by John Anthony, The Truth Monster, ©2023

(Jan. 22, 2023) — In 2018, a video appeared across the internet of President Obama warning of the dangers of fake news. Only, the video itself was a fake. The image was manipulated, and AI used to create the voice.  Is deception acceptable for a worthy cause? Maybe “yes.” Maybe “no.” What we do know is the institutions and authorities we are accustomed to trusting deceive us on an unimaginable scale.

It was March of 2020 when I first realized the research and medical studies we rely on for advances in medicine, that inform doctors, and protect our health were anything but genuine.

My wakeup began when President Trump suggested Americans try hydroxychloroquine as a potential treatment for covid 19 virus. A harmless enough call. But within weeks peer-reviewed studies appeared destroying hydroxychloroquine as a COVID treatment warning the public of serious harm injury or death if used.

This seemed odd because I know people who have used hydroxychloroquine for rheumatoid arthritis in higher doses and for longer intervals than those recommended to treat covid. In addition, the military gives soldiers tens of thousands of yearly doses of hydroxychloroquine and there have been no studies suggesting that it posed a threat.

In 2018, the CDC’s own Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria recommended hydroxychloroquine for international travelers.  (It’s noteworthy that by 2022 all references to HCQ as a malaria treatment had been expunged from the CDC’s travel site.)

In July 2020, when the Henry Ford Health Systems Study showed HCQ effective at saving lives of the COVID infected, the work was quickly condemned by Dr. Fauci as “flawed”.

The anti-HCQ movement contradicted years of medical data, yet was so sudden and prolific, I decided to research the new studies. I found design lapses, protocol manipulations, and conflicting conclusions on a scale never thought possible in professional medical publications.  I created a video exposing the failures.

During the past 2 years the public has been fed a regular dose of the same methods used to debunk HCQ redirected to eradicate Ivermectin as an effective treatment for COVID-19 and its variants.

The real crime is drugs like HCQ and IVM have been so demonized, and doctors so threatened for their use,  they are afraid to prescribe treatments that are safe, effective, and inexpensive and it appears, far superior to the vaccines pushed by HHS and pharma. The compromised studies become the basis for the attacks.

Some study manipulations are so transparent they are hard to miss, others bury data in supplemental material and are rarely noticed. Below are some of the ways researchers have distorted studies to “prove” Ivermectin is ineffective against COVID.  In the pharmaceutical world, knowing the truth can save lives.

ACTIV-6 Trials

The original ACTIV-6 Trial studied 1591 adult outpatients with COVID-19. The study concluded, “Among outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19, treatment with ivermectin, compared with placebo, did not significantly improve time to recovery.” 

This conflicts with over 100 studies showing Ivermectin to be highly effective in treating COVID. A little digging shows why the disparity.

Practitioners using Ivermectin successfully tell us:

“Early treatment is critical and the most important factor in managing this disease. COVID-19 is a clinical diagnosis; a confirmed antigen or PCR test is not required. Treatment should be initiated immediately after the onset of flu-like symptoms.”

·         But, rather than begin dosing immediately, the trials began treatments 7 days after enrollment maintain Ivermectin in nearly ineffective after 8 days.

·         The report shows “There were 10 hospitalizations or deaths in the ivermectin group and 9 in the placebo group.” Notice how hospitalizations and deaths are lumped together. What the appendix reveals is there was a single death in the Ivermectin Group. The patient died in the hospital before treatment began. This was still attributed to an Ivermectin death.

·         Next patients were administered Ivermectin for 3 days. As Dr. Pierre Kory cautions, “no antiviral has ever been dosed for such a brief period of time.” Practitioners recommend a minimum of 5 days or until symptoms resolve.

·         Instead of dosing by weight, all patients received the same amount of Ivermectin. Overweight participants were included, assuring that up to 23% of the patients were underdosed.

The ACTIV-6 Trials boast more than 20 research authors. Every one has ties to the pharmaceutical industry. The study was designed to make it impossible for Ivermectin to perform well against the disease or the mRNA injections.

Dr. Kory elaborates on the trial.

Follow-up ACTIV-6 Trial

Between February and July 2022, the ACTIV-6 program conducted a second Ivermectin trial. In this they acknowledged that the original trial offered too small a dose of Ivermectin for too short a period to be effective. They increased the dose, varied it by weight, and extended the treatment period to 6 days.

Still, the study concluded, “Among outpatients with mild to moderate COVID-19, treatment with ivermectin, with a maximum targeted dose of 600 μg/kg daily for 6 days, compared with placebo did not improve time to recovery.”

You have only to look at the trial procedures to recognize how the authors managed to get the drug to fail again. “Delivery was tracked, delayed deliveries followed-up on, and participants must have received study drug within 7 days of enrollment to be included.” 

·         Rather than begin treatment immediately, Ivermectin dosing began up to 7 days after enrollment, a total of 8 days by which time it was too late for Ivermectin to be effective.

·         The study was estimated to have 80% power, meaning there is a 20% change the study shows false negatives.


Read the rest here.

Join the Conversation

5 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. The virus, like most viruses, attenuates and becomes endemic over time. If you get it, you will most probably recover just fine, and be stronger for it.

    1. “The virus” is a manufactured one, a bio-weaponized gain of function virus with an established furin polybasic cleavage site says subject matter expert Dr. Lawrence Sellin.

      Furthermore, the “Vaccine” is not actually a “Vaccine”. Traditional vaccines use a part or portion of the actual virus it is meant to combat, usually in an attentuated form. The Covid mRNA does not.

      https://www.wionews.com/opinions-blogs/a-2008-synthetic-model-to-make-covid-19-in-the-laboratory-329367

  2. There’s nothing new about the FDA’s opposition to the use of quinine / hydroxychloroquine for most purposes.

    For many years quinine sulfate was the active ingredient in several over-the-counter products to prevent nocturnal leg cramps. However the FDA banned those OTC products in 1994, out of concern about the side-effects, and in 2007 they further restricted prescription quinine / hydroxychloroquine.

    Here’s a 2007 article about it:
    https://wp.peoplespharmacy.com/fda-bans-quinin-1

    (Full disclosure: I currently take a low dose of hydroxychloroquine for that purpose; it works quite well, but it wasn’t easy to get. A typical hydroxychloroquine dose is 200 mg per day; I take only 1/14 that much [100 mg per week], and I’ve found it very helpful.)

    1. Sleep is a top priority activity with regards to the body. Many functions are enhanced while sleeping. One is the utilization of Zinc which kills the Covid virus. Ivermectin is a zinc ionophore meaning it aids the cell by allowing zinc to cross the cell lining and enter the cell. Zinc slows down the replication of the Corona virus through the inhibition of enzyme RNA dependent RNA polymerase. Other ionophores are Hydroxycloroquine and Quercetin (PubMed 2010).