend continues, the media is going to be forced to report the hard news or else risk a continued decline in readership and advertising revenue. It is the only plausible reason why the O adminstration is entertaining the idea of subsidizing the O friendly media and granting various such entities a nonprofit status. How else will it be able to control the message, especially if the nation is no longer mesmerized by O’s charismatic but empty rhetoric?
A call to arms of sorts before it is too late.