by Sharon Rondeau

Graphic created by plaintiff Cody Robert Judy as to the preparation of his latest motion in Judy v. Obama, 17-4055

(Aug. 22, 2017) — During the solar eclipse on Monday, an appellant motion for review “en banc,” or by a full panel of judges, was delivered to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver, CO by priority mail from Obama eligibility/forgery case plaintiff Cody Robert Judy.

Last week, a three-judge panel of the appellate court had upheld a lower court’s opinion that Judy’s case is “frivolous.”

In its August 15 order, the three-judge panel of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals argued that the “new evidence’ Judy presented, which stemmed from a December 15, 2016 press conference expounding on the reported forgery of Barack Hussein Obama’s “long-form” birth certificate, had been filed with the District Court outside of the one-year statute of limitations as “new evidence” to his previous case, Judy v. Obama 14-9396.

Since 2008, Judy has alleged that Obama is unqualified to serve as president because he is not a “natural born Citizen,” as Article II of the U.S. Constitution requires.  That same year, Judy filed a mirror eligibility challenge against Republican Sen. John McCain.

Obama claims a birth in Hawaii to a U.S.-citizen mother and British-citizen father. McCain was born in Panama to two U.S. citizen parents, one of whom was serving as an officer in the U.S. Navy at the time.

In 2008, then-Democrat National Committee (DNC) chairman Nancy Pelosi, one of Judy’s current defendants, alleged in a Certificate of Nomination form submitted to the state of Hawaii that Obama was constitutionally-eligible to serve as president, although the Hawaii Democrat Party did not itself certify Obama as “legally-qualified,” as required by law.

Beginning in 2007, a number of credible news reports emerged stating that Obama was born in Indonesia or Kenya, depending on the source.  Some writers later changed their articles to say that Obama was, in fact, born in Hawaii, without explanation as to how an error in his birthplace had been made.

A fervent Obama supporter, MSNBC host Chris Matthews had said on his December 18, 2007 show that Obama was “born in Indonesia.” Years later, however, he became combative with anyone who he perceived to be questioning Obama’s claimed birth in Honolulu.  Matthews never explained the discrepancy in his two very different statements.

Obama’s life story appears in several places inconsistent to this day, including the hospital where he was born and where his father attended university.  Such sources as The Washington Post, UPI and the Associated Press have reported details about Obama’s background as differing from those the former White House occupant himself has claimed.

The Post and the AP provided no response to this writer as to the discrepancies they reported.

After six months of investigation, on March 1, 2012, former detective Mike Zullo declared the image uploaded to the White House website said to represent Obama’s original birth record a “computer-generated forgery.”  Also found fraudulent was Obama’s purported Selective Service registration form.

Neither the Congress, FBI, nor a federal grand jury has investigated the claims, and the Selective Service System suggested that Obama’s records had been uncharacteristically destroyed.

Zullo’s investigation continued over five years through the end of last year, culminating in the December 15 presser from which Judy gleaned the new information submitted to the District Court on January 27, 2017 associated with the birth certificate and, Judy said, Obama’s eligibility.

During the hour-long presser, Zullo revealed that two well-respected forensic analysts had reached very similar conclusions to his own based on “nine points of forgery” found to have been lifted and duplicated onto the Obama “birth certificate” image.

Judy disagreed with the appellate court’s recent finding of his lack of timeliness in submitting the new evidence because of a pending motion he had filed with the U.S. Supreme Court which Judy signed and dated on February 4, 2016.

In early May, after the April dismissal by the District Court, Judy appealed not only to the Tenth Circuit, but also for a second time to the U.S. Supreme Court through Associate Justice Neil Gorsuch.  Judy said he directed it to Gorsuch because the Justice responsible for the Tenth Circuit, Sonia Sotomayor, acted on the original case in October 2015 and would therefore not be neutral.  The case would therefore fall to the next newest member of the court, Judy said, according to Supreme Court rules.

Judy is requesting the en banc hearing because he believes the court has failed to uphold the constitutional rights of all Americans.  He has previously said that the judges have “acted as counsel” for the defendants in his cases rather than as unbiased arbiters of the Constitution.

Referring to the Priority Mail envelope in which he placed the Motion for Review, Judy told The Post & Email on Tuesday, “This was delivered to the Tenth Circuit Appeals Court at 10:45AM the exact time the picture was taken of the eclipse in Ogden, Utah.  The document, a Motion for Review En Banc, will rely on getting at least seven of the nine remaining judges, excluding those who already ruled, to reach a majority of 12.

Judy said of his reasoning for pursuing the case:

“We understand that American Nationalism gives equal rights regardless of race, color, sex, or religion. It does not give superiority to Black or White Nationalism. They both exist.

“With the TENS-OF-Thousands of references to Obama as the first black President, the mainstream media seems to have forgotten Obama, like McCain, Cruz, Rubio, Jindal and Justices defending them as Counsel, are using superiority over the U.S. Constitution’s qualification for the Office of President, and Americans are hurt and now getting angry. A race war over not being represented and excluded by factors prohibited by the Constitution will ultimately hurt most the minorities.

I feel as if I’ve been using my voice as a presidential candidate to avoid race wars and nasty racism rooted in “Superiority in Color.” I support our U.S. Constitution in defending minorities and individual rights so enumerated therein. The panel of three justices in the Tenth Circuit have in their decision done more against race relations than for, acting with superiority for Black Nationalism than for American Nationalism under the Supreme Law of the Land in our U.S. Constitution.

My suit against McCain gives equality to Obama under the standard of the U.S. Constitution. And a federal judge in Judy v. McCain said as much. The burden is not to the loser of the election but to the winner who occupies the office.”

As of the time of this writing, Judy has not published the motion, which is presented here as an exclusive:

Judy then provided an electronic proof of delivery with an “eclipse” theme.

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. EXPOSING Obama’s Inside Game and WHY President Trump’s BIGGEST Mistake may be not TAKING ON Obama’s INELIGIBILITY Head On with some one who had credible Standing from Day 1.
    [The Obama administration’s massive shakedown of Big Banks over the mortgage crisis included unprecedented back-door funding for dozens of Democratic activist groups who were not even victims of the crisis] [Jeff Sessions has ordered a full audit of the funds while discontinuing the practice of funneling Justice Department settlements to third-party groups.]


  2. Judy may believe whatever he desires. But every judge who has considered the issue — in real courts, in real cases, with real law — has concluded that birth in the United States is sufficient to confer natural-born citizenship. Notwithstanding the unsuccessful efforts of Judy (and other eligibility litigators), or the comments made in comment sections or on internet radio shows.

  3. With the nomenclature of which the Framers were familiar :

    1-No subject could become King.

    2- Those subjects adopted as pointed out
    had [some] rights but not [all] equal.

    The Heart of the American Revolution was indeed Rebellion against England.

    It is skewered reasoning and suspect to dis-regard of the Standard of Amerian History which intimately created a new Jurisdictoon of Law.

    Indeed, much thought and consideration went into differing [Qualifications of Time] considered as the Standard in the US Constituion for the differing Offices with their responsibilities and of course expectations.

    Representatives differed from Senate in
    [ Time ] in Order to be considered qualified and the Office of President also differed from Representatives and Senators judged most narrowly.

    It is a real dilution to argue physiologically, emotionally, and mentally that a perfect American allegiance is vested in a 14th Amendment Citizen born of foreign aliens of the United States.

    However, it certainly is not small change that they are indeed Trusted as Qualified in the bodies of Congress.

    One generation is of course all that is needed for Senators and Representatives.

    The security of Qualification in Time were indeed harolded as the Standard here in America , as History notes, and Vattel also noted, if all that is considered is [Place] it will only be his place of birth as the nurturing factors are forgotten.

    Obama’s father was a foreign alien of Kenya, who notably requires for their President [Born in Kenya to Kenyan Citizens] , also very concerned and in rebellion of imperialistic forces observed of England with the nomenclature Kenyans are familiar with.


    1- be a Kenyan citizen by birth;
    2- not hold dual citizenship;
    3- not owe allegiance to a foreign state;

    Obama’s mother was at best wed to Foreigners and subject to her husband’s influence in Indonesia and Kenya in a much greater influence to Obama in his graduating maturity of socialism, communism, and determination to abuse and afflict the Standard of helping your enemies by selling them weapons, and selling your countrymen for 70K a piece in 10 Trillion Debt.

    Obama’s abuse in DOCA and many other immigration Laws was [deferred prosecution] meaning , Yes Laws were broken but that’s OK with me.

    Obama’s 25 Scandals and counting are infamous:


    Thus reason, and Obama’s history actually affords and provides proof [Natural Born Citizen] ie. (Born in the US to Citizen Parents ) is not a Term-of-Art the 14th Amendment made null, moot, frivolous , and wholly incredible.

    Not everyone owns the Mona Lisa and it’s Value is understood. The recent desecration of art providing reminders of American History are also lessons being wiped off the board bound to have to be re-learned.

    Obama in his Actions seems to be the most excited one to reconstitute “Slavery” and “Subject” .

    Of course, his biggest mistake he subjected himself and was chained to 2 Terms. Reversing damages is possible.

    Interesting note of American History Sen. Ted Cruz from Texas and Sen Marco Rubio , both also abusing the Standard of Qualifications running for President with dual citizenships at the Time of their Birth, met Harvey and Irma Hurricanes.

    Sen. John McCain- Born in Panama diagnosed w Brain Cancer.

    The relativity to these and stating the security of the USA was in consideration , through suggesting, as our First SCOTUS Chief Justice did to our First US President ,that only a natural born Citizen be considered qualified for the Office of President, may be paralleling to the suggestion that the Framers were enforcing the nomenclature of England.

  4. Selected quotes from Wong Kim Ark, as contained in Ankeny v Indiana:

    It thus clearly appears that by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country, and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, and the jurisdiction of the English sovereign;  and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject, unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign state, or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.

    III. The same rule was in force in all the English colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the constitution as originally established.

    The first section of the second article of the constitution uses the language, ‘a natural-born citizen.’   It thus assumes that citizenship may be acquired by birth.   Undoubtedly, this language of the constitution was used in reference to that principle of public law, well understood in this country at the time of the adoption of the constitution, which referred citizenship to the place of birth.

    All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens.   Birth and allegiance go together.   Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well as of England.   We find no warrant for the opinion that this great principle of the common law has ever been changed in the United States.   It has always obtained here with the same vigor, and subject only to the same exceptions, since as before the Revolution.

    As the above quotes demonstrate, the Supreme Court and the authorities they relied on did in fact note that while the definition of natural-born citizen was not altered, it always included all those born in the US, regardless of parentage, except in when the parents are not subject to the laws of the US (ie, diplomatic immunity, occupied territory, or treatied Native Americans).

    Keep in mind, “natural-born” was not some esoteric term that no-one ever heard of before the Constitution. It was actually a concept that applied to most people in the colonies/US. A person who was not a natural-born subject or citizen couldn’t inherit property unless explicitly included in the will, nor could they contest the will if they weren’t a natural-born subject/citizen. In fact, there were several cases that made it all the way up to the Supreme Court that revolved around some of the more esoteric means by which natural-born citizens could inherit. One such case involved whether a natural-born citizen could inherit through the collateral line if her alien father was still alive (the answer: no, since the alien father couldn’t inherit, the natural-born citizen daughter could not inherit unless he was already dead). None of these laws still apply, so the only remaining vestige of “natural-born citizen” is found in the Eligibility Clause.

  5. Judy may imagine whatever he desires, but around a dozen different courts (and not only two) from a variety of states — including a federal judge in Virginia — have all concluded that birth in the United States is sufficient to confer natural-born citizenship. And none have concluded otherwise.

    Judy may believe other judges are laughing at these judges, but there is no evidence such laughter exists anywhere other than in Judy’s imagination.

  6. Don’t get carried away with your [imagination] T.F Bow,-

    The only judges to consider it have either been an [ Executive Branch] court judge, and a [State] Indiana Court.

    Both those [two] undertook in an opinion on a Federal Jurisdiction Question out on the highway with a speed limit of 70mph doing 150mph with out wearing seat belts and driving naked.

    Most Judges realize this and are laughing at them in Chambers.

  7. It is a good thing that absolutely no one has ever argued that the 14th Amendment altered the meaning of natural-born citizen.

    Rather, the judges who have considered the matter have all concluded that natural-born citizen, as the term was defined at the time of the U.S. Constitution’s writing, included those born in the United States (regardless of the parents’ citizenship). Judy’s contrary imaginations notwithstanding.

  8. No Doubt, the Supreme Law has been squatted on by Judges who swore oaths to uphold it.

    Who mean who is Malihi?


    In order to reach this conclusion the Georgia court ALSO had to disregard yet another part of the holding from the Minor v. Happersett Supreme Court ruling. Even if you ignore the rules of Constitutional construction and the rule that dicta can’t overturn precedent, even if you agree with the Georgia court that the definition of natural born citizen in the Minor decision was dicta, you still can’t reach the Georgia court’s ruling. You see, the Minor Court ALSO explicitly ruled that the 14th Amendment didn’t create any new privileges and immunities. So, if a person couldn’t run for President before the 14th Amendment, they couldn’t run for President after the 14th Amendment. This means that the Minor Court explicitly ruled that the 14th amendment didn’t alter the definition of natural born citizen under article II of the Constitution. Yet the Georgia court ignored this Supreme Court ruling as well.

    An ‘Executive Branch’ Judge who completely ignored the Law?

  9. Judy may imagine that the United States is somehow bound by the “Laws of Nature” (whatever that term means). And Judy may further imagine that these imaginary laws of nature somehow define natural-born citizenship.

    But reality is different: every judge that has considered the matter has concluded that birth in the United States is sufficient to confer natural-born citizenship. Including the judge that rejected Judy’s challenge in Georgia in 2012.

  10. Laws of Nature are those our Founders worked very diligently not to cross. It can mean the difference of being in harmony and being in outright rebellion against [nature], and in such [nature’s God], and thus failure.

    Justice Neil Gorsuch is well acquainted with the Laws of Nature.
    Legal philosophy[edit]

    Gorsuch is a proponent of originalism, the idea that the Constitution should be interpreted as perceived at the time of enactment, and of textualism, the idea that statutes should be interpreted literally, without considering the legislative history and underlying purpose of the law.[6][7][8] An editorial in the National Catholic Register opined that Gorsuch’s judicial decisions lean more toward the natural law philosophy.

    So what does the AP mean when it prints “has nature gone nuts?”

    How about the Laws of Nature governing the highest office of the Land as a ‘natural born Citizen] ie. born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents and the violation of Barack Obama unleashing as the Courts refuse to adhere to the true laws of nature, the actions of being in violation?


    Could we expect WAR next?

  11. @Rick Damon – re: [ The Supreme Court doesn’t re-open cases]

    And… (?)

    The US Constitution does not allow any one who was not a [Citizen] at the Time of the Adoption of this Constitution, or a [ natural born Citizen] , ( who no one disagrees) as one [ Born in the US to Citizen Parents ] ?

    Oh yeah… that happened w/ Obama.

    You know, I’ve faced over and over in my Life those who said ” That will never happen” , then it did.

    Do you know what happened to the People who said it?

    They crawl in holes and scatter like ants.

    They use fake names, and comment boldly with Anonymous Courage. They have no real courage to Stake their lives, livelihood, reputations, and fortunes on what they say.

    They are excited if they are right but they used fake names so it does them no real good accept perhaps a pat-on-the-back from someone whose just as Fake and Deceitful.

    In short, they are less than dust amounting to nothing in “reality” but hot air and honk-honk blow hards. Like a goose in a flock , you hear a sound but it means nothing and is quickly lost in the wind.

    You have given a lot of advice, under the radar . Who are you really anyone should consider it?

    Your Fake and a Fraud because that’s how you represent yourself.

    I “Hope” you “Change”.

  12. @ Cody Judy

    I know what isn’t coming soon – a successful appeal to the Supreme Court.

    If you try, it won’t be docketed for the same reason your petition to Justice Gorsuch wasn’t docketed – SCOTUS closed your case on October 8, 2015 and SCOTUS doesn’t reopen closed cases.

    A word to the wise: even licensed attorneys are reluctant to represent themselves in court. Our legal system is complex and arcane, and it takes an experienced hand to navigate through it. If you can’t find an attorney willing to represent you, it probably means that your case has little or no chance of succeeding.

  13. I don’t know if everyone involved in this thread has heard the news, but Mr. Judy’s petition for a re-hearing was, as expected, denied by the Court of Appeals on August 31.

  14. @Cody,

    The bottom line is, the courts will never agree with you and are tired of this stuff and just may fine you for wasting their time. Time to move on my friend.

  15. @ Cody,

    Thank you for sharing your feelings, however, your feelings are not a legal argument that any US Court would ever deem as relevant.

  16. Thank you for confirming to us all the [Corruption] both Politically & in the Judicial and Legislative and Executive Branches, that has taken place against the US Constitution since 2008 regarding the person Barack Obama.

    All you wrote about has been done, but it does not dismiss that it should not have been done, nor the wake of hurricane turbulence as domestic disturbances in its Path upsetting the tranquillity of peace with God and man here in the USA.

    US History testifies, purchased with the blood and fortunes of many more Patriots notable in US History, of this in much [louder] terms as [natural born Citizen] or a[Citizen at the Time of the Adoption of this Constitution] Art. II., Section 1, C-5. , than I could possibly express.

    The Citizenship Status of Our 44 Presidents is well known and testifies against every modern day 2008 circumstance.


    Notice I expressed it has been done, but also all actions carry consequences. While FIRE is small, it is best to extinguish it that the House go not up in a Total Loss.

    My Actions far from being [angry] at Obama are in the Great Concern born out of Love for my Countrymen as it pertains to the Responsibility and Accounting to our Creator and Lord.

    The All-Seeing-Eye of God in Heaven who our First President George Washington recognized “alone can protect us.”, protect YOU if you make it personal has guided my Petitions.

    Take away the Umbrella of Protection the US Constitution does now and has worked in the past, and the very ground YOU walk on May shake out from under you.

    If you would “Dare” God to destroy by inexcusable Action against our US Constitution our USA , what Love have you had for your Countrymen? What safety and concern have you for the People?

    What Love have you had for your own Right to comment in a celebration of Freedom of Speech, and Press, and Religion, and right to assemblage?

    You have no Constitution if you seek to destroy it. You have no Claim on Protection in this Land from God or Man. I know what it’s like to be hunted.

    You have no Love. Destruction in your hate for your Countrymen, and yourself, comes for those of you so ungrateful for your bounty, and homes, and fortunes. It comes swiftly as a Reward but not a Reward if Fortune. The Penalties of God are more than any Court could fine me.

    God Bless you and may God Bless America as long as 1 Voice remains shouting from the Housetops.


  17. @Cody,

    Hawaii only issues BCs in paper form. What the White house issued was a pdf or in other words a picture of a BC which can no more be deemed a forgery of a Hawaiian BC than a picture of a dollar bill can be deemed a forgery of a dollar bill. In addition to this, Obama’s attorneys have argued and the courts have agreed that the pdf is not a Certified copy of a Hawaiian BC nor a work product of the State of Hawaii and therefore cannot be used to prove or disprove the time or place of Obama’s Birth, hence the courts have no idea of what you are arguing as far as the pdf is concerned or why you are arguing it. So yes, stuff.

    As far as eligibility is concerned, the State of Hawaii through its AG has attested that Obama was born there. This attestation was a public Act of the State of Hawaii and is therefore given Full Faith and Credit by all US states that the attestation is true and correct. So yes stuff.

    In addition to this, in order to put a legal finality to this argument, in July 2009, Congress passed a binding resolution that Obama was born in Hawaii that passed 378-0. So yes, stuff.

    US Courts have deferred to the ruling in Ankeny v. Gov of Indiana which states –

    “Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”

    And finally to put a lid on this whole thing that can never again be lifted a joint session of Congress who were fully aware of all birther claims not just once but twice confirmed that Obama was eligible to be US President and was the lawful President of the United States.

    If you are not aware you should be aware that no US Court including the Supreme Court has any power whatsoever to disturb this determination by Congress that Obama lawfully ran for President and lawfully held the office of the Presidency once he was elected.

    So yes, the courts see your suit as frivolous stuff and if you keep it up they will fine you as a vexatious litigant just like they fined Orly Taitz for doing the same thing that you are doing.

  18. “This Stuff” Huh? Fraud/Forgery, Deceiving , Fabrications, Interference w US Elections , Dis-enfranchised States, Circumventing tge Constitutions Qualifications for President, Color Superiority, Judicial Corruption?

    Do you think that would actually Call for a Hearing or make the News?

    If that happens, you are not living in the United States of America anymore.

  19. I bet the courts are so tired of Cody and this Birther nonsense they don’t know what to do.

    Masrk my words!!!!

    The courts are going to start sanctioning Cody in the form of extremely heavy fines if he keeps bothering them with this stuff.

  20. The Bad Example I’m talking about

    The Washington Post
    COLOR BAITING THE COUNTRY” w “Black Nationalism” as superior to the US CONSTITUTION

    [Trump and Arpaio became brothers in arms five years ago. As they saw it, the two provocateurs — one a celebrity real estate developer, the other a polarizing sheriff — were pursuing justice in the form of supposed evidence that Obama’s birth certificate was fraudulent.

    As caretakers of the false “birther” conspiracy, Trump and Arpaio relentlessly probed Obama’s birth in Hawaii and nurtured a lie to damage the legitimacy of the nation’s first [African American president.]]


    What does Obama being a different color have to do with Qualifications in the Office of President Art.II, Sect. 1, C-5?

    Why does Washington Post forget McCain, Cruz, Rubio all had Federal or State Cases on Eligibility for the Office of President?

    What does being “Black” have to do with Fraud/FORGERY on a long form birth Certificate?

    Who debunked the Qualifications for President? Who is race-baiting the Country because the Courts refuse to SEE EVIDENCE?

    The MSM’s Narrative is.

  21. How can a Motion for a Relief of Judgement and a Reconsideration Judged by the District Court be considered “Tardy”?

    Re: T.F. Bow’s assertions and Tenth Circuit Panel

    The most glaring malfeasance of the Tenth Circuit Panels Order&Judgement is no where in the District Court’s Order, seen at the bottom of the Link Post below, is any mention of “lapse in Time”.


    The insertion of that argument by the Tenth Circuit Panel up for Review En Banc, defies the District Court’s acceptance and judgement on the Motion and Reconsideration.

    It’s as if the Panel of the Tenth Circuit is saying you have no Right to Appeal a Decision by the District Court, when that’s their Job!

    The Tenth Circuit can’t make a Judgement and Order re-directing the Order of the District Court’s already adjudicated Decision “that Time was a problem”, with out first declaring the Order from the District Court “moot” .

    They would have liked to obviously , but the District Court CLEARED the “Tardy” factor away by considering the Motion and Reconsideration.

    This puts the Tenth Circuit Panels decision and argument in a category of coming up with frivolous and wholly incredible arguments that are not based in any kind of Reality, but are based in subversive alternates of, as the appeal En Banc suggest
    Anti-Constitutional bias based on Color.

    The “wrong-doing of the Defendant’s” was the Appeal with “new evidence” and it was considered Timely by the District Court.

    The District Court ruled on the “New Evidence”. That is what’s Appealed. That is what the Panel avoided.

  22. It is good thing that no one has ever argued that those born in the United States are natural-born citizens only by the virtue of the 14th Amendment. (Which not enacted solely by Congress, but was also ratified by the states.)

    Which is of course not relevant to the 10th Circuit’s ruling that Judy’s motion was tardy.

  23. #Republicans & #Democrats together on Sure& Firm NBC #Utpol #MAGA #Birther #TenthCircuit https://t.co/4UtsnCvITu

    https://t.co/6SVgWly73z https://t.co/Vzl0toFPf5


    nat·u·ral·ized, nat·u·ral·iz·ing.
    to confer upon (an alien) the rights and privileges of a citizen.

    14th Amendment Citizenship. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. Before the adoption of the FourteenthAmendment, citizens of the states were automatically considered citizens of the United States.

    Something that is passed down from preceding generations; a tradition. The status acquired by a person through birth; a birthright: a heritage of affluence and social position.]

    The Time process required for a alien adopting new citizenship to acclimate to his new Countries Laws and Norms. A developing loyalty towards a new Country.
    Ref: (Failed)

    MONDAY, JULY 24, 2000


    Can Congress make [ natural born Citizens] under the authority of the US Constitution?

    Congress cannot obstruct or short-cut [natural born Citizen] through naturalization powers without Amending the Constitution.

    The reference to naturalization in the Citizenship Clause is to the process by which immigrants are granted United States citizenship. Congress has power in relation to naturalization underthe Naturalization 
    Clause in Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 of the Constitution.

    We are much better sticking to what both Republicans, Democrats, Independents, All Judges, All Courts and US History in Art. 2, Sect 1, C-5 adhetance, understanding there is no doubt.

    Natural Born Citizen – [Born in the US to Citizen Parents ]


  24. No one doubts that a person born in the United States to two citizen parents is a natural-born citizen — just as no judge, professor, or other expert doubts that a person born in the United States is a natural-born citizen. It is unsurprising that losing litigants claim that judges’ and defendants’ adhering to the U.S. Constitution’s requirements are somehow ignoring the Constitution. When it is actually the losing litigants who are ignoring the U.S. Constitution and the courts’ rulings.

    Judy’s beliefs about the Constitution and Congress have been repeated rejected by the courts. None of which is relevant to the 10th Circuit’s ruling that Judy’s motion was tardy.

  25. “…constitutional requirements; JUSGES & DEFENDANTs cannot ignore the U.S. Constitution when it is convenient for them to do so.”

    [Mayberry v. Madison] when two aspects of the Constitution conflict both must be given diligence.

    The 14th Amendment was not passed to usurp the [natural born Citizen] requirement for President : so started even by the authors.

    Congress has had 8-9 proposals placed before it to change the [ natural born Citizen] requirement in Art 2, Sect 1, C-5, which have failed since 2002 (See House Judiciary Committee Hearing 2000-02)

    Stating Congress rejected alterations proposed,( as T.F. Bow claims the 14th Amendment was all that was needed), leads one to conclusions that Congress was out on needless wild-Goose-chases… especially proposed by Democrat Congressmen.

    This is tantamount to absurdity with anyone who has a reasonable mind.


    This then leads us to conclude the 10th Circuit Panel up for Review En Banc deliberately ignored the Constitution & Congress.

    Their is always a Legal Argument in Debate of Principals and the Standard of Law. And T.F. Bow’s [opinion] is simply an adversarial argument towards the [natural born Citizen] being [naturaluzed] by men rather then by nature and natures God.

    [Born in the US to US Citizen Parents] never was or has been doubted by Any Court or Judge considering the Term. Even T.F. Bow agrees with me on that.

  26. Standing and jurisdiction are not mere “technicalities,” but are constitutional requirements; plaintiffs cannot ignore the U.S. Constitution when it is convenient for them to do so. Regardless, around a dozen courts did expressly rule that birth in the United States is sufficient to confer natural-born citizenship. Including the Georgia ballot challenge in 2012, which Cody Judy unsuccessfully appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

    None of which is relevant to the 10th Circuit’s ruling that Judy’s motion was tardy.

    You know how a parent spanks the 2 yr old when they need to? Well, we on the right are merely spanking the left when we need to!
    But you know this topic generates reverberations on high. Nonetheless, you’re right, thank you for reminding us, youre doing a great job editing. Ultimately, you’re the “master-spanker!”

  28. T.F. Bow tongue-tied again..
    (Re:On the other hand, the “non-birthers” have every judge, professor, or other expert agreeing that birth in the United States is sufficient to confer natural-born citizenship.)

    He talks a big game, but the Truth is the same. Most every Court has dismissed and covered the Constitution up worth technicalities of Standing and Jurisdiction.

    And the MSM has covered up for Obama by refusing to hit the Amp button or in other words shutting the Mic off. Then jumping up and down like TF Bow and saying ” we don’t hear anything?”

    AUGUST 23,2017 GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore (ie. former Chief Justice of Alabama Supreme Court) has said he doesn’t believe Obama is a [natural-born citizen]

    [“Why doesn’t the President have to show he’s a natural-born citizen?,” Moore asked. “There are so many questions about that, and yet the Constitution requires that the President be a natural-born citizen, and we’ve had all kind of suits filed. The press doesn’t mention them and the courts continually reject them. I don’t understand it; I think — they can holler political question all they wish, but it’s a simple fact that if he’s not a natural-born citizen, he’s not qualified to be President, and I don’t care who he is.”]
    By Andrew Kaczynski and Paul LeBlanc, CNN
    Updated 5:23 AM ET, Wed August 23, 2017


    Truth is Obama has become a huge liability for the DNC presiding over 1100 losses around the Country to Republican controlled Legislatures and Governorship. #Democrats Fund Raising has tanked Debt has soared compared to #Republicans



    Still T.F Bow says “Obama’s a winner” The bigger picture is he’s a loser, and in history he’ll be the biggest Humpty- Dumpty.

  29. Sometimes what [needs] to be said, and what is said in the hallway of lawyers and judges gets polluted based on careers, politics, and even money. History’s Record will not be kind to the fancy-pancy parties of today. The Record of History will hear a whisper and no I was not a lawyer or a judge, but there was no lawyer or judge to say what needed to be said. Obama was just plain naked and those with him exposed to all of history will undoubtedly be ashamed to walk the halls of U.S. History.

    AUGUST 23,2017 GOP Senate candidate Roy Moore (ie. former Chief Justice of Alabama Supreme Court) has said he doesn’t believe Obama is a [natural-born citizen] [“Why doesn’t the President have to show he’s a natural-born citizen?,” Moore asked. “There are so many questions about that, and yet the Constitution requires that the President be a natural-born citizen, and we’ve had all kind of suits filed. The press doesn’t mention them and the courts continually reject them. I don’t understand it; I think — they can holler political question all they wish, but it’s a simple fact that if he’s not a natural-born citizen, he’s not qualified to be President, and I don’t care who he is.”]
    By Andrew Kaczynski and Paul LeBlanc, CNN
    Updated 5:23 AM ET, Wed August 23, 2017

  30. The category is citizen which is made up of two sub-categories, natural born and naturalized. Thus a member of congress can be either a natural born citizen or a naturalized citizen.

    If natural born citizens were not part of the category, citizens, they could not be members of congress.

  31. Don’t worry Hillbilly, that’s not my breath you’re smelling, it’s that darned ol’ swamp gas again. You know when it gets to oozing and bubbling the swamp emits a gas that is toxic, so be very careful not to inhale too much or you’ll turn in to a “Swampthing,” then your mind will be polluted for life.

  32. @Hillbilly: I don’t think “TRUMP 44TH PRESIDENT. ..NOT 45TH…LITTLE BOY BARRY NEVER WAS ELIGIBLE” meant any disrespect by using the descriptor “non-birther.”

    The imaginings about fraudulent documents, Fuddy’s death, DNA tests, Kenya, and “Soetoro,” however, do exemplify the “blah blah blah.”

    None of which is relevant to why the 10th Circuit rejected Judy’s filing as tardy.

  33. @Thre-Pound Sledge: No “birth factors” are required for Article I eligibility, as naturalized U.S. can (and have) served in Congress.

  34. It’s important to realize OFA , recognized as a Defendant in Judy v. Obama 17-4055, is destroying any hope for the Democratic Party, and has become a staple of violence in America causing damage within.

    We would expect this from those who believe in wiping out the Standard of Laws Americans expect in the US Constitution. And it is on par of the radical branch to encourage violence , and find protections in the Courts Obama’s hand is in to act as Counsel creating a Record which ignores American History in the Office of President.

    [The 55-year-old Obama is not content to go quietly into the night like other ex-presidents.]

    [“You’re going to see me early next year,” he told his OFA troops after the election, “and we’re going to be in a position where we can start cooking up all kinds of great stuff.”]

    [Obama hopes to install his former civil rights chief Tom Perez at the helm of the Democratic National Committee.]

    [Armed with Obama’s 2012 campaign database]

    [Run by old Obama aides and campaign workers, federal tax records show “nonpartisan” OFA marshals 32,525 volunteers nationwide. Registered as a 501(c)(4), it doesn’t have to disclose its donors, but they’ve been generous. OFA has raised more than $40 million in contributions and grants since evolving from Obama’s campaign organization Obama for America in 2013.]

    [Far from sulking, OFA activists helped organize anti-Trump marches across US cities, some of which turned into riots. After Trump issued a temporary ban on immigration from seven terror-prone Muslim nations, the demonstrators jammed airports, chanting: “No ban, no wall, sanctuary for all!”]

    [Obama is intimately involved in OFA operations and even tweets from the group’s account. In fact, he gave marching orders to OFA foot soldiers following Trump’s upset victory.]

    [When former President Barack Obama said he was “heartened” by anti-Trump protests, he was sending a message of approval to his troops. Troops? Yes, Obama has an army of agitators — numbering more than 30,000 — who will fight his Republican successor at every turn of his historic presidency. And Obama will command them from a bunker less than two miles from the White House.]

    [In what’s shaping up to be a highly unusual post-presidency, Obama isn’t just staying behind in Washington. He’s working behind the scenes to set up what will effectively be a shadow government to not only protect his threatened legacy, but to sabotage the incoming administration and its popular “America First” agenda.]

    Obama’s [doing it through a network of leftist nonprofits led by Organizing for Action. Normally you’d expect an organization set up to support a politician and his agenda to close up shop after that candidate leaves office, but not Obama’s OFA. Rather, it’s gearing up for battle, with a growing war chest and more than 250 offices across the country.]

    How Obama is scheming to sabotage Trump’s presidency

    By Paul Sperry
    February 11, 2017 | 12:52pm


  35. “Hello and welcome everyone to Barry Sotoero’s magic carpet ride. I’m your pilot, the ‘CIA’, and your co-pilot for this fantasy ride today will be T F Bow. Please fasten your seat belts and secure your NON-BIRTHER fraudulently fabricated forms and documents until we have reached cruising altitude. Your magic carpet ride will include a fly over above the area where Loretta Fuddy unfortunately was killed in a soft landing plane crash in the ocean. Although all other passengers survived, our hearts go out to her family. Your magic carpet ride will include a soft landing in parking lot of the DNA Testing Lab. While landed, we’ll go inside and pick up the DNA results from Barack & Michelle Obama, their two innocent daughters, Anita Blanchard, Martin Nesbitt, and Malik Obama. Then we’ll hop back on our magic carpet ride and return back to Kenya, but not before we make a quick pass through Indonesia, so be sure to have your cameras ready. Thank you for flying with ‘Barry Soetoro’s magic carpet ride.’ We hope you fly with us again soon. And always remember, we have you covered through our ‘Magical Mystery Tour’.”

  36. The post and email seems to have been invaded by one of the leftist name calling Obamabot trolls similar to the ones on all the other news sites. I have really enjoyed reading the comments posted here by mostly conservative “thinking” adults who do not usually resort to the childish labeling as the left does constantly. Anyone posting a comment here who uses the term “birther” is attacking and labeling and therefore prejudging in a negative light anyone who does not hold his opinion of where Barack Hussein Obama was born. The troll is also hanging on to the left’s derogatory coinage and use of the word “birther” when Mr. Judy’s lawsuit concerns forged documents and fraud against all Americans.
    I won’t mention this posters name but I’m sure the true conservative Patriots reading the comments will know the one that stated Obama’s legacy will remain intact. The leftist comment trolls will resort to name calling and personal attacks so they are easy to spot. They usually get frustrated and go away if you ignore them.

  37. @TF (totally false) Bow:
    If the singular factor of birth in the U.S. qualifies one to be a natural born citizen, what birth factors define a plain-vanilla ‘citizen’ as required for Article I (One) Congressional jobs?

  38. “Blah blah blah” is all the “birthers” have: comments on blogs, calling in to internet radio shows, but no traction in the courts or Congress.

    On the other hand, the “non-birthers” have every judge, professor, or other expert agreeing that birth in the United States is sufficient to confer natural-born citizenship.

    None of which is relevant to the 10th Circuit’s ruling that Judy’s motion was tardy.

  39. Seems this has hit a nerve. I hope you prevail Judy no matter how you look at it Obama was not eligible to be president. I admire your determination..

  40. Blah blah blah…that’s all these NON-BIRTHERS have really. They’re all riding on a magic carpet ride fueled by a massive blob of methane emitting slime infected sewer swamp. Man, I would literally hate myself if I placed my trust in such a blob. Really? No,…REALLY REALLY? A fake fraudulent fictional magic carpet ride fueled by a,…..A SEWER-SWAMP BLOB? I don’t know if I should laugh uncontrollably or report all of these NON-BIRTHERS to the psychiatric ward. I’m leaning towards the latter. (I wonder if the psychiatric ward have enough jackets that zip up in the back)?

  41. Judy’s case was never a viable rallying point, as it was quickly dismissed as frivolous, and the 10th Circuit affirmed that dismissal in 2015. Even if one believes in some “deep state,” the case has been over for years. Judy’s latest attempt to revive it failed in the district court and failed again in the appellate court. There’s no rational reason to now expect a different result. Nor will any commentary left anywhere change these results.

    No eligibility case went to a jury because, as the courts have explained, there is no law or fact to support such a case. Judges of all political persuasions have dismissed these cases; they have all ruled there is simply no there there. The judge in the Hollister case, for example, only said that the issue had been discussed online; the judge did not rely on Factcheck, Snopes, or any other internet site when dismissing the case.

    “African American” appears nowhere on Obama’s birth certificate; Obama’s father’s race is listed as “African.” And the parents’ race was self-reported; Miki Booth has explained this. Nor was race limited to “Black” or “Negro”; even Mike Zullo has disavowed this argument.

    The notion that Judy would claim he wouldn’t be seeking attention if no attention was given to him is adorable.

  42. Birthers are back to the petty “nuh-uhs!” and displaying their utter ignorance of how the judicial system works. Decades from now, when we are dead and buried, birtherism will be long forgotten, but Obama’s legacy as President #44 will be intact.

  43. “It’s not over till it’s over.” – Yogi Berra.

    Due to the odds, until the usurper Obama game that the cowards in Congress presented to We The People is complete, anything could happen and Judy appears to be a rallying point.

    I say: “Never give up.”

    Barack HUSSEIN Obama is the greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the citizens of the U.S. of A. – a twist on words of a famous Hollywood celebrity.

  44. Cody,

    You have definitely found your calling man!
    You are a paragon of perpetual perseverance:-)
    And We May Thank God that you are!
    God Be With You Cody
    God Bless America

  45. TF bow…no, Cody Judy didn’t strike out 27 times…the courts were corrupt and PROTECTED BY THE DEEP STATE SWAMP 27 times. Your turn.

  46. Not one single case against Barack Obama/Soetoro has made it to a jury. The reason is clear when when you understand when a slobbering liberal judge remarked and working for the defense said that Obama/Soetoro’s narrative had been “fact checked” and “snoped” so he was confident Obama/Soetoro was a US citizen.

    Although a mountain of proof denies any truth to Obama’s claim of being a US citizen liberal judges and contemptible and quite cowardly useless republicans allowed this national disgrace to spread.

    If one looks at Obama/Soeotoro’s certificate of live birth the very first and obvious reason for fraud is the term “African American”. These two words on the face of that fraudulent document weld it solidly to counterfeit status because that was not used as a definition of a race of people. Only Black and Negro was used on birth certificates and other documents in the early 1960’s.

    Then there are the fonts. There were only typewriters used then and how could you have two
    different fonts on the same document and then there is the safety paper that has even more issues. Obama’s CLB is an example of very bad counterfeiting. The only thing that exceeds that total incompetence is our justice system alongside congress.

  47. Everybody is so scared to bust Obama,aka Sotoero. Just because the deep state thugs protect this fraud doesn’t mean he was eligible to run for president. If I was the bully of my neighborhood and stole everybodys’ lemonade money it doesn’t justify my actions just because I’m a bully. I’m praying to God right now as I’m writing that his judgement will fall on this corrupt deep state and it’s frightened protection by crooked judges who should be arrested for what they have done to our Constitution and our people. God please release your high and almighty justice upon these corrupt teeth-gnashing arrogant judges and bless Cody Judy, and Sheriff Joe Arpaio and Mike Zullo. God please show favor not to just my plea but to millions and millions of your children here in America. Please dear heavenly Father. We pray right now. In Jesus name, amen, and amen.

  48. Every time Judy goes to court, he is told that the law is not his side. And Judy’s (and Laity’s) beliefs regarding the meaning of natural-born citizen have been rejected by every court that has considered the matter.

    The game ended January 20, 2013. For the four last years, Judy has confused playing the game with swinging his bat in the stadium’s long-since-deserted parking lot.

  49. By the late 19th century, baseball was widely recognized as the national sport of the United States.

    @TF Bow Calling the Game over, before it’s actually over is what most people would call ” Cheating the Game “.

    Rallies in baseball can come even in the last inning. Let’s not forget baseball is an American Game.

  50. Judy will prevail because the law is on his side. Obama is not a “Natural Born Citizen”. Since Baseball is being used analogically, Obama’s team will soon have to forfeit the game.

  51. Judy has been stopped in literally every eligibility case that he ever filed.

    To extend the baseball metaphor, Judy has struck out 27 times; the game is over.

  52. I gotta give Judy credit, he “just isn’t stoppable”. He is like that TimeX watch commercial of
    years ago (he takes a licking and keep on ticking). He is still in the ball game. Although he
    has struck out many times, all he needs is just one home run. Judy, keep swinging and get
    that home run. Thanks for going to bat for all America.

  53. Years ago, when the 10th Circuit first affirmed the district court’s dismissal (and finding of frivolousness), Judy filed a petition for rehearing en banc back then, and no judge voted then to rehear the case. The same will happen here.

    Judy’s motion does not explain why the one-year limit should not apply to him. Nor did Judy have a motion pending in SCOTUS; he had mailed one, but since his case was closed, it was returned unfilled.

    Rather, Judy accuses the court of treason, and says it based its ruling on Obama’s skin color. It is easy to predict that these arguments will not prevail.

    Judy’s case against McCain was dismissed because Judy failed to provide a valid address; the judge did not comment on Judy’s arguments.