by Sharon Rondeau

(Dec. 11, 2020) — On Friday evening the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case of Texas v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al, in which the state of Texas, joined by 17 other states, 106 congressmen and members of the Pennsylvania House of Representatives, among other parties, claimed voter disenfranchisement based on the manner in which Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan and Georgia ran their elections.

Numerous accounts in the form of sworn affidavits presented to state legislators and the Trump campaign legal team state that violations of law took place in the defendant states’ election centers on Election Day and afterward. The mainstream media insists that “no evidence” of fraud exists, and Joe Biden, who the media declared “president-elect” on November 7, has remained silent on the allegations of widespread voting aberrations.

After holding a conference, the court determined that Texas did not have “standing” under Article III of the U.S. Constitution to bring the Bill of Complaint. “Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections,” the court wrote.

Associate Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas differed from their colleagues in that they said they would have allowed the filing of the Bill of Complaint but without granting any other immediate relief.

Atty. Sidney Powell, who is working independently of the Trump legal team, claims to have proof that at a minimum, hundreds of thousands of votes were “flipped” from Trump to Biden overnight from November 3 to November 4. Powell promised Thursday in an interview with Lou Dobbs to provide Dobbs with “more information that’s just stunning” that night.

Join the Conversation

2 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. In the Name of the Constitution, being the Fruits of vast illegalities.THE 
President of the United States Senate, should refuse,to accept or count 
the Elector Votes from any of the 6 truant States, being that to do so 
would make the President and the Senate complicit in heinous Crimes in 
violation of His Oath of Office. Let the President of the Senate DESTROY
the VOTES on SIGHT.
    Let the THE PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE CHALLENGE ANY Court and PROVE the PURITY of those Votes! Let the Court issue a truly Criminal ORDER for the Senate to accept FRAUDULENT VOTES which cannot be proven to be otherwise.

    …the President of the Senate…shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates…and the votes shall then be counted…”

    “who gets to decide which votes get counted and which do not.”
    Scott R. Anderson
    https://www.lawfareblog.com/how-resolve-contested-election-part-2-how-congress-counts-electoral-votes

  2. So much for Trump’s three Supreme Court nominees; a lot of posturing for nothing.
    So Christine Blasey Ford didn’t have to lie after all.
    The Court just rendered themselves obsolete.
    America lost today, just too darn bad the Dems are just too stupid to mourn with the rest of us.
    We still retain a smidgen of hope.
    The only thing we have now is what Yogi used to say, “It ain’t over ‘till it’s over.”
    I can only hope that this is not the beginning of the end, and if anybody thanks me for my service I may just tell them what I’m really thinking.