Former Law-Enforcement Officer Calls Out All Who Failed to Investigate Obama’s History

TO: ALL THE PRETEND PATRIOTS, THE ETHICALLY CHALLENGED POLITICIANS, AND THE PHONY JOURNALISTS WHO DID NOT, AND STILL DO NOT, HAVE THE PROFESSIONALISM AND COURAGE TO TELL US, THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, WHAT IS REALLY WRONG WITH OUR COUNTRY, AND HAS BEEN WRONG NOW FOR MORE THAN AN DECADE.

by Tom Arnold, ©2020

(Apr. 18, 2020) — [Editor’s Note:  The following was sent on Saturday evening to Fox News commentators and reporters Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, John Roberts, and Bret Baier; radio host Rush Limbaugh; multiple mainstream media outlets, the Justice Department inspector general; several members of Congress and a handful of private individuals.]

It’s the ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM.  It’s the OPEN SECRET everyone knows in Washington DC but won’t talk about.  It’s the GREATEST AND MOST DANGEROUS THREAT TO OUR COUNTRY’S NATIONAL SECURITY ever in history.  It’s TREASON!  In fact, I can’t conceive of anything more treasonous!

What does STEALING THE PRESIDENCY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND COMMAND OF OUR UNSUSPECTING AND VULNERABLE MEN AND WOMEN IN THE ARMED FORCES sound like to you?  It occurred in 2008 and again in 2012.  The effects from it are still afflicting us and will continue to do so or become even worse.  There’s only one thing standing between this treasonous onslaught and the survival of our constitutional democratic republic, and, whether you believe it or not or like it or not, that one thing is our current president DONALD J TRUMP.  What am I talking about?  In a word or two, it is-

“BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.”

Let’s just cut to the chase.  “Obama” (or whatever his true name and origin is) was first elected by fraud in 2008 (i.e. stole the presidency).  The DNC and then Secretary of State Nancy Pelosi FALSIFIED “OBAMA’S” CERTIFICATION OF CANDIDACY by omitting the customary/required phrase “constitutionally qualified” from the referral of their Democrat candidate to the various states’ for placement on those states’ general election ballots.  “Obama,” it is noted, and the DNC knew it, too, was NOT BORN IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

!n 2012, “Obama” was re-elected, despite the continuing controversy regarding his PLACE OF BIRTH.  And, yet another controversy, BENGHAZI, had just taken place.  In this writer’s opinion (a military veteran and a retired law enforcement officer), “Obama’s” actions (INACTIONS) on Benghazi constituted CRIMINALLY NEGLIGENT MANSLAUGHTER.  As it turned out, though, no such finding was forthcoming (and, practically no other finding of any consequence was reached by the House Benghazi Committee).

For the record, in the year 2013 in Ocala, Florida, a Citizens’ Grand Jury was convened.  The Grand Jury found president “Obama,” in absentia, GUILTY OF TWO COUNTS (one State and one Federal) of ELECTION FRAUD BY USE OF A FORGED “BIRTH CERTIFICATE” CLAIMING FALSELY THAT HE WAS BORN IN THE UNITED STATES (Hawaii).  “Obama” was sentenced by the Grand Jury to two five year prison terms, consecutive to each other, totaling TEN YEARS.

So, how did all of this, as I said at the beginning, create something “REALLY WRONG WITH OUR COUNTRY?”  As a preface to the below-listed concise but true observations and facts, allow me first to say that “Obama” and his handlers (the CIA, DNC, New World Order proponents, Communists, Saudis, et al) intend to TAKE OVER THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND RADICALLY CHANGE ITS PHILOSOPHY (constitution included), WORLD VIEW, AND INTERACTIONS BETWEEN THE GOVERNMENT AND ITS CITIZENS (victims).  So, disbelievers and pretenders to know differently, here goes-

“Barack Hussein Obama,” or whatever his real name, is-  UNDOCUMENTED (forged and stolen identification documents, such as a forged birth certificate, a forged military draft card, and numerous stolen Social Security Numbers, do not count!), FOREIGN-BORN (his 1991 bio, which remained intact and unchallenged for sixteen years until 2007, stated that he was the first KENYAN-born African American editor of the Harvard Law School review), COMMUNIST-MENTORED (Frank Marshall Davis, “Obama’s” own family, the CPUSA, Chicago Baptist Pastor Jeremiah Wright, and numerous others), SAUDI-INFLUENCED and FUNDED (paid his Harvard Law School tuition), GAY (lifetime member of Man’s Country in Chicago), TERRORIST-AFFILIATED (The Muslim Brotherhood, country of Iran, Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, et al), DRUG ABUSER, PHONY BLACK (ethnically 50% at most White, only 6% Black, whereas 44% Arab), ARAB-AMERICAN, MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE (ask former CIA Director John Brennan about this), SERIAL CRIMINAL, CONSTITUTIONALLY INELIGIBLE (Article 2, Section 1, Phrase 5), USURPER OF THE PRESIDENCY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND COMMAND OF OUR ARMED FORCES.

All of this, whether you like to hear it or not, is the reason that our country is in such bad straits today and possibly for the foreseeable future.  So, the question needs to be asked-  WHERE WERE YOU, SEAN HANNITY, GLENN BECK, RUSH LIMBAUGH, AND OTHERS, WHEN ALL OF THIS BEGAN?  AND, NOW, AFTER AIMLESSLY DIDDLING AROUND FOR MORE THAN A DECADE, WHY ARE YOU STILL CLUELESS (or pretending to be)?

32 Responses to "Former Law-Enforcement Officer Calls Out All Who Failed to Investigate Obama’s History"

  1. Charles   Sunday, July 5, 2020 at 6:05 PM

    We The People can only hope after Nov 3, 2020 President Donald J. Trump is US President for Four More Years . The liberal/socialist dems and MSM are going nuts and trying to make it look like Biden will win in November .

  2. Douglas Fredluss   Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 1:16 PM

    The person who presided over Klayman’s trial wasn’t a judge — just someone selected in some unspecified manner. And the verdict indicates convictions for both federal and state crimes. But only federal judges try federal criminal cases and only state judges try state criminal cases; no judge can try both.

    Perhaps Robert Laity can describe how his grand jury service was initiated. Did he receive a summons? An unsolicited email?

  3. Bob68   Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 12:54 PM

    James Carter,
    Thanks for your reply. I still use Bob68, but I’ll soon be 77. Not surprised you were already aware of Don Fredrick’s books and website. I too have followed the obvious fraud Barack Obama for many years. On election night in 2004 I remember watching the presidential election returns and while time was being filled by one of the networks they showed an “up and coming” Democrat politician giving part of the his speech at the Democrat National Convention that year. It was Barack Obama. I watched for a few moments, listened to his words and observed his speaking technique and thought, “That guy is going to be a real problem someday”. That was the understatement of my lifetime and I will never forget that prophetic moment.

    About today, there is still hope as long as Donald Trump remains President. That is something the many complicit in installing and covering for the usurper Barack Hussein Obama understand very well and it explains their non-stop efforts to remove President Trump from office. When the complicit media and the cowardly and complicit politicians, both parties, failed to stop Obama from being sworn-in as the putative president in 2009 they indeed became part of a crime “too big to fail”, and we have been watching proof of that since 2009. Hillary, the planned in 2008 after Obama cover president failed and Obama’s nemesis the “birther” Donald Trump was elected, unleashing massive criminal activity in all complicit in the crime of effectively giving America’s government and her military to the enemy. This activity had begun years before when it appeared Donald Trump might run for president, and it intensified as it looked possible he could win.

    None of this has ever been hard to follow or understand, but the “too big to fail” part is still holding……………..

  4. James Carter   Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 9:18 AM

    Bob68,

    I’ve been well aware of Don Frederick’s exhaustive documentation of Barack Hussein Obama’s life history from the get-go.

    Not only is Obama’s life history full of astronomical odds but it is also devoid of an “American” upbringing and full of relationships with America hating Communists, Marxists and Socialists.

    Any objective person who ever held even just an entry-level national security clearance would agree that the latter would have prevented them from being granted their security clearance.

    Thus far Obama has been the fraud/hoax too big to fall. After President Trump is re-elected perhaps he will effect same.

    BTW: I turned 77 a week ago yesterday. Come on up here, the weather’s just fine! :)

  5. Robert C Laity   Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 4:06 AM

    Corrected Link:

    The Revival of the Common Law Grand Jury. https://www.thepostemail.com/2014/04/01/the-revival-of-the-common-law-grand-jury/

  6. Robert C Laity   Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 3:55 AM

    “Can the Grand Jury regain it’s rightful Place?” https://www.thepostemail.com/2014/08/15/can-the-grand-jury-regain-its-rightful-place-pb

  7. Robert C Laity   Saturday, April 25, 2020 at 3:39 AM

    Doug, I served on the same Grand Jury that heard (2) cases regarding Barack Obama. Grand Jury members serve for a limited term, usually one year. Secondly, a Judge is the party upon which true bills against an individual are “Presented”. I am sure that Attorney Klayman did not select the Judge. Judges sit on courts in the districts wherein they also reside. When I applied to be a Judge years ago, I was told that I must move to the district wherein the court was situated. I declined to do so.

  8. Bob68   Friday, April 24, 2020 at 2:19 PM

    James Carter,
    Obama’s entire life history is full of astronomical odds. Some are discussed in these books by Don Fredrick:

    The Obama Timeline:
    https://www.amazon.com/Obama-Timeline-Birth-Through-Office/dp/1440150737

    And this one:

    Can it All be a Coincidence?
    https://www.amazon.com/Can-All-Coincidence-Associations-Characters/product-reviews/1481171720/ref=cm_cr_dp_d_show_all_btm?ie=UTF8&reviewerType=all_reviews

  9. Lew Harper   Friday, April 24, 2020 at 12:35 PM

    So I got around to reading the verdict in the Obama citizen grand jury trial.

    Apparently he was convicted of one federal crime and one Florida state crime.

    But as this did not take place in a federal court overseen by a federal judge, my guess is it is meaningless.

    As to the state count, Florida’s Constitution requires judges of its courts have to be elected and also members of the Florida bar.

    The signature of the Citizen Grand Jury Judge is Randle C. Fritz. A quick search of the Florida Bar directory does not list him.

    Again I’m guess that convict is also meaningless.

    FYI, in 2009 Leo Donofrio published his opinion on presentments and the 1946 FRCP. He only discusses it within the framework of the exist grand jury system rather than a citizen grand jury.

    http://freedom-school.com/law/federal-grand-jury.html

  10. James Carter   Friday, April 24, 2020 at 9:11 AM

    Douglas Fredluss posted: “Robert Laity said that he has twice served on citizen grand juries. He also said that grand juror selection must be random. It seems like the odds of the same person being twice randomly selected for citizen grand jury duty would be astronomical.”

    If the odds of the same person being twice randomly selected for citizen grand jury duty would be astronomical then the odds of the same person running for the Office of the President having anomalies in their “Certification Of Live Birth”, “Certificate of Birth”, birth announcement in both local newspapers, “Selective Service Registration Form”, Social Security Number, mother’s passport, Indonesian grade school registration form, “Official Certification Of Nomination”, etc., etc. would be beyond astronomical.

  11. Lew Harper   Thursday, April 23, 2020 at 3:42 PM

    “The process eroded to a point wherein only an officer of the court could initiate a Grand Jury hearing seeking an indictment.“

    Going back to United States v. Williams, 112 S. Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L. Ed. 2d 352 (1992), Justice Scalia mentions the “constituting court”.

    “It certainly would not permit judicial reshaping of the grand jury institution, substantially altering the traditional relationships between the prosecutor, the constituting court, and the grand jury itself.”

    “The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation”

    “Given the grand jury’s operational separateness from its constituting court”

    I can find no historical references to citizen grand juries or presentment working outside the normal judicial system. Do you have some?

    What was the court that constituted the citizen grand jury in Florida?

    “In the case I mentioned in Florida, Obama was convicted by a trial, presided over by a properly seated Judge.”

    Was the trial in a Florida state court?

    According to the Constitution it is up to Congress to create the Federal court system (“The judicial power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.”).

    Has Congress granted citizens the power to generate their own courts to try crimes against a Federal law? Or was Obama convicted of violating Florida state laws?

    FYI, Chief Justice Marshall’s decision in United States v. Hill, 26 F Cas. 315, 316 (C.C.D. Va. 1809) (No. 15,364) discusses grand jury presentment and indictments.

    https://tinyurl.com/y8vbks2p

    And the following law review article discusses the 1946 Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and grand jury presentments

    https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7541&context=ylj

  12. Douglas Fredluss   Thursday, April 23, 2020 at 1:44 PM

    Robert Laity said that he has twice served on citizen grand juries. He also said that grand juror selection must be random. It seems like the odds of the same person being twice randomly selected for citizen grand jury duty would be astronomical.

    Laity also said that the judge who presided over Obama’s trial in Florida was properly seated. Klayman in his article said the judge was picked from the community. Does Florida law allow the citizen grand jurors to pick their own judge?

  13. Robert C Laity   Thursday, April 23, 2020 at 8:00 AM

    Lew, As I said previously, prior to 1946 when the F.R.C.P. was written, a properly empanelede Grand Jury could, sua sponte, initiate a hearing to hear allegations of criminal activity against anyone in their jurisdictional venue. That authority was illegally taken away by errant rule makers of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure who said such hearings were “Obsolete”. The process eroded to a point wherein only an officer of the court could initiate a Grand Jury hearing seeking an indictment. That is NOT the way it is supposed to work. I agree that a Grand Jury does not convict. In the case I mentioned in Florida, Obama was convicted by a trial, presided over by a properly seated Judge. The steps included the sua sponte hearing, the true bill and the trial. The Constitution was followed. This is the same process that ensued when I was a Jurist in two previous Citizens Grand Juries. We heard evidence, we voted on the issue of indictment and then we provided our findings to the Court. The Fifth Amendment grants these powers to the Grand Jury. Citizens do NOT have to wait until a Judge or other officer of the court notifies that Grand Jury that they seek an indictment. A Grand Jury has the power to seek an indictment on anyone in it’s jurisdiction. The conjecture that a leftist Grand Jury might indict President Trump is not likely. A Grand Jury is empaneled under the laws of the State or in the case of a Federal Grand Jury, under federal law. Grand Jurists must take oaths, must be chosen at random and must follow strict guidelines in processing cases. My point was that the authority of a Grand Jury to issue an indictment on it’s own authority, not having to wait for a Judge or other officer of a court to do so, was unconstitutionally commandeered by errant rule makers of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. There has never been any amendment to repeal the 5th amendment. “No law, rule or regulation can serve to abrogate a right guaranteed by the Constitution”- Miranda v Arizona, USSCt.

  14. Lew Harper   Wednesday, April 22, 2020 at 2:11 PM

    “Here is an article about the Citizens Grand Jury belonging to the People and NOT to the Judiciary, Legislative OR Executive Branch.”

    Klayman cites United States v. Williams, 112 S. Ct. 1735, 504 U.S. 36, 118 L. Ed. 2d 352 (1992) for this but he ignores Justice Scalia’s statement, “It is axiomatic that the grand jury sits not to determine guilt or innocence, but to assess whether there is adequate basis for bringing a criminal charge.”

    Then how could the same citizen grand jury convict Obama?

    Also as Klayman describes the process there is nothing preventing a group of Californians from a liberal section of the state from forming a citizen grand jury and indicting and convicting Trump.

  15. Robert C Laity   Wednesday, April 22, 2020 at 10:28 AM

    Lew Harper, Here is an article about the Citizens Grand Jury belonging to the People and NOT to the Judiciary, Legislative OR Executive Branch. It also references a Citizens Grand Jury hearing against Obama IN Florida. https://www.newsmax.com/larryklayman/grand-jury-justice-mueller/2018/04/24/id/856407/

  16. scott e.   Tuesday, April 21, 2020 at 9:40 PM

    does anyone have a picture of the building where the special vault lives? the BC was hastily moved i recall. how are they going to protect whatever is in it ? it’s a slow chase, obama has authority to move it ? perhaps to a library near chicago. i want to talk to blogojevich… bet he’s got some stories. he took a bullet for that team.

  17. Lew Harper   Monday, April 20, 2020 at 11:48 AM

    “Presentment hearings could be and were used by the citizenry”

    This citizen grand jury thing is getting confusing. The Founders understanding of “presentment” would have been based on English law. Blackstone defined them as,

    “A presentment, properly speaking, is the notice taken by a grand jury of any offence from their own knowledge or observation, without any bill of indictment laid before them at the suit of the king”

    It would appear that a grand jury could report either a presentment or a bill of indictment as indicated in the Fifth Amendment.

    But how were these Grand Juries empaneled?

    According to the Judicial Act of 1789, “And jurors in all cases to serve in the courts of the United States shall be designated by lot or otherwise in each State respectively according to the mode of forming juries therein now practised, so far as the laws of the same shall render such designation practicable by the courts or marshals of the United States; and the jurors shall have the same qualifications as are requisite for jurors by the laws of the State of which they are citizens, to serve in the highest courts of law of such State”

    Are grand juries then selected based on the laws of the state?

    Under Florida law grand juries “consists of citizens of a specified number who have been summoned and empaneled by a judge of the circuit court (or by a judge appointed by the Florida Supreme Court, in the case of the statewide grand jury).”

    So how were jurors selected in Florida for the citizen grand jury?

    What prevents a bunch of Democrats from getting together and convening a citizen grand jury?

  18. ELmo   Monday, April 20, 2020 at 1:53 AM

    May God bless all of you who continue to stand for our country and our Constitution IN SPITE OF the indifference, and in some cases, the complicity of the press (including those mentioned in the article).

    I agree with Tom Arnold even though I think the ultimate blame needs to be laid at the feet of an unwatchful and uncaring American Public/Electorate (for the most part) who are losing cherished liberties that were dearly won at great sacrifice and that will be sorely missed by subsequent generations.
    Bless CDR Kerchner and all of you who have written and/or contributed in support of those who continue to fight.
    ELmo

  19. Robert C Laity   Monday, April 20, 2020 at 1:30 AM

    Lew Harper, In 1946 errant rule makers of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (F.R.C.P) erroneously concluded that Presentment hearings were “obsolete”. That is simply not the case.

    Prior to 1946, Presentments were in ubiquitous usage in the U.S. Presentment hearings could be and were used by the citizenry to remove corrupt Judges and public officials from office, upon indictment by a Grand Jury and subsequent conviction by a Court.

    A Presentment is a citizen’s empaneled deliberative group of “We the People”. which is without Judicial control of any kind. No Judges are involved. The “Presentment” is constitutionally authorized by the United States Constitution, in the 5th Amendment.

    I have been on two of these panels in the past. The Fifth Amendment states that:

    “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a PRESENTMENT or indictment of a Grand Jury”.

    In today’s society, the U.S. Attorney or District Attorney sends a case to the Grand Jury. The Grand Jury is controlled by that Attorney and is under Judicial influence. Because of the unconstitutional forced obsolescence of the “Presentment” the power of the people has been deprived by the Federal Courts for the last (74) years.

    The late, great Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Antonin Scalia recognized the right of the people to hold public officials accountable and confirmed the right of the people to conduct Citizen Grand Juries (Presentment hearings).

    It used to be,prior to 1946, that (2) types of these panels existed the totally citizen empaneled “Presentment” Jury and the Judicially empaneled Grand Jury.
    Too many Judges and corrupt politicians were being brought to misdeeds.

    “Are Citizens Grand Juries legal in Florida”. YES!!! They are constitutionally authorized in ALL U.S. States and territories. As I have stated in the past, they merely need be taken off the shelf, dusted off and used again. The U.S. Supreme Court backs this up.

    In Miranda v Arizona, USSCt, the Court said that “NO law, RULE, or regulation can serve to abrogate a right guaranteed by the Constitution”

  20. Robert C Laity   Monday, April 20, 2020 at 12:57 AM

    “Remember your Oath”-Dr. Rashid A. Buttar.

  21. Lew Harper   Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 7:37 PM

    Are Citizen Grand Juries legal in Florida?

    How can a grand jury try, convict and sentence someone? Aren’t they limited to issuing bills of indictment?

    However in Kansas the law states that citizens can petition for a grand jury and the person submitting the petition must be the first witness before the jury. And potential witnesses can petition the jury to give testimony.

    Seems like Kansas would have been the better place to go.

    http://www.kslegislature.org/li_2016/b2015_16/statute/022_000_0000_chapter/022_030_0000_article/022_030_0001_section/022_030_0001_k/

  22. thomas w arnold   Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 5:05 PM

    To Ron Teidel. Mr Teidel, I am unaware of any inaccuracies in my article (with the exception, which has been pointed out to me, of whether “Obama” was the editor, or the president, of the Harvard Law Review). If there are errors in my presentation, then I certainly should be corrected, and would not mind you or anyone else doing so.
    And, just for the record, please refer to the below scholarly, well-documented, and undisputed piece of what I like to call evidence by J B Williams (from September 2009).
    https://www.canadafreepress.com/2009/williams091209.htm

  23. Ron Teidel   Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 2:36 PM

    Good Grief, Of Course Barry Soetoro (aka @BarackObama ) Is A Proven Bonafide Fraud! The Evidence Is Overwhelming. Why @thepostemail Would Print A Story Without Edit Is A Major Disappointment!
    “The DNC and then Secretary of State Nancy Pelosi FALSIFIED “OBAMA’S” CERTIFICATION OF CANDIDACY…”

    Accuracy And Solutions To Atrocities Mean Everything To Me. This Article Provided Neither! Further, If I Were A Serious Constitutional Patriotic Writer, I’d Pen Under A Ghost Name, Or At Least Qualify That This “Tom Arnold” Should Not Be Confused With The POS Husband Of Roseanne Barr!

    I See No Efforts Being Made To Discipline 535 Cowards That Smack Of Malfeasance! The Time Is Right For A Mass Attempt For Consequences To Be Dealt To All Involved Or Complicit! #1POdNamVet

  24. Thomas Arnold   Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 1:38 PM

    Amen Rob Laity and Bob68. What’s happening now in our society (such as our society is today) and politics is pretty obvious. You guys, and the rest of us who have not been brainwashed, scared into silence, or recruited as co-conspirators, are absolutely correct. LITERALLY, ALMOST EVERY ACTION AND REACTION IN WASHINGTON DC TODAY IS TAKEN AFTER CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF WHETHER OR NOT IT WOULD FACILITATE OBAMA, THE DNC, AND OTHERS’ (you know who you are- Clintons, Brennan, Mueller, Comey, Soros, CPUSA, CIA, et al) TAKEOVER OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. All I can say is one-time self-declared “birther” Donald J Trump must be re-elected to a second term and complete the drainage of this swamp. I’m talking in a legal sense,i.e. LOCK ‘EM UP! It very well could be our last chance.

  25. Jeffrey Harriosn   Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 1:24 PM

    CDR Kerchner, Ed Sunderland, Bob 68, and Robert Laity I am thankful for all of you and your
    great efforts to defend the Constitution and expose the the fraud and usurpation of Obama.
    Likewise, I am thankful for all the coverage of The Post & Email on this vital topic. I apologize
    for not mentioning endless others who have contributed to the investigation and effort to expose Obama. Arpaio, Zullo, and others have revealed more than enough evidence to bring evidence to court. This would include many sources from America and international
    experts.

    In my opinion since there is no “time limit” for usurpation, can Obama and his complicit team
    sleep well at night? Not!

    .

  26. Nikita's_UN_Shoe   Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 11:55 AM

    Words for the eyes of birther-bashers:

    All persons born overseas to one or even two US citizen parents are naturalized US citizens under naturalization laws authorized by the US Constitution.

    Congress has authority to deem people citizens at birth via positive law, but Congress does not have authority to make anyone a natural born Citizen. Natural born Citizens are citizens-at-birth, but not all “citizens at birth” are natural born Citizens.

    A person is a natural born Citizen by natural law – born in the United States to two (2) US citizen parents. Deceased and former US Senator John S. McCain, III was born overseas. Because of that, McCain ran as an ineligible presidential candidate during the 2008 general election.

    The initial USofA Naturalization Act of 1790 stated: [Excerpt] “And the children of citizens [plural] of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens: ………”.

    Note the phrase: “shall be considered”.

    But, since the Founding Fathers knew that they could not make anyone a natural born Citizen via positive law, the first Naturalization Act (1790) was effectively nullified by the follow-on Naturalization Act (1795) that repealed the 1790 Act. The Naturalization Act (1795) now stated: [Excerpt] “…… and the children of citizens of the United States, born out of the limits and jurisdiction of the United States, shall be considered as citizens of the United States:….” Naturalization Act (1795) further stated: [Excerpt] “SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That the Act intituled, “An act to establish an uniform rule of naturalization,” passed the twenty-sixth day of March, one thousand seven hundred and ninety, be, and the same is hereby repealed.”

    The action by Congress to repeal the Naturalization Act of 1790 is better explained in detail by Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
    https://puzo1.blogspot.com/search?q=McCain

    So, in retrospect, we now can see how the voting public was hoodwinked by the entire 110th Congressional Senate during the month of April 2008 when they passed the non-binding resolution called Senate Resolution (SR) 511 that claimed that John McCain was a natural born Citizen, deceptively citing the repealed Naturalization Act of 1790, while at the same time used that SR 511 to distract attention away from aka obama’s own ineligibility for the presidency.

    John McCain was a naturalized US citizen, not a natural born Citizen. To further understand why Congress has zero authority to make anyone a natural born Citizen, I challenge anyone to try to find the phrase “natural born Citizen” quoted more than the two times in US law or in the US Constitution. Currently this phrase is penned at: (1. Naturalization Act of 1790 and 2. US Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5).

  27. Stephen J. Hiller   Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 11:46 AM

    ATTENTION all those who don’t know better – If you cut off a snake’s tail, he can still bite you,
    Going after the little pawns in the hope of getting one to “turn” on someone higher up will take
    forever and a day. It is past time to cut off the snake’s head. My Daddy said “poop or get off the pot”.

  28. JB   Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 11:09 AM

    To CDR Kerchner (Ret)
    Great source link. Thanks.

  29. Rob Laity   Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 6:19 AM

    Not even Fox News cared to expose Obama. Hannity still won’t. He’s recently either cancelled or had cancelled an interview about Obama’s ineligibility. He like others at Fox new either refused to talk about it or have used the terms “Pinheads” (Bill O’Reilly) and “Crazy” (Shepard Smith) to describe “Birthers”. There is such a crime known as Misprision, the failure to report a crime that one is aware of. To not accurately report on facts about a felony and failure to report it is Misprision of Felony. Obama is a fraud,usurpe,traitor and spy. Pelosi and Biden, as well as Michelle Obama and the late John McCain, et al are ALL complicit. Others who have committed,aided and/or abetted Treason and Espionage against “We the People” are still walking around free. These include Barack Obama himself, both Clintons, both Bushes, Dick Cheney, Joe Biden and many others. Now Biden is the front runner on the Democrat Party ticket. You can bet that if, by some strange chance, he wins, the Presidency WILL be controlled by Barack Obama and his treasonous deep State cabal.

  30. Bob68   Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 12:57 AM

    Thank you, Tom Arnold. IMO the only way to defeat the enemy within is to go after the biggest criminal act against American citizens and her Constitution in history. It is the one which effectively gave America’s government and her military to the enemy. There is no way the talking heads who pretend not to understand the extreme hatred of President Trump do not know the core reason….and they also realize its fear more than hatred which is driving the panicked attempts to remove President Trump from office. The many complicit in The Obama Fraud fear President Trump because they know he has all the evidence necessary to reveal and act on the truth about Barry and to reveal their complicity in making and/or allowing it to happen and in the still on-going cover-up. I hoped President Trump was just waiting for the “right time” to do this………but now I fear it isn’t going to happen…and it is the only way to save our Constitutional Republic. Now is the time, no more tick-tock and no more putting it off until tomorrow………..because, tomorrow never comes……………

  31. Ed Sunderland   Sunday, April 19, 2020 at 12:53 AM

    To this day all these people mentioned in this article are cowards and shills for the gas light media. People who thought they had a friend in Sheriff Joe Arpaio only used that friendship to promote their own position till he and all his friends became expendable at the expense of the truth and the sake of the American people.

    All I can say is the time is now and years ago to expose Obama for the corrupt fraud he and his ilk really are.

    I hope the conversation AG Bob Barr had with Rupert Murdock included some mention of the Carl Cameron gig that went down in Phoenix for Dennis Montgomery. I am sure Barr would love to see that. So would I.

  32. CDR Kerchner (Ret)   Saturday, April 18, 2020 at 8:48 PM

    More information and documents about the fraud Obama in these collections for those reading this article and wanting to learn more: https://www.scribd.com/user/52640192/protectourliberty/lists

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.