Spread the love

by Tom Arnold, ©2021 

(Dec. 13, 2021) — Actually, it may surprise you to learn that HE ISN’T!  In my constitutionally protected opinion (at least it used to be), the worst U.S. president ever was/is BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.  See some of the countless reasons why below:

1.  Obama was a MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE (a person being used as a puppet by an enemy for the purpose of destroying our country).  In Obama’s case, one of the puppeteers, believe it or not, was our very own Central Intelligence Agency (CIA).  Together with radical left-wing organizations and communist fellow travelers, the CIA CHOSE OBAMA AT AN EARLY AGE, HELPED PAY FOR HIS EDUCATION, HIRED HIM AT ONE POINT TO WORK IN THE MIDDLE EAST AS A CONTRACTOR/AGENT BECAUSE OF HIS MUSLIM CONNECTIONS, AND EVENTUALLY, WITH THE COMPLICITY OF THE DEMOCRAT PARTY, ARRANGED FOR HIM TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT.

2.  OBAMA WAS CONSTITUTIONALLY INELIGIBLE TO RUN FOR AND/OR BECOME ELECTED PRESIDENT.  AMONG OTHER DISQUALIFYING MATTERS, OBAMA WAS NOT A “NATURAL BORN AMERICAN CITIZEN” (Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution).  If that’s not “good enough” for you, then at the very least, he was ineligible because he was A CITIZEN OF THREE DIFFERENT COUNTRIES!  Where he was born (maybe Hawaii or Kenya?) made no difference.  The three different countries were:  Britain (Obama’s alleged birth father was a citizen of the British protectorate of Kenya); Indonesia (stepfather who adopted Obama was an Indonesian citizen, allowing Obama aka Barry Soetoro to claim Indonesian citizenship); and possibly, just possibly the United States (however, Obama’s American citizenship, if any, would have been as a naturalized citizen, NOT A NATURAL BORN AMERICAN CITIZEN).  

3.  Thus, no matter what others, especially including Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts, Jr. (swore in Obama twice, and knowingly did so) have to say, Obama was not a real, authentic president and commander-in-chief.  To add to this, Obama was NOT our country’s “first Black President!”  Besides the fact that he usurped the presidency and, therefore, was not a real president, OBAMA WAS ETHNICALLY BY FAR MORE ARAB- AMERICAN (46% Arabic) THAN AFRICAN-AMERICAN (4% Black African).  By the way, I contend that anyone can plainly see this by the partiality which he and his Administration used to conduct foreign relations.

4.  Unfortunately, I admit that I am wont to call most politicians “CROOKS.”  In Obama’s case, the title is well-deserved.  The actual crimes he committed (and got away with!) included:  FORGING OR CONSPIRING TO FORGE A BIRTH CERTIFICATE; IDENTITY THEFT BY USING SOMEONE ELSE’S SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER; FORGING OR CONSPIRING TO FORGE A SELECTIVE SERVICE REGISTRATION FORM (a backdated military draft card, which, by law, made Obama ineligible to be our country’s commander-in-chief, and, of course, president); VIOLATIONS OF LAWS GOVERNING NARCOTICS AND LEWD SEXUAL ACTIVITIES; PERJURY; ABUSE OF POWER; BRIBERY OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS; AIDING AND ABETTING ENEMIES OF THE UNITED STATES; CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER (did not exercise the duties of commander-in-chief to attempt to prevent or combat the murders of four American government workers in Benghazi, September 11, 2012, then tried to cover up what actually had happened prior to the November 2012 presidential election); for all practical purposes OBAMA STOLE THE PRESIDENCY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (twice) and, in doing so, committed TREASON.

5.  Supposedly, no one is above the law.  Take heart, patriots, in knowing that THERE IS NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR THE CRIME OF TREASON.  

6.  Civil unrest, murders, racism, woke concepts, sexual anomalies, war against religion, efforts to defund and re-imagine police, cancellation of teachable aspects of American history, war on religion, and the overall decline of our once great republic BEGAN IN 2008 WITH THE PRESIDENCY (ILLEGAL) OF “BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.”  Surprisingly, that can be interpreted as something similar to what CNN senior investigative correspondent Drew Griffin said in the recently televised (12-5-2021) “Assault On Democracy:  The Roots Of Trump’s Insurrection.”  Obviously, though, Mr. Griffin does not mean to emphasize 2008 the way that I mean it.  My belief is that OBAMA IS AT THE ROOT OF, AND CAN BE RIGHTLY ACCUSED OF, BEING THE SINGLE GREATEST PERSONAL CAUSE OF TODAY’S AMERICAN DOWNFALL.  If that and everything else that I have pointed out to you doesn’t make him our country’s worst “president” ever, then I beg your pardon.

43 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Ronald little
Thursday, September 15, 2022 2:12 PM

Hell yes

Thursday, June 2, 2022 11:01 PM

What we are experiencing is Obama’s 3 rd term. This is new world order agenda 21/2030. The Georgia guide stones clearly states reducing the world population down under 500 million by 2030, with stated goals by 2025. The environmental agenda, the loss of freedoms across all spectrums. Drug manufactures clearly out of control. Oil,fuel energy producers being restricted. In the shadows George soros,Henry Kissinger, Bill gates , Anthony Fauci who are outspoken supporters of population reduction. This will not end well if we the people don’t come to a place where we push back.

Friday, December 17, 2021 12:02 AM

OBAMA WAS A DUAL CITIZEN (BRITISH, INDONESIAN, AND POSSIBLY AMERICAN). This is not what I consider a “natural born American citizen” to be. How about any of you? And, too, because of his dual citizenship (times three), it doesn’t even matter where Obama was born! I also must tell you that Obama himself reportedly applied for financial aid as a foreign student from INDONESIA when attending Occidental College in Los Angeles, after he had traveled from Hawaii to the US on an INDONESIAN passport! Furthermore, he was CONVICTED of election fraud and sedition by two different citizens’ grand/petite juries (Ocala FL and New York City NY) due to a finding in each of those cases that his Hawaiian “birth certificate” was a forgery! He was sentenced (in absentia) to ten years in prison. Tom Arnold.

Garret Hobart
Reply to  Thomas Arnold
Saturday, December 18, 2021 3:59 PM

There is no indication Obama ever acquired Indonesian citizenship. Regardless, Obama is natural-born citizen because he was born in the United States. The possibility that he might also have citizenship in another country is irrelevant.

There’s no evidence Obama ever applied for financial aid as a foreign student.

There’s no evidence Obama ever possessed or traveled on an Indonesian passport.

Citizens’ jury have no legal authority; their pronoucements are worthless.

Mic J Palazzolo
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 9:21 PM

Not possible to be the worst president because, Biden is not the president. Trump is.

msbetz
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 2:06 PM

Double WHAMMY!
The Team of Obama/Biden rolls on for a 3rd term
presidents” Biden/Obama or Obama/Biden are STILL working together… The only interruption is Trump!
The “TEAM” is the WORST presidency ever.

Robert
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 12:55 PM

Traitors usually make bad presidents! Obama and Biden…….two of a kind, worthless!

Bob68
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 10:34 AM

This is a new article on who was and is colluding with Russia, both in the past and today. Please take a few minutes to read this:

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/2021/12/schumer-who-accused-trump-russian-collusion-daniel-greenfield/#commento-login-box-container

Ben Colder
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 10:09 AM

Odumbo came right out and said he was going to change America into something entirely different and he sure as hell did that .Old Traitor Joe is just helping it along but what gets me is he claims to be Catholic but he sure acts like a communist.He can’t be both and he sure aint Catholic.I think Biteme is more dis honest than Odumbo at least Barry said what he was up to and I don’t doubt for a second that the CIA was /is involved.Barry and Joe need to be careful look what the CIA did to Kennedy.

Joe R.
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 9:49 AM

No matter how bad Fjoebidensux, it doesn’t seem to make Carter, Clinton, Obama, or any of the satanic-communist(D) also-rans look any better.

Irate Nate
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 9:40 AM

Let it go, honey. Obama was not “the cause” of American’s present death-spiral. He was just an unfortunate by-product. We have been slowly dying for nearly 100 years, ever since the birth of the “progressive” movement. The true threat to this country is the unbelievable number of selfish, greedy, ignorant parasites who only see life in terms of how they can benefit off of someone else’s effort. As to hats, do you recommend regular or heavy-duty foil?

Professor Zorkophsky
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 12:57 AM

Dear Tom,

No, because he (Biden) is not the president.
Legally…NOT.
Technically…NOT.
Honesty…NOT.
Argumentatively…NOT.
Imaginatively…NOT.
Dreamingly…NOT.
Stupidly…Not.
Dementedly…NOT.
Pretendedly…NOT.
Truly…NOT.
Really…NOT the president.

And Barry Soetoro (aka Obama) was a de facto, i.e., the cheap suit wasn’t a president either.

Professor ‘Trash the masks’ Zorkophsky

Garret Hobart
Reply to  Professor Zorkophsky
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 9:59 PM

Obama (twice) and Biden (once so far) both received a majority of the electoral and popular votes, and both were duly sworn in.

Gary Wilmott
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Thursday, December 16, 2021 10:20 PM

Obama was not constitutionally qualified. He is a usurper. Biden rode the coattails of a rigged election. Biden did not get more legitimate votes than Trump. It’s mathematically impossible when all the statistical anomalies are analyzed. Sorry Garret, dream on.

Garret Hobart
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Saturday, December 18, 2021 4:03 PM

Every court that heard an eligibility challenge to Obama’s eligibility ruled in favor of him. The cases on the merit ruled he was constitutionally qualified.

The electoral and popular votes were counted and certified around a year ago. Before then, there was a flurry of lawsuits making a variety of challenges to legitimacy of the election, and those suits all failed.

How is it dreaming to acknowledge that Obama served as president and Biden received the most votes?

Bob68
Monday, December 13, 2021 10:53 PM

Thank you Tom Arnold!
Much of the criminality of those complicit in The Obama Fraud against Donald Trump, such as making-up crap to try to impeach President Trump, was/is because of fear of Trump rather than hatred. Both parties are complicit in allowing “Obama”, the Soros funded, Brennan and the CIA created, ineligible identity fraud to be sworn-in as America’s putative president. When the planned and promised in 2008 after Obama cover of Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, job number one for both political parties was to protect Obama from being exposed as the usurper he is by keeping President Trump under siege with made-up charges and absurd attempts to remove him from office by impeachment. Their efforts to protect Obama still today are fierce because giving America’s government and her military to her enemies is a crime as serious as crimes get.

When Hillary lost as the planned and promised in 2008, (and much needed), after Obama cover presidentt both parties panicked and desperately tried to remove Trump from office to protect…..themselves. They succeeded in stealing the 2020 election to prevent a Trump second term…………The crimes committed in The Obama Fraud and its still on-going cover-up are many and include treason……..

Ostensibly, there is still a possibility justice will be served on the many complicit in The Obama fraud, but based on previous investigations where the complicit were investigating themselves, most if not all will be found, “not guilty”.
I fear the Durham Report will be another “nothing burger”, but it isn’t over until it’s over.

On a side note, does anyone know where John Brennan is today?

Robert
Reply to  Bob68
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 12:57 PM

Absolutely agree!

Bob68
Reply to  Robert
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 6:16 PM

Thank you very much Robert………and Merry Christmas…….

Reply to  Bob68
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 3:39 PM

Bob68: Thanks for your comments, which, as usual, are right spot on! As for John Brennan, I suspect he’s hiding out. They call it “laying low!” Anyway, God Bless and stay safe. Tornadoes, I assume, missed you. What a tragedy, as if we didn’t already have enough problems to deal with. Tom Arnold. P.S. I have found one error in my above remarks (not intended). Obama’s ethnicity is 44% Arabic and 6% African Black. And, we think, approximately 50% American White.

Bob68
Reply to  Thomas Arnold
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 6:27 PM

Hi Tom,
I can’t find anything recent on Brennan, not on his Twitter account or in any of the links I checked……….I keep hoping the rumors of why he has gone quiet are true. Thanks for this article and for never giving up……..and, Merry Christmas….. : -)

Garret Hobart
Reply to  Thomas Arnold
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 10:00 PM

There continues to be no evidence that Obama has any Arabic ancestry.

Garret Hobart
Monday, December 13, 2021 10:11 PM

1. There’s no evidence the CIA “selected” Obama.

2. There’s no evidence that President Obama ever had Indonesian citizenship. Regardless, Obama is a natural-born citizen of the United States because he was born in Hawaii, which is part of the United States; there’s no evidence he ever naturalized (or had a reason to do so).

3. There’s no evidence Obama’s ancestry is Arab.

4. There’s no evidence: Obama forged (or conspired to forge) a birth certificate; used someone else’s Social Security Number; forged (or conspired to forge) a Selective Service registration form; violated any laws regarding lewd sexual activity; committed perjury, abuse of power, bribery, aided or abetted any enemy of the United States, or manslaughter.

5. There’s no evidence Obama committed treason.

“In my constitutionally protected opinion (at least it used to be), the worst U.S. president ever was/is BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA” and “OBAMA WAS CONSTITUTIONALLY INELIGIBLE TO RUN FOR AND/OR BECOME ELECTED PRESIDENT” are contradictory.

Joe R.
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 9:52 AM

He’s just another evil-satanic-communist(D).
Someone to keep an eye on (and maybe shout hateful things at his funeral procession someday ??? I don’t know), but not as immediate a problem as Fjoebiden.

Let’s go Brandon!

James Carter
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 10:00 AM

(P)resident Obama’s registration card at the grade school he attended in Indonesia shows him, by the name Barry Soetoro (his legal name after his mother married Lolo Soetoro), as an Indonesian citizen. The 14th Amendment does not contain the phrase/term/verbiage “natural born citizen” and, therefore, cannot not make anyone same. Both “Barack” and “Hussein” are of Arabic origin while “Obama” is of Kenyan origin.

“Better to remain silent and be thought a fool than to speak out and remove all doubt.” — Abraham Lincoln

“When somebody tells me a lie once, I tend to disbelieve everything they say!”
— Judge Judy Sheindlin

Garret Hobart
Reply to  James Carter
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 8:36 PM

There is no evidence that Obama’s legal name has been anything other than “Barack Obama, II.” That someone claimed Obama was an Indonesian citizen is not evidence that he was an Indonesian citizen.

Natural-born citizens and citizens are neither the same nor mutually exclusive. To suggest natural-born citizens can’t be citizens would lead to absurd results, like natural-born citizens being barred from serving in Congress.

Obama is named after his father. Obama’s paternal grandfather converted to Islam before Obama’s father was born, suggesting Obama’s grandfather’s change of faith influenced the name he chose for Obama’s father. None of this, of course, shows that Obama is of Arab ancestry.

But thanks for the irony of saying liars are not to be trusted.

James Carter
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Wednesday, December 15, 2021 10:51 AM

If an official document of an Indonesian school is not evidence that Obama was an Indonesian citizen when he was a student there then an official document of the Hawaii Department of Health is not evidence that Obama was born there. After all, “someone claimed” in both cases.

Thank you for agreeing that “natural born citizen” and “citizen” are not the same. I knew you could do it! However, to then suggest that the adjectives “natural” and “born” do not add exclusiveness to the noun “citizen” and that the noun “citizen” by itself includes “natural born citizen” is what is absurd, as if you don’t believe adjectives matter. That exclusivity is why a mere “citizen”, born or naturalized, may serve in Congress but only a “natural born citizen”, an exclusive form/type of “citizen”, may serve as President.

“suggesting” is, of course, not evidence and, therefore, does not account for someone with alleged Indonesian ancestry having a first and second name of Arabic ancestry.

Thanks for playing. You’re up.

Garret Hobart
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Wednesday, December 15, 2021 8:09 PM

A school document is not proof of citizenship. No one presents a school registration to the DMV or the U.S. State Department, for example, when obtaining identification documents. They certainly don’t submit another country’s school document, especially one that hasn’t been certified by that foreign country. On the other hand, a U.S. state’s certified birth certificate is sufficient proof of place of birth for any government agency in the United States.

No one said citizen and natural-born citizen are synonymous. And no one disputes naturalized citizens may serve in Congress but not as president or vice president.

There’s no evidence Obama was an Indonesian citizen; there’s certainty no evidence he was born with Indonesian citizenship. Regardless, Islam and Arab ancestry are not synonymous: Not all Muslims are Arab nor are all Arabs Muslim. That Obama’s grandfather gave Obama’s father an Islamic influenced name is not evidence that Obama has any Arab ancestry.

Dennis Becker
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Wednesday, December 15, 2021 8:20 PM

“If an official document of an Indonesian school”

How do you know it is “an official document”? It is neither signed nor dated.

BTW, it says he was born in Honolulu on 4/8/61 (d/m/yr).

“Thank you for agreeing that “natural born citizen” and “citizen” are not the same.”

No one ever said they were. What the Courts and just about every legal scholar is say is that “citizen” is the class and it is made up of two subclasses “natural born” and “naturalized”. If you are not a naturalized citizen then you are a natural born citizen. Naturalized citizens are people born outside the US to non-citizen parents who then go through the naturalization process and natural born citizens are those born in the US or born outside the US to at least one citizen parent.

So natural born is still an exclusive form/type of citizen.

OPOVV
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 11:54 AM

WHERE’S THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE?

Garret Hobart
Reply to  OPOVV
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 8:37 PM

Obama’s original birth certificate is the custody of the State of Hawaii.

James Carter
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Wednesday, December 15, 2021 10:59 AM

When is he going to permit the State of Hawaii to post undoctored images of all of his “Vital Records” on their web-site?

Garret Hobart
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Wednesday, December 15, 2021 8:10 PM

That is a question better directed at Obama.

Ask him.

Dennis Becker
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 1:53 PM

“There’s no evidence that President Obama ever had Indonesian citizenship.“

In fact there is strong evidence that President Obama could not have gotten Indonesian citizenship.

Lolo Soetoro’s records show that as late as the fall of 1967 President Obama was still considered be a legal step-child of Soetoro.

https://www.scribd.com/document/35192432/Allen-v-USCIS-DHS-FOIA-Release-Lolo-Soetoro-Obama-s-step-Father-U-S-Records-7-29-10

We know from Indonesian law (Law No. 62 of 1958, Law on the Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia) there were only two ways President Obama could have become a citizen of Indonesia;

A) adoption by the age of five (“Article 2 (1) A foreign child of less than 5 years age who is adopted by a citizen of the Republic of Indonesia acquires the citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia, if such an adoption is declared legal by the Pengadilan Negeri at the residence of the person adopting the child.”), if an adoption had occurred after age five, President Obama could have petitioned for citizenship at age 19 as per Article 4.

B) naturalization at the age of 21 (Article 5 (1) The citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia because of naturalization is acquired with the validity of the decree of the Minister of Justice who grants this naturalization. …(2) In order to present a petition for naturalization, the petitioner shall: a. have reached the age of 21”).

https://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b4ec8.html

Since President Obama was not adopted before the age of five (he was still considered a legal step-child), he could not have become an Indonesian citizen by Article 2. And because he did not reside in Indonesia for the five years before petitioning for naturalization at 21, he could not have naturalized.

“A stepchild is a child born to or legally adopted by your spouse before your marriage whom you have not legally adopted. If you legally adopt the child, your parent-child relationship is the same as if the child were biologically related to you.”

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/stepchild

BTW, we know Stanley Ann Dunham never gave up here US citizenship because she continued to renew her passport throughout the 1970s and 1980s

Garret Hobart
Reply to  Sharon Rondeau
Tuesday, December 14, 2021 8:48 PM

Every court that heard an eligibility challenge on the merits ruled Obama was a natural-born citizen. Conversely, every legal challenge to Obama’s eligibility failed.

Every court that ruled on Obama’s eligibility read U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark in a manner consistent with him being a natural-born citizen. The CRS came to the same conclusion. Their conclusions are inconsistent with those who challenged Obama’s eligibility. In other words, no court has agreed with the challengers’ reading of Wong Kim Ark; neither has the CRS. Ironically, stating all courts and the CRS are wrong is an ipse dixit.

There’s also reality: Obama served two full terms. Countless sites, such as the White House’s, plainly state Obama was the president.

James Carter
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Wednesday, December 15, 2021 12:17 PM

As if all those courts and the CRS could not have gotten it wrong simply because U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark got it wrong in the first place.

I may have missed it but I don’t recall U.S. v Wong Kim Ark citing what John Bingham, the primary framer of the 14th Amendment, understood “natural born citizen” to mean and, therefore, intended the first clause of the 14th Amendment to mean, to wit:
1. “All from other lands, who, by the terms of your laws and in compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens.” — John Bingham, Congressional Globe, 1862
2. “I find no fault with the introductory clause of the 1866 Civil Rights Act, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen”.
— John Bingham, Congressional Globe, 1866

If those two quotes don’t make it clear as clear can be that the primary author of the 14th Amendment understood that only those born in America of parents not being citizens any other country are natural born citizens and intended the first clause of the 14th Amendment to mean exactly that then I can’t imagine what else would.

Barack Hussein Obama II did indeed serve two full terms as president. Countless sites, such as the White House’s, did indeed plainly state Obama was the president. However, there’s also reality: Just because he served two terms as president does not mean he was eligible to serve as president.

This is also reality: Obama’s White House web-site plainly showed the image posted thereon alleged to be of his “Certification Of Live Birth” (COLB, short-form BC) was not sourced from his 2008 campaign headquarters in Chicago as one would expect (because that’s where DailyKos, FightTheSmears, FactCheck and Snopes all claimed they got the same image) but, rather, from Snopes.com’s public message boards to which anyone could upload anything (within reason of course). And, as I recall, a “birther” claimed to have produced and uploaded that very image as proof that counterfeiting a Hawaii “Certification Of Live Birth” was easy to do.

Dennis Becker
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Wednesday, December 15, 2021 7:56 PM

“I may have missed it but I don’t recall U.S. v Wong Kim Ark citing what John Bingham, the primary framer of the 14th Amendment, understood “natural born citizen” to mean and, therefore intended the first clause of the 14th Amendment to mean“

How do you know what Bingham intended for the “first clause of the 14th Amendment to mean“?

As you well know he did not write the citizenship clause that was written by Senator Jacob Howard.

What was Senator Howard’s intention in writing the clause?

“This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States.”

Senator Howard also said, “A citizen of the United States is held by the courts to be a person who was born within the limits of the United States and subject to their laws.”

If the Courts and the CRS are misinterpreting Wong Kim Ark they are in good company. The US Government said a decision in Wong’s favor made him eligible to be President. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court Melville Fuller wrote that the majority opinion made Wong eligible to be President.

Were they also wrong?

Justice Gray does cite Senator Howard and Senator Conness and Senator Cowan. And Justice Gray rightly points out that Senator Howard authored the first clause of the 14th Amendment.

“It does not appear to have been suggested, in either house of congress, that children born in the United States of Chinese parents would not come within the terms and effect of the leading sentence of the fourteenth amendment.”

As to the COLB posted on the White House website, is the information on it different from the one posted online in 2008 by the campaign? You know the one they allowed anyone to come in and examine.

Garret Hobart
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Wednesday, December 15, 2021 8:18 PM

Bingham wasn’t a Framer of the U.S. Constitution, so his purported beliefs hold no special meaning.

You are free to believe Wong Kim Ark was wrongly decided. But until it is overturned or abrogated, it continues to be law. The same is true for lower courts’ interpretations of Wong Kim Ark.

Officials from the State of Hawaii repeatedly and expressly certified and verified Obama’s Hawaiian birth. And there no evidence Obama was born anywhere else. That some anonymous “birther” may have claimed to have replicated Obama’s birth certificate doesn’t invalidate Hawaiian officials’ repeated pronouncements of Obama’s Hawaiian birth.

Gary Wilmott
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Thursday, December 16, 2021 10:24 PM

Pathetic Obot. Lies and more lies.

Reply to  Garret Hobart
Thursday, December 16, 2021 11:48 PM

OBAMA WAS A DUAL CITIZEN (BRITISH, INDONESIAN, AND POSSIBLY THE UNITED STATES). Not exactly what anyone in their right mind would call a “natural born American citizen.” Also, note that Obama claimed INDONESIAN citizenship himself when he enrolled in Occidental College and applied for financial aid as a foreign student. It is reported, too, that he came to the mainland US on an Indonesian passport. Yeah, I know, I’m just passing along hearsay and “birtherism” talk! Guess what, though, it doesn’t matter one iota where Barry was born (he’s a constitutionally ineligible dual citizen!). Tom Arnold.

Garret Hobart
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Saturday, December 18, 2021 4:04 PM

What lies?

Gary Wilmott
Reply to  Garret Hobart
Thursday, December 16, 2021 10:23 PM

Boy are you clueless or just purposefully ignorant. Or perhaps you just like to spread lies? Talk about gaslighting.

Garret Hobart
Reply to  Gary Wilmott
Saturday, December 18, 2021 4:05 PM

What lies? Ignorant of what?