Exclusive: Facebook Designates Comment on Presidential Eligibility “Hate Speech”

WHY WOULD BIG TECH CENSOR DISCUSSION OF CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR ELECTED OFFICE?

by Sharon Rondeau

(Dec. 5, 2019) — On Thursday morning, reader Robert Laity notified The Post & Email that a comment he wrote on Facebook about presidential eligibility was rejected because, allegedly, it “goes against our Community Standards for hate speech.”

The comment reads, referring to former and current presidential candidates, “Harris, like Gabbard, McCain, Obama, Cruz, Rubio, Jindal and Swarzenegger [sic] is NOT ELIGIBLE UNDER ARTICLE II TO BE PRESIDENT OR VP.”

He then included a link to an article published at The Post & Email on November 19, 2017, containing an initial section of Laity’s book, “Imposters in the Oval Office,” available for purchase here.

Laity sent us a screenshot of his Facebook admin panel showing that once submitted, his comment was deemed to be “in review.”

A subsequent message from Facebook stated that the comment constituted “hate speech.”

While not invoking the term specifically, Laity was referring to the “natural born Citizen” clause of Article II, Section 1, clause 5 of the U.S. Constitution reserved by the Founders only for the president and commander-in-chief.  The complete wording reads:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Frequently over the years at The Post & Email and in his book, Laity has made the case that in his view, anyone not born in the United States to two U.S.-citizen parents is not a “natural born Citizen.”

The 12th Amendment, ratified in 1804, requires that the vice president meet the same qualifications as those of the president. “…But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States,” it states.

The pertinent section of the Facebook panel Laity forwarded to The Post & Email reads (sections are not precisely aligned due to the panel having been divided into two screenshots):

Editor’s Note:  At 6:12 p.m. EDT on Thursday, the article was reposted on The Post & Email’s Facebook page.


Looking for all of your news in one place?  Try Whatfinger, your one-stop aggregator of news, opinion and everything else.

6 Responses to "Exclusive: Facebook Designates Comment on Presidential Eligibility “Hate Speech”"

  1. marlene   Saturday, December 7, 2019 at 12:37 AM

    Facebook is interfering with the 2020 election of the US President by controlling the fake narrative, proving that small minds think alike. Facebook has definitely crossed the line from their claim of being a private social media company to being a political partner in a RICO conspiracy against our Republic.

  2. Jeffrey Harrison   Friday, December 6, 2019 at 5:23 PM

    I can’t thank The Post & Email nor Robert, nor others who have contributed information of the
    fraud and usurpertation Obama for all their work and effort in revelling the sinful deeds of Obama and the Deep State accomplices. Others and myself are still fighting this issue at the local, state, and at the federal level.

    On another level this whole impeachment effort against Trump is a stunt to “suck the air out of the room” and take him out. The problem here is that Trump is innocent of all claimed infractions. My hunch is that Trump will take out Obama, Hillary, and others when the timing
    is right. I’m in my seat with my pop corn and soda…

  3. Sharon Rondeau   Friday, December 6, 2019 at 3:51 PM

    His comment appears in its entirety in the article.

  4. Philly   Friday, December 6, 2019 at 1:02 PM

    Does the banned article mention the “Natural Born Citizen” clause that Obama broke?

  5. Marilyn Renee   Friday, December 6, 2019 at 9:54 AM

    Facebook are the haters. They hate everyone who does not agree with them. They must be broken up, along with Twitter and Amazon. What ever happened to not allowing anyone to have command over competitors. If AT&T can be broken up, so can facebook, twitter and monsters like Amazon. Too big for their britches they are.

  6. Barbara Lynn Huck   Friday, December 6, 2019 at 5:13 AM

    I got this out to about ten groups I’m in. I shared it first with hate speech part as a title. I then went to that page and shared it again with a new title over the first one and listed all the names.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.