by Sharon Rondeau

(Jun. 20, 2017) — On Thursday, a Los Angeles mother whose very young daughter was taken by the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS) in March of last year and placed with her non-custodial father will face trial on a charge of “spousal abuse.”

The hearing is scheduled for 8:30 a.m. PDT at the Clara Shortridge Foltz Criminal Court Building located at 210 West Temple Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012.

The charge arose as a result of an altercation which occurred on December 20, 2015 involving both parents.  While the mother, to whom The Post & Email has referred as “Michelle Robinson” throughout its coverage of the case, reported the incident to the police and the father declined to file a report, in a bizarre twist of events, she is being prosecuted by the Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office.

Robinson has reported that she was the victim of domestic violence on the part of her child’s father, Eric Crutchfield, in both March 2015 and the December 20 incident.  Following the March episode, Robinson turned Crutchfield out of her home, and there was no question as to the custody of their then-three-month-old daughter.

Robinson then filed for and was granted a restraining order against Crutchfield with full legal and physical custody of their daughter.

With December 20 being their daughter’s birthday, Robinson chose to allow Crutchfield to see his only child at his home under her supervision for a time.  However, after Robinson arrived at the home, they entered into a violent argument, resulting in her sustaining a bite to her arm.

During the altercation, their child was reportedly strapped in her car seat, asleep.

Once extricating herself, Robinson drove to the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department to report the incident.  However, a deputy informed Robinson that she was in the wrong jurisdiction and should report it to the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) after first obtaining medical treatment.

Robinson proceeded to the emergency room at Kaiser Permanente and, following treatment, reported the incident to the LAPD, after which an investigation was opened by Detective Sean Horton.  She has identified Horton as the individual who contacted DCFS claiming that her young daughter was at risk in her custody.

Although Crutchfield did not press charges against Robinson, Horton completed a criminal complaint on Crutchfield’s behalf which Robinson said Crutchfield signed “after the fact.”  Robinson was then prosecuted by the Los Angeles district attorney, facing trial last July in what ended in a mistrial.

The hearing scheduled for Thursday came about as a result of last July’s mistrial.

Horton’s call to DCFS triggered an initial investigation which the agency closed in February 2016. However, after Horton claimed to DCFS to have seen a home video allegedly taken by an eyewitness from the altercation showing Robinson as the “aggressor,” DCFS contacted Robinson at work to request that she bring her daughter to their offices to relinquish custody.

During the spousal-abuse proceedings last July, Robinson said that Horton “perjured himself” when questioned about the video he alleged exists of the December 20, 2015 altercation.

The Post & Email has seen the transcript of Horton’s testimony, and Robinson has filed a complaint with the Internal Affairs Division of LAPD in regard to her allegations against Horton which remains unresolved.

At the time she turned over her daughter to DCFS, Robinson said she expected the detention to be brief at an area foster home. However, the child was placed with Crutchfield, who has a history of drug use and violations of Robinson’s restraining order, the most recent of which was reported just last week to the Inglewood Police Department.

Robinson’s attempts to regain custody of her daughter, who is now 2 1/2 years old, were unsuccessful after a contested hearing on April 25 granted final and full custody to Crutchfield.  Because of difficulties finding a DCFS-approved monitor for the supervised-only visitation she was granted by the Edelman Children’s Court, Robinson has not seen her daughter since last October.

Robinson told The Post & Email that the proceedings are expected to last 4-5 days.  Her defense is being handled by the Los Angeles County public defender’s office.  “I had to ask during my appearance last week for the public defender (PD) to counter the Prosecution’s offer after I heard the judge say there was no counter by the Defense. My attorney said they would reject my request for dismissal, but I went for the ask and requested that she have my counter entered on to the record. The Judge noted my counter for the record; however, there was no comment or response from the prosecution,” Robinson told us on Monday.


Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. How can I get my case investigated and it been 8 year s I have two case the Hernandez and Mitchell me and my kids are disable in Lancaster they do not try to help u with nothing and they don’t understand us and all the worker s I had said they don’t believe there are disable people or kids or babies or child children kid these soc workers out here they need to be train all over again they don’t understand or we need Advocates to understand us I am going to try to start a org for disable people and kids and try to train the soc worker and boss and supervision they need to work together

  2. I actually know this case, and victimizing a victim is never acceptable. In many cases involving a battered person there is a lengthy history of a pattern of abuse. In California, the law is clear, a person who is victimized by a batterer, shall be protected by law enforcement. In fact, in this case, the Batterer was clearly and directly admonished by the Court not to engage in any contact with the victim.

    Charlotte Jones are you actually Detective Sean Horton? Or an LAPD employee?

  3. I would say just one thing in this case that I know as fact because clearly there are undisclosed details.

    Restraining orders cannot be treated like a game of pick and choose. If you get one it is a court order for all involved, not a special right that allows you to decide you can see the other person when you’re in the mood.

    Unfortunately a lot of women believe they’re holding a golden ticket. It’s like climbing in the tiger cage at the zoo because you were in the mood to play with a cat.