The Pundits Have Been Punked…

by Tom Arnold, ©2024

(Sep. 12, 2024) — …by an opportunistic, empty-suit Marxist who can’t define or keep her woke policies straight.  That, of course, assumes Harris has any policies of her own at all.  Also, in case you don’t know it, she is a LIAR and cannot be trusted to tell the truth.  In addition, everyone knows that the debate “moderators” were anything but “moderate!”  Some say Donald Trump was faced with THREE, NOT JUST ONE, OPPONENTS.  To me, it doesn’t matter because TRUMP SUCCESSFULLY EXPOSED THEM ALL and won the debate anyway.  The apparent fact that the ABC debate moderators were pro-Harris only turned out to be an additional conquest on the part of Donald Trump.  

I’m not a “journalist” and not an expert on politics or the debate process.  SOME OF YOU PRETEND TO BE.  So, with any deference (or none) due to you, I must ask you the question, WHAT THE HECK IS WRONG WITH YOU?  WHAT EXCUSE CAN YOU POSSIBLY HAVE FOR GANGING UP ON PRESIDENT TRUMP AND TELLING YOUR VIEWERS AND READERS THE UNTRUTH THAT HE SUFFERED A BEATDOWN IN TUESDAY’S DEBATE?  

I remind you of a very interesting definition I stumbled upon last night while writing an earlier post.  It is on the internet, from Definitions by the Oxford Dictionary, and refers to the definition of the adjective “cackling.”  It reads, “A cackling supervillain with dire plans for the world.”  I also found, on a different website, the following quote from Lord Byron, “Nothing can confound a wise man more than laughter from a dunce.”  

SO, IS IT JUST THE FASHIONABLE JOURNALISTIC THING TO DO TO BAND TOGETHER AGAINST SUCH A POTENTIALLY-VULNERABLE AND ALREADY-TARGETED INDIVIDUAL (EVEN “WEAPONIZED AGAINST” IN THE REAL SENSE OF THE WORDS), AND/OR IS IT BECAUSE DONALD TRUMP IS WIDELY POPULAR, BELOVED BY MANY, OFTEN CONTROVERSIAL, RIGHT MORE OFTEN THAN WRONG, IRREPRESSIBLY DRIVEN, AND A VICTIM MANY TIMES OVER OF UNSCRUPULOUS GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS AND THEIR NEWFOUND ABILITY TO WAGE LAWFARE?  

Whatever it is that you political geniuses think you saw during the debate which convinced you that Kamala Harris was the victor is, in my opinion, EXACTLY WHAT YOU WANTED TO SEE.  Think about it, or is this asking too much of you?  ALSO, AND OF EVEN GREATER IMPORTANCE, TRY THINKING ABOUT THE NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES TO OUR COUNTRY’S FUTURE WHICH YOU ARE PROMOTING VIS A VIS YOUR BASTARDIZATION OF JOURNALISM. 

Are you happy now?  Are you proud now?  You have interjected yourselves and your personal political beliefs into our country’s 2024 presidential campaign.  Some might call it interference.  I have other words for it, but I have already said enough, and what I have said is protected (so far) by my First Amendment right to freedom of speech.  From what I have written about you above, I can see that you, too, are familiar with your rights despite being wrong about much of your thinking and the conclusions you are reaching and reporting to your mostly uninformed and susceptible audiences.