by Sharon Rondeau

(Jun. 18, 2021) — As promised, plaintiff Robert C. Laity has filed a petition for rehearing with the U.S. Supreme Court on his petition for a writ of certiorari concerning whether or not Kamala Harris is eligible to serve as vice president of the United States.

On June 1, 2021, the high court denied Laity’s petition without comment or dissent from any of its members. Prior to his appeal to the Supreme Court in April, Laity was told by lower courts that he lacked “standing” and/or that his objection to Harris’s presumed constitutional eligibility was “frivolous.”

In response, Laity wrote:

The evidence is overwhelming that Kamala Devi Harris is not the bona-fide Vice-President of the United States because she does not meet Article II and 12th Amendment criteria that she be a “Natural Born Citizen.” That this court suggested sua sponte that my appeal is ‘”frivolous” (that there is no serious purpose or value) in trying to ensure that our highest offices are not breached gives me great cause for concern.

As has been established in Laity’s current case and others he filed beginning in 2008 challenging the constitutional eligibility of presidential candidates Barack Hussein Obama, Bobby Jindal, Marco Rubio, Rick Santorum and Ted Cruz, Laity believes that the Article II, Section 1, clause 5 requirement that the president and commander-in-chief be a “natural born Citizen” was intended to exclude anyone not born in the United States to U.S.-citizen parents.

On Friday morning, Laity sent The Post & Email the FedEx proof of delivery he received from the preparer, Cockle Legal Briefs, showing that 40 copies of the petition for rehearing were delivered to the Supreme Court building at 9:26 AM on June 17, 2021.

In the email, Laity included the note, “More info when I receive it.”

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Very brave home-brewed colonialists fought British tyranny. After that, very smart men wrote an award-winning Constitution that was the envy of freedom-seeking countries the world-over and at the same time this U.S. Constitution riled the British Empire.

    Then, satan invented the Democratic Party. Now, the world is turned on its ear and the Democratic Party ran out of toilet paper, so they used the U. S. Constitution as a substitute. And, the RINOs smiled.

  2. The 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals did not find as you state in your article that Robert C. Laity’s “objection to Harris’s presumed constitutional eligibility was “’frivolous.’” The only issue the D.C. District Court decided was standing (which allows a court to dismiss a case without reaching its substantive merits). The lower court did not reach the question of the meaning of natural born citizen. Hence, the appeals court statement could apply to Laity’s appeal of the standing issue, and not to the question of the definition of a natural born citizen and whether Kamal Harris meets that definition.

    1. It was the D.C. Circuit that said Laity’s standing argument was frivolous.

      It was the 3rd Circuit that said Apuzzo’s standing argument was frivolous.

    2. I meant to write in my comment the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, not the 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals.

      This article and my comment are about the Laity case which plaintiff filed in the D.C. Federal District Court and then appealed to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals. My amicus brief was only on the natural born citizen issue. I made no mention of standing.

      1. “The only issue the D.C. District Court decided was standing” was a mention of standing.

        Regardless, the D.C. District Court dismissed Laity’s lawsuit due to lack of standing. Just as the New Jersey District Court dismissed Kerchner’s lawsuit due to lack of standing.

        1. Try to stay focused, Mr. Wilson. I said that the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals did not find as is stated in the article that Robert C. Laity’s “objection to Harris’s presumed constitutional eligibility was “’frivolous.’” That finding concerned Mr. Laity’s argument on standing, not his argument on the meaning of a natural born citizen.

        2. You said hadn’t mentioned standing when if fact you had.

          Regardless, D.C. Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Laity’s case and also ruled the appeal was frivolous.

          Just as the Third Circuit affirmed the dismissal of Kerchner’s case and also ruled the appeal was frivolous.

          And the U.S. Supreme Court denied cert. in both Laity’s and Kerchner’s cases.

      2. Henry Wilson,

        You try too hard. What does the Kerchner case have to do with my comment that neither the D.C. Federal District Court nor the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals reached the question of the meaning of a natural born citizen? If anything, none of the courts in Kerchner reached the merits of the meaning of a natural born citizen. Next, you are going to work Magna Carta into this discussion.

        1. In both Kerchner’s case and Laity’s case: the district court dismissed for lack of standing; the circuit court affirmed the dismissal and ruled the appeal was frivolous; and the U.S. Supreme Court denied cert.

          The results in Laity’s case were obvious and easy to anticipate to anyone who had studied Kerchner’s case.

  3. Citizen.born Citizen.natural born Citizen = 3 paths to U.S. citizenship

    PRECEDENTIAL U.S. Presidential and Vice-presidential selections (candidates)
    and elections (incumbents) of “natural born Citizen”:


    My current review of these three websites reveals PRECEDENTIAL EVIDENCE of “natural born Citizen” being interpreted from 1789 to 08-28-08, via all previous human examples, to mean, almost entirely (99%?), “born on U.S. soil to U.S. citizen-parents”.

    In addition to the INCUMBENT SAMPLE of U.S. highest-office-population of individual U.S Presidents and individual U.S. Vice-presidents, and all their U.S parents (99% born on U.S. soil to U.S. citizen-parents prior to 08-28-08,, I am reviewing the “ALSO RAN” SAMPLE (= some 92 also rans, plus their parents) of Precedential Presidential and Vice-presidential candidates of major tickets 1789- 08-28-08, to determine the quantity of “born on U.S. soil to U.S. citizen-parents” historic CANDIDATE SELECTIONS.

    It is my seasoned belief, as a “natural born [U.S.] Citizen” of U.S. citizen-parents, that the entire judicial system in USA will knowingly continue RELYING ON LYING so as to evade the hugely consequential Obama+Kamala CANDIDATE-FRAUD (= “systemic evadenism = erasism” 08-28-08- TODAY).

    candidate+voter+election-FRAUD 2020

    In addition, we are in the midst of historic election fraud that is under scrutiny, right now, so as to possibly reinstate a rightful 2nd-term President Trump from Plagiarist President Biden who is taking credit for Trump’s 2nd term.

    So, Mr. Laity’s relentless probing with the U.S. Supreme Court is perfectly timed to, possibly expose CANDIDATE FRAUD 2008- 2020 along with voter+election-FRAUD 2020.

    While our U.S. Government may continue its “systemic evadenism”, our revealing to We the People on Main Street USA, if possible, that, say, some 99% of all candidates for president and vice-president 1789- 08-28-08 were, in fact, “born on U.S. soil to U.S. citizen-parents”, the compelling next step might be to prosecute Pelosi et al for CANDIDATE- COUP 08-28-08- TODAY.

    1. What we are experiencing has a name — “Gramscism”. What has happened with the “natural born Citizen” term in the U.S. Constitution is one example of what the linguist and communist Antonio Gramsci suggested in his Prison Notebooks writings as the way to undermine the western democracies and their constitutions, i.e., over time change the meaning of words and language to help achieve one’s political objective.

      We have been dealing with the far-left slow-roll strategy of Antonio Gramsci to bring down the western democracies including the USA for a long time. Key institutions have been infiltrated and controlled by the far-left organic intellectuals and permanent persuaders, as Gramsci called them, under the Marxist plan which Gramsican gradualists call “The Long March Through the Institutions.” They’ve been at it for generations for the last 100 years and are at the apex of their hegemony in the institutions and thus control virtually all of our national institutions. If Trump had not won the election they would have come forward and out of the woodwork and totally taken over under Clinton and moved the nation at a quicker pace to a Socialist one, which status to the Communists is a temporary state, and just one more step towards Communism, which end state they believe is a Utopian form of government. They must be stopped now. We need to learn more about the enemy within and their tactics, projects, and strategy. Know thy enemy! Read what Jeff Carlson summarized. I’ve read lengthy works about Gramsci and what Jeff Carlson summarized about Gramsci is excellent. See:

      The article excerpted and linked to above by Jeff Carlson is spot-on about Gramsci and a good summary of Gramsci’s long-term political agenda to bring socialism and communism to the western democratic nations. Modern “Progressives” believe in and use his tactics and strategy all the time. And they know what they are “progressing” towards … Socialism … and then in the very long-term Communism.

      Learn what Jeff Carlson is sharing in his article and spread it to your friends and associates and anyone and everyone who needs to learn that what we see is happening in our country, and the co-opting and destruction of our institutions and changing the meaning of words in our language, is not an accident. Gramsci was educated as a linguist. He advocated the manipulation of language to further political goals. What we are experiencing is the result of the Gramscian long-term plan all along. We are just the generation at the end point of his long-march strategy in which we see it coming to full fruition and a head.

      What we are feeling and seeing now, that we know something is wrong in our country, we can all now understand that it has has a name “Gramscism”. It’s “progress” must be stopped before it is too late. Control of the the House and Senate must be taken away in 2022 from the Democratic Socialist Party lead by Pelosi and her ilk. President Donald Trump must be re-elected in 2024. They tried to cripple him in his first term at every step. Now he knows what he’s up against. He will be the only one with enough power, authority, and courage to take them on if he gets a second term. Give him the opportunity to save our constitutional republic. Take back the House and Senate in 2022. Re-elect Donald Trump 2024.

      “The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of ‘liberalism’ they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” ~ Norman Thomas ~ Source:

      CDR Charles Kerchner, P.E. (Retired) — and

    1. The court’s last conference of the 2020 term occurs next Thursday June 24th. There is a chance Laity’s petition for rehearing will be denied then. Petitions for rehearing do not require a response so it can be dealt with summarily.