THE BATTLE WITH BULLIES, FOREIGN & DOMESTIC
by Cody Robert Judy, ©2017
(Jun. 1, 2017) — Pushing against a standard without the intent to change the standard legally, when that process is defined in the U.S. Constitution is essentially the definition of bullying the standard. This describes the process that has been used to subvert the qualification of the Office of the President in the [natural born Citizen] requirement as a standard unique to the Office and different than U.S. Representatives and U.S. Senators, that is Citizen, now before the U.S. Tenth Circuit Court in Case Judy v. Obama 17-4055 and the U.S. Supreme Court in a hidden Application to Individual Justice Gorsuch.
Cody Robert Judy is no stranger to Taking A Stand for the U.S. Constitution. He has fought battle after battle for America’s Choice in seating a President who was indeed without a doubt American defined by an allegiance of both soil in the United States and by both parental inheritance of mother and father equally recognizing those immigrants coming from foreign countries indeed need TIME to acclimate to a standard of law that is foreign to them from their country of origin. But that is not the only battle Cody has had to fight with bullies, foreign and domestic, as we will detail further.
Bullies insert themselves in high and low places in virtually every fabric and niche of society. Let’s review a definition of “bully” to remind ourselves the difference in Taking A Stand against a bully who’s harassing a standard and one who is standing up for the standard because they can often be confused and misidentified.
Bully – a person who uses strength or power to harm or intimidate those who are weaker.
Bullying is the use of force, threat, or coercion to abuse, intimidate, or aggressively dominate others. The behavior is often repeated and habitual. One essential prerequisite is the perception, by the bully or by others, of an imbalance of social or physical power, which distinguishes bullying from conflict. Behaviors used to assert such domination can include verbal harassment or threat, physical assault or coercion, and such acts may be directed repeatedly towards particular targets. Rationalizations of such behavior sometimes include differences of social class, race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, appearance, behavior, body language, personality, reputation, lineage, strength, size, or ability. If bullying is done by a group, it is called mobbing.
Those who are most susceptible to being bullied are those who are weaker. That can be seen in as simple of a position as a ‘renter’ and a landlord’ or as complicated as multiple corporations merging together to form a cartel or cabal in order to push a desired and mutually beneficial goal of fleecing the little guy with a standard that conflicts with law or even sabotages an election with fraud and forgery upon the voter.
Recently Cody has had to take a stand with the former at the same time as he has had to deal with the latter because bullies are really about robbing, stealing, and pillaging as a habit and until they are stopped, as the definition points out, their behavior is unbridled and encouraged with positive rewards. They get what they want by rolling over people, often with a thick checkbook, high-priced attorneys, and even elected position.
In a property sale affecting the place where Cody is a renter, the landlords exchanging the property sought to terminate (Cody’s) renter’s contracts, obligations to renters, and future rents that had been paid. As it happens, renters often pay a deposit which covers damages when they move, but landlords have been increasing these premiums to also cover first and last month’s rent. In a property exchange these funds can often be lost to the renter as the new owner points to the old owner landlord for the reimbursement of these funds, and the old owner landlord points to the new owner landlord as responsible for all obligations of the property.
This is optimally a form of bullying renters out of their cushion rents to even get in another place and let’s just call it what it is – a form of contractual theft that most renters neither have the money to fight or stand up against when educated attorneys are far from being afforded and they are looking for the old landlord in the dark of being kicked out on the street with no money to even move their property in what can be as quick as a five-day process.
Read the rest here.