by, ©2023

(Feb. 12, 2023) — Nikki Haley’s home state of South Carolina doesn’t list active candidates for the 2024 election yet, and there is no Presidential candidate filing for her with the Federal Election Commission. So, it is with great amazement just how far and wide news organizations and social media posts have already begun to report on an ineligible 2024 Presidential candidate, even without a formal announcement.

Among all this fervor for another opportunity to usurp the Constitution, Article II Guardians remains committed to adhering to the law of the land, the U.S. Constitution. Electing a candidate with multiple allegiances at birth not only violates the Presidential requirements in #Article2, but it also represents a national security threat. Because the Chief Executive is also the Commander-in-Chief of the nation’s Armed Forces, the Framers required a #naturalborncitizen with sole allegiance for the Office of the Presidency as a strong check against foreign influence.

The Citizenship and Allegiance Tree is a useful resource for illustrating how varied birth circumstances can determine one’s natural-born citizenship status, and thus Presidential eligibility.

In this example, we can see that Nikki Haley’s parents were not U.S. Citizens at the time of her birth. Being born in South Carolina to two alien parents, Nikki Haley is a citizen of the United States, naturalized “at birth” under the Fourteenth Amendment; but not an Article II natural-born citizen of the United States and therefore fails to meet the Constitutional requirement for President of the United States.

A2Guardians welcomes anyone wishing to provide verifiable biographical information about a candidate. Submissions can be made online at or email to

Although previous efforts to enforce Article II eligibility have reached the docket of the U.S. Supreme Court, every challenge was answered with silence and repeated injury. This inability to enforce the Constitutional qualifications for President of the United States, Commander-in-Chief of its Armed Forces, and Vice-President of the United States is a threat to national security and should not be mistaken for acquiescence. is now on Rumble! To get the latest Constitutional news and analysis from Article II Guardians, be sure to subscribe and share.

Twitter – @A2Guardians
#Article2 #naturalborncitizen
Parler – @Article2Guardians

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. The 14 amendment might make one a US Citizen but it does not make one a Natural Born Citizen. When the 14th amendment was ratified it initially left out native Americans because they’re subject to the jurisdiction of a different sovereignty, so clearly Congress didn’t want people who were subject to the jurisdiction of a different sovereignty to have citizenship let alone be thought of a Natural Born Citizens and that’s why Harris,Romney, Haley, Cruz and Obama aren’t Natural Born Citizens. Jamaican citizenship is acquired regardless of place of birth so long as the father is a Jamaican Citizen, yet no one has asked if Kamala holds or has held foreign citizenship. The US Govt has specific rules for dual citizens they are required to follow and they aren’t optional either. They stipulate one owes allegiance to the foreign country they hold citizenship to and they’re subject to that nations jurisdiction, sound like something the founders would have been down with? Not likely.

  2. This is precisely what the founders did NOT want. They did not want foreigners to attain to our highest offices. I do wish that they spelled it out word for word what an NBC is. Namely “One born in the United States to parents who are both U.S. Citizens themselves”. Two foreigners does not a Natural Born US Citizen make.

  3. Here we go again.

    People who contemplate running for national office should at least ascertain whether or not they are constitutionally qualified to run or serve.

    There is no ambiguity and thus no debating the Article II language defining “Natural Born Citizen.” The founders wrote it that way for a perfectly good reason that they described in detail.