DOES A “REAL, HONEST DEBATE” EMBRACE ANARCHISTS?
by Tom Arnold, ©2020
(Jul. 24, 2020) — Juan Williams- I’ve always thought that you were a pretty sincere liberal gentleman and a person who could intelligently interact, and make some points, with your mostly conservative colleagues on “The Five.”
Then, on July 23rd I turned on the television, and the first thing I see and hear is you saying that our country needs a “real honest debate.”
So, Mr. Williams, exactly who do you think might be the “real honest” debaters? Are you thinking that they would be the racist BLM, ANTIFA, and/or other rioters and anarchists pretending to protest the killing of George Floyd and other blacks at the hands of police? Or Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer, and other hopelessly partisan individuals.
Come on, Juan, these people are NOT “honest,” and they certainly are not capable of participating in a constructive or “real honest” debate!
I ask you, Juan, DEBATE ABOUT WHAT! That slavery was wrong? That police and other law enforcement authorities are racist? That America does not have, or want to have, a diverse citizenry and society? That “reparations,” God forbid, should be made (for what, may I ask, that have not already been addressed and resolved)?
One last time, Juan, I am going to tell you that our current constitutional and societal crisis began in 2007-08 (if not earlier). That was when our presidency and command of our armed forces was STOLEN by a constitutionally ineligible impostor, “BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.” I suppose that you, Juan Williams, “know better” than the language of our founding fathers in our U.S. Constitution? Must I remind you that it says that only NATURAL BORN AMERICAN CITIZENS (Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5) are qualified to be president and commander-in-chief of our armed forces?
SO MUCH FOR ANY “REAL HONEST DEBATE.” Our constitution is our constitution, and this extraordinary one-of-a-kind document has been adhered to and honored for nearly two and one-half centuries.
COME ON, MAN!