by Tom Arnold, ©2021

(Jun. 30, 2021) — Why did former president Donald Trump come up short and fail to achieve his campaign goals to “hold the Federal Government accountable” and “drain the swamp?” Was it because he was constantly under attack politically and having his efforts to reform government checked by the Democrat Party? 

Why did Donald Trump (prior to his election) announce that Barack Obama was “born in the United States, period?”  Wouldn’t it have been better to say nothing, leaving open the possibility of addressing the matter at a later and more strategically opportune time?  

Why, though, does it actually NOT MATTER where Obama was born?  I will give you a hint — it appears that he was a citizen of two and most likely three different countries (dual citizen with multiple allegiances).

What is the one greatest national security and constitutionally relevant issue hat no one, not our news media and definitely not our Supreme Court, wants to talk about? 

Go ahead.  You can do it.  Say “NATURAL BORN AMERICAN CITIZEN.”  So, do you know or care that being a natural born American citizen is a constitutional requirement (Article II, Section 1, Clause 5) for persons to run for and become elected president and/or vice president?  And, furthermore, are you aware that being born in the United States is NOT the only qualification necessary to be a natural born American citizen? 

And, by the way, Bill O’Reilly and others like you (journalists?), WHY WOULD BARACK OBAMA HAVE A FORGED BIRTH CERTIFICATE IF, AS YOU LIKE TO SAY, NEWSPAPER BIRTH ANNOUNCEMENTS PROVED THAT HE WAS BORN IN HAWAII?

Why is Obama’s repeated CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR being “swept under the rug” and excused?  Do you know, or care, that one of Obama’s numerous criminal acts was arguably TREASON (unlawfully acquiring – I like to call it STEALING – the presidency of the United States and its armed forces, with intent to transform our society into the way he wants it, regardless of the will of those who elected him)?  And, too, did you know that treason is a high crime WITH NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS?  In other words, BEING HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR IT WILL NEVER GO AWAY!  

Did you know that Barack HUSSEIN Obama was not our “first African-American president?”  Here is a hint:  he was much more Arab-American (44% Arab ethnicity, 50% White American, and only 6% Black African), and, as previously described, he also was not a “real,” constitutionally eligible and duly elected president (Note:  former U.S. Representative Trey Gowdy claims that Obama was duly elected, but, then, Mr. Gowdy now works for FOX NEWS). 

Does it surprise you that Obama was once (and likely still is) a Muslim who worshiped Allah and practiced the Islamic religion and philosophy?  It should NOT be surprising to you because of his policies and actions while in office, which were often favorable to Muslim countries and at the same time anti-Semitic.  As a matter of fact, Obama was sometimes supportive of terrorist groups: for example, the country of Iran, the Muslim Brotherhood, the Weather Underground, and others both foreign and domestic.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B_889oBKkNU

DO YOU KNOW, OR CARE, THAT OBAMA WAS A “MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE” WHO WAS CHOSEN AT AN EARLY AGE, EDUCATED, TRAINED, FUNDED, AND GENERALLY GROOMED FOR THE U.S. PRESIDENCY BY OUR VERY OWN CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (CIA)?  Do you know that the mission of the CIA DOES NOT INCLUDE BECOMING INVOLVED IN DOMESTIC AFFAIRS ON UNITED STATES SOIL?  Intelligence-gathering abroad on suspected foreign threats is my understanding of the agency’s duties.  Curiously, the CIA is not subject to any oversight by anyone else or a government agency.  Is it any wonder that they have operated autonomously and often outside the law, and so far have gotten away with it?  Frankly, I believe they are a significant part of the Deep State, if not in fact the Deep State itself!

Why does our current federal government, THE BIDEN-HARRIS ADMINISTRATION WITH OBAMA BEHIND THE SCENES AND CALLING THE IMPORTANT SHOTS, advocate harmful things to our society, e.g., defunding police, racism disguised as “equity,” cancel culture, critical race theory, violence and anarchy misnamed “peaceful protests,” reparations to minorities for injustices committed against their ancestors many generations ago, failure to recognize the progress which our society had been making toward equal treatment of all citizens regardless of race, color, or creed, “woke” but mostly unscientific and amoral politically-correct concepts about race, gender, and sexual identity, the implementation of these spurious concepts into and the weakening of our armed forces, political indoctrination of students instead of traditionally educating them, rewriting the history of our country and actually destroying various physical parts of it, weaponizing the Department of Justice and courts of law against political opponents, failing to protect our borders and keep immigration legal, election improprieties resulting in the 2020 presidential election likely having been “stolen” from incumbent Donald Trump, the incessant four-year-long effort by the Democrat Party to remove Republican President Donald Trump from office, and much, much more. 

Why, especially in today’s climate, won’t Barack and Michelle Obama “COME OUT OF THE CLOSET?”  Playing both ends against the middle?  Hypocrites?    

In CONCLUSION, DO YOU, THE READER, WANT SOCIALISM, OR DO YOU WANT TO MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN?  IF YOUR ANSWER IS THE LATTER, THEN I RECOMMEND WE START BY TELLING THE TRUTH.  HOLD THOSE ACCOUNTABLE WHO HAVE VIOLATED OUR LAWS AND CONSTITUTION.  THEORETICALLY, NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW.  AT LEAST, THAT’S WHAT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA HIMSELF ALWAYS SAID!  

TRAGICALLY, AMERICA HAS BEEN LIVING A LIE (IN FACT, LOTS OF LIES), AND IT NOW IS TIME TO PUT AN END TO IT BEFORE IT PUTS AN END TO US!  AMEN.  

Join the Conversation

65 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Henry, Presidential Candidate Cody Robert Judy filed a lawsuit against Obama. C.R. Judy ran for President against Obama and had so called “Standing”.

    1. To call Judy is a candidate is rather charitable, as all he did was complete a FEC form.

      Regardless, Judy sued Obama several times. And lost every time.

      None of Judy’s suits reached a point where he was entitled to discovery, which was among the reasons he never obtained a court order to access otherwise private information.

  2. I was with Tom Pavich when we went to see his Rep. McCarthy in DC. Tom and I gave a presentation of Obama’s fraud and usurpation. See Sharon Rondeau’s article entitled: VOLUNTEERS’ MEETING WITH CONGRESSMAN RECAPTURED BY CNN’S “K-FILE”. (Jan.17,2018) At this meeting McCarthy seemed interested then. However, McCarthy went wobbly.

  3. Those who dispute the fact that a natural born Citizen is a person born in the USA to two USA citizen parents cannot explain to me why the following words, “natural born Citizen”, are not listed in existing USA citizenship/naturalization laws.

    If you need to try, I am open for laughs this morning.

    1. BOOM! Great trump card. Love it. It warms my heart to hear about metal molecules vs plastic molecules being emitted by barry soetoro’s missle silo that has lips on the outside of it. Your unequivocally correct challenge to walking/”slithering” treasonous cannon fodder is a complete 180 compared to “fake news, wishful thinking Henry W.” (H. W., in case your reading this, Globe Life is now offering Fake-News Liability Insurance starting from $69 per month…contact john brennan for more info.)

    2. Congress writes laws. Congress does not define terms in the U.S. Constitution, such as natural-born citizen. Only the courts can interpret the U.S. Constitution.

      So it is unsurprising that Congress has not done what it cannot do.

      Congress could, as Laity has suggested, amend the U.S. Constitution to include a definition.

      1. Big Mike, your response didn’t answer the reason for the omission of the modifier words: “natural born”.
        Three chances for a quarter.

        1. Your question was answered, but since you desire repetition: Congress hasn’t attempted to define “natural born Citizen” because Congress lacks the authority to define “natural born Citizen.”

          On the other hand, the U.S. Constitution expressly permits Congress to define “citizen” (provided its definition is consistent with the U.S. Constitution).

      2. The U.S. Constitution does not have to define “natural born citizen” in order to distinguish same from all other forms/types of citizen. Rather, the U.S. Constitution does that inherently by using “natural born citizen” only once AND, in context, to the exclusion of all other forms/types of citizen.

        Additionally, since “natural born citizen” is the only form/type of citizen the U.S. Constitution allows to serve in the highest government office of the nation, the U.S. Constitution inherently elevates same above all other forms/types of citizen.

        Congress amended the U.S. Constitution so as it included a definition of “citizen”. Congress could have amended the U.S. Constitution so as it included a definition of “natural born citizen” or simply added “citizen” to the existing criteria for eligibility to serve in the highest government office of the nation — Congress did neither.

        In 1975 , Democrat House Rep. Jonathon B. Bingham introduced a constitutional amendment which called for the outright removal of the natural-born requirement for president found in Article II of the U.S. Constitution – it failed. In 1977, he re-introduced it — it also failed.

        From 2003 through 2008, during Barack Obama’s rise to political power and preceding the November 2008 presidential election, various members of Congress (mostly Democrats) introduced eight different bills to either alter the natural born citizen requirement or remove it entirely — they also failed.

        It is reasonable to conclude therefrom that the learned members of Congress have known all along what “natural born citizen” means and, therefore, it is unsurprising that Congress has never sought to amend the U.S. Constitution so as it includes a definition of something that needs no definition.

        Thanks for the laughs Mr. Wilson.

        1. No one has said that “citizen” and “natural born Citizen” are synonymous.

          That there have been various attempts to repeal the natural-born-citizen requirement is evidence only that some members of Congress would prefer it if naturalized citizens could serve as president.

          It is not evidence of some secret definition that Congress never bothered to share.

      3. Henry, First you say “Congress does not define terms in the U.S. Constitution”. Then you say “Only the courts can interpret the U.S. Constitution”. Thirdly you say that “Congress has not done what it cannot do”. You are wrong on all points.

        Art. 1, Sec. 8 gives Congress the power to “Define and punish…offenses against the Law of Nations”. The definition of NBC is IN the Law of Nations.

        The courts “interpret” what Congress writes as law.

        The courts HAVE defined the term of art “Natural Born Citizen”. Congress knew in 1776 that the term “Natural Born Citizen” means “One born in the United States to parents who are both U.S. Citizens”. This fact is evident that the mistake they made in the 1790 Nationality Act “considering” those persons born outside the US as NBCs was promptly REPEALED in 1795.

        1. The U.S. Constitution gives Congress the power to make laws. The U.S. Constitution does not give Congress the power to interpret the U.S. Constitution.

          The U.S. Constitution is not a reference to Vattel’s “Law of Nations,” which does not define or contain the words “natural born citizen.”

          No court date interpreted natural born citizen to mean only those born in the United States to two citizen parents.

          The 1795 also evinces that Congress realized it lacked the authority to define terms in the U.S Constitution.

  4. Mr. Arnold; your tenacity is admirable! Your fund of knowledge vis-a-vis Obama is voluminous and thorough. Your convictions are passionate and in my opinion, on point! Why Trump stopped pursuing him when he had him in his sights, is a shock and mystery to me! And, by the way; by virtue of the fact that he is gay, I don’t believe Obama is a practicing muslim.
    It appears as long as the Deep State holds the reins of power, Obama is completely protected from ALL scrutiny, from all prosecution! It is still entrenched. I am convinced that to take Obama down we would have to take down the Deep State. That means taking down more than half the federal government ,the Hawaiian and Illinois state governments, and countless other entities, like three quarters of the media; all must go down with Obama. They are all complicit in the massive coverup of Obamas’ seminal crime, and subsequent crimes while usurping the Office! Even President Bush must have been aware of Obamas’ ineligibility. Can you imagine him in plastic cuffs? How about Pelosi? (I can!). Personally, I too am passionate about this issue. Obama and many of his accomplices have escaped justice to date. Many, like Sheriff Arpaio, Mike Zullo, Sharon Rondeau, Mike Volin and yourself have risked life, family and reputations to expose the traitor!
    The Deep State is massive, vindictive and dangerously powerful! They will not sacrifice their situations to expose Obama. They stand to lose too much. They will sacrifice anyone and everyone else, and stop at nothing, even assassination to protect themselves. They stopped Trump in his tracks! Hence, the Roger Stone, the Gen. Flynn and the Jerome Corsi ordeals, to name but a few more victims.
    Finally Mr. Arnold; I’m not trying to discourage you. keep fighting, I will keep fighting with you! Our foes are legion and formidable, as Trump discovered! As we all did! Many say it’s a lost cause but as Winston Churchill said: “lost causes are the only causes worth fighting for!”. So, please keep fighting!!!

    1. Doctor Lou: Thank you for your comprehensive (and kind) analysis. Honestly, I have little faith these days that our constitutional democratic republic will be saved. Leftist Socialists, Wanna-Be and Real Communists, Antifa, Those in BLM Who are Anarchists, DNC and GOP Traitors, FBI, CIA, Deep State, et al, are all under the spell of some one or some thing that can only be described as EVIL! It truly is MADNESS. In the end, there will be no winners, and Hell will be overcrowded with the losers. Many of us will finally get to see Barack Obama in person!

      1. The Arpaio / Zullo investigation / report revealed irrefutable proof that
        the Obama BC, the BC that was posted on the White House . Gov website, was a layered, computer generated forgery… What the investigation did not reveal is.. who was it that sat down at the computer and actually typed up / produced that document and put it into Obama’s hand… 3 names have been thrown around – John Brennan, Loretta Fuddy or Susan Rice.. I think it would have helped their case if that person was known and identified..

        1. My money is on Loretta Fuddy, who was knocked off in the ocean. Btw, I heard that “henry wilson” is the pen name created by michael obama…after all, michael’s circle of friends are habitual fabricators of the truth.

        2. There’s no evidence that anyone fabricated Obama’s birth certificate.

          I have no idea why you believe I am Michael (whoever that is).

    2. Dr. Lou, Obama is indeed a Muslim. As Jewish Mothers confer Jewishness upon their children (Hitler had a Jewish mother) Islamic fathers (like Barack Obama, Sr.) confer being Muslim on their children. Besides that fact, Obama has admitted publicly several times that he is Muslim. Most publicly in his speech in Egypt. He also speaks arabic fluently and wear a ring with the arabic inscription “allahu akbar” which he removes during Ramadan.

  5. Your point is right, Tom, that’s exactly what President Trump said: “Why did Donald Trump (prior to his election) announce that Barack Obama was “born in the United States, period?”

    After President Trump won, the GOP ran both houses of Congress and the White House for two years, but still, nothing happened. It’s now been thirteen years since Obama first entered the White House.

    Rob Laity’s efforts for a Constitutional Amendment sound like the most promising development, hope he keeps us posted on his progress and the folks who have gotten on board so they can be complimented and voted for.

    Whatever happened to Mike Zullo? He never released any of those reports, he and Carl Gallups talked about them for years. Zullo even said at one point if Congress wouldn’t take it up, he’d release the information directly to the public. Zullo doesn’t even have social media.

    Joe Arpaio was pardoned by President Trump so why isn’t he helping Zullo with a new press conference giving all the information they have?

    1. As of today I have sent my proposed amendment to (70) U.S. Senators. I am going to send out the last (30) senate letters in the next couple days. Then I will finish sending EVERY congressman in Congress a letter on the matter. After that, I plan to contact the (50) State legislatures. This project is ongoing. More to come.

      1. So the unnamed member of Congress previously mentioned isn’t going to introduce a resolution to amend the U.S. Constitution.

      2. I suspect you will fall victim to the same problem Lucas Smith faced when he mailed each member of Congress copies of his fake Kenya birth certificate.

        In general, members of Congress only accept correspondence from constituents who live in there state or congressional district. They will normally forward letters from out-of-District constituents to the appropriate congress member.

        So your congressman may end up with 400 copies of your letter.

  6. You speak a lot of truth there Tom, the one that I still don’t understand after talking face to face to so many like Louie Ghomert face to face about the Obama problem is why none of them even offered a morsel of intent to do something about it. This includes our President Trump who to this day did nothing to expose the fraud we know Obama to be while in office. We know President Trump knows Obama is a fraud but the inexplicable silence on the matter has given the Obama team rise to continue shelling out discontent and division in this country and the power for a loser like Biden and unqualified Harris the power to levy devastation once again in this country financially and socially. I have lost any and all respect for politicians who all sound and act alike as pandering and self indulgent to themselves. I see them all through a different lens.

  7. Part of the problem President Trump faced was the TREASON within the gop. Most of them, including mcconnell and mccarthy, are deep state themselves. Only a few republicans are patriots, most being in office on the payroll of Nazi war criminal george soros. President Trump was opposed by both political parties, the Pravda/Goebbels fake news media, the big tech leftists, and virtually all of the big government bureaucrats. Those of us who supported him were deplatformed to keep us out of the public forum, as was President Trump himself. It has been a satanic conspiracy to establish the one world government under satan, financed by soros, gates, zucker, bezos, zuckerberg, and other satanic billionaires!!!!!!!!!!

    1. McCarthy is my Congressman. I gave him a Sheriff’s kit. He knows of the fraud, but will not even allow a discussion about it. His standard answer is: “ The President has submitted his birth certificate. We need to move on.”

    2. I would have like him to open the sealed Obama files. I was wondering if Ratcliff could have ordered files opened and exposed. There has to be a ton. We finally got the Sandy Hook files opened after the FBI classified the documents and although there was an incredible amount redaction there is some interesting information in their lack of professionalism. I think because the press said about the fraud, “we got this”.

      1. If a candidate (Obama) for a seat in a State Senate can get a judge to unseal the divorce records of his opponent previously sealed by the divorce court judge, then…

        1. …then a candidate running against Obama should have filed a lawsuit.

          But none did, and it is unlikely Obama will ever seek an elected office again, so that window is closed.

  8. Still waiting for the release of the evidence that shows Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery. Claims made at a press conference are not evidence of anything. Just ask Judge Gary Donahue, Rosemary Wilcox, Don Stapley, Kenneth Fields, Barbara Mundell, Anna Baca, Stephen Wetzel, Sandi Wilson, Susan Schuerman, Conley Wolfswinkel, Andy Kunasek, Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey.

    All were political opponents of Sheriff Arpaio, all were accused of crimes in Arpaio press conferences, all were exonerated, all received cash settlements from Maricopa County to settle wrongful arrest complaints.

    The pattern is obvious – call a press conference, accuse a political opponent of a crime, never release any evidence of a crime.

    Read the report on the investigation by the Arizona Supreme Court.

    https://media.kjzz.org/s3fs-public/Thomas%20Aubuchon%20Alexander_opinion.pdf

    1. Mr. Becker; I’m afraid no amount of evidence and proof will convince you of Obamas’ fraudulent birth certificate! Many people, including Arpaio, Zullo and countless others have staked their lives, their families safety, their reputations and careers, providing a mountain of IRREFUTABLE PROOF of Obamas’ fraud! No court in the land has allowed any of this proof to be brought to discovery! And considering what the Supreme Court did to all the election voter fraud cases, I have lost any and all confidence in the courts! I have only disdain for the court puppets of the Deep State!

      1. Dennis isn’t asking for an unfathomable amount of proof; he’s asking for the evidence that Arpaio claimed to have gathered over all those years.

        A court order isn’t required for Arpaio to release his evidence. Arpaio could release it whenever he wants. Why is Arpaio not releasing his mountain of evidence?

        1. .
          .
          Henri,
          .
          The Sheriff went to great lengths releasing the information, in a thorough detailed press conference.
          .
          But, surely you knew that…again.
          .
          .
          .

        2. Still waiting for evidence showing that in 2008, the Democratic Party of Hawaii, the Democratic National Committee or the Chairperson of the Democratic National Convention (Nancy Pelosi) requested and/or paid for a copy of Obama’s “Vital Records” in order to verify his eligibility to serve as President under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution (Article II, Section 1, Clause 5) prior to nominating him as the Democratic Party’s candidate for President.

          On January 29, 2010, pursuant to Hawaii’s Uniform Information Practices Act (UIPA) a curious person emailed Hawaii Department of Health Director Janice Okubo: “Pursuant to UIPA I request an electronic copy of any and all UIPA requests from Joseph Sandler, Brian Schatz, William H. Gilardy, Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean, Neil Abercrombie, Daniel Inouye, Senator Akaka, Marsha Joyner, or anyone representing the Hawaii Democratic Party or the Democratic National Committee.” Janice Okubo replied: “Please provide names for the people referred to as ‘anyone'”. The curious person replied: “Joseph Sandler, Brian Schatz, William H. Gilardy, Nancy Pelosi, Alice Travis Germond, Howard Dean, Neil Abercrombie, Daniel Inouye, Senator Akaka, Marsha Joyner, or Andy Martin.” Janice Okubo replied: “The department has no records responsive to your request.”

          On February 4th, 2010, again pursuant to Hawaii’s Uniform Information Practices Act (UIPA), a different curious person also emailed Hawaii Department of Health Director Janice Okubo: “Pursuant to HRS 92F-12, I hereby request to inspect and copy the following records the DoH is required to maintain per the SoH General Records Schedule that identify the Democratic National Committee, and the Democratic Party of Hawaii and/or their respective authorized representative as a payer between the dates of February 4, 2007 – February 4, 2010.
          3.A.3 OSHM or equivalent Cash receipts (payer, amount, date)
          3.A.4 OSHM or equivalent Sales journal (payer, amount, date)
          3.A.5 OSHM or equivalent Accounts Receivable journal (payer, amount, date) 3.D.6 OHSM or equivalent Journal voucher and supporting documents (payer, amount, date)
          3.D.7 OHSM or equivalent Universal input form (payer, amount, date)
          3.D.8 OSHM or equivalent Agency internal journal entry and supporting documents (payer, amount, date).” Janice Okubo replied: “In terms of records of payments from the DPH and DNC, there are no records responsive to your request.”

          Still waiting for Barack Obama, Robert Gibbs or Dan Pfeiffer (or anyone else for that matter) to explain how images posted on the DailyKos, FightTheSmears, Factcheck, Snopes and/or Politico alleged to be of Obama’s “Certification of Live Birth” show a “JUN 6 2007” date-stamp on the backside when Robert Gibbs and Dan Pfeiffer claimed during their April 2011 “presser” that Obama’s campaign had requested it in 2008 in response to questions about his birth in Hawaii.

          Also still waiting for a Xerox Workcentre 7655 expert and/or Adobe Acrobat/Preview/Illustrator/Photoshop expert (or anyone else for that matter) to explain away all, yes ALL, of the visual and digital anomalies in the PDF image of Obama’s “Certificate Of Birth” — just one of which are the 9 pieces of information scattered around it which, when grouped together and overlaid on top of Joanna Ah’Nee’s Hawaii “Certificate Of Birth”, align perfectly with the same 9 pieces of information on her birth certificate. That would be impossible even if both were typed by the same person using the same typewriter.

          The most pertinent/relevant question is: Why hasn’t Obama ever released his original “Vital Records”, his college records or his passport records? He doesn’t need a court order to release any of those. “The only people who don’t want to tell the truth are people with something to hide.” — Obama.

        3. Arpaio very clearly said there were reports not disclosed at his press conference. Those reports have never been released, and there is nothing preventing Arpaio from releasing them at any time.

          I don’t know Arpaio, so I can’t ask him. But I have made written requests to him; no response.

      2. Some more critical questions.

        Where is the mountain of IRREFUTABLE PROOF? Where is it?

        Mara Zebest was touted as a computer expert. She wrote three reports and all three were refuted by Zullo’s and Gillar’s work.

        Zullo claims they made dozens of PDFs using a Xerox. Where are they?
        Why can’t we look at them, open them in Illustrator and compare them to the White House PDF?
        Why hide them?

        Arpaio has claimed that two forensic experts, one from Hawaii and one from Italy, proved the birth certificate was a forgery.

        Where are their reports?
        Why hide them if they say what he claims they say?

        1. More than one Obot, “NBC” for just one, claims to have debunked most of the alleged anomalies on the PDF of Obama’s “Certificate Of Birth”. They explain them all away and claim anyone can replicate them using a similar Xerox Workcentre and procedures used by Obama’s White House. Where’s their PDF? Why can’t we download it, open it in Adobe Illustrator and compare it to the White House PDF? Why hide it?

        2. That’s not how the scientific process works: The point of explaining how was done is so that anyone who sufficiently motivated can also replicate the process and compare results.

        3. Dear Mr. Henry Wilson,

          I simply asked the same questions of your comrade in circular illogic, Mr. Dennis Becker, that he asked of Mr. Doctor Lou — “Where’s their PDF?” et al. Therefore I am redirecting your retort, “That’s not how the scientific process works:”, to the appropriate commenter, your comrade in circular illogic Mr. Dennis Becker. Thanks again for the laughs.

        4. The difference is that my question was about a so-called criminal investigation allegedly done by a sheriff with a history of using non-existent criminal investigations to target opponents.

          People still make claims that two actual experts, in different countries and unbeknownst to each other, found something, something, something even though there is no evidence of them or their “finding” beyond the claims of Zullo.

          As to the “Obots” PDFs, I posted links to their websites where you can find what you are looking for.

        5. “Which PDFs are those?”

          When Zullo was testing the Xerox 7655, Garrett Papit made a series of birth certificate PDFs to try and duplicate the layers, identical pixels, halos, etc of the Obama PDF.

          Are clipping masks added to Papit’s PDFs when saved in Mac Preview?

          None of those PDFs have been released so everyone can compare them to Obama’s by opening them in Adobe Illustrator.

      3. Whether or not Obama’s BC is actually a forgery or not, Even if Obama was born in the Lincoln bedroom and it was televised Obama was NOT born to two US Citizens. He is NOT an NBC.

      4. Even if Obama was born in the Lincoln bedroom and it was televised, Obama is still NOT an NBC. Both his parents were not US Citizens.

        1. Even if Obama was born in the Lincoln bedroom LIVE on Facebook with all nine Wong Kim Ark SCOTUS Justices in the room as eye-witnesses, Obama NEVER was and NEVER could be an NBC.

    2. Still waiting for evidence showing that in 2008, the Democratic Party of Hawaii, the Democratic National Committee or the Chairperson of the Democratic National Convention (Nancy Pelosi) requested and/or paid for a copy of Obama’s “Vital Records” in order to verify his eligibility to serve as President under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution (Article II, Section 1, Clause 5) prior to nominating him as the Democratic Party’s candidate for President.

      On January 29, 2010, pursuant to Hawaii’s Uniform Information Practices Act (UIPA) a curious person emailed Hawaii Department of Health Director Janice Okubo: “Pursuant to UIPA I request an electronic copy of any and all UIPA requests from Joseph Sandler, Brian Schatz, William H. Gilardy, Nancy Pelosi, Howard Dean, Neil Abercrombie, Daniel Inouye, Senator Akaka, Marsha Joyner, or anyone representing the Hawaii Democratic Party or the Democratic National Committee.” Janice Okubo replied: “Please provide names for the people referred to as ‘anyone'”. The curious person replied: “Joseph Sandler, Brian Schatz, William H. Gilardy, Nancy Pelosi, Alice Travis Germond, Howard Dean, Neil Abercrombie, Daniel Inouye, Senator Akaka, Marsha Joyner, or Andy Martin.” Janice Okubo replied: “The department has no records responsive to your request.”

      On February 4th, 2010, again pursuant to Hawaii’s Uniform Information Practices Act (UIPA), a different curious person also emailed Hawaii Department of Health Director Janice Okubo: “Pursuant to HRS 92F-12, I hereby request to inspect and copy the following records the DoH is required to maintain per the SoH General Records Schedule that identify the Democratic National Committee, and the Democratic Party of Hawaii and/or their respective authorized representative as a payer between the dates of February 4, 2007 – February 4, 2010.
      3.A.3 OSHM or equivalent Cash receipts (payer, amount, date)
      3.A.4 OSHM or equivalent Sales journal (payer, amount, date)
      3.A.5 OSHM or equivalent Accounts Receivable journal (payer, amount, date) 3.D.6 OHSM or equivalent Journal voucher and supporting documents (payer, amount, date)
      3.D.7 OHSM or equivalent Universal input form (payer, amount, date)
      3.D.8 OSHM or equivalent Agency internal journal entry and supporting documents (payer, amount, date).” Janice Okubo replied: “In terms of records of payments from the DPH and DNC, there are no records responsive to your request.”

      Still waiting for Barack Obama, Robert Gibbs or Dan Pfeiffer (or anyone else for that matter) to explain how images posted on the DailyKos, FightTheSmears, Factcheck, Snopes and/or Politico alleged to be of Obama’s “Certification of Live Birth” show a “JUN 6 2007” date-stamp on the backside when Robert Gibbs and Dan Pfeiffer claimed during their April 2011 “presser” that Obama’s campaign had requested it in 2008 in response to questions about his birth in Hawaii.

      Also still waiting for a Xerox Workcentre 7655 expert and/or Adobe Acrobat/Preview/Illustrator/Photoshop expert (or anyone else for that matter) to explain away all, yes ALL, of the visual and digital anomalies in the PDF image of Obama’s “Certificate Of Birth” — just one of which are the 9 pieces of information scattered around it which, when grouped together and overlaid on top of Joanna Ah’Nee’s Hawaii “Certificate Of Birth”, align perfectly with the same 9 pieces of information on her birth certificate. That would be impossible even if both were typed by the same person using the same typewriter.

      Most of all, still waiting for Barack Hussein Obama to go to the Hawaii Department of Health in Honolulu, retrieve his original “Vital Records”, and lay them all out on a table for all to see and licensed forensic document examiners to evaluate.

      1. I don’t know why you would expect Pelosi to personally request a copy of Obama’s birth certificate from Hawaii, or why you believe that might be relevant.

        No actual expert has said there are any anomalies with Obama’s birth certificate, so waiting for an expert to refute an accusation that no expert has made seems unproductive. But I seem to recall that Mike Zullo has said the Xerox Workcentre 7655 can create some artifacts during its scanning process.

        You would have to ask Robert Gibbs or Dan Pfeiffer why they said “2008” in 2011. But the likely response would be it was a mistake, as a lot had happened between 2008 and 2011.

        Obama released his birth certificate in 2008. No other president has voluntarily released their college or passport records. Nor has any president submitted any documents to a forensic examiner.

        And Obama left office over four years ago.

        1. Really, Mr. Wilson? Subject to prosecution under Federal criminal perjury laws you would sign your name to a legal document certifying someone eligible to serve as President under the provisions of the U.S. Constitution without having legal documentation indicating that that someone is in fact eligible? You really would do that, Mr. Wilson?

          Oh Mr. Wilson…two actual experts, in different countries and unbeknownst to each other, have indeed said there are numerous anomalies with the White House PDF alleged to represent Obama’s birth certificate. You are, of course, free to doubt their expertise and/or conclusions but any doubt you have does not, of course, mean they are not experts and/or their conclusions are wrong. Like yourself, I too recall that Mike Zullo has said something about the Xerox Workcentre 7655 creating some of the artifacts in the White House PDF during its scanning process — but not all the anomalies.

          I don’t have to ask Mr. Gibbs or Mr. Pheiffer. I take what people say at face value unless/until they give me reason to do otherwise, which neither of them have done. Ah yes, yet another “mistake” –like Miriam Goderich’s “mistake” of writing “Kenya” instead of “Hawaii” in Acton-Dystel’s 1991 author bio pamphlet and not catching/correcting it until 17-years later when Obama’s birth in Hawaii became an issue, even though someone (most likely her) updated it three times between 1991 and 2008 — like someone at the Social Security Administration making a “mistake” by mistyping the state identifying prefix of Obama’s Social Security Number — like Obama himself making a “mistake” when he said he was born of his parents experiences at the Civil Rights March from Selma AL to Montgomery AL despite the fact that his birth certificate indicates he was born 4 years earlier. Please, Mr. Wilson…spare us your “mistake” excuse…there are way too many to have been “mistakes”.

          Due to questions being raised about his status as a “natural born citizen”, Obama released his “Certification Of Live Birth” in mid-June 2008. Prior to that, in April 2008, due to questions being raised about his Republican opponent John McCain’s status as a “natural born citizen”, a Senate sub-committee investigated John McCain and concluded he was a “natural born citizen” because he was born to parents each of whom was a U.S. Citizen when he was born. Months later, when the same questions arose about Obama, no congressional committee investigated Obama despite the fact that his campaign web-site noted that his father was a British subject/Kenyan citizen when he was born. Why investigate McCain but not Obama, especially/specifically since Obama’s campaing web-site indicated he didn’t meet the criteria by which the Senate committee had deemed McCain a “natural born citizen”?

          Obama was only the 2nd president since the adoption of the U.S. Constitution to have been born to parents at least one of whom was not a U.S. citizen when they were born AND he’s the only one whose non-U.S. citizen parent NEVER became a U.S. citizen. That set him apart from all other presidents since the adoption of the U.S. Constitution, and warranted at least as much scrutiny as the Senate committee gave John McCain. Perhaps that’s why no other president, that I’m aware of anyway, has been asked to release their college and/or passport records or submit their “Vital Records” to a forensic document examiner.

          Obama did indeed leave office over four years ago. However, I believe that the U.S. Congress and/or the SCOTUS has the Constitutional authority to determine whether or not he was eligible to serve as president and, if either determine he was not, declare null and void anything/everything he did acting as POTUS.

          Lest we forget that Kamala Harris, born a citizen of three countries, is currently in office.

        2. There’s no evidence that Pelosi didn’t have legal documentation. Requiring her to personally obtain such documentation, and then requiring proof of her obtaining it, is not the law.

          There’s no evidence any experts came to any conclusion about a PDF. Which experts? Where are their reports? Again, no actual expert had said there are anomalies.

          So you have a question that only Gibbs or Pfeiffer could answer, yet you refuse to ask them. And you misspelled Pfeiffer as “Pheiffer”; interesting how you expect others to be infallible when you are not.

          There’s no evidence that Obama’s literary agent was lying when she took responsibility for that error.

          Obama’s “Selma” speech was widely understood as allegorical. Only Mike Volin believes Obama literally was saying his parents met in 1965.

          The Senate did not “investigate” McCain’s eligibility; it passed a non-binding resolution in support of his eligibility. There was no resolution for Obama because, unlike McCain, Obama was born in the United States. And the Senate’s non-binding resolution did not imply Obama was ineligible.

          Anyone who believes that two U.S. citizens parents are required for natural-born citizenship would not need forensic examinations of irrelevant documents like school records because Obama freely admitted his father was not a U.S. citizen.

          Congress or SCOTUS cannot void Obama’s presidential actions; that’s just a pipe dream.

          There no evidence that Harris is a citizen of three countries.

        3. “Subject to prosecution …without having legal documentation indicating that that someone is in fact eligible?”

          They could have simply looked at Obama’s birth certificate which was on view at his campaign headquarters in Chicago. Reporters went and looked at it. It is a legal proof of birth in Hawaii.

          “two actual experts”

          This is a claim made by Arpaio and Zullo but has never been verified.

          “Due to questions being raised about his status as a “natural born citizen””

          No. He released it to disprove that his middle name was Mohammad.

          There was no need for a committee hearing on Obama because the Congress accepts his birth in Hawaii and the majority definition of natural born citizen.

          “I believe that the U.S. Congress and/or the SCOTUS has the Constitutional authority to determine whether or not he was eligible to serve as president”

          Wishful thinking

      2. Why would any of those people request Obama’s vital records? Were they under some legal obligation to do so?

        Why would any of those organizations make any requests of Hawaii? Is it normal for campaigns to seek those records?

        Dan Pfeiffer did confuse June, 2007 with June, 2008. Yes, people do make mistakes. Robert Gibbs was not at the April 27th, 2011, so not sure why you included him.

        In 2010, Gibbs did say he put the birth certificate on the Internet two years earlier. This is a true statement.

        https://web.archive.org/web/20170216134922/https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/briefing-white-house-press-secretary-robert-gibbs-3410

        Your claim that it is “impossible” for information to align even if typed on the same typewriter by the same person is frankly wrong. This is clear by looking at the overlay of the two certificates done by Doug Vogt. A number of entries align (boxes 9, 12b and 14 for example). Typewriters have fixed line and letter spacing so it is highly probable that boxes will align.

        https://rcradioblog.files.wordpress.com/2017/01/johanna-obama-overlay.jpg

        You final question about Obama makes no sense. Why would he do all you request when there is no reason to do so? Do you expect all Presidents to do this?

      3. Maybe you could show similar proof where anyone has requested a certified long-form birth certificate for all of the others who have sought the office of President or Vice President, or at least explain why this was only important for Obama’s candidacy.

        1. Current practice:
          Background documentation requirements levied to US government/US military personnel are inversely proportional to the level of authority/national security. i.e., More scrutiny and background data over a person’s past are required for/of a military person to acquire a security clearance than any Member of Congress, the US Supreme Court, or the Executive Office. This appears to be backwards on its face value.

          Certified Birth Registers are always required when entering a branch of the US military and then again later for the purpose of obtaining a security clearance, including affidavits of proof of residency and acquittances over several decades. Obama’s destruction of the USA is a direct result of why it is just as important, if not more, to make those as pre-requisites for the three branches of the US government?

        2. Perhaps you can join Laity in his quest to amend the U.S. Constitution to add these additional eligibility requirements.

        3. In April 2008 a Senate sub-committee investigated the citizenship status of Obama’s Republican opponent, John McCain. That sub-committee concluded that he was a “natural born citizen” because each of his parents was a U. S. citizen when he was born. If they concluded that without having requested and received a certified copy of his long-form birth certificate, or had already seen the one he released in 2004, then they committed Dereliction of Duty and/or Malfeasance in Office.

          However, the issue of how that Senate committee concluded what it did about John McCain notwithstanding, maybe you could explain why that same Senate committee, or any other committee, never investigated the citizenship status of Obama? “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.” Yes/no?

        4. The Senate did not “investigate” McCain eligibility; it issued a non-binding resolution in support of him.

          No one disputed where McCain was born, so it is unsurprising the Senate did not ask for his birth certificate.

          I wasn’t in or even working for the Senate in 2008; your question is better directed to those who were. But the likely explanation is no one doubted that Obama was a natural-born citizen because he was born in the United States.