WILLIAM BLAINE RELEASES PURPORTED OBAMA CERTIFICATE OF LIVE BIRTH
by John Charlton
(Oct. 20, 2009) — At 10:22 PM Last evening someone purporting to be William Blaine issued the following email:
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:15:27 -0400
Subject: Obama Birth Proof
My client has asked me to share this with you and asks that you share it with as many patriots as possible so that it cannot be scrubbed from existence.
I trust you will know what to do with this.
Attached to this email was the following Certificate of Live Birth of Barack Hussein Obama, which contains no file number:
The Post & Email has not authenticated this document, which has several signs of being a fraud. But as it will be news in coming days, it provides it for the utility of the readers. The above image is a PNG format, cropped from the original PDF. (Download the Image for enlargment and clearer visibility of details) The PDF file indicates it was created by a Canon iR5065 scanner/printer, scanning a document which appears to have been a fax. The form seems similar to others available on the web.
The witnesses on the Document are Madelyn Payne Dunham and Martin Blaine Enriscon (Erickson?). The registrar’s name is not discernable. In the opinion of The Post & Email the signatures of the first two witnesses are similar forms of handwriting.
Commander Charles Kerchner, issued this statement:
Atty Mario Apuzzo and I believe it is a forgery and a fraud … probably done by some Obot to get our side scurrying around with it.
The biggest reason we think it is a fraud is because the Hawaiian statute cited in the lower right corner as the version with the “.8” amendment on the end, i.e., 338.17.8 did not exist in 1961. It was added to the statute in 1982. That jumped out at me right away. 338.17.8 did not apply to Obama in 1961 because it did not exist in the law books yet. But the registration of out of state children was permitted in 1961 under older laws such as the one in 1911 and another in 1955, as I recall off the top of my head.
But since this doc is citing 338.17.8 it cannot be the initial or original birth registration document.
There is a William E. Blaine, esq., who practices law in Columbus, Ohio, according to LegalHelpmate.com.
Martin Blaine Enriscon (Enrision/Erickson?) appears to be the Doctor who delivered the child. There is a Martin Erickson in Kailua, Hawaii, according to Whitepages.com.
The document is also self contradictory, since a Doctor cannot certify a live birth at a foreign hospital. He has to be present to do that.
The release of this PDF file seems therefore to be a publicity stunt and/or political statement.