WAS IT HIS TESTIMONY?
by Sharon Rondeau
(May 9, 2017) — Late Tuesday afternoon, White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer announced that President Donald Trump fired FBI Director James Comey.
Speculation is abounding that Comey’s May 3 testimony relating to Hillary Clinton’s aide, Huma Abedin, to the Senate Judiciary Committee, which was reported earlier on Tuesday to have proved inaccurate.
A correction to Comey’s statement was issued on Tuesday.
Last summer, Comey was highly criticized for making the judgment that Clinton’s use of a private email server, on which some classified information was sent, did not merit criminal prosecution.
In late October, just 11 days before the presidential election, Comey wrote a letter to Congress which was made public stating that he was reopening the Clinton investigation based on new information found by some of his agents concerning Abedin’s husband’s computer.
Comey again said approximately a week later that the FBI would not prosecute.
A letter Trump wrote to Comey on Tuesday indicated that U.S. Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein recommended his dismissal.
During congressional testimony on March 20, Comey confirmed that the FBI was conducting an investigation into alleged connections between Trump and the Russian government, an issue about which no hard evidence has yet been made public.
However, the letter to Comey states, in Trump’s words, that Comey reportedly informed Trump “on three separate occasions” that he was not under investigation.
This is a developing story.
I am so thankful that Pres. Trump has fired FBI Director Comey, at last. In my opinion, Comey did many things wrongly. He gave Hillary a ‘get out of jail free pass’; he decided she needed ‘intent’ to be proved in order to be indictable; he saw no conflict of interest in Bill meeting with Comey’s own boss Lynch on the airport tarmac in AZ while Bill’s wife got off scot-free by Comey; during the presidential campaign his agents conducted a mock-investigation/interview of Hillary at her home on a weekend where no pertinent questions were asked; he still has not indicted crazy-weiner with his under-age sexting and storage of state dept secrets on his and huma’s laptop. I am sure there is more. Hopefully, the new FBI Director will indict Hillary and really start to drain the swamp.
Wow! That interesting especially given his ten year term. I’ll bet he was planning on being around for awhile.
[The FBI Director is appointed for a single 10-year term by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The current Director of the FBI is James Comey, who assumed office on September 4, 2013.]
After his testimony about Hillary’s Server and emails that amounted to a usurpation of the Secretary of State’s Office, I became very doubtful of his being compromised.
[After watching the four plus hour Hearing held by the House Committee on Government Oversight and Reform chaired by UT. R. Representative Jason Chaffetz with FBI Director James Comey under sworn testimony, it is my Review that the Director has not conducted the Investigation in a thorough consideration of the interest of the Public, in consideration of the Standard of the Laws, by subscribing to the interest of the Facts, presented in the Case, held to the Standard of Laws of the United States of America, any Reasonable Director of an Investigation would Report Publicly so as to conclude the matter rather than prolong the matter.
This “self-appreciated” grand-standing held by the Director as “Transparency” is a dis-service to the Public and has acted in a couched way of denying evidence that existed, any reasonable prosecutor would prosecute the case with the Facts, he has become familiar with under a tiny scope of the Laws least likely to succeed, while ignoring the broader scope of Laws most likely to succeed under the exact same Facts or circumstances as Evidence.
If I may parlance the varying Sets, or Standards of Laws, under the parameters of the Investigation as Victims of a Predator. One victim was acknowledged alive and well, though carelessly victimized but without any real physical injury. The other victim was repeatedly stabbed over thirty thousand times and suffered an agonizing death.
The Laws that suffered a death were the Felony Charges of: Obstruction of Justice by destruction of evidence and Obstruction of Justice to avoid FOIA in the usurpation of the Office of the Secretary of State.]
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2016/07/testimony-of-fbi-director-compromised.html