Meadows: Some Strzok Testimony Potentially Problematic


by Sharon Rondeau

(Jul. 12, 2018) — On Thursday’s edition of “Hannity,” House Oversight & Government Reform Committee member Mark Meadows (R-NC) told Sean Hannity that some of former FBI Special Agent Peter Strzok’s statements made during almost eight hours of testimony did not match “the facts” supported by “the evidence.”

Meadows suggested that Strzok could be cited for making false statements under oath and that Strzok had “a hard time with the facts.”

Strzok arrived on Capitol Hill at 10:00 a.m. to testify to the House Oversight & Government Reform and Judiciary Committees.  Strzok said his appearance was voluntary, but House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte insisted Strzok was under subpoena.

Questioning began at approximately 10:20 in what quickly became a contentious back-and-forth between Republicans, Democrats and the witness.  Particularly in the first session, which concluded at 1:00 p.m. EDT, many Democrats attempted to raise “points of order” while Republicans were questioning Strzok.

The hearing reconvened at approximately 2:00 p.m. and ran until 5:00, at which time another break was called.  A third and final session began after 6:00 p.m. and ended two hours later with a closing statement by Goodlatte.

Throughout the day, members of Congress frequently interrupted Strzok and each other, creating a raucous atmosphere present at times.

Strzok played a major role in the Hillary Clinton private server probe as well as the Trump-Russia “collusion” investigation now overseen by Special Counsel Robert Mueller.  Although removed from the latter by Mueller after politically-charged text messages exchanged with former FBI counsel Lisa Page were found by the Justice Department’s inspector general, Strzok insisted he did not display political bias and that Mueller did not cite him for it when dismissing him.

A revelation made by Strzok not previously made public was that, according to Strzok, it was Justice Department official Bruce Ohr who provided the now-infamous Trump-Russia “dossier” to the FBI, or at least one version of it.  At the time, Ohr’s wife Nellie was working for FusionGPS, which commissioned the dossier using money from the DNC funneled to the Perkins Coie law firm, then to Fusion.

Strzok maintained throughout his testimony that any “personal political beliefs” he harbored about Trump or Clinton did not cloud his ability to perform his job as the second-in-command in the FBI’s counterintelligence division and his work on both investigations.

Strzok often interpreted comments and questions personally and remarked that any suggestion that the FBI is infused with political bias is “offensive.”

He also said that “collusion,” which Mueller’s team is allegedly exploring in regard to Trump and his campaign associates, “is not a crime.”



3 Responses to "Meadows: Some Strzok Testimony Potentially Problematic"

  1. JM   Sunday, July 15, 2018 at 12:13 PM

    This sick DNC culture needs to be weeded out of American Government before it’s entire collapse is imminent. These people should be turned over to American Veterans for a little “attitude adjustment” not an airconditioned cell with color cable. This creepy, overeducated, under experienced, over entitled, spoiled, Socialist culture needs addressing before the people rise up against this Soros culture control inside the walls of our government. Term limits, fast action prosecutor committees need to be installed to rid out system of this Marxist cancer that is growing daily. Once the Vietnam era people are gone, the new generation will be totally inept to stop this movement and America will be in collapse. The Godless movement is clear and evident and without intervention soon, America will collapse within its own walls- all the signs are there. How long to wake up?

  2. JONATHAN DAVID MOOERS   Friday, July 13, 2018 at 12:19 PM

    US Government-citizens are RELYING ON LYING while too many private-citizens RELY ON media VENTERTAINMENT:

    1. JFK assassinated by LBJ et al

    2. Pentagon Papers expose LBJ’s unwinnable Viet Nam

    3. Woodward and Bernstein expose Nixon’s Watergate Break-in

    4. Judicial Watch exposes government-protected celebrity-criminal Hillary RICO Clinton

    5. Many private citizens judge Strzok to be the poster child of the mutinous Deep State; regardless of his statements of whitewash, hogwash and brainwash on tunnel vision television, his actions on-the-job reveal his true self-serving thinking since thought precedes actions.

    6. TRUMP-ZULLO-RONDEAU-TAITZ expose NEVER-presIDent Soetoro-Obama II in 2018?

  3. Bob68   Thursday, July 12, 2018 at 11:39 PM

    The Democrats, (and the Republicans), both know without a shadow of a doubt “Obama” was/is an ineligible, identity fraud con-artist who, without any real attempt to stop him by people who should have vetted him, was allowed to usurp America’s presidency and do maximum destruction to our nation for 8 years. All went well for the enemy until Hillary lost to the birther Donald Trump…then all hell broke loose in fear the truth would be revealed and acted on. The truth is that by their actions and/or inaction Congress, the Obama media and many others literally gave America’s government and her military to the enemy. That is the root cause of the absolute panic among those most complicit, many are still in Obama’s corrupted agencies such as the FBI, CIA, DOJ and even the IRS. Also occurring because of the election of Donald Trump are attempts by those “only” complicit by their inaction and being part of the cover-up of this mother of all crimes, (example, some members of Congress), to stonewall and obfuscate and lie to get Trump out of office before prosecution of the wrong person pulls this mother of all crimes against America’s Constitution into the sunlight. Getting Obama in office was political theater, as was covering for his usurpation, and so is much of the attempt to ostensibly get to the truth about massive corruption in government agencies….which could reveal the truth. I trust a few people on our side…but only a few. Just look back at what happened and did not happen as the race-protected imposter and Alinsky combined to prevent impeachment or investigation or even a fair and open discussion of, “Who is Barack Obama?”, from ever happening.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.