by Tom Arnold, ©2020

(Sep. 21, 2020) — Earlier today I attempted to call in to Dr. Michael Savage’s radio show and talk to him (1-855-400-7282).  Somewhat surprisingly, my call went through to his screener (censor).  This young man asked me why I wanted to speak to Dr. Savage, who had been discussing Kamala Harris.  I told him that I would like to talk about the constitutional eligibility, or lack thereof, of Senator Harris for vice president or president.  The screener wanted to know my opinion.  I told him that Kamala Harris was NOT constitutionally eligible for the office.  He, the call screener, told me that he (and presumably including Dr. Savage) believed Harris was eligible.  I asked, “Is this something that Dr. Savage would like to “debate” me about on air?”  The screener immediately and, I feel, sarcastically answered, “NO!”

Needless to say, that was the end of our conversation.  Mind you, this makes the 3rd or 4th time in recent years that I have been treated this exact same way (concerning different subjects) by the “Savage Nation.”  I have never been “approved” to converse with Dr. Savage.

I am a military veteran, retired law enforcement officer, an Independent registered voter, nineteen years of formal education, a conscientious taxpayer and law-abiding American citizen, and author last year of a modest but unique little book titled, “The Sick Treasonous Truth Surrounding Barack Hussein Obama As Witnessed & Experienced by an Ordinary American Citizen.”  Not exactly the credentials of Dr. Savage, but how about my 1st Amendment rights!

If anyone there (especially including Dr. Savage) cares, please refer to  ProtectOurLiberty.org – Natural Born Citizen & Natural Law – U.S. Constitution.


Kamala Harris is NOT a NATURAL BORN AMERICAN CITIZEN (Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution).  At best, she is a DUAL CITIZEN, whose allegiance (like Obama’s) to our country is at best compromised.  THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DOES NOT NEED ANOTHER CONSTITUTIONALLY INELIGIBLE USURPER IN THE WHITE HOUSE!  SEE HOW IT TURNED OUT BEFORE (2009-2017).  The effects of that two-term THEFT of our presidency continue to haunt us today.  We are on the brink of losing our constitutional democratic republic, and don’t think that Obama and his co-conspirators aren’t still running the show!

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. The Constitution notwithstanding, the guiding law is the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952. KH is the child of foreign students, here temporarily. As such, foreign students are classified as “non-immigrants”. Any children they might have acquire the nationality of the parents, in this case, JAMAICAN, since Indian law doesn’t allow dual citizenship. Thus, KH was born Jamaican by way of her father. Now here’s the kicker: if the parents subsequently change their status to immigrants and do naturalize, any children older than 18 at the time do NOT automatically become Americans like their younger siblings but are FOREIGNORS and have to naturalize on their own! If nether thing happened to KH, SHE’S STILL a JAMAICAN, and ILLEAGAL at that!!! This should void the whole election and give it to Trump by default! Trouble is, no one wants to listen, not that I can find. Can any of you?

  2. Those votes are evidence only of how they voted — the House was against amending the U.S. Constitution and the Senate believed McCain was eligible.

    And all those votes occurred over a decade ago. There has been much turnover in Congress since then.

    1. “Those votes are evidence only of how they voted ”

      Indeed they were. And they all voted AGAINST either removing or defining “natural born Citizen” as anything/everything other than what they knew it meant — born in the country to citizen parents of the country. And the Senate deemed McCain eligible because they considered him born in the county to citizen parents of the country — i.e., a natural born Citizen.

      All those votes and the Senate resolution may have occurred over a decade ago but no Congress or Senate since has voted otherwise.

      BTW: Why didn’t the Senate do for Obama what they did for McCain? Double-standard? White vs Black?

      1. McCain wasn’t born in the United States; the Senate resolution says that.

        And votes are evidence only of voting. Votes aren’t evidence of the voters’ knowledge or motives.

        You would have to ask members of the members of the 2007-2008 Senate why they didn’t vote for a similar resolution for Obama. And ditto about senators from the following sessions.

        1. Barack Hussein Obama wasn’t born in the United States: a) His bio in Acton & Dystel’s author bio pamphlet said that from its release in 1991 through mid-April 2007; b) An AP article in the Kenyan Standard newspaper in 2004 said that, and; c) He himself said that at an event in Kenya in 2018. As sportscaster Warner Wolf was known to say: “Let’s go to the video-tape” — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L36sGc4Id2I — from 5:50 to 6:00 Obama says “Now three years ago [2015] I visited Kenya as the first sitting American President to come from Kenya”. I know, I know…a) was in reference to his father, b) was in reference to his father, and c) was in reference to his father. “Come on, man!”

          Votes may well only be evidence of voting. Votes also may well not be evidence of the voter’s knowledge or motives. However, when one vote, two votes, three votes, four votes, five votes, six votes, seven votes and eight votes over the course of several years all go against the same thing it certainly is evidence of the voters unwavering opposition to that thing…else one/more votes would have been in favor of that thing.

          I actually did ask members of the 2007-2008 Senate why they didn’t vote for a similar resolution for Obama…the two Democrat Senators who represented me in Congress at the time and still represent me…Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) and Benjamin L. Hardin (D-MD). Their answers? Boilerplate letters thanking me for my inquiry but unresponsive to same, rather simply telling me about all the wonderful things they’ve done for their constituents.

        2. Repeated votes against amending the U.S. Constitution is evidence of a desire not to amend the U.S. Constitution.

          One would have to look at the actual text of the proposed amendments to determine what might have been objectionable.

        3. Senate Resolution (SR) 511 “not binding”. Binding or not, the US Senate suggested through this resolution that McCain truly was a natural born Citizen. This resolution quieted the crowd (constituents); that’s all that both parties cared about. The goal of the big show SR 511 was to resolve for McCain and not for aka Obama. And, by not addressing aka Obama’s eligibility, the inaction left the impression that he was eligible, i.e. born in the USA nonsense.

          Congress cannot make any person a natural born Citizen (NBC) through any law; that is why SR 511 was a sham. Actually, previous immigration law declared John S. McCain, III, a statutory US citizen at birth by enacting a law that states that certain persons born outside the limits of the USA are indeed US citizens, but not an NBC. See 8 US Code § 1403. Persons born in the Canal Zone or Republic of Panama on or after February 26, 1904, Reference: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1403

          Yes, John S. McCain, III, was declared a US citizen, but John S. McCain’s parents also were required by law to document his US citizenship upon his first entry into the continental US. If it takes a law to document someone a US citizen, they are not an NBC; instead they are a statutory US citizen under the laws of immigration. I have a nephew who was born in England to two US citizen parents. My nephew’s father was an enlisted member of the US Air Force. Their son also needed immigration documentation to complete and validate his US citizenship upon his entry into the USA.

          Immigration laws are made to proclaim and lawfully make a person a US citizen through positive law. No immigration law can make anyone an NBC. It is my true contention that everyone that voted either for McCain or for aka Obama in the 2008 election and again for aka Obama in 2012 voted for an ineligible presidential candidate.

          Summary: Under natural law, people are an NBC – i.e., born in the USA to two US citizen parents. These two parents can be both natural born Citizens, both statutory US citizens, or a combination of those two types of citizens. Congress can only grant statutory (positive laws) US citizenship. Repeated: Only those persons born in the USA to two US citizen parents are natural born Citizens; all others who do not meet the NBC specification are statutory US citizens and are only eligible for the US Congress or for the US Supreme Court. The authors and signers of SR 511 positively misled their constituents through political trickery.

    2. Previous attempts to eliminate the natural born Citizenship (NBC) requirement for the presidency met with resistance, obfuscation, and confusion by and from both chambers of Congress. See World Net Daily (WND) article in the below reference by Bob Unruh that summarizes those attempts. This WND article also reminds his readers of the double-standard constitutionally-eligible wording of the 2008 Democratic National Committee nomination affidavits for aka Obama that were sent to different states of the union. Mr. Unruh also reminds his readers of the 2008 putative president-elect aka Obama’s suspicious ‘visit’ to eight of the nine US Supreme Court members shortly after his illegal 2008 election. Reference: https://www.wnd.com/2011/07/317705/

      The embedded D.C. swamp, aka the UniParty, realized this change to the US Constitution was unattainable through the constitutional amendment process, so the UniParty commenced to distort the meaning of NBC by using that same phrase, “natural born Citizen” as found in the USA’s first naturalization law, as the feel good momentum to promote SR 511. This ruse had a two-fold purpose: (1) to covertly define NBC contrary to the Founding Fathers’ understanding, which is born in the USA to two US citizen parents and (2) to convince their constituents that they were focusing on McCain’s eligibility, but in slight-of-hand confidence were using SR 511 to aka Obama’s advantage.

      Notice the eerie silence from all Members of Congress on any more attempts to eliminate the NBC requirement for the presidency? There is no need to seek this goal through a constitutional amendment anymore, because Congress succeeded to eliminate the real NBC requirement for the presidency by other means. SR 511 not only allowed an unconstitutional aka Obama and McCain to run for the office of the POTUS in 2008, but also emboldened the following individuals to run for the presidency during the 2016 election: Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Bobby Jindal. This deceitful SR 511 also spawned three unconstitutional candidates for the upcoming 2020 presidential election – Kamala Harris, Tulsi Gabbard, and Andrew Yang.

      Decent US citizens often are tricked into lying by Congress or the FBI and are quickly penalized, but who prosecutes Congress for lying to We The People as SR 511 did to us? Our two-tier justice system is on full display every day in Washington DC. Yes, the full 110th Congress, US Senate, rushed on over to the General Store and each member purchased a digging shovel with SR 511 stamped on the handle. They will keep digging to avoid treason charges, because they know they “messed” with the US Constitution.

      President George Walker Bush (GWB) is the primary person responsible for allowing an unconstitutional person, aka Barack HUSSEIN Obama, to succeed him while on his (GWB) constitutional watch.

  3. both political parties are corrupt, owned by Nazi war criminal george soros and his billionaire cabal of ultra wealthy liberal traitors who are above the law, a law that only applies to working class patriots. Each party, when in power, will “investigate” the other but NEVER do anything to punish the guilty nor actually solve a problem. the “mainstream media” and now the ” socialist media” hate patriots and the Constitution, and are determined to destroy both in order to establish their New World Order global dictatorship. Many people voted for the ineligible obama because they either feared being labeled as a “racist” or wanted “brownie points” from the left and be accepted as worthy of life.

  4. Michael Alan Weiner may be one of those individuals that will philosophize social and political issues, not because of the rightness or wrongness of either, but because it results in a better bottom $line$.

  5. Come Judgment Day, one tin soldier will ride away, but until then, don’t look for law and order.
    Truth, Justice, and the American Way – sorry, Superman, but I don’t think so.

  6. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/09/fbi-agent-uncovered-weiner-laptop-hillarys-emails-says-fbi-leadership-told-erase-findings/?ff_source=Email&ff_medium=the-gateway-pundit&ff_campaign=dailypm&ff_content=daily

    It is BAD when national leaders commit crimes [Obama II+Hillary+Biden II].
    It is WORSE when government-citizens, corporate media and attorney-criminals cover-up those crimes [Pelosi+Savage+Hannity+Muellar].
    Yet, the WORST crime of them all is when government-citizens, courts and all law enforcement REFUSE TO PROSECUTE THOSE CRIMES [DOJ+FBI+Durham?+Congress]!

    The WORST crime, today, then, is guilty-knowledge oath-takers RELYING on RE-LYING to DCeive We the People via a hidden oath-takers’ unity of co-operative impunity and immunity.

  7. The “cause,” Richard, unfortunately is that PRACTICALLY EVERYBODY IS GUILTY! I’m talking about from the fake news media (FOX NEWS included) to our FBI, DOJ, and CIA, to Congress (Democrats and Republicans included), and to the US Supreme Court. America has been living a lie since 2008-09. The man calling himself “Barack Hussein Obama” stole our presidency and command of our armed forces twice. He claimed (and nearly everybody believed it) that he was our country’s first African American president. Actually, he is much more Arab American (44% Arab compared to 6% African, and 50% Caucasian). And, too, he was never a “real” (constitutionally eligible) president anyway! So, don’t let anyone try to tell you that we just began having a CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS. In fact, we have had an ongoing constitutional crisis since 2008-09, i.e. when PRACTICALLY EVERYBODY BECAME GUILTY!

    1. So a high percentage of the federal government and the media aware of a different meaning of “natural born Citizen,” but almost no one knows about this large group that does know?

      1. Between 2003 and 2008 there were eight bills introduced in the House, 7 by Democrats, to either remove “natural born Citizen” from Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 or define it to mean literally everything EXCEPT “born in the country to citizen parents of the country.” They all failed. That’s 435 high-level members of the Federal government who knew what it meant AND didn’t want to remove or change it.

        In 2008 the Senate unanimously approved a non-binding resolution (SR 511) declaring: “Whereas John Sidney McCain, III, was born to American citizens on an American military base in the Panama Canal Zone in 1936: Now, therefore, be it Resolved, That John Sidney McCain, III, is a “natural born Citizen” under Article II, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States.” That’s 100 more high-level members of the Federal government who knew what it meant AND applied it to the presidential nominee of the Republican Party. Interestingly they didn’t do the same to the presidential nominee of the Democrat Party.

  8. The courts aren’t interested. Politicians aren’t interested. Even the media isn’t interested.

    What’s the cause of this disinterest?

    1. The cause of the disinterest is non-feasance in office and disrespect of the U.S. Constitution on the part of scores,if not hundreds, of malfeasant corrupt government officials more interested in being paid off then enforcing the law.

      I had a similar problem when trying to call in the the Tom Bauerle-David Bellavia (Yes that guy) Show on WBEN radio in Buffalo. Bellavia had a “lithmus test” about whether or not I was a “Truther”. I said I had an open mind. He would’nt let me speak.

        1. The question should be who isn’t being paid off? Corruption is ubiquitous in our government. That is why it is referred to as “The Swamp”. TheBidens have been bribed. Soros iws in trouble for buying politicians. The Clintons are corrupt. Pelosi is a criminal. Obama paid off Iranians with taxpayer $$. Obama,Biden,both Bushes,both Clintons all preached New World Order. Everyone that finances these anti Nationalist cabalists make up “scores” of corrupt individuals. De Blasio is infusing $$. Kamala Harris herself raises $$ to pay the bail of anarchists. It’s rampant and unadulterated RICO activity.

    2. IMHO the cause of this disinterest can only be one of two things: a) Fear of the consequences of challenging the eligibility of the first ‘black’ president, and/or; b) Fear of being held accountable for having aided and abetted nothing short of treason.