PREALITY: The Constructivist Confabulation of Reality Must End

by James Lyons-Weiler, PhD, Popular Rationalism, ©2024

(Jul. 2, 2024) — In our contemporary world, the concept of reality has increasingly come under the influence of policies and narratives crafted by powerful entities. This constructivist view, where policies determine reality, reflects a shift toward what can be termed as “post-realism by the firehose.” In this paradigm, reality is not an objective truth but a construct shaped by a relentless stream of information and narratives. Pre-conceived, managed reality – PREALITY – refers to the deliberate shaping and control of public perception through curated narratives and selective dissemination of information, blurring the lines between objective truth and constructed reality. This has left us navigating a landscape where managed reality, kayfabe, and gated institutional narratives (GIN) dominate the discourse, leading to widespread frustration and disillusionment. However, this has not left us defeated; it has ignited a determination to replace these agencies of confabulation with those grounded in realism.

All agencies left of center have turned on Biden, all at the same time. Like a mass formation. It’s spooky.

Managed Reality and Kayfabe

Managed reality manifests as the presentation of carefully constructed versions of events designed to manipulate public opinion and maintain control over the narrative. This concept parallels kayfabe, a term borrowed from professional wrestling, where the distinction between reality and performance is intentionally blurred. Kayfabe, in the context of media and politics, describes how the presentation of events is designed to manipulate public opinion by creating an illusion of reality.

Gated Institutional Narrative (GIN)

The gated institutional narrative (GIN) represents the monopolization of information by authoritative institutions that gatekeep and control the flow of information, ensuring that only sanctioned viewpoints are disseminated to the public. This narrative control marginalizes dissenting voices and alternative perspectives. By controlling the narrative, these institutions reinforce their power and maintain the status quo, often at the expense of truth and transparency. This is not just a concern; it’s a travesty that undermines the very foundation of informed democracy.

Distributed Idea Suppression Complex

The distributed idea suppression complex refers to the coordinated efforts by various entities, including government agencies, media organizations, and tech companies, to suppress ideas and information that challenge the prevailing narrative. This complex operates through censorship, deplatforming, and other means of controlling the dissemination of information. The goal is to create an echo chamber, an environment where only approved ideas are amplified and dissenting voices are stifled, creating a closed system of information that reinforces specific narratives and viewpoints. This isn’t safeguarding democracy; it’s throttling it.

GEC and Section A of the Reserve Index

The Global Engagement Center (GEC), a U.S. government entity, focuses on countering foreign propaganda and disinformation. However, its operations often extend to influencing domestic narratives under the guise of national security. Similarly, Section A of the Reserve Index represents the categorization and control of information reserves, further entrenching the power of gatekeeping institutions. These mechanisms are less about protecting us and more about protecting their control.

CISA and Narrative-Driven Journalism

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) plays a significant role in managing reality by protecting the integrity of information systems and engaging in narrative control by monitoring and countering misinformation. This aligns with the broader trend of narrative-driven journalism, where media organizations prioritize stories that fit a particular narrative, often influenced by political or corporate interests, over objective reporting. This isn’t journalism; it’s propaganda.

Democracy Defense Coalition and Journolist

The Democracy Defense Coalition and Journolist exemplify the collaborative efforts to shape and control public discourse. The Democracy Defense Coalition, comprising various organizations, aims to protect democratic institutions, but its activities often involve narrative control to promote specific political agendas. Journolist, a now-defunct private listserv for journalists and academics, highlighted how coordinated efforts can influence media coverage and public perception, demonstrating the power of collective narrative management.

Read the rest here.