If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!

THEN PLEASE EXPLAIN THE FOLLOWING THINGS

by Tom Arnold, ©2020

Obama speaks to reporters, April 27, 2011, about his “long-form” birth certificate released that morning but later found by experts to be a forgery

(Aug. 22, 2020) — Why has his so-called Hawaiian birth certificate been examined by forensic document experts and found to be, beyond any doubt, a pieced-together, photo-shopped, amateurish forgery?  Couldn’t you, John Brennan, have done better!

Why was there no hospital or birthing center in Hawaii which credited itself with being “Obama’s” location of birth (information obtained from Chief Elections Clerk, Honolulu, Timothy Adams, on or about 2010, who revealed that “Obama” was NOT born in Hawaii)?
Why did “Obama” have multiple Social Security Numbers throughout his lifetime, including one which belonged to a dead man which he, “Obama,” used while president in 2010 to file his 2009 federal income tax return with the IRS?  Isn’t that against the law, i.e., the crime of Identity Theft?
Why was “Obama’s” Selective Service Registration Form (draft card) forged and backdated to make it appear that he was in compliance with Selective Service filing regulations, when in fact he was not?  Did you know that anyone who has committed this offense, forgery of this particular official government document, is prohibited by law from ever becoming commander-in-chief (president)?  Wanna bet?  Just ask John Brennan how he and “Obama,” possibly conspiring with the Chicago Draft Board, did it!
Why did “Obama’s” bio, published by Acton & Dystel in 1991 and undisputed for over sixteen years until 2007 when he (with his handlers) decided the time was right for him to run for president, say that he, “Obama,” was born in Kenya?  Does anyone think for a minute that “Obama” forgot, for all those years, to proofread his own bio!  In fact, don’t you suppose that “Obama” himself wrote the bio, or at least provided the personal information in it to the publisher?  And, by the way, does this make “Obama” the original “birther?”  If not, was it Hillary “What Difference Does It Make” Clinton, “Obama’s” Democrat opponent in the 2007 primaries for nomination to be the party’s presidential candidate, who stated publicly that “Obama” was born in a foreign country and constitutionally ineligible?  Clinton was defeated in the primaries, and later was rewarded by appointment to be Secretary of State.
Why in 2007 did then-Speaker of the House and DNCC Chairperson Nancy “Too Wealthy To Be Held Accountable” Pelosi submit extralegal Certificates of Nomination to the various Secretaries of State for placement of the Democrat nominee, “Barack Hussein Obama,” on their states’ general election ballots?  Pelosi omitted the usual and required language that the nominee meets all constitutional qualifications for the presidency (which she knew “Obama” did not, because he was not a natural born American citizen).
The Theory is Now a Conspiracy And Facts Don’t Lie
Why did “Obama” claim that he completed the last two years of his undergraduate work at Columbia University in New York when in fact he was attending Patrice Lumumba University in Moscow, Russia?  Wasn’t he a CIA operative being sponsored and financed by the Central Intelligence Agency to attend Patrice Lumumba University as part of them grooming him for the American presidency?
What earthly business is it of the CIA to choose and train someone (especially someone who has foreign allegiances and world views in opposition to ours) who they think should be president?  This is contrary to, and may be unlawful or unconstitutional because of, the CIA’s stated mission to gather intelligence on possible foreign adversaries, not to dabble in American politics or produce Manchurian Candidates!  These days and looking back on the history of our country, nothing that the CIA (or for that matter the FBI) does surprises me.
First trial of “Obama” by citizens.  How did he get away with it?
Second citizens grand jury.  Is it true that “no one is above the law?”
One last question, and it may be one of the most important questions for you to think about.  Did you know that in addition to the fact that “Obama” was not a constitutionally qualified, or “real,” president, he also was much more Arab-American (44% ethnically) than African-American (50% white, 6% black African)?  Could it be that the widely-held misconception of “Obama” being our first “black” or “African American” president is responsible for much of the divisiveness, racism, and violence occurring today in our country?  Unfortunately, I believe it is.
And, now, just four years later, there is another constitutionally ineligible candidate (Senator Kamala Harris), this time running for vice president but only a heartbeat away from becoming president! I ask you, and especially ask Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts (assuming he might be interested!), CAN ANYONE IN THE WORLD FROM ANY FOREIGN COUNTRY WITH PARENTS WHO, ONE OR BOTH, WERE NOT UNITED STATES CITIZENS AT THE TIME OF THE BIRTH OF THEIR CHILD, AND INCLUDING THAT THE CANDIDATE MAY HAVE ALLEGIANCES TO OTHER COUNTRIES, PHILOSOPHIES, AND WORLD VIEWS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THOSE OF OUR COUNTRY, BECOME VICE PRESIDENT OR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?

Join the Conversation

33 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Hillary’s “at this point” will also probably ( sarcasm ) be about the time hell freezes over. If Jesus doesn’t come back soon, I am going to go get Him.

  2. Our mutual perseverance, no! Our obsession with pursuing this issue surprises even me sometimes ! Our government is hopelessly corrupt,and in my belief beyond redemption. For years our government politicians, both local and federal have used and abused our governments for their own self interests, their own enrichment, the people be damned. Now, we are all supposed to sit back, relax and accept another illegitimate President?! And, why not? They got away with it before, barring a miracle they will get away with it again! Two questions haunt me incessantly. First, when, if ever, will Trump drop the nuclear bomb about Obama’s fraudulent birth certificate and selective service registration right on that criminals head? When he does he will permanently destroy Obama and all of his accomplices (too numerous to list right now). He has this weapon! What or who is holding him back? Has he been threatened? Has his family and friends been threatened? Their is no doubt in my mind that they have been threatened. Nothing is beneath these criminals, even murder (remember Seth Rich, remember Linda Fuddy, remember…)!
    Secondly: when is the American public going to rise up and “throw off the yoke of tyranny” of these governments? These governments are beyond salvation, they can only be removed and replaced! I hope I live to it! Enough is enough!

    1. “Their is no doubt in my mind that they [Trumps] have been threatened.”

      So the Trumps have been threatened not to talk about Obama’s birth certificate but not threatened to do anything else the deep state wanted.

      How about this – Trump never believed in the birth certificate stuff and used it to get votes.

  3. The Democrats and Republican politicians sold us out a long time back. I hope to see those who have been screaming in our face, “No one is above the law” eat those words….while being perp walked for their ride to Gitmo….or the Gallows.

  4. Sheriff Arpaio and Attorney Mike Zullo provided indisputable facts as evidence that Obama was and is a fraud, but they were shortstopped by one judge on the lame excuse that they did not have “standing” in his hallowed court.

  5. Laity v Harris is proceeding in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. See Case # 20-7109. To be heard by a panel of three U.S. Circuit Judges. An “Emergency Motion for Expeditious Consideration” was filed by me on 11/23/2020.

    1. Does he have a middle name? I think his name Barry Soetoro, And when did he become a naturalized citizen of the USA after becoming a naturalized citizen of Indonesia?

      1. As the article’s title indicates, Barack Obama’s middle name is Hussein.

        There’s no evidence that he ever legally changed his name to anything else.

        There’s no evidence that Obama ever acquired Indonesian citizenship, so he was a natural-born citizen of the United States since the time of his birth in Hawaii.

        1. Barack Obama actually needs to prove is even a citizen of this country. The constitution requires a natural-born citizen to qualify for president. The definition of a natural-born citizen can be found in The Law Of Nations in section 212 that says simply this is where Obama’s fraudulent narrative fails. (The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.)

          Obama’s fake narrative starts out with an alien dad from Kenya who had an existing wife there. Then adding inslult to injury, the bad forgery process said his mom was 18 at the date of his birth. What the forger didn’t know is there is an age requirement mom didn’t meet to pass her US citizenship if she was even his birth mom. That age requirement was 19. Obama isn’t even a citizen let alone a natural-born citizen and hundreds of thousands of Americans who wailed about this, sending letters, faxes, documents, phone calls, lawsuits were ignored by the corrupt United States Government, the corrupt biased judicial system, their elected representatives and the biased media.

  6. I’m not used to seeing so much BS on this website.
    Just quick and off the top of my head:
    1. FALSE. In fact I have seen the evidence with my own eyes.
    2. N/A
    3. FALSE. In 2009, Private Investigator Susan Daniels discovered that Barack Hussein Obama has been using a Social Security number with a prefix indicating that it was issued in the state of Connecticut. Daniels has reported that the first usage of the Social Security number she could find was in 1986, after Obama allegedly had graduated from Columbia University and was working as a community organizer in Chicago.
    4. FALSE
    5. So what? Are we supposed to believe her/him? I don’t.
    6. Clinton certainly implied that Obama had foreign influences.
    7. FALSE. There is plenty of information dealing with this election fraud.
    8. Never heard that one. New talking point? Did you throw that in there just for fun?
    9. FALSE.Actually there is a book (by Wayne Madsen) that deals specifically with this possibility.*
    I would like to see a thorough investigation however.
    10. What does that mean? Explain.
    11. FALSE.
    12. FALSE. A big fat LIE.

    I agree with Mr. Carter, you should keep your mouth shut, when you obviously don’t know what you are talking about. You are lucky that Sharon allowed you to post your Obot talking points.

    *The book (The Manufacturing of a President) covers Barack H. Obama’s rapid rise in American politics and the role that the CIA played in propelling him into the White House. Research is based on formerly classified CIA and State Department files, personal interviews, and international investigations. Obama’s birth certificate has never been the issue. The real issue, which affects his eligibility to serve as President of the United States, is his past and likely current Indonesian citizenship. The reader will be taken through the labyrinth of covert CIA operations in Africa, Southeast Asia, South Asia, and other regions. The real history of President Obama, his family, and the CIA quickly emerges as the reader wades into the murky waters of America’s covert foreign operations.

      1. 1. As no expert examined Obama’s birth certificate, you cannot have seen any evidence.

        2. HIPAA is applicable because it prevents hospitals from identifying their patients.

        3. States don’t issue Social Security Numbers.

        4. The Selective Service System did say Obama was duly registered, your denial notwithstanding.

        5. There is no logical reason not the believe the literary agent’s acceptance for the mistake.

        6. Even if true, Clinton never said that Obama was foreign born or ineligible.

        7. The DNC certificates were duly accepted, your denial notwithstanding.

        8. You would have ask Tom Arnold why he believes Obama went to college in Russia, despite there being no evidence to support that belief.

        9. Wayne Madsen’s speculation is not evidence that Obama was a CIA operative.

        10. The “citizen grand juries” don’t have the legal authority to do anything, so there was no consequence for Obama’s ignoring them (assuming that he was even aware of them).

        11. There is no evidence Obama was of Arab ancestry, your denial notwithstanding.

        12. Every judge who heard an eligibility challenge on the merits did rule that birth in the United States confers natural-born citizenship; for example, Ankeny v. Governor of State of Indiana, 929 N.E.2d 789 (2010).

        13. There is no evidence that Obama ever had Indonesian citizenship.

        14. “Obot” isn’t a real word.

      2. Gotcha! I attended all of the Sheriff Arpaio press conferences in Phoenix where the evidence was provided. I didn’t see you there! There were power-point presentations explaining everything. The Dec. 15, 2016 press conference actually identified the Hawaiian birth certificate that was used for the Obama forgery and showed visually how it was pieced together. One of the forensic reports by Mara Zebest, I have personally seen the report and met with her. I have not personally seen the two reports from Italy and Hawaii respectfully, but am aware of their summary. I have also seen expert evaluations, in person by Lord Monckton re: the birth certificate and presentations detailing the forgery of the selective service registration. As to the stolen SSN, Susan Daniels has provided all her research on the internet and her court affidavit is also available for the intellectually curious. So there! Stop making up stuff.

        1. “The Dec. 15, 2016 press conference actually identified the Hawaiian birth certificate that was used for the Obama forgery”

          Doesn’t the Ah’Nee certificate contradict one of the key findings from the July, 2012 press conference?

          She was born two weeks after Obama and the Nordykes yet has a much lower certificate number than them.

        2. Neither Joe Arpaio nor Mara Zebest are forensic document experts, and neither ever examined Obama’s birth certificate.

          Christopher Monckton also is not a forensic document expert, and he also did not examine Obama’s birth certificate.

          Notwithstanding any unsubstantiated claims of forgey, the Selective Service System said Obama was duly registered.

          Susan Daniels, who lost her lawsuit, relied on a database that disclaims the accuracy of its contents.

        3. “One of the forensic reports by Mara Zebest, I have personally seen the report and met with her”

          Didn’t her report say that the layers in the PDF could only be caused by human manipulation?

          Didn’t they say at the 12/2016 press conference that a Xerox copier could also make those layers?

      3. Gotcha! I attended all of the Sheriff Araio/Zullo press conferences. In fact the Dec. 15, 2016 presser showed in detail the Hawaiian birth certificate used for the Obama forgery and a power-point presentation methodically demonstrated how the forgery was made. In addition the selective service registration forgery was addressed. I have also met Mara Zebest and read her expert forensic analysis of the fraudulent Obama birth certificate. I have not personally seen the latest forensic reports out of Hawaii and Italy, but attended the press conferences which summarized their findings. You need to get busy and do your own research instead of drinking the Obot kool-aid and regurgitating their leftist propaganda.

    1. Mr. Wilmott,

      Thanks for the kudo.

      I actually began doing what you did…refute Mr. Brown’s list item by item…but decided his BS wasn’t worth my time.

  7. Mr Brown- Did you click on the “links” and read ALL of the material contained in them? Personally, I am convinced that everything I’ve said in my article is true. And, even if only a fraction of it is, then Soetoro should be up on charges! You’re welcome, Tom Arnold. By the way, are you really surprised that there is “no evidence” (or, only a small amount) left of any of this!

    1. Yes.

      That you have convinced yourself is unsurprising. That you have not convinced many others also is unsurprising.

      As none of it is true, Obama has not been brought up on any charges. And there’s no indication he ever will be.

      I’m not surprised that there’s no evidence to support your beliefs.

  8. Yes, suspect the CIA; but, don’t forget about the full complicit US Senate.

    The full US Senator chamber of the 110th Congress (2008) assisted in foisting the undocumented alien, Barack HUSSEIN Obama, into the White House when they passed the bogus and slight-of-hand Senate Resolution (SR) 511 that stated that US Senator John McCain was a natural born Citizen based-upon a Naturalization Act (1790) that was repealed, along with rewording of the resolution’s original wording.

    Yes, McCain had a hand in this deception by unconstitutionally running for the POTUS in 2008, but recused himself from voting to SR 511 in order to give the appearance of being impartial.

    1. A Senate Resolution isn’t legally binding. SR 511 had exactly one purpose: to express the sentiment of the Senate that McCain was a natural-born citizen.

      1. 1. The sentiment the Democrat majority Senate expressed was that McCain was a natural born citizen specifically because he was born to U.S. citizen parents.

        2. There is no evidence the Democrat Senate even considered whether Obama also was a natural born citizen, much less expressed the sentiment that he was.

        3. Why one and not the other?

      2. I can see why you were easily confused about Senate Resolution 511. I should take the time to better edit my comments. Permit me to correct my second paragraph, then maybe you will understand.
        Corrected to: The full US Senator chamber of the 110th Congress (2008) assisted in foisting the undocumented alien, Barack HUSSEIN Obama, into the White House when they passed the bogus and slight-of-hand Senate Resolution (SR) 511. The 100 UniParty US Senators spent the time and energy to focus on McCain’s presidential eligibility – which he isn’t – to distract from aka Obama’s own presidential ineligibility. As cited from the repealed Naturalization Act (1790): “And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: ……”. Key phrase “the children of citizens” and the key word “considered”. aka Obama should have been scrutinized and vetted as an ineligible candidate for the POTUS at this time, too.

        (Extra comments).

        One hundred U.S. Senators definitely misled the electorate in 2008. Among other things, they did not consider telling the electorate that the first Naturalization Act (1790) was effectively nullified by the following corrective text found in the follow-on Naturalization Act (1795) that repealed the 1790 Act. The Naturalization Act (1795) now stated: [Excerpt] “…… and the children of citizens of the United States, born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of the United States:….” Naturalization Act (1795) further stated: [Excerpt] “SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That the Act intituled, “An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization,” passed the twenty-sixth day of March, one thousand seven hundred and ninety, be, and the same is hereby repealed.”

        So you understand, McCain was just “considered” a statutory US citizen, but, as far as aka Obama goes, his real nativity papers and background documentation are missing in action.

        1. The Naturalization Acts of 1790 and 1795 applied only to those born outside of the United States.

          Obama’s birth certificate, which was first released in 2008, shows that he was in Hawaii, which is part of the United States.

  9. 1. There’s no evidence that any experts examined Obama’s birth certificate.

    2. HIPAA.

    3. There’s no evidence Obama ever used multiple Social Security Numbers.

    4. The Selective Service System said Obama duly registered.

    5. Obama’s literary agent said she made the mistake.

    6. Clinton never said that Obama was foreign born or ineligible.

    7. The DNC’s nomination certificates were legal and duly accepted.

    8. There’s no evidence Obama attended college in Russia.

    9. There’s no evidence Obama was a CIA operative.

    10. “Citizen grand juries” have no legal authority.

    11. There’s no evidence that Obama was of Arab ancestry.

    12. Every judge who heard an eligibility challenge on the merits ruled that birth in the United States confers natural-born citizenship.

    You’re welcome.

    1. “It is wiser to say nothing and let others wonder if you are a fool than to say something and remove all doubt.” — Unknown.

      You’re welcome.