by Sharon Rondeau
(Mar. 14, 2024) — At approximately 8:00 p.m. EDT Thursday, Fulton County Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee told Channel 2 Action News his decision as to whether to disqualify District Attorney Fani Willis and her former paramour, Nathan Wade, from the case against 45th President and presumptive 2024 Republican presidential nominee Donald J. Trump “should be out tomorrow.”
On March 4, McAfee had stated his decision would be made public within two weeks.
On Thursday evening, WSB Atlanta reported:
Channel 2 investigative reporter Mark Winne spoke exclusively to McAfee on the eve of that decision.
“What can you tell us about the timing of your order on the Fulton DA disqualification issue?” Winne asked McAfee.
“I made a promise to everybody. These kind of orders take time to write. I need to say exactly what I want to, and I plan to stick to the timeline I gave everyone,” McAfee said.
“So this week?” Winne asked McAfee.
“Should be out tomorrow,” McAfee said.
…“The message I want to convey is no ruling of mine is ever going to be based on politics. I’m going to be following the law the best I understand it,” McAfee said.
Appointed to the position by Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp (R) early last year to complete the term of retiring Judge Christopher Brasher, McAfee is running for election in his own right in May.
He previously served as Georgia Inspector General, as an assistant U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, and Senior Assistant District Attorney for Fulton County.
The case over which McAfee is presiding arose after an attorney for one of the defendants in the high-profile case against Trump and 18 others for allegedly acting illegally to “overturn” the results of the 2020 election claimed Willis and Wade had an affair encompassing lavish vacations enabled by Wade’s unusually high hourly compensation rate.
Four of the original 19 defendants have accepted plea deals.
Wade and Willis claim their “personal” relationship commenced after Willis hired Wade to lead the prosecution on the Trump case, while at least two witnesses testifying last month claimed it began much earlier, in 2019.
On Wednesday, McAfee dismissed six charges among Trump and several other defendants for lack of specificity.
“…“The message I want to convey is no ruling of mine is ever going to be based on politics. I’m going to be following the law the best I understand it,” McAfee said.”
In younger days, I might have naively believed this statement…with the serious- seeming black robe get-up and all. And I used to believe in Santa Clause in my youngest days as well.
However, at age 74, and having studied U.S. politics over the past 11 years in retirement, I no longer believe in, “…no ruling of mine is ever going to be based on politics.”
Why?
ANSWER: Nature Rules! and human nature follows; the flimsy, changeable and criminally-ignorable laws of man versus the forever non-negotiable laws of Nature
The first thing any human judge, just[ice] like you and I, will naturally do is weigh the consequences to himself on his final decision. It is natural that this primary thinking will occur, like other natural “fight or flight” survival instincts.
Secondly, the idea that anyone is “color blind” and will mete out justice to white folks and black folks the same is also un-natural and a politically correct self-delusion.
On March 1, 2024, I sent an email to several folks including Sharon Rondeau and Lara Trump; here is a portion of that email as we all awaited Judge McAfee’s “no ruling of mine is ever going to be based on politics.”:
“Color of Law: black justice with AFFIRMATIVE discriminACTION for Fani Willis and OJ Simpson, and white justice with disdained “white privilege” for Donald Trump
https://people.com/politics/donna-rice-hughes-ptsd-gary-hart-sex-scandal/ : The white justice of the Gary Hart affair ended a white man’s political career. Will black justice prevail in today’s “Fani Affair” to let District Adulterer Fani Willis avoid removal from office and disbarment even after her embezzlement-emolument of some $700,000 of public funds for her own personal pleasures? ANSWER: only AFFIRMATIVE discriminACTION and fear of black-reactionary street riots (which is America’s ever-present “black male blackmail”) will tell; Fani’s trial is of subordinate/secondary importance, whereas, the application, or non-application, of “color-blind justice” by white Judge McAfee is of far greater long-term importance in this case.”
On March 15, 2024 (Beware the Ides of March!), our nation witnessed “the fix was in” as white Judge McAfee rendered “black justice” to “District Arrogance Fani Willis” in order to keep his job for his upcoming re-election and avoid the black-reactionary “black male blackmail” of racial street riots in Atlanta
( https://apnews.com/article/trump-willis-georgia-election-prosecution-ead99863d106387cc3113b44390d53ab ) much like scores of other FEAR-BASED RULINGS of white judges who let “America’s first black President”, narrative-Obama, remain an immoral AFFIRMATIVE discriminACTION Constitutionally-ineligible FRAUD presIDent 08-28-08- Today:
natural reality(eyes) = https://www.thepostemail.com/2024/01/01/kapow-a-new-analysis-and-report-proof-obamas-birth-certificate-is-fake/
vs
narrative reality (lies) = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXFwqUi3zR0&feature=youtu.be >>>
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/birther%20case%20list.pdf >>> MAKE-THEM-BELIEVE MAKE BELIEVE “black justice” = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VAzgoBFYsCM >>> https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66746540