SACRIFICING CHOICE, INNOCENCE & OUR CHILDREN’S FUTURE
by Cody Robert Judy, Presidential Candidate, ©2016
(Apr. 29, 2016) — The thought occurred to me that woman are not acting like a Minority in defending the United States Constitution. Our Republic under the U.S. Constitution is designed to respect individual rights. The U.S. Constitution protects Individual rights in a synopsis the Minority is able to stand up against the Majority when specific rights are trampled. Because of the 19th Amendment that gave Citizens suffrage without regard to sex, sometimes we think of women more as a minority needing these protections adopted in the Constitution.
I’ve been careening my head and wrestling about the dismal support in general of Women for the [natural born Citizen] qualification for the Office of President, i.e., born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents for some two weeks now. Scratching my head at this and trying to understand it because on the outset women have a great interest in protecting their children in a natural instinct of ‘nurturing’ that I think should be very friendly to this Core Protection in the Constitution.
Additionally, women very much in a Civil understanding have more experience of being treated as weaker sex, not being allowed to vote, being shunned for divorce or not being given a Choice in many instances of history in the reproductive rights, which should engender a defense for the protections of the U.S. Constitution especially at the Core of it in the Office of President.
This however has not translated into support either by Contributions or readership for which I’ve scratched my head about until the question was formed: Why? Why aren’t woman acting like a Minority any more? And the answer is because they just aren’t. The laws have been changed to favor them in almost every perspective and as it happens often the majority gets complacent with their rights because they begin taking them for granted. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has no doubt made great strides in achieving office and made unprecedented roads towards the Office of the President, but she’s also made unprecedented roads in sacrificing the Principles of that Office by not challenging Obama’s ineligibility which has in fact lead to everything we are going through now that is panning out like a golden road to disaster.
Women’s choices are protected in most aspects. They can get divorced and file such as a Majority, most always getting favor in property which also might be parallel the majority filing. There’s no CIVIL office they are prohibited from based on gender. They can vote. Minimum wage is the same for both genders.
So what’s this thing in my head about so little respect for supporting the Constitution especially surrounding the Office of President in the concern for national security via children and weaknesses in vulnerability of gender in a Minority position?
Well, as I researched this I found the facts don’t lie. Women are a Majority and as such are, I believe, slipping into a complacency of their Constitutional Rights afforded and protected by the U.S. Constitution in their voting bloc faster then they even can comprehend; even whilst Hillary Clinton is promising the world to women they actually already have it as a Majority.
Perhaps in the hope that the FBI does not handle her choice to change the Computer Server of the U.S. Federal Government to her own private server in the official conduct of Secretary of State? No doubt, the U.S. Government might have something to say about changing their server, but she didn’t ask, she just made that decision and I don’t think it was in the interest of FOIA or serving the people in a responsibility of that office. Yes, it’s true women are the Majority.
With the exception of Alaska and North Dakota women are the Majority or equal in every State of the Union and Men are the Minority. Tossing the States whose population is equal, Women are a Majority in the Majority of States.
Read the rest here.