by Sher Zieve, ©2018

(Apr. 10, 2018) — We have now reached the crisis point in the United States of America.  No longer will attorney-client privilege be recognized by the U.S. government if one is not a member of the Deep State.  What was once used only against the most despicable of drug lords and other organized crime groups is now being liberally used against those who support the president of the United States…and now the president himself.

The presidency of Donald J. Trump has been fraught with opposition as has no other presidency in the history of our country.  The leftist and increasingly criminal U.S. chapter of the global Deep State is fighting with every illegal chicanery it can muster and is using the most devious and duplicitous group of hard-liner and even legally-sanctioned (not the ‘good’ sanction) group of cutthroats that ever darkened a courtroom.  The frustrated Special Counsel Robert Mueller assigned to investigate potential collusion (not a crime, by the way) between Russia and the Trump presidential campaign has not produced anything.  Therefore, Malevolent Mueller—who has been involved in his own crimes in the past but has been allowed to get away with them (See “Mueller and the US Corruptocracy” – “Time to end Mueller’s Wild Reign of Malfeasance?” – “How is Conducting an Investigation Based upon Fake Evidence Legal?”)—is now engaging in regular “no-knock” (literally break-down-the-doors) raids of Trump supporters’ homes in the middle of the night and businesses.  And, along with his other highly suspicious endeavors (his direct participation in the highly ignored “Uranium One” scandal which still threatens our national defense comes to mind), Mueller protected mass murderer Whitey Bulger by giving him FBI “informant” status.  Mueller also arranged to have four innocent people sent to prison.  Note:  The FBI from Mueller on, in my opinion, has been a den of corruption and iniquity.  As long-time Democrat, legal and Constitutional scholar Alan Dershowitz observed:   “He’s [Mueller] the guy who kept four innocent people in prison for many years in order to protect the cover of Whitey Bulger as an FBI informer. Those of us in Boston don’t have such a high regard for Mueller because we remember this story. The government had to pay out tens of millions of dollars because Whitey Bulger, a notorious mass murderer, became a government informer against the mafia . . .And that’s regarded in Boston as one of the great scandals of modern judicial history. And Mueller was right at the center of it. So, he is not without criticism by people who know him in Boston.”

With Mueller’s latest move against President Trump’s personal attorney (who—as had Manafort–had been cooperating with the Mueller team), he has exhibited his true murky colors and is, essentially, telling anyone who works for or supports President Trump:  “You’re not safe anywhere.  No matter what deal we say that we’ll make with you…we won’t live up to it.  Why?  Because we don’t have to and can get away with it.  There’s no more attorney-client privilege for any of you who support Donald Trump or anyone else we don’t like.  My team and I operate beyond your foolish laws and anyone who even voted for Trump is now in jeopardy.  We make our own laws!”  This, folks, is precisely what this Mueller character is telling us.  He is operating outside of U.S. laws and has torn up our U.S. Constitution.  No one is safe now.

This is the most perilous position We-the-People and our country have been in since the American Revolution.  The Luciferian Left is now pushing for a second one.  We have, finally, again reached the point of the government moving against the American people…and this time Mueller and his goons are using true KGB tactics.  It appears that Mueller is the only one employing anything Russian.  He has declared war against Trump and has now shown us that he will do anything to destroy him.  If he can get away with this against a sitting president of the United States, how long do you think it will be before he and the rest of the Deep-Staters turn fully against and come after us?

“Woe to those who enact evil statutes and to those who constantly record unjust decisions”—Isaiah 10:1

Alan Dershowitz Rips Special Counsel Mueller as ‘a Partisan and Zealot (and protected crime kingpin Whitey Bulger):  https://www.newsmax.com/politics/alan-dershowitz-mueller-political-zealot/2018/04/08/id/853235/

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. In other but related birth certificate news:

    Reed Hayes testified in a court case in Saipan (U.S. Territory). Under close examination by the plaintiff’s Attorney Mr. Hayes was questioned about his involvement in Arpaio’s investigation. As reported:

    “Mok objected when Holmes asked about Hayes’ involvement in the Obama birth certificate controversy, but he was overruled by judge pro tem David A. Wiseman, who is presiding over the trial.”

    “Hayes recounted that he was tasked by the Maricopa County volunteer group Cold Case Posse to look at the electronic PDF image of Obama’s long form birth certificate. Hayes said he evaluated the authenticity of the PDF version of the Obama “certificate of live birth” that was released by the White House and posted on the White House website in April 2011.”

    “Hayes said he posted an article online in August 2016 about the Obama birth certificate issue because of false information spreading in the internet.”

    “Hayes said he only examined the PDF document itself and not the original birth certificate. In the article Hayes wrote that there are indications that the certificate of live birth released by the White House in 2011 may be a manufactured document or perhaps even an outright forgery. He, however, emphasized that without examining the original document housed at the Hawaii Department of Health, there can be no absolute certainty.”


    Another report:

    “Holmes also asked Hayes about his involvement with the birth certificate of former President Barack Obama.”

    “Hayes, a Democrat who voted for Obama twice, told the court that he initially refused to look at the birth certificate issue thinking that that he might not be objective because of his political leanings.”

    ““I finally decided that if I was really an objective examiner I should be able to examine the document and not apply my personal or political leanings.””

    ““He said he was asked to review the pdf version of the birth certificate that was released by the White House on April 11, 2011.””

    ““I was asked to examine it for any anomaly or indication that it might have been altered or fabricated or that kind of thing,” he added.”


    He apparently did say the PDF was a forgery or that would have been reported.

    An audio transcript of the trial can be obtained by contacting the court clerk.


    Manglona v. Torres, et. al.
    Civil Action number 17-0140
    February 20th, 2018
    Judge Wiseman

    Cost is $20 to $25. (They use U.S. dollars)

    The Plot Thickens

  2. All of this criminality leads to the feet of the man who calls himself Barack Hussein Obama. Obamagate began with unlawful presidency of AKA Obama propped up by forged identity documents and a phony life narrative. Exposing this usurpation of the presidency and the resultant crimes of the AKA Obama miscreants and the Clinton Cabal will go a long way toward draining the swamp! Time to get an attorney general who will do his job. Appoint a special prosecutor. Delay and more delay will only allow many of these criminals to escape prosecution, Drain the swamp NOW!

  3. To: abb3w

    Correct. However, there was no (required) identified crime to begin this investigation…in the first place. Mueller’s investigation has been a fraud and illegal from its inception. Any “evidence” obtained after Mueller’s initial crime is legally considered as “fruit of the poisoned tree.”

  4. The crime-fraud exception to attorney-client privilege is rarely invoked, because most attorneys are not stupid enough to themselves commit criminal acts that would fall within it. However, the existence of this exception was already solidly established by 1933, and discussed in the Supreme Court’s ruling in Clark v US.