If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!

“THE CONFLICT WOULD BE MONUMENTAL”

by Alan Korwin, Gunlaws.com, ©2020

(Aug. 9, 2020) — REMEMBER:  Kamala Harris is not eligible to become President of the United States.  Neither of her parents were American citizens at the time of her birth. It’s like offering the children of any other foreigners as candidates. It is forbidden, banned, not allowed by the U.S. Constitution, which spells out the requirements.

A candidate, a valid candidate, must be a “natural born Citizen” per article Art. II, Sec. 1, cl. 5 of the U.S. Constitution: “No person, except a natural born Citizen,” shall be eligible to the Office of President. This is not about any past mistakes, or modern arguments — of which there are many. It is about The U.S. Constitution and the rule of law. Kamala Harris is ineligible.

What Congress relied upon in drafting that section —

Law of Nations, Book I, Ch. XIX, at § 212:

  • 212: The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens.

John Jay (first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court) wrote to George Washington:

July 25, 1787

“Permit me to hint, whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expresly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”

Modern media pundits and others are attempting to confuse the issue, but the reality and logic is plain and inescapable: only a 100% American can be President. How foreign is too foreign? Any. (Her mother was from India, her father was Jamaican, neither had been in the U.S. long enough (five years) to have become naturalized at the time of her birth.) Sorry, those are the facts. She may be nice, talented, experienced, she isn’t qualified.

What would happen if our country got into a disagreement with a nation that was the homeland of a President with foreign roots, parents from elsewhere? Where would the person’s loyalty reside? Who would that person side with? Would the person have undivided loyalty to this country? Of course not — the conflict would be monumental. India has nuclear weapons. Jamaica is close to our shores. Both have alliances with other nations, some less than friendly with us, and complex financial relationships, supply chains, citizens here. The Founding Fathers recognized the problem those foreign entanglements would cause. That split loyalty is why our Constitution requires the U.S. President must be 100% American.

Details, if you want more:

https://www.gunlaws.com/Should We Elect An American President.htm

https://tinyurl.com/y4edrdx9

Coming as soon as I can:

Joe Biden’s bill to require testing you personally, and then restrict or remove your access to your own guns, or any new ones, already written and introduced in the House and Senate, described in plain English. Here’s a quote, the first line:

“It shall be unlawful for any individual who is not licensed under this section to knowingly purchase, acquire, or possess a firearm or ammunition.”

Bureaucrats will be granted power to decide if you are of “sound mind and character” (not defined) before you can keep your own guns, or get new ones, and “any other requirements the State determines relevant” to “make a determination of suitability” to keep the guns you already own, or get new ones. I know, I know, it’s beyond outrageous. Mess media has kept it a secret, Republicans haven’t done much better, but at least they didn’t write the thing.

Thank you for your patience.

Alan Korwin, The Uninvited Ombudsman
Author of 14 books, 10 on gun law
Three more underway, including the blockbuster,
Why Science May Be Worng

While you’re waiting — Manhattan has been boarded up; mass media has been keeping this hidden; it is so far beyond “demonstrations” or peaceful there are no words for it. Look for yourself:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dn8JOrNFFxk

Alan Korwin, Publisher
Bloomfield Press
“We publish the gun laws.”
4848 E. Cactus, #505-440
Scottsdale, AZ 85254
602-996-4020 Phone
602-494-0679 Fax
1-800-707-4020 Orders
http://www.gunlaws.com
alan@gunlaws.com

Join the Conversation

17 Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. We all have been finding out that the entire process has been corrupted. They never vetted Obama either. He was also not qualified but that did not stop them. The swamp creatures will resist draining of their swamp and put anyone in power they can control and manipulate to do their will, like Harris, Biden, Obama and Clintons. The Marxist know this is their last chance to take over the country so are doing all they can to make it happen.

    1. Yes indeed Steve. They believe it is now or never for what they’ve been trying to achieve in the USA for generations. The key institutions have been infiltrated and controlled by the far left organic intellectuals and permanent persuaders under the Marxist plan which Gramsican’s gradualists call “The Long March Through the Institutions.” They’ve been at it for generations for the last 100 years and are at the apex of their hegemony in the institutions and thus control virtually all of our national institutions. If Trump had not won the election they would have come forward and out of the woodwork and totally taken over under Clinton and moved the nation to a Socialist one, which to the Communists is just one more step towards Communism, which they believe is a Utopian form of government. See: Gramsci, Alinsky & the Left: https://themarketswork.com/2017/02/11/gramsci-alinsky-the-left/ If Trump wins re-election they will be set back for at least a generation.

      CDR Kerchner (Ret) — http://www.ProtectOurLiberty.org

    2. So corrupt has the entire process been with regard to Barack Hussein Obama that, even though the Democrat Party of Hawaii did not certify him eligible “under the provisions of the United States Constitution” AND even though the Senate vetted his opponent but not him, he was elected and re-elected POTUS.

      1. And, fear of Donald Trump the “birther” revealing and acting on the many complicit in the Obama fraud and the massive corruption it enabled are super panicked they might not be able to prevent a second term for President Trump. While there was and is massive criminality within the federal government…nothing is bigger than being complicit in effectively giving America’s government and her military to the enemy and its still on-going cover-up. Hillary, the planned and promised in 2008 after Obama cover just had to win and when she did not the many complicit begin trying to remove President Trump from office to protect number one……themselves…
        IMO this is not complicated…just so far too big to prosecute and even too big to openly and fairly discuss. If America’s Constitutional Republic is going to survive that must change……and time is running out……

  2. I read something similar early in her acceptance of running as VP. I wondered then, AND still am wondering HOW DID THIS HAPPEN, AND WHO LET IT HAPPEN. The CONSTITUTION is the constitution, but it only applies to the to some. barry’s leadership was a joke from the get go. He RENAMED officials in his den czars (what), he REFUSED to prove his birth and records, No body ever when to school with him, or any classes. He snubbed his nose at this country, and still to this day is still snubbing. He has manipulated biden to break all the rules, knowing NO ONE WOULD CHALLENGE WHATEVER THEY TRIED TO DO. THIS NONSENSE SHOULD BE STOPPED BEFORE NOVEMBER 1. I FOR ONE WOULD OPENLY CHALLENGE HER LEGALITY AND HAVE THE CONSTITUTION AS MY FACT FINDER, TRUTH EXAMINER OR WHATEVER OTHER NAME YOU WANT TO CALL IT. And I would like to see what her father (and deceased Mother) thinks about calling herself African American, I guess she gives no respect to her natural heritage. I read her father isn’t the happiest camper in the camp with her.

  3. In addition to NOT being constitutionally eligible as Joe Biden’s running mate VP pick (which, if the ticket is elected, would virtually guarantee Harris the presidency well inside of four years), she is NOT AFRICAN AMERICAN. News Media and others- stop labeling her “African American!”

    https://www.newsweek.com/why-kamala-harris-afro-asian-identity-matters-opinion-1516607

    https://www.thenationalpulse.com/editor/kamala-harris-isnt-african-american/

  4. In addition to NOT being constitutionally eligible to run as Biden’s VP running mate (practically guaranteeing future presidency), Kamala Harris is not “African American.” She is an Asian Jamaican American. Of course, all this presumes a Democrat victory in November, which, thankfully, I doubt is going to happen.

    https://www.newsweek.com/why-kamala-harris-afro-asian-identity-matters-opinion-1516607

    https://www.thenationalpulse.com/editor/kamala-harris-isnt-african-american/

    .

    1. He is way off base and is incorrect. After 12 years of research on the subject I can state that an NBC IS one born in the US to parents who are BOTH US Citizens themselves. BTW, the 1790 law that “considered” persons born overseas to US Parents was REPEALED in 1795. Volokh gets an “F-“.

    2. As Robert Christopher Laity already pointed out, the Immigration and Naturalization Act 0f 1790 (which contained the verbiage “natural born citizen”), which Eugene Volokh cited as a basis for his opinion that Kamala Harris is a natural born citizen, was REPEALED (and REPLACED) by the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1795 (which replaced the former’s verbiage “natural born citizen” with the word “citizen”).

      It would therefore appear that Eugene Volokh’s opinion as a constitutional law professor is not worth a grain of salt and, therefore, that Kamala Harris is indeed not a natural born citizen.

  5. John Jay was our nation’s FIRST Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court. HE UNDERSTOOD “Natural Born Citizen” to be one born IN the U.S. to parents who are both U.S. Citizens themselves. That’s enough for me. I KNOW that this IS precisely what an NBC is. So do people with common sense and honesty. The U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed this definition a half dozen times. “We the People” of the United States MUST NOW insist and DEMAND that the Constitution be adhered to. Whether people want to admit it or not, the definition of NBC is one born in a country to parents who are both citizens of said country.

  6. Problem is, the cotton-pikkkin’ deep state, who are actually running this country, are threatening/and or paying off ALL OF THE PEOPLE who can do anything about all this maggot infested evilness. And this same deep state have millionaires, billionaires and lucifer infested killers on their team…I’m sorry I meant “in their tribal gang!”

  7. Senator Kamala Harris was born a dual-Citizen of Jamaica and the U.S. She has divided loyalties and required allegiances and foreign influence on her due to her birth to non-U.S. citizen parents. She does not have sole allegiance and unity of citizenship at birth to the USA, and only the USA, which is the characteristic of a “natural born Citizen” of the United States. She is absolutely not constitutionally eligible (per the 12th Amendment to the Constitution) to serve as Vice President. Nor is she constitutionally eligible to serve in the future as the President and Commander in Chief of our Military. She is not constitutionally eligible to be a heart beat away from the Presidency. For more see: https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/2020/07/23/u-s-senator-kamala-harris-is-not-a-natural-born-citizen-of-usa-not-eligible-to-be-president-and-cinc-or-vp/ CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret) — http://www.ProtectOurLiberty.org

  8. If Biden selects wanna-be-black Kamala Harris (or any other constitutionally ineligible running mate), LET HIM HAVE IT! Figuratively, of course.
    Also, if that happens, some one or a group of us (concerned patriots) must REKINDLE the “OBAMA” matter. REIGNITE the controversy, which actually isn’t controversial at all, because it is a FACT.
    Our federal government has allowed our founding fathers’ miraculous writings unparalleled in “modern” history to be TRASHED. Courtesy primarily of Chief “Justice” John Roberts. As I’ve always said- CAN ANYONE FROM ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD, HAVING ANY PARENTS ONE OR BOTH OF WHO ARE FOREIGN CITIZENS, AND ANY WORLD VIEWS, PHILOSOPHIES, ALLEGIANCES OF THE CANDIDATE TO COUNTRIES NOT OUR OWN BE PERMITTED TO RUN FOR AND/OR ACTUALLY BE ELECTED PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA? It has already happened once recently (“Obama”), and look what it has done and is continuing to do to our society and constitutional democratic republic!
    One more thing that is EXTREMELY TROUBLING TO ME AND OUGHT TO BE TO ALL OTHER CONCERNED AMERICAN CITIZENS- how did OUR OWN CIA connect with a dope-smoking, homosexual, fellatio-loving, Arab American Muslim pretending to be black PUNK, and then educate and groom him unlawfully and unconstitutionally into a paperless (undocumented) U.S. president? CAN YOU SAY “JOHN BRENNAN” and “DEEP STATE!” And, “NANCY PELOSI?”
    What’s John Durham USDOJ going to come up with? He’s either going to look the other way when it comes to the “Obama” administration crimes, or he might just surprise us and actually hold people accountable regardless of who they are (no one is above the law?) and, in the process, help save the United States of America.