by Devvy Kidd, NewswithViews, reposted with permission, ©2023
(Aug. 21, 2023) — This fourth indictment is like something from an alternative universe. Can’t be real but it is and serious as a heart attack. The law means nothing to rotten, corrupt Democrats in public offices and too many Democrat voters. It is beyond obscene. The American people are seeing this pile-on as purely political.
Those DA’s are trying to time the trials to burn up Trump’s campaign time during the upcoming primaries. That’s their game plan right there for all to see. The Fulton County indictment by DA Fani Willis with 19 defendants leaves one speechless. Desired trial date is March 4, 2024, the day before Super Tuesday with 16 states holding their primaries; 8 days before GA primary. Dream on, Fani. 19 Defendants with how many attorneys each? How many motions will be filed? Depositions? And don’t forget the courts take long breaks for Thanksgiving and Christmas eating up your prep time regarding motions.
I’ve read all four indictments. Read endless legal opinions on line from Dershowitz to Turley. Will Trump get convicted? Can he pardon himself? There isn’t a snow ball’s chance in hell Trump can get a fair trial in NY, DC and Fulton County, GA. Florida is different. But that’s what those cockroaches are counting on: Personal hatred by jurors directed right at Trump.
I am not a lawyer and have no legal training but I can read and analyze. The “hush-money” indictment is farcical and should have been flushed down the toilet on day one. The classified documents indictment is also bogus junk.
Can Trump sue the State of Georgia? I overnight mailed this information to Trump; priority mail to his Chief Senior Adviser at the WH, Stephen Miller and his NV election fraud attorney, Jesse Binnell, in Oct. 2020. If Trump would have done this in those ‘swing’ states, it would have been a whole different outcome. Response from any of them? Crickets. The circus that followed with all those court challenges got blown away by partisan judges who completely ignored the U.S. Supreme Court.
Read the rest here.
Trump was denied a fair and legal election. His rights were violated by the State of Georgia as well as AZ, PA, MI, WI, MI and NV who declared Biden the winner 4 days after Election Day and likely many other states who kept counting federal votes after midnight ON Nov. 3, 2020. Can he sue? I’m not a lawyer but I sure wish to God Trump’s lawyers would file a lawsuit and shove this indictment right down big Fani’s throat. Perhaps it could go straight to the Supreme Court since it’s the court’s decision in 1997 the State of Georgia ignored.
(Short video. Relax FBI, this is about activism, not grabbing muskets. Number one is to stop our elections from being stolen. Again.)
Author – “…declared Biden the winner 4 days after Election Day and likely many other states who kept counting federal votes after midnight ON Nov. 3, 2020.”
This hyper-technical definition of Election Day was reviewed by the US District Court for the Northern District of Florida in Harris v. Florida Elections Canvassing Com’n, 122 F. Supp. 2d 1317 (N.D. Fla. 2000) and later affirmed by the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
In Harris v Florida ECC, the plaintiffs argued that counting absentee ballots after Election Day was a violation of federal law. Senior District Judge Paul wrote
“The plaintiffs apparently urge that this means that every vote must be made by a voter and counted by election officials by midnight on that day. As we know from this election, while it is possible for everyone to vote on election day, it is highly unlikely that every precinct will be able to guarantee that its votes would be counted by midnight on election day. This has been the case for years, yet votes are not routinely being thrown out because they could not be counted on election day.”
“… In other words, overseas absentee voters, like all the rest of the voters, cast their votes on election day. The only difference is when those votes are counted. Thus, this case comes down to having very little difference from the typical voting and vote-counting scenario. Routinely, in every election, hundreds of thousands of votes are cast on election day but are not counted until the next day or beyond.”
“The federal government has surely been aware of this practice, and has surely been aware of the eight states around the country which allow post-election-day acceptance of absentee ballots. However, no state has been sued by the federal government for such practices, which lends further support to the notion that Congress did not intend 3 U.S.C. § 1 to impose irrational scheduling rules on state and local canvassing officials, and certainly did not intend to disenfranchise voters whose only reason for not being able to have their ballots arrive by the close of election day is that they were serving their country overseas.”
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp2/122/1317/2580388/
Foster v Love, 522 U.S. 67 (1997) which is often cited by those making the argument that votes can not be counted after Election Day, does not apply as it does not deal with ballots arriving after Election Day or counting of votes after Election Day. It is a case of an congressional election occurring before the official federal Election Day.
BTW, I posted to an earlier article about Minor v Happersett but it has not made it through the moderation. Does this site have a strict or unusual moderation policy?
Sorry but you, Joe, ignore the fact that it is people, some not even citizens of eligibility, that are having their votes counted in violation of federal law. Do the math and tell us if the count runs into the millions. If it does we have too many government employees that should be fur-lowed to be home on ELECTION DAY. It seems that many are willing to allow blanket acceptance when only those in foreign duty are the subject of the need of a possible delay in the count. Congress should codify the requirement narrowly defined to only those not able to cast a vote in country on “ELECTION DAY”. There should be NO excuse for violating the Constitution as written.