by Sharon Rondeau

(May 25, 2021) – After a busy week of blog posts on his new communications platform, “Desk,” located on his political website, donaldjtrump.com, 45th President of the United States Donald J. Trump told his audience Tuesday morning to “stay tuned” regarding the 2020 presidential election in which he was ultimately declared the loser to Democrat Joe Biden.

In a post from Monday night, Trump again commented on the ongoing Maricopa County, AZ forensic audit begun over a month ago and resumed Monday morning following a week’s break due to high-school graduation ceremonies taking place in the audit’s venue.

In addition to Arizona and Georgia, where Trump noted that a judge “just granted a motion to unseal and inspect ballots from the 2020 Election,” he predicted that “Michigan, Pennsylvania, and more” states will conduct some type of election review.

In echo of Arizona, Georgia state judge orders Fulton County to allow local voters to inspect mailed ballots cast last fall,” The Washington Post reported on Friday.  Writer Amy Gardner added, “The decision marks the latest instance of a local government being forced to undergo a third-party inspection of its election practices amid baseless accusations promoted by President Donald Trump that fraud flipped the 2020 contest for President Biden.”

On the evening of November 3, 2020, Trump was leading Biden by significant margins in 6-7 “swing” states, only to see those leads evaporate the following morning after what appeared to be large spikes containing hundreds of thousands of votes tabulated primarily for Biden in Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Arizona, Nevada and Georgia. To date, no elections official has explained what accounted for the “spikes” and whether or not those ballots represented legal voters and were cast in accordance with state law.

Each of the aforementioned states’ governors and secretaries of state certified Biden as the winner of its electoral votes, and on December 14, 2020, those states’ chosen electors cast their votes accordingly.

On January 6, as Vice President Mike Pence opened the joint session of Congress at the U.S. Capitol to officially tally the electoral votes and began to hear objections from members of the House and Senate, an incursion took place wherein protesters of one sort or another entered the chamber and individual members’ offices.  Amid the mayhem, an unarmed Air Force veteran, Ashli Babbitt, was killed at close range by an unidentified Capitol Police officer who the Justice Department said it will not prosecute.

Trump was widely blamed for the incursion, and the then-sitting president was impeached for a second time during his four-year term for allegedly “inciting insurrection” during his address to hundreds of thousands of supporters that day despite his call to rally “peacefully and patriotically” at the Capitol while the electoral votes were counted.

Although seven Republican senators voted in favor of conviction in February, the necessary two-thirds required to convict was not reached. After the vote was taken, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell remarked that while he did not believe impeachment was the proper remedy for Trump’s actions that day, criminal prosecution might be.

In his post on Monday, Trump asked, “Why aren’t Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and Republicans doing anything about what went on in the 2020 Election?”

Trump’s reference on Monday to New Hampshire is to an audit taking place in Windham, where, according to a local report last week, “The first review in the forensic audit of Windham election returns has produced different vote totals than were reported right after the Nov. 3 election.  The four Republican candidates for state representative in Windham each got roughly 220 more votes through an audit of automated vote counting machines than reported on Election Day.”

“Mark Lindeman, one of the three-person audit team, urged the volunteers to carefully examine ballots with fold lines in them as the automated voting machines improperly counted some of them as votes,” wrote Kevin Landrigan of The New Hampshire Union Leader.

The audit, Landrigan said, must be completed by May 27, which is Thursday.

 

 

Join the Conversation

10 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Everyone knows that President Trump won the election and that the devildemocommiecrats used massive FRAUD to throw the election to a mentally deficient, corrupt, pervert and gop establishment hacks, including mike pence, stood with their deep state TRAITOR pals because they too wanted to stop the swamp from being drained because they are also corrupt and wanted President Trump removed from office to protect themselves from corruption being revealed!!!!!!!!!! None of the court cases were heard but were rejected for “lack of standing”. How can We the People and those who represent us at the state level not have standing to question an election so blatantly staged for a corrupt and radically leftist candidate??????????

    1. It appears to me that “no standing” was picked as a universal shutdown method for anyone who questioned Obama’s eligibility. After Obama was sworn-in by John Roberts in 2009, the one thing that still could have saved America was fully revealing and acting on the truth about Barry. No judge was going to allow that to happen. I believe reason number one reason was/is fear for their personal safety and that of their family. Some of the judges were also part of the plan to install and protect Obama. Once Obama was sworn-in, everyone who swore an oath to protect the Constitution and did/said nothing became complicit in the Obama fraud. It was considered “too late” after Obama was sworn-in for him to be found ineligible, no matter how much additional evidence was uncovered. A crime too big to prosecute was committed and has all but destroyed America. No standing protected all complicit in the Obama fraud.
      Pelosi reached out to the CRS to to provide Congress with information “proving” Obama was eligible. This was after Obama was sworn-in, so the chances of the CRS (Congressional Research Service) saying Obama was not eligible were exactly zero. Several revisions to the CRS report were made as numerous errors were uncovered. Removing a president once he is sworn-in is very difficult as we are seeing in the blatantly fraudulent installation of Joe Biden as the putative president after the stolen 2020 election…….Protecting Joe is a repeat of protecting Obama, and a continuation of the protection of the Obama fraud…………..

  2. When Donald Trump offered Obama 5 million dollars to Obama’s favorite charity if he would show his real Hawaii birth certificate, Obama did not. Who would refuse 5 million for their favorite charity by refusing to show their birth certificate? Answer, someone who lied about where they were born and usurped America’s presidency. It was obvious in 2008 that fear of Donald Trump was driving the panic by both parties to prevent Donald Trump from being elected, and then to remove President Trump from office, much more than hate. Fear of Trump cannot be mentioned, because no one wants to answer the question of why all complicit in the Obama fraud fear Trump. Those complicit, both parties, hate the fact that President Trump makes them fear the danger of possibly being exposed as the criminals they are.

    I realize Obama is also ineligible because his claimed parents were not both America citizens when he was born, wherever that was. Obama’s installers were only concerned about his place of birth because they believed they could easily convince most Americans that, “born in America”, was good enough for, “natural born citizen”.

    The Obama regime owns the courts, and once Obama was sworn-in by John Roberts there was little to no chance of Barry being found ineligible, no matter what. It was too late to do the right thing as both parties had made themselves complicit in effectively giving America’s government and her military to her enemies. The enormity of the crime of Obama’s usurpation protects Obama and all complicit because it is, apparently, a crime “too big to prosecute”. If this does not change America will have been permanently, “taken over without firing a shot”, as predicted by Communist leaders years ago……….None of this was difficult to see as it unfolded in real time, and I will always consider those who openly fought and are still fighting for the truth to save America as American Hero’s at the highest level………………

    The election of Donald Trump in 2016 instead of the planned and promised in 2008 after-Obama cover of Hillary Clinton created panic in all complicit in the Obama fraud. They kept president Trump under siege and removed him from office in the stolen 2020 election, and are now back on track with Obama/Biden and the ineligible Kamala Harris. No need for enemies within to hide their intent anymore because time has proved they are immune from criminal prosecution, no matter what they do.

        1. Trump’s well-deserved reputation for not making good on his promises to pay make it a chump move to do anything like this and expect him to follow through on his end.

        2. If the money had been deposited in a third-party escrow account, and independent arbiters were named, the offer might have been taken more seriously.

        3. If Obama possessed the documents Donald Trump requested and they were authentic, he could not have lost no matter what Trump did. Give Donald Trump real and authentic documents, and mock and ridicule him for making the offer while national and global news broadcast Donald Trump handing over a 5 million dollar check to the “hero” Barack Obama and Obama giving the check to his favorite charity. The other option was handing over authentic documents and the same news endlessly broadcasting, “Donald Trump refuses to pay off on his 5 million dollar bet requiring Obama’s school and passport records”. Either way Obama could have stopped Trump’s presidential aspirations in their tracks and cleared up the ‘birther” issue forever.
          The obvious reason Obama did nothing was because the requested documents would have proven he is not eligible. Obama’s refusal helped Donald Trump defeat the planned and promised in 2008 after Obama cover president of Hillary Clinton. Hillary was not supposed to lose and certainly not to Obama’s biggest nemesis, Donald Trump……………….

        4. Obama had many reasons believe that the offer was not genuine, or that it wouldn’t be honored.

          And there was also another option available: Ignore the offer and win re-election.