(Dec. 3, 2023) — In this video, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. discusses his presidential campaign, which has gained significant traction, despite censorship and the barriers set up by the Democratic National Committee (DNC).
“The polling shows my favorability rating is better than any other candidate,” Kennedy says, “So … I’m very, very happy with the way things have gone up to now.”
We also discuss some of the issues he intends to tackle if he gets into the White House. By now, it’s clear that, as a country, we’re facing a constitutional crisis. Elected officials are actively working to censor, silence and smear anyone who disagrees with them, including Kennedy.
In fact, we recently learned through the lawsuit brought against President Biden by the attorneys general of Louisiana and Missouri that the Biden administration began censoring Kennedy on Biden’s second day in office.
A Direct Attack on First Amendment Rights
Kennedy had initially filed a separate class action lawsuit against Biden (Kennedy v. Biden et.al.1), alleging key Biden officials colluded with Big Tech to censor free speech, but due to their similarities and overlap, his case was consolidated into Missouri v. Biden.2
In early July 2023, U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty of Louisiana granted the plaintiffs’ injunction, prohibiting federal agencies and Biden administration officials from working with social media companies to limit protected speech. Commenting on the judge’s decision, Kennedy says:
“It’s a 155-page decision, and it details this very troubling chronicle of the Biden administration coming into office. Thirty-seven hours after President Biden took the oath of office, the White House was contacting Twitter and other social media sites … actually threatening them with retaliation if they did not remove me from their platforms.
Soon after that, they started going after many other people, including you, and many of other people who were criticizing the COVID lockdowns and some of the countermeasures that the public health agencies and the White House had implemented.
And it’s disturbing … They had to make up a new word, because so many of us were putting up information that they couldn’t actually call misinformation. In fact, Facebook and Twitter pushed back and said, ‘This is actually true what these guys are saying.’
They couldn’t call it misinformation or disinformation, so they invented a new word called ‘malinformation.’ That word means or denotes statements that are true but nevertheless inconvenient for the White House or the government.
And they weren’t just censoring statements about COVID policies and COVID countermeasures. Soon after that, they began censoring critics of the Ukraine War. In one instance, they were censoring a satire about President Biden and his wife. This should be shocking to every person, regardless of your political party.
The U.S. government should not be using its power to force publishers to silence its opponents, its critics, its adversaries or people who question government policies. That’s why we have the First Amendment.
The threat that the government, that the White House, was applying, was that if the social media sites did not comply, did not obey the orders to censor us, the White House would work at removing their Section 230 immunity. That’s Section 230 of the Communications Act, and that immunity is absolutely critical to the survival of these companies.
It gives social media platforms immunity from defamation lawsuits. In other words, if you were to publish a defamatory statement about me in The New York Times that was not true, that was damaging to me, I could sue you individually, but I could also sue The New York Times. And so, for every article that goes up on The New York Times, there are lawyers who review that article for potentially defamatory statements.
But social media sites, if they had to hire a lawyer to look at every post, they would be out of business overnight. So, Congress gave them this extraordinary power that they can publish defamatory material on their site and I can sue the guy who wrote that material, but I can’t sue Mark Zuckerberg or Facebook or Twitter.
Mark Zuckerberg has described the Section 230 immunity as existential. In other words, Facebook could not exist without it. Well, the White House was threatening to withdraw that. In other words, ‘We will destroy your company if you do not censor our critics.’ That has stepped over a lot of boundaries … [and is] a direct attack on the First Amendment of our Constitution.”
Government Acted on False Information From Hate Group
The justification for much of this censorship was the reporting of a front group for the globalist cabal called the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH). In one of its earliest reports,3 the CCDH identified 12 individuals, including me and Kennedy, who it claimed were responsible for 73% of vaccine misinformation on social media.
A subsequent investigation by Facebook revealed the so-called “disinformation dozen” were responsible for only 0.05% of all views of vaccine-related content on the platform,4 yet the federal government continued to cite this fabricated report as the reason for why they wanted the people listed in it censored by Big Tech.
“You and I have been libeled, I would say, tens of thousands of times across the media, globally, because of the false statements of this group,” Kennedy notes.
The Department of Homeland Security, FBI and CIA even used the CCDH’s “Disinformation Dozen” report to identify us as “domestic threat actors,” which is akin to putting people on a domestic terrorist list based on hearsay from a random barfly.
It’s definitely not what one would expect from so-called intelligence experts. Either they didn’t do any due diligence to confirm the accusations leveled, or they’re colluding with the CCDH and knowingly used false information to target American civilians. I’m not sure which is worse. Either way, it’s another reason for the rapid erosion of people’s trust and confidence in these agencies.
Download this Article Before it Disappears
Ironies and Paradoxes Abound
Now that the Republicans are in control of Congress, they’ve been able to subpoena the CCDH and, hopefully, their investigation will expose the true intent behind this group.
Read the rest here.
COVID vaccine development red flag. I suppose we should stop calling the mRNA vaccines bioweapons, now.
COVID vaccine cocktail for disaster.
https://deeprootsathome.com/crazy-objects-found-in-blood-and-vials/
“From above article: All the injections are identical, but with different brand names like Pfizer, Moderna etc. with minor differences in adjuvants and synthetic lipid nanoparticles.
There were no biologics in any of the injections tested, meaning there was zero biological material found such as mRNA, spike protein subunits, pseudovirus vectors etc.
These injections are deadly CHEMICAL COCKTAILS, not a ‘bioweapon’, but a chemical weapon.”