by Leo Donofrio, blogging at naturalborncitizen, ©2020 

(Dec. 4, 2020) — Emergency Application to expedite sent to Justice Alito yesterday. Complete Motion For Leave To File, Bill of Complaint (invoking the Court’s original jurisdiction), Motion For Expedition & Legal Argument filed today. Name will be unredacted when the Clerk dockets case. Due to Covid-19, papers take longer to clear. Should be on docket by Monday. Office of the Clerk is aware of the case. All documents filed will be published here over the weekend.

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Kamala’s ineligibility renders the Biden/Harris election bid as null from the outset, regardless of the cheating on the voting process.

    Kamala made false oath to start with.

    Her oath must be legally challenged as a separate action, aside from the other legalities.

    Kamala Harris is not eligible for office of POTUS or VPOTUS

    If Kamala Harris were to get away with fraudulently gaining office, it would disenfranchise all those real natural born citizens of the USA.

    Kamala Harris would have made false oath when she signed Presidential Major Party Candidate Declaration for Nomination and
    Oath of Candidacy.

    Take time to read all of this article and go to the links to get confirmation for yourself.

    It’s irrefutable.

    Read for your self, about how and why only a natural born citizen could be eligible for office.

    Obama is also not a natural born citizen, regardless of where he was born.

    Biden’s a front for the Dems, in my opinion Kamala Harris is who they are really pushing toward the presidency.

    Her eligibility must be challenged asap, and the only way to have “standing” in SCOTUS, is to have a massive class-action by true US natural born citizens, because if she gets away with it, like Obama did, it leaves those who ARE real natural born citizens without any significant standing that is representative of their inherited sovereignty.

    That is, a natural born citizen child born to US citizen parents would be no different to an anchor baby from the pits of Mexico.

    The inherited sovereignty of the children of “we the people” US citizen parents would be worthless and count for nothing.

    Liken this to, say, a native North American Indian, their children inherit membership in the tribe from their parents who are members of the tribe.

    They are natural born members of the tribe.

    It’s that simple.

    Kamala Harris has virtually claimed to be a US constitutional “natural born citizen”.

    But she can’t prove it, because it’s not true.

    Burden of proof rests with the claimant.

    The main point regarding eligibility for office of POTUS and vice POTUS …

    The precedent was set by the framers, when they identified “natural born citizen” in Article II of the Constitution , then LATER, in the 14th Amendment, declined to use that same terminology to identify a 14th Amendment citizen.

    Kamala Harris is not constitutionally eligible for office of POTUS.

    She is a fake, and not a natural born citizen, yet she was born a citizen.

    If it were true that being born in the USA is all that is required for one to be a NBC, then the 14th Amendment would say “natural born citizen”, but it doesn’t.

    The framers of the US constitution deliberately made the distinction between citizen and natural born citizen, by requiring presidential eligibility to be NBC and requiring eligibility for citizen to be born in US, so NBC is not the same as a born citizen.

    The framers were careful to require the highest possible allegiance for one to be commander in chief, i.e. not influenced by foreign connections.

    The highest possible allegiance is a born citizen per 14th Amendment, AND BOTH parents US citizens.

    The framers would settle for nothing less, and it makes perfect sense that the 14th Amendment intentionally makes no mention of “natural born”.

    Article II of the constitution (presidential eligibility) was enumerated in the original document, and thus the concept of NBC existed BEFORE the born citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment.

    Had the authors of the 14th Amendment intended a born citizen to mean a natural born citizen, it is without any doubt they would have clearly stated this in the 14th Amendment, by using established terminology, but they didn’t for very wise and good reasons of national security.

    The precedent was set by the framers, when they identified NBC, then LATER, in the 14th Amendment, declined to use that same terminology to identify a 14th Amendment citizen.

    It was no accident.

    It would be incomprehensible to entertain the notion that the framers were not careful and not deliberate in their choice of terms.

    Vattel’s Law of Nations was relied on by the founding fathers.

    Vattel:

    Ҥ 212. Citizens and natives.
    The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages.

    The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

    As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.

    The society is supposed to desire this, in consequence of what it owes to its own preservation; and it is presumed, as matter of course, that each citizen, on entering into society, reserves to his children the right of becoming members of it.

    The country of the fathers is therefore that of the children; and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent.

    We shall soon see whether, on their coming to the years of discretion, they may renounce their right, and what they owe to the society in which they were born.

    I say, that, in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen; for, if he is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.”

    Benjamin Franklin:

    “Dear sir,

    I received your several favours, of May 18, June 30, and July 8, by Messrs. Vaillant and Pochard;2 whom, if I could serve upon your recommendation, it would give me great pleasure. Their total want of English is at present an obstruction to their getting any employment among us; but I hope they will soon obtain some knowledge of it. This is a good country for artificers or farmers, but gentlemen, of mere science in les belles lettres, cannot so easily subsist here, there being little demand for their assistance among an industrious people, who, as yet, have not much leisure for studies of that kind.

    “I am much obliged by the kind present you have made us of your edition of Vattel.

    It came to us in good season, when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the law of nations.

    Accordingly, that copy which I kept, (after depositing one in our own public library here, and sending the other to the college of Massachusetts Bay, as you directed3) has been continually in the hands of the members of our congress, now sitting, who are much pleased with your notes and preface, and have entertained a high and just esteem for their author. Your manuscript Idee sur le gouvernment et la royauté, is also well relished, and may, in time, have its effect.4 I thank you, likewise, for the other smaller pieces, which accompanied Vattel. Le court exposé ce qui s’est passe entre la cour Br. et les colonies, &c. being a very concise and clear statement of facts, will be reprinted here,…….”

    https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-22-02-0172

    https://www.jayweller.com/natural-born-citizen-defined/#:~:text=Section%20212%20of%20Law%20Of%20Nations%2C%20defines%20Natural%20Born%20Citizen%3A&text=The%20natives%2C%20or%20natural-born,completely%20free%20of%20foreign%20influences