The Whistleblower Revolution

by Joseph DeMaio, ©2022

(Feb. 22, 2022) — Given the recent revelations  – finally – contained in filings by Special Counsel John Durham regarding his investigation into the thoroughly debunked – but mainstream media mal-reported – “Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax” discussed here and here, the time may have come to consider the next step: let us call it a “whistleblower revolution.”  After all, we are only discussing the protection and preservation of the Republic against attempts to destroy it from within…, aren’t we?

If true – always a prudent caveat until irrefutable evidence is adduced and validated in court – the allegations of the Durham investigation seem clearly to support the conclusion that a concerted effort was made to surreptitiously monitor and report on the Internet and other communications activities of President Donald Trump… after his inauguration as President and after he became Commander-in-Chief.

And who were the alleged perpetrators and facilitators? Apparently the 2016 Clinton for President Campaign, “Tech Executive-1” as the head of “Internet Company-1,” and the Democrat mouthpiece law firm of Perkins Coie, along with various related individuals beholden to them.

And given the careful wording of Durham’s “conflict of interest” motions filed in the Danchenko and Sussmann cases, there may be a lot more factual evidence yet to come to light, but already moving through the Durham indictment pipeline.

Enter the whistleblowers. 

The Durham revelations may present something akin to the first crack in a dam holding back a gigantic flood.  If the dam is cemented together with the mortar of anti-Trump conspiracy and deceit, maybe, just maybe, a few strategically detonated whistleblowers could destroy the dam.

The anti-Trump Deep State is populated by many individuals, entities and interest groups, most with ulterior motives not conducive to the health of the Republic.  Aside from their hatred of Trump, many of them also hate the United States of America and the principles for which it stands.  Oh, sure, they cloak their anger in faux outrage over the “threat to democracy” posed by Trump…, while simultaneously undermining the very democratic policies and principles they purport to be defending.  

While the vast majority of those individuals, entities and interest groups do not have the best interests of the Republic at heart, it is highly unlikely that 100.00% of them are so indoctrinated.  Stated otherwise, there are undoubtedly one or more – perhaps even a “few” – who deep down retain the vestiges of patriotism once taught in public schools and even in some colleges and universities…, back in the day.  They can still identify and differentiate between “good” and “evil” insofar as the perpetuation of the Republic is concerned.

Specifically, there are probably dozens, if not scores of individuals in the web of law and lobbying firms, “research organizations” and computer tech entities – both in D.C. and elsewhere – possessed of information which, if revealed and acted upon, could finally expose the depth of mendacity and deceit which pervades the dark leviathan that is the Deep State vendetta against Donald Trump.  He threatened its existence, so he must be crushed, even now as a private citizen.

Those individuals – and they…, know…, who…, they…, are… – may hold the key to finally exposing and bringing to ground those who would destroy the Republic by trying to destroy Trump.  They need to step forward, and sooner rather than later, because November 2022 may be too late.

Not satisfied with two unsuccessful and completely baseless impeachment trials or the fact that Donald Trump is no longer – for the moment – sitting in the Oval Office, the Democrats, the Left and a host of leftist media apparatchiks persist in marginalizing and dismissing Durham’s investigation as an “old-news-nothing-to-see-here-move-along” waste of time and taxpayer dollars.  Not this time.

Recalling the time-worn adage that a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, even the most mendacious entity must have within its ranks individuals who still harbor vestigial patriotic sentiments and do not wish to see the nation devolve into a smoldering, borderless “region” of North America stripped of the name “The United States of America.”  A revolution of whistleblowers could help prevent that, and it would appear that revelations yet to come from Durham’s investigation would be an excellent place for such an effort to start.

Let us speculate: what if a whistleblower came forward with information that Hillary (“BleachBit, What BleachBit?”) Clinton herself met with Tech Executive-1 at, say, the Mayflower Hotel in D.C., in a “private dining suite” in December 2016 to discuss the plan to monitor President-elect Trump’s Oval Office communications?  What if another tech-sector whistleblower could confirm that a series of texts and emails existed confirming cooperation in the monitoring plan between and among the Democratic [sic] National Committee, Perkins Coie and…, say…, the SUC, Barack Hussein Obama, Jr.?

Repeat: the two foregoing examples are speculative hypotheticals, with no immediate proof of existence.  But that is what a speculative hypothetical is: a “what if” question posed in search of a potential answer.  Given the already patent disdain and outright hatred of Trump on display by his detractors, would it come as a surprise to anyone if either of those hypotheticals ultimately proved true?  Really?

Most people do not want to be fired from their jobs, punished, censored or “canceled” in the event that they reveal or “blow the whistle” on misdeeds, fraud, corruption and crimes of which they may become aware.  They try to keep their heads down, hoping things will improve on their own without their intervention or that “someone else” will do the right thing…, which is why the beast has become as colossal and menacing as it is today. 

However, recall that there remains a federal criminal statute regarding the crime of “misprision of a felony,” 18 U.S.C. § 4, stating: “Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.”

Interesting…, no?  Potential whistleblowers – and they…, know…, who…, they…, are – might well ask themselves: would they rather be fired and “cancelled,”… or indicted?

It is also why a whistleblower revolution – or perhaps just a whistleblower “insurrection” aimed at righting the ship of state – may be “just what the doctor ordered.”  And by that, your humble servant most assuredly does not mean Dr. Fauci.  C’mon, man…