California Constituent: Sen. Kamala Harris Not a Natural Born Citizen


December 4, 2017

Sen. Kamala Harris
112 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510

Dear Ms. Harris:

My name is Gary Wilmott and I reside in Southern California.

I couldn’t help but notice that the press has recently been extolling you as the next “Obama” and the inevitable frontrunner for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020. While this growing presidential buzz may be quite intoxicating for you, I suggest that you take a serious look at Article II of the U.S. Constitution, i.e., the presidential eligibility clause.

Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 mandates that a president be a NATURAL-born citizen, which you clearly are not. At the time of your birth, BOTH of your parents were citizens of foreign countries, so your birth in California makes you at best a NATIVE-born citizen (anchor baby?) under the prevailing view of the 14th Amendment. Lest you think that I have Republican bias I would also point out that presidential wannabes Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio also fail to meet this higher standard of citizenship. Their campaigns were fraudulent and in clear violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Before you waste too much time, energy, and donor money, I would ask that you reconsider your disingenuous efforts to position yourself as a presidential contender. Your leftist, socialist identity politics aside, you can expect to get tremendous push-back from constitutionalists such as myself who refuse to allow another fraud in the White House. Our presidential candidates must be vetted.

In this age of Trump, where the current president was fully informed of Obama’s identity fraud and lack of constitutional eligibility in April of 2011 (just weeks prior to Obama’s forged birth certificate release), you can expect ferocious opposition from equal opportunity “birthers” such as myself who only want the Constitution respected. The time is ripe for the American people to be fully informed as to how the elite media and our complicit so-called representatives in Congress allowed this greatest of crimes against the American people to occur both in 2008 and 2012. The American people are determined to take back their country and expose all the swamp creatures, both past and present.

Meantime, I would advise that your time would be better spent doing scholarly research on this issue. In the long run it will save you a lot of headaches and money! I would also suggest that you watch on YouTube the Sheriff Arpaio press conferences which PROVED that Obama proffered a forged birth certificate on April 27, 2011. Throw in a forged Selective Service registration and a stolen SSN for good measure, and you clearly have the “crime of the century.” Ms. Harris, there is so much information and truth available for the intellectually curious. Time to get your priorities straight, Ms. Harris, and do what is right.


Gary M. Wilmott

Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news.  She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.

23 Responses to "California Constituent: Sen. Kamala Harris Not a Natural Born Citizen"

  1. Hlenn Garrison   Friday, January 11, 2019 at 5:34 PM

    It depends on what you mean by “definitively”: Every judge who heard an eligibility challenge on the merits ruled birth in the United States is sufficient to confer natural-born citizenship. The same for every professor or other expert that has considered the issue.

  2. Sharon Rondeau   Friday, January 11, 2019 at 4:13 PM

    Has it been definitively established that the authors of the article are correct?

  3. Jim Campbell   Friday, January 11, 2019 at 2:28 PM

    You all might consider going to the U.S. Constitution and looking up what a natural born citizen actually is.
    If she is deemed the candidate by her party it seems she passes all the qualifications mentioned in the Harvard Law Review link above. Thanks, J.C.

  4. Mark Bellison   Tuesday, December 5, 2017 at 1:35 PM

    “Everyone born in the US is” NOT “a natural born citizen”

    And yet you don’t seem to be able to convince anyone in the judicial system that you are right. Oh look another judge disagrees with your interpretation. And cites both Wong Kim Ark and Georgia’s Judge Mahili in determining the meaning of a natural born citizen.

    “The Georgia Secretary of State recently denied a similar challenge to Mr. Obama’s status as a natural born citizen in Farrar, et al. v. Obama, OSAH-SECSTATE-CE1215136-60-MAHIHI, where Georgia State Administrative Law Judge Mahili relied upon Ankeny and Wong Kim Ark for his ruling that the President was indeed a natural born Citizen.”

    “Time does not allow for the fullest discussion of the case law addressing these issues, but suffice it to say that the status of “natural born Citizen” for Mr. Obama has not been denied by any court or administrative agency that has addressed the merits of the issue. This is not the place to write a law review article on the full analysis of the subject, but there is no legal authority that has been cited or otherwise provided that supports a contrary position. The petitioners’ legal position on this issue, however well intentioned, has no merit in law. Thus, accepting for the point of this issue that Mr. Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a “natural born Citizen” regardless of the status of his father.“ Judge Jeffery Masin, New Jersey

  5. T.F. B0W   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 11:19 PM

    How does Robert Laity know that Harris was born in 1964 to two foreign nationals? Has he seen her birth certificate?

    Robert Laity is free, of course, to believe whatever he desires, but every judge who has heard an eligibility challenge had concluded that birth in the United States is sufficient to confer natural born citizenship. (Which is essentially what the 1828 Catchism on the Constitution says, a document that can be located on the website for the American Justice Foundation.)

  6. JONATHAN DAVID MOOERS   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 10:37 PM

    RAPES/RAPS/RICO Bill Jefferson “BJ” Clinton is an Arkansas-licensed ATTORNEY-CRIMINAL

    LYIN’ TED THE UNDOCUMENTED FED, Rafael Cruz, is a Texas-licensed ATTORNEY-CRIMINAL for impersonating a “natural born Canadian citizen” for U.S. president

    NEVER-presIDent SOETORO-OBAMA II is a disgraced “retired” Illinois-licensed ATTORNEY-CRIMINAL guilty of national identity theft and Constitution Prostitution

    KAMALA HARRIS is a California-licensed ATTORNEY-CRIMINAL-WANNABE presIDential candIDate impersonating a “natural born Citizen”

    THE PROBLEM: State attorney licensing Boards see attorney-crime everyday…and look the other way = The Flaw!

    THE SOLUTION: Revoke attorney-criminal licenses for criminal behavior OR REVOKE ALL STATE ATTORNEY-CRIMINAL LICENSING BOARDS IN USA…because ignorance of The Flaw is no excuse!

    JD Mooers, PE (licensed engineer in Maine since 1978)

  7. Talking Dog   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 10:34 PM

    Good editorial;
    The “Deep State” is a collection of like minded-anti-Constitution individuals who make up a confederacy (loosely connected) of the naive and corrupt to maintain the (previous?) status quo (Swamp) under any circumstances, and if it takes circumventing the Constitution to achieve self-defeating goals (forgive them? I’ll leave the forgiveness part to the Man upstairs) is of little (or no) consequence.
    Good question but suffice to say that the more ignorant; the more provincial of thought; the more focused on protecting the status quo; the more unethical the tactics which is why there’s hues and cries of the impeachment of Trump when the focus should remain on Obama’s fake BIRTH CERTIFICATE (and the Uranium One deal) and all the other false records, including submitting a false Draft Registration number which is a clear felony.
    And, no, we don’t expect Harris to read the Post & Email but you can bet your bottom dollar that one of her trolls does.
    AG Sessions has to go.
    Look: Obama was never vetted:

  8. Robert Laity   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 10:32 PM

    TF Bow, Kamala Harris was born in 1964 in Oakland California to an Indian National Mother and a Jamaican National Father. Unless Harris PROVES that both of her parents were US Citizens before she was born then she is OUT as President or VP. President Trump should ask Congress to form a new agency whose sole purpose would be to determine whether or not a candidate for President meets ALL Article II requirements to be President or VP and that all States list these mandatory requirements uniformly. The State of NY is currently in non-comp liance with the US Constitution in that it represents “Born a Citizen” as the requirement for being POTUS versus the actual requirement that a POTUS and VP must be a “Natural Born Citizen”.

  9. T.F. B0W   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 10:22 PM

    It is a good that Jeffrey Harrison sees the importance in speaking truthfully.

  10. Robert Laity   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 10:20 PM

    Bellison, Still confused I see. “Everyone born in the US is” NOT “a natural born citizen”. An NBC is one born IN the country to parents who are both said country’s citizens”. Minor v Happersett, USSCt. unanimously defined an NBC as One born IN the United States to parents who are both US Citizens themselves.

  11. Robert Laity   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 10:14 PM

    Hiller, It makes a big difference. Breaking the law is breaking the law. If Kamala Harris’ Parents were not US Citizens when Kamala was born, Kamala is OUT as President or VP.

  12. Jeffrey Harrison   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 8:09 PM

    P.S. Gary, indeed you are free to believe and say anything you deem. Keep speaking the
    truth for scripture indicates darkness will not overcome the light. Keep letting your light
    shine. Amen.

  13. Jeffrey Harrison   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 8:02 PM

    Gary, Thanks for your article. Indeed, you covered it rather well.

  14. Mark Bellison   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 7:38 PM

    “…if you want to claim there’s a Supreme court case where an opinion or ruling states that everyone born in the US is a natural born citizen, perhaps you should find it FOR Ms Harris.”

    Well, Judge Stansfield of the Circuit Court of Carroll County, Maryland found one,

    “The issue of the definition of “natural born citizen” is firmly resolved by the United States Supreme Court in a prior opinion [Wong Kim Ark], and as this Court sees it, that holding is binding on the ultimate issue in this case. While Ms Fair and Ms. Miltenberger may disagree with the holding of the Supreme Court, from a perspective of stare decises, the only means by which an opinion of the Supreme Court concerning substantive law can be overturned is either by a subsequent holding of the Supreme Court or an Amendment to the U. S. Constitution. Both have occurred in the past on very rare occasions, but this Court does not believe that it has the discretion to simply disregard a holding which clearly applies to the definition of “natural born citizen” as it applies to President Obama.” Judge Thomas Stansfield in Fair v. Obama

  15. T.F. B0W   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 7:14 PM

    Gary Wilmott is, of course, free to believe whatever he desires, but there’s no indication of what Wilmott has given Harris notice of, or the consequences of Harris’s ignoring Wilmott’s “notice.” What would motivate a person to write a letter in which the author expects neither a response nor for the recipient to see it is rather a mystery; boredom, perhaps? Preening?

    Advising someone (especially someone as busy a sitting U.S. senator) to go do some research is a poor persuasion technique; the better practice would be to specify the materials, and include them.

    Because without these unspecified scholarly materials, Harris’s research would likely be what any attorney would do: read the judges’ rulings stating that birth in the United States is sufficient to confer natural-born citizenship. That’s what people, attorneys especially, do: they look to actual lawgivers, like real judges hearing real cases in real courtrooms.

    Catherine Hughes is, of course, free to believe whatever she desires, but no judge who considered the eligibility issue has read Minor’s dicta to suggest that birth in the United States to two U.S. citizen parents is constitutionally required. Mark Bellison, for example, quoted a real judge, who discounted how Hughes reads Minor.

    Speaking of materials to be sent, surely Harris, as a sitting U.S. senator, is entitled to see Arpaio’s reports. Has Arpaio sent them to her yet? Maybe Harris would be more impressed by the actual reports than Zullo’s online summary of them.

    It is interesting that Wilmott assumes Harris was born in California. (She might not be even a citizen!) Has he seen her birth certificate? Perhaps Wilmott should request to see Harris’s birth certificate, and provide copies of his request to regional newspapers, like the Los Angeles Times, the Orange County Register, and the San Diego Union-Tribune.

  16. Gary Wilmott   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 6:43 PM

    Additional follow-up for Totally False Bow. I don’t expect Senator Harris to personally see the letter and I certainly don’t expect a response. So you ask what was the purpose of the letter? It really is quite obvious but I will let you strain your brain and try to figure it out.

  17. Catherine Hughes   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 6:28 PM

    @T.F BOW – Your confusion over what a natural born citizen is astounding. Perhaps you and Ms Harris, as well as others, could benefit from actually reading Supreme Court cases and the opinions regarding citizenship. For instance, say something from Minor v Happersett – decided March 29 1875:

    “The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.”

    By all means, if you want to claim there’s a Supreme court case where an opinion or ruling states that everyone born in the US is a natural born citizen, perhaps you should find it FOR Ms Harris.

  18. Mark Bellison   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 5:25 PM

    Boy, you better hope she doesn’t read Allen v. Obama

    “Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co., 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P. 2d 983, 986 (1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. See United States v. Wong Kim Ark (addressing U. S. Const. amend. XIV) ; Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana (addressing the precise issue). Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett does not hold otherwise.” Judge Richard E. Gordon

    He was appointed by Governor Brewer and was re-elected in 2016 getting 76% of the vote.

  19. Gary Wilmott   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 2:56 PM

    Totally False Bow: ALWAYS spinning and making up stuff. The letter is unquestionably sufficient to put her (Harris) on notice. I have already indicated that the “system” is corrupt, so why would Harris have any inclination to “likely read” rulings on eligibility by corrupt left-leaning judges when she too is part of the swamp?

  20. Talking Dog   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 2:52 PM

    Dear Gary;
    Talking dog here. My master is typing my reply because I’m yelping (dog speak for laughing) because you asked this Harris character to do “the right thing”.
    You wasted your time and I’m asking you to not waste anymore of your time.
    Harris actually believes in the Obama/Hillary/Socialism/Elizabeth “Pocahontas” Warren stupidity.
    Us dogs have more lives than humans (but not as many as cats) and even we don’t ask people who support a group of people who hate, torture and kill dogs for sport and shame on those that do.
    Harris is of the group that does not like me or my K-9 friends; Service dogs for the Blind and other things; search and rescue; and just being a friend/companian for life. You can’t be for one and say you are for another: you either are or aren’t and Harris is an “isn’t”.
    Talking Dog

  21. T.F. B0W   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 12:40 PM

    It is interesting that Wilmott only suggested that Harris do some “scholarly research on this issue” — instead of providing Harris with that research. Because Harris (an attorney) will likely read the judges’ rulings from other eligibility challenges and conclude that her birth in California is sufficient to confer natural-born citizenship.

  22. Stephen Hiller   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 11:20 AM

    Hillary was right, “at this point what difference does it make?” NOTHING has been done to correct Obama’s 8 years of treason, nothing was done after Eric Holder’s contempt of congress charge. I won’t bother to mention Bill & Hill as their crimes are too numerous and there simply are NO consequences. Ms. Harris knows that.

  23. Miki Booth   Monday, December 4, 2017 at 10:54 AM

    When were her parents naturalized if at all? I see met at berkley says a lot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.