by CDR Charles F. Kerchner, Jr. (Ret), blogging at CDR Kerchner, ©2024
(Jul. 22, 2024) — Trump will have the legal standing in federal courts to do so if she is nominated for that office by the DNC. And Trump should do so to force SCOTUS to take up the issue of the “natural born Citizen” term as it applies to whom can constitutionally serve as the President and Commander in Chief (and VP per the 12th Amendment) and resolve it. The courts evaded the issue using “lack of standing by the plaintiffs” for Obama and then also for Harris for VP. They should not do that again. Former Chief Justice Marshall‘s words from the past tell them they should not evade the issue.
To Kamala Harris: Fool the voting electorate once, shame on you. Fool the voting electorate twice, shame on us. She owes allegiance since birth to the English monarch – formerly Queen Elizabeth and now King Charles! Click on the image below for more details.
Kamala Harris is NOT a “natural born Citizen of the United States” per Natural Law and the Founders and Framers original intent, understanding, and purpose of the “natural born Citizen” term in the U.S. Constitution!
See these articles for more details as to what the Founders and Framers intended for future Presidents and Commanders in Chief and why Kamala Harris in NOT constitutionally eligible for the office she seeks nor the one she holds now: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2020/07/23/u-s-senator-kamala-harris-is-not-a-natural-born-citizen-of-usa-not-eligible-to-be-president-and-cinc-or-vp/ — and — http://www.kerchner.com/protectourliberty/naturalborncitizen/TheWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyandHowofNBC-WhitePaper.pdf
J.D. Vance should start asking the press in his interview with them as to why they as the press are not asking Kamala Harris about her dual-nationality, dual-Citizenship, and dual-allegiances since birth and continuing to the present day. Or Trump during any debate with her should ask her why she is still a Citizen of Jamaica and owing homage and allegiance to the English Crown. Then watch her cackle.
CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired)
Author: Natural Born Citizen
http://www.kerchner.com/books/naturalborncitizen.htm
https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com
https://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists
https://www.protectourliberty.org
Schneider v Rust 377 US 163, 1964
children of ambassadors analogy is worthy. Are not anchor or 14th amendment children
considered naturalized? See Sup. Ct case of Schneider v Rust quote below:
[….]We start from the premise that the rights of citizenship of the native born and of the naturalized person are of the same dignity, and are coextensive. The only difference drawn by the Constitution is that only the “natural born” citizen is eligible to be President. Art. II, § 1.
Schneider v Rust / s ct / ca 1960
Paraphrase
Rights of naturalized and natural born citizens are coextensive except only n b c is eligible for President
President Donald J. Trump gave any protest of Kamala Harris not qualifying under Article ll Section 1 Clause 5 of the US Constitution up when he stated Berry Soetoro aka Barack hussein Obama could indeed be US President ! I believe President Donald J. Trump took BAD ADVICE from politicians to not challenge Obama’s right to be US President !
Trump said Obama was “born in the United States.” https://apnews.com/united-states-presidential-election-general-news-events-61f7085d848248cd98410027d33f2101
Bobby Kennedy could also make this challenge in court. He also has standing, and perhaps more to gain by making the challenge.
An updated image re Kamala Harris and her foreign citizenship by and at birth. All, feel free to use it.
The problem is that RFK and Trump would have to lose the election to have standing to sue.
They both can’t win.
Once she’s the official nominee, who is going to file an eligibility challenge?
Not who “should” or “could.” Who actually will?
Who has “standing?”
In federal courts, competing candidates.
In many states’ courts, any voter (and any competing candidate).
You can forget Indiana since the legal precedent is Ankeny v Governor of Indiana. Rubio cited it as precedent and the election board agreed.
Also Florida, Georgia, New Jersey, Arizona, Vermont and Maryland have had cases that decided against Vattel and the two-citizen parent theory.
It would take only one judge to disagree, and it would rocket to SCOTUS.
But who will actually file it?
Kamala Harris in a usurper to the Vice Presidency.
The sooner she is outed, the sooner this charade will be over.
Speaker of the House will assume the Oval until Jan 20.
If Harris is a Jamaican Citizen at birth that would mean she can’t be a US citizen because of the phrase in the 14th amendment subject to the jurisdiction thereof which mean 100% complete jurisdiction of the United States, a qualification that a foreign citizen can’t meet because of US govt. rules for dual citizens that mandate allegiance to and subject to the jurisdiction of the foreign nation to which they hold citizenship.
If she is the nominee and wins Congress can’t certify the election because she doesn’t meet their eligibility criteria as laid out in Resolution 511.
IMO if it gets to that point Congress will certify the election because they certified the election of the ineligible Obama, and have covered for that treason since the day John Roberts swore-in the fraud Obama. Congress, both parties, gave America’s government and her military to her enemies when they did nothing to stop the ineligible Obama from being sworn-in. Why have the Obama’s not endorsed Kamala? I believe the answer is the Obamas do not want to bring back the issue of eligibility, and Barack Hussein Obama… again……………………
Congress would face questions as to why they’re certifying an election of a candidate who doesn’t meet their own definition of a Natural Born Citizen.
What is Congress definition of Natural Born Citizen? Whatever it is, it did not stop the ineligible Obama……Congress is guilty of treason, both parties,,,,,
So in 2008 when they ruled John McCain a Natural Born Citizen it was on the basis that McCain’s parents were US Citizens. That resolution included legal opinions from 2 constitutional scholars, one a Harvard Law professor the other a former Solicitor General in support of the rationale for McCain eligibility.
On the contrary. Obama would be very happy to have another ineligible person usurp the presidency. In fact it has always been my contention that Obama picked Harris for Biden’s VP. Obama’s miscalculation is that he never realized how absolutely incompetent and stupid she was.
Yes she can be a NATURALIZED citizen. She will never be a Natural Born Citizen.
I noticed the Obama’s have not endorsed Kamala. I believe that is becasue they do not want the issue of presidential eligibility on the front burner where is should be….again………..
I agree. Some important points you may want to emphasize when addressing this issue, that of competency and loyalty. This lawsuit has nothing to do with Mrs. Harris’ competency or loyalty to fulfill her duties should she be elected to serve, but everything to do with the security of the Republic electing future presidents who may have divided loyalties from being born of non-citizen parents via 14A §1.
We the People Need More Information About the Backgrounds of Candidates for the Highest Political Offices.
Transparency Requirements for Candidates for President and Vice-President – More Is Needed in Our Modern Electoral Process – Filing The (OGE) Financial Disclosure Form 278e Is Mandatory – The (OPM) National Security Questionnaire Form SF-86 Should Also Be Mandatory: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2023/05/07/transparency-requirements-for-candidates-for-president-and-vice-president-more-is-needed-in-our-modern-electoral-process-filing-the-oge-financial-disclosure-form-278e-is-mandatory-the-opm-na/
“This lawsuit has nothing to do with Mrs. Harris’ competency”
What lawsuit?
Now is the time … we are in a culture war … if we don’t win this battle we will lose the country we grew up in forever. Watch this short video and then pass it along to any border fence sitters in this election cycle: https://ak2.rmbl.ws/s8/2/i/7/O/Z/i7OZq.caa.mp4
If nothing else, he could bring this issue up during any debate with her by asking her if she was born a Citizen of Jamaica via her foreign national Jamaican father and is she still a Citizen of Jamaica. And since Jamaica is a constitutional monarchy with the English Crown at its head, does she still legally owe allegiance and homage to King Charles III. I would like to see Kamala Harris cackle her way out of answering that question. Or J.D. Vance could bring up the issue of Kamala’s dual-allegiances, dual-nationality, and dual-Citizenship by and since birth in an interview with the press about the choice of her. And ask the press why they are not asking Kamala about that issue. If anyone has a contact with J.D. Vance, pass this along to him.
CDR Kerchner (Ret)
http://www.ProtectOurLiberty.org
Pursuant to the British Nationality Act of 1947 BOTH Harris and Obama were born British Subjects. It is incontrovertible that the founders would never have countenanced a British President or VP. NEVER!!!
The easiest path would be to point out the Naturalization Act in the constitution that specifically cites the term Natural Born Citizen and says the children of citizens shall be considered Natural Born Citizens. While that act was repealed 5 years later it’s the only instance in the Constitution other than the qualifications clause where the term is cited. The founders clearly viewed Natural Born Citizenship as a lineage.
Coupled with Congress’s Resolution 511 it’s difficult to see how she would be able to claim Natural Born Citizenship, it’s not a sliding scale, it has to be applied universally to all.