by Joseph DeMaio, ©2022
(Sep. 29, 2022) — Well, well, well… the Second Usurper in Chief – “SUC” to his close friends – now claims that the “biggest fuel behind the Republican agenda is related to immigration and the fear that somehow America’s character is going to be changed if, people of darker shades, there are too many of them here.”
Seriously?
This is the species of race-baiting one would expect from Al Sharpton or Elie Mystal, but not from the most famous resident of Martha’s Vineyard.
Yes, Virginia, Monsieur Obama – the SUC – maintains a 7,000 square foot home on a nearly 30-acre waterfront parcel worth close to $12 million in Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts. That island, of course, is where the oh-so-woke, “hate-has-no-home-here” residents succumbed to the vapors, some even going into cardiac distress, when Florida Governor DeSantis recently flew fifty – oh, the horror, fifty – “undocumented Democrats” to the sanctuary island off Cape Cod. They recovered when the people of “darker shades” were quickly removed by Massachusetts National Guard authorities to a nearby military base.
One wonders how many persons of a “darker shade” are employed at the Obama property to mow the lawn, clean the pool, make the beds and prepare the lobster thermidor.
Racist slander like that – especially coming from someone who still lurks in the “darker shade” of his own shadowy past as a purported “natural born citizen” and who…, ahem…, still pulls down a six-figure annual retirement stipend as a former “president” – suggests recognition of a new term to describe this new species of prejudice: “racial hypocrisy.”
The sad and dark history of the SUC’s claim to eligibility to the office has been repeatedly explained by your humble servant – and many others – here at the P&E, and will not be repeated. That does not preclude, however, revisiting briefly some of the more salient “facts” surrounding the still-unanswered questions cloaking the issue.
In that regard, suffice it to say that if the SUC really is a “natural born citizen,” why does he still refuse to say so himself? Why has he not himself asserted that, when sworn in as the purported 44th president of the nation, he was a “natural born citizen” as contemplated by the Founders, as opposed to relying on the hearsay contentions of lawyers from Perkins Coie, the Congressional Research Service or former Solicitors General Paul Clement and Neal Katyal?
Moreover, does he believe that the decision in United States v. Wong Kim Ark correctly forms the basis for his contention that he is a “natural born citizen” and that mere birth here, regardless of parental citizenship status, renders one a “natural born citizen?” He was, after all, a lecturer (not to be confused with a full “professor”) of constitutional law at the University of Chicago Law School, so who better to opine on Art. 2, § 1, Cl. 5, the “natural born Citizen” clause?
Finally, and inexplicably, why does he still refuse to allow the purported hospital of his claimed birth – the “Kapi’olani Maternity and Gynecological Hospital” in Honolulu – to confirm that he was, in purported fact, born there on August 4, 1961? Having made that claim himself, has he not waived any claim of privacy or confidentiality under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”)? Might it be that the hospital itself would not be able to confirm his birth there from its own records? All this, of course, without regard to the fact that his father was a citizen of Kenya rather than a U.S. citizen when he was born.
But I digress.
The SUC’s words about supposed nefarious Republican agendas opposing illegal immigration ring hollow against the backdrop of the multitudes of “darker shade” people his regime deported while he usurped the presidency. Back then, the laws forbidding the illegal entry into the United States still had meaning and were still enforced, oddly, by the SUC and his apparatchiks. They were not then seen to be racist because a “black” usurper – or, to deploy the characterization he used to describe himself in the eyes of others, a “tragic mulatto” – was controlling the reins of power.
But now that it appears the Republicans are on the verge of retaking both the House and the Senate, by playing the race card when appearing before a gathering of Hispanics by slandering the GOP as opposing illegal immigration because the invaders are not the “right color,” his words take on an even more odious tone.
Furthermore, the SUC fails to account for the inconvenient fact that newly-elected GOP member of Congress Mayra Flores – a Hispanic born in Mexico and brought legally into the United States by her parents as a child – now holds a congressional seat previously occupied by a Hispanic Democrat. She is married to a Customs and Border Patrol agent and correctly states on her website: “Living in South Texas offers a unique perspective on illegal immigration and how it affects the livelihood of American citizens. We MUST secure our border to keep bad individuals out and to encourage LEGAL immigration.”
It is noteworthy that Flores – of Hispanic, or, to use the SUC’s term, “darker shade” ethnicity – can see that which the famous resident of Martha’s Vineyard cannot: opposing the violation of law, including immigration laws, is not racist. Instead, it is rational…, at least if you are not a Democrat.
Using a slur in the headline only proves Obama’s point.
How is it a slur if Obama described himself that way?
Obama didn’t literally describe himself that way; Obama was being satirical when he was disparaging those who viewed him in such a simplistic and racist manner.
Response from the author:
———————
Mr. Lee states:
“Obama didn’t literally describe himself that way; Obama was being satirical when he was disparaging those who viewed him in such a simplistic and racist manner.”
If Mr. Lee were to examine more closely the text of the post, he would see that the “satirical” disparagement and attribution issues were recognized and addressed with the phrase “in the eyes of others.”
Moreover, apart from the fact that Obama could have easily selected different less offensive terminology and less denigrating of those who viewed him “differently” – which neither he nor his editors did, thus reinforcing the conclusion that disparagement was intended – he specifically later in the Introduction (the phrase comes from his book Dreams From My Father) confesses: “I don’t fault people their suspicions. I learned long ago to distrust my childhood and the stories that shaped it.”
If Barack Obama “distrusts the stories” that shaped his childhood and “does not fault people” for their suspicions based on characterizations using terms of his own selection – even if considered to be “slurs” – why does Mr. Lee feel more empowered than Obama to assess blame or fault?
The use of the slur in the headline, which was the original observation, doesn’t contain any explanatory context.
Regardless, the unnecessary use and reuse of a slur only serves to undermine the author’s point, bolster Obama’s, and gives further ammunition to those who see critiques of Obama as veiled racism.
Would “mixed breed” please you and the other politically correct sensitive people?
Have you personally asked the usurper himself what he thinks he is?
This leaning into slurs only serves to bolster Obama’s point while strengthening the perception that his critics are racists.
Only a racist would consider the use of a factually descriptive word as a racist slur.
A slur isn’t factually descriptive; regardless, as dictionaries explain, its use is only offensive.
And the attempted defense of its usage continues to be evidence of racism in action.
Very valid points made from start to finish!!!!! Fuhrer obama was not eligible and everyone onvolved knew it but the deep state, including the gop establishment, wanted the nation destroyed and he pledged to do it, almost succeeding!!!!! The Constitution means nothing to the deep state TRAITORS, all devildemocommiecrats and about 90% of the gop, because to follow it would hamper/ abolish their evil globalist plans!!!!!!!!!!
I agree and Obama was chosen because those who intended to destroy America from the inside knew he would be protected from criticism because of his race protection, and they were right. Once Obama was sworn-in he also became ineligibility protected because both parties did nothing to stop his usurpation of America’s presidency. Virtually any criticism of Obama was called “racist”, because the race card works. Obama was the perfect untouchable candidate with race protection from the moment he was chosen as the a candidate in the Democrat primary. That was greatly enhanced when Obama was sworn-in and became ineligibility protected.
Owning 98% of the media means Obama remains untouchable for anyone who still fears the greatly overplayed race card, and/or is still protecting themselves by being part of the forever cover-up of Obama’s usurpation………….
Excellent article, Mr DeMaio, and outstanding comments , Bob68! You guys make it difficult for a guy (like me!) to get a word in edgewise! But, you know I’ll think of something! First of all, no offense intended, Barack HUSSEIN Obama is NOT a “tragic” figure on Martha’s Vineyard or anywhere else in our (his) country or the world. I know I’ve said most or all of these things before, but I’M STILL TRYING TO GET SOMEONE TO LISTEN! Obama STOLE the presidency (twice) and command of our country’s armed forces. As far as the performance of his military command duties was concerned, I believe that he was criminally responsible (involuntary criminally negligent manslaughter) for the DEATHS of at least 4 brave men (Benghazi) and dozens of other government/military personnel (Extortion 17 alone resulted in 30 deaths, most of whom were Navy Seal Team Six fighters and their naval support staff). And, to make matters worse, if that’s even possible, Obama did all of this (I call it TREASON) as part of a conspiracy to “transform” our country FROM WITHIN! In the event that you are unaware of it or don’t want to believe it, Obama was identified, chosen, educated, trained, hired at one point and paid as an agent (stationed in the Middle East), and groomed to be a MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE and future PRESIDENT by our country’s own Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). With the complicity of the Deep State, the Democrat Party, New World Order proponents, wealthy bankers and industrialists, and foreign oil money, Obama was unconstitutionally put on the fifty states’ ballots in 2007 (thank Nancy Pelosi personally for that) and again in 2011 and SUCCEEDED IN STEALING THE PRESIDENCY TWICE. Almost unbelievably, he was sworn in to the highest office by Supreme Court Chief Justice John G Roberts Jr! And, let’s not kid ourselves, Roberts knew exactly what was going on, and, of course, that it was NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH OUR US CONSTITUTION! At the time, Obama had been a citizen of three different countries with allegiances to each of them (British Kenya, Indonesia, and possibly the United States although I do not recall ever seeing proof of the latter). For all intents and purposes, Obama was an UNDOCUMENTED individual. Never has so little been known about a man (recommend you use the spectrum LGBTQ+ when trying to specifically identify Obama) who occupied the highest office in our land! One last observation of mine is that our current societal and governmental decline STARTED WITH BARACK AND MICHELLE/MICHAEL OBAMA AND THEIR IDEOLOGIES AND BEHAVIORS, WHICH HAVE BEEN PRETTY MUCH UNCHANGED AND THOUGHTLESSLY MIMICKED AND CONTINUE TO BE CARRIED OUT BY THE AMERICAN PUBLIC, TO THE TRULY TRAGIC POINT AT WHICH WE FIND OURSELVES TODAY. LOOK AROUND YOU. DO YOU LIKE WHAT YOU SEE AND THE LIE YOU HAVE BEEN LIVING?
“Remember Martha’s Vineyard” should be Republicans’ rallying cry for the mid-terms.
The grooming and installation of the fraud Obama neutered the already spineless Republican Party. They were clueless on how to praise and oppose Obama at the same time without being called racist, so they mostly just let the Obama media control the narrative of Obama. Virtually 24/7 praising by the media and America’s opportunity to elect the, “historic first black president”, shut down most opposition to Obama. Within the Republican Party those who were a threat to disclose the truth about Barry were shut down by Congressional leadership. Pelosi is “exhibit A” as she manipulated state certification documents to insure Obama was on the ballot in all 50 states.
Still, millions of Americans were not fooled by the lies from and about “Obama” and Pelosi and Reid ask the lawyers for Congress, the Congressional Research Service, to provide Congress a report to help get all members of Congress on the same page in their many responses to constituent’s questions on Obama’s eligibility. This document was requested after Obama had been sworn-in……. Meaning the possibility of Obama being found ineligible by the Congressional Research Service was zero.
IMO seeing through to lies of the protectors of Obama, both parties, for doing nothing to prevent Obama’s usurpation is not difficult. The dots connect and the pieces fit from the beginning of The Obama Fraud right up until today. The problem is the crime of giving America’s government and her military to her enemies is so HUGE and it affects both political parties, meaning the cover-up of the crimes associated with the Obama fraud must be forever. The first 8 years of the after Obama cover-up were promised to Hillary Clinton in 2008 when she agreed to drop out of the Democrat Primary to insure an Obama win……………….
Hillary was not supposed to lose as the after Obama cover president and most certainly not to Obama’s nemesis, Donald Trump. When Hillary lost, both parties panicked and kept Trump busy with B.S. charges which failed to remove him from office. In 2020 President Trump was removed in a stolen election, complete with cheating which could be adjusted as required……………….Now, the fear of both complicit parties in the Obama fraud and it’s forever cover-up is that Trump will be re-elected in 2024.
What will they do to prevent that??
Bob 68, the republicans ARE NOT spineless, they are COMPLICIT IN TREASON, at least most of them!!!!! There are some good ones but they are kept out of important positions by the deep state establishment TRAITORS like mcconnell !!!!!!!!!!
OK, I agree. However, I do think some of the Republicans became complicit because they were afraid to do or say anything about The Obama Fraud after being told what to do, say, and think by the leadership of Congress. Whatever the reason they did not act, yes, doing nothing to try to stop Obama from being sworn-in made them guilty of treason. I don’t believe every Republican wanted what they knew Obama would bring, but they were afraid to speak out. Their spinelessness caused them to become complicit in The Obama Fraud. The end result was no different than it would have been if every Republican had wanted Obama to usurp America’s presidency. Obama was installed and the intended weakening of America happened…and every member of Congress covers for and protects Obama to protect themselves…..