Lying to FBI is Illegal; How About the FBI Lying to Us?

“COLLUSION WITH HILLARY CLINTON”

by Jeff Crouere, ©2017

(Dec. 1, 2017) — While the liberal media is celebrating the announcement that former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn has pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI, a bigger scandal was practically ignored.

On Thursday, Judicial Watch released 29 pages of FBI emails regarding the inexcusable June 27, 2016 meeting between former President Bill Clinton and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch on the tarmac of the Sky Harbor International Airport in Phoenix, AZ. This meeting was not accidental, as Clinton purposely delayed the takeoff of his aircraft to arrange the supposedly impromptu encounter with the Attorney General.

According to Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton, “These new FBI documents show the FBI was more concerned about a whistle-blower who told the truth about the infamous Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting than the scandalous meeting itself.”

In the midst of an FBI investigation into Hillary Clinton’s “extremely careless” handling of top secret email communications, Lynch held a secretive meeting with her husband. This bombshell information would have never been made public if not for the investigative work of Phoenix television anchor Christopher Sign, who received a tip about the meeting from a “trusted source.”

With an ongoing Justice Department investigation into the improper handling of email communications, it was highly improper for Lynch to agree to the meeting with Bill Clinton just days before FBI agents would interview his wife. Once confronted about the tarmac meeting, Lynch claimed they only discussed golf and grandchildren, which is a completely ludicrous explanation for the 30-minute meeting.

If the meeting was so innocent, why did the Justice Department withhold key documents for so long? After an initial July 7, 2016 Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request by Judicial Watch for documents pertaining to the meeting, the Justice Department claimed that nothing could be located. Only after an official FOIA lawsuit did the department provide the various FBI email exchanges.

As noted by Fitton, the real focus of the emails was to try to locate the leaker who exposed the meeting. One unidentified FBI agent lamented that the meeting was disclosed to the press and claimed that “We need to find that guy” in order to get him fired or sanctioned by his supervisors. The emails show that the FBI believed the source was a Phoenix police officer and one agent expressed a desire to ban the officer from being involved in future security details.

This anger is very indicative of what is wrong with the FBI today. The source who leaked news of the meeting to the local media did a real public service and should be commended. Americans had a right to know that the Attorney General was involved in a questionable meeting while an investigation was purportedly ongoing.  Unfortunately, instead of congratulating the source, the FBI wanted to punish this individual, obviously because they wanted to protect the reputation of the Attorney General and the presidential aspirations of Hillary Clinton.

The FBI should be impartial, not be taking sides in political campaigns. The bureau was obviously politically compromised, much like the IRS during its unfair harassment of Tea Party groups.

In any vigorous and honest FBI investigation, agents should be outraged if the Attorney General held a secret meeting with the spouse of the subject being examined for wrongdoing. Instead agents showed only concern about identifying the police officer who caused the embarrassment. This nonchalant attitude was not shared by Lynch who admitted that the ill-advised meeting “cast a cloud” on the Justice Department’s investigation into Hillary Clinton.

These disclosures led to the distressing conclusion that the Hillary Clinton investigation was a sham from the very beginning. In fact, when Clinton was finally interviewed by the FBI on July 2, 2016, she was not under oath and there was no recording of the meeting. Several weeks earlier, before the FBI had interviewed Clinton or 17 key witnesses in the investigation, then FBI Director James Comey had already begun drafting her exoneration statement.

Such unusual procedures were denounced by U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and U.S. Senator Lindsay Graham (R-SC) in a joint statement. According to the Senators, “Conclusion first, fact-gathering second—that’s no way to run an investigation.  The FBI should be held to a higher standard than that, especially in a matter of such great public interest and controversy.”

Of course, the Senators are right, as the FBI’s handling of this matter was atrocious. A mere three days after the inadequate interview of Clinton, Comey announced that she would not be indicted despite what many legal analysts believe were her clear violations of federal law.

Evidently, the FBI, under the direction of James Comey, had no intention of ever truly investigating Hillary Clinton and bringing charges against her. If there was ever an issue that needed a Special Counsel investigation, it is not “Russian collusion,” but the Justice Department’s collusion with Hillary Clinton.

——————–

Jeff Crouere is a native New Orleanian and his award winning program, “Ringside Politics,” airs locally at 7:30 p.m. Fridays and at 10:00 p.m. Sundays on PBS affiliate WLAE-TV, Channel 32, and from 7-11 a.m. weekdays on WGSO 990-AM & www.Wgso.com. He is a political columnist, the author of America’s Last Chance and provides regular commentaries on the Jeff Crouere YouTube channel and on www.JeffCrouere.com. For more information, email him at jeff@jeffcrouere.com

4 Responses to "Lying to FBI is Illegal; How About the FBI Lying to Us?"

  1. T.F. B0W   Saturday, December 2, 2017 at 11:44 AM

    There was never a “common law grand jury” assembled outside of governmental authority.

  2. Stephen Hiller   Saturday, December 2, 2017 at 11:02 AM

    Shoot the messenger … nothing new about that.

  3. cort wrotnowski   Saturday, December 2, 2017 at 10:52 AM

    I offer a theory. The loss of the common law grand jury set the stage for extensive government corruption a long time ago. Instead of the current system where a (corrupt) judge impanels a grand jury, we need to revive what is still a constitutional protection: The common law grand jury.

    The federal government is totally out of control when it comes to the consequences of lying to each other and to the public. It must be changed.

    Lying is the cornerstone of any kleptocracy, plutocracy or oligarchy.

  4. JONATHAN DAVID MOOERS   Saturday, December 2, 2017 at 8:19 AM

    “State-licensed ATTORNEY-CRIMINAL”, to blaze a phrase.

    Since 08-28-08 when Treason Queen Pelosi allowed the Soros’ Soetoros (Barry and Michelle) into the White House, while our U.S. Government hid/hides the full IDentity of Barry from its fellow citizens, I now see the “legal profession” as using state licenses TO STEAL with relative impunity.

    Surely, all 50 plus attorney-licensing Boards see crimes everyday on TV such as lying, sexual misconduct, taking bribes, assisting treasonous acts, slander, identity theft, illegal drug use, extortion et al committed by their state-licensed attorneys…but their licenses are rarely revoked by those same state-licensing Boards. Why? Waiting for convictions before issuing evictions?

    These Boards see something…and do nothing…everyday!

    How can these Boards license Arkansas Rapes/Raps/RICO Attorney-Criminal Bill Clinton, Contempt-of-Congress Attorney-General-Criminal Eric Holder, Lyin’ Attorney-General-Criminal Loretta Lynch, Leakin’ New York Attorney-Criminal Comey, Lyin’-on-his-Illinois- Attorney-Criminal-application NEVER-presIDent SOETORO-OBAMA II and so, so many others.

    I now see America’s “legal profession” as nothing more than an unaccounted crony-assembly of liars-for-hire and pimps of Lady Justice; of licensed flawed sinners practicing unaccounted “taboo voodoo doodoo” on its lay citizenry.

    MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN by holding all state attorney-licensing Boards accountable for licensing/promoting glaring attorney-criminal behavior!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.