What’s Your Record?

THE NATURAL BORN CITIZEN SUPERBOWL CHAMPIONSHIP

by Cody Robert Judy, Presidential Candidate, ©2016

(Jan. 25, 2016) — What’s your Record? Everyone has got a record. Last Sunday the Denver Broncos played the New England Patriots for NFC Championship and the North Carolina Panthers played the Arizona Cardinals for the AFC Championship in the National Football League. The Panthers and Broncos won their respective Conference Championships, after winning their Divisions, and are now qualified to play in Super Bowl 50. Imagine the outrage of America if two teams showed up who had not qualified? This is what his happening in the highest Office of the United States of America, but where is the outrage?

CBS News reported in an article January 24th written by Scott Simon entitled “Scott Simon: Do away with the “natural born Citizen” clause”, that the qualification for President should be done away with. The article essentially derided the amount of time it took to become qualified for President if [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] were enforced, as it should be excluding even Obama, and Cruz, if [born in the U.S.] were alone the qualification.

Indeed it cannot be denied the totality of the argument includes both Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents. Obama and Cruz both claim the [conferred] citizenships of their [Parents] at birth, so if this were denied their credibility weakens in the single claim of [conferred] U.S. Citizenship from their mothers.

The 14th Amendment enhances the [Place] as important jurisdiction in the United States of America of the 50 States as a defining territory and certainly cannot be thrown under the bus as an important part of the U.S. Constitution. As Amendments go and considering the difficulty in the Amendment process it stands as credible Law.

Indeed Cruz’s citing of the Naturalization Law of 1790 as law actually excludes him as at that time, and in the Act, a mother’s citizenship was not allowed in a conferred citizenship as suffrage had not been passed either. The Naturalization Law of 1795 actually retracted two words, natural born, from [natural born Citizen] in favor of [Citizen], and added a word [moral] to character. Of course the titles infer an ACT of Congress considering [naturalization] given to Congress in enumerated powers Article 1, Section 8, Clause 1 and [natural born Citizen] needs no act of Congress for definition.

The absolute failure of most reports by the Main Stream Media is of course to simply advocate upholding the Constitution’s qualifications for President and Vice President distinct and unique from those of Senators and Representatives. The obvious capitulation is to remove the barrier of TIME it takes for [born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents] because two generations cannot be skipped, and it may also be lost with a union of a foreigner or a foreign place of birth.

Bancroft wrote in his History of the Formation of the Constitution of the United States (1884) (Volume 1 Page 346):

One question on the qualifications of the president was among the last to be decided. On the twenty-second of August the committee of detail, fixing the requisite age of the president at thirty-five, on their own motion and for the first time required that the president should be a citizen of the United States, and should have been an inhabitant of them for twenty-one years. The idea then arose that no number of years could properly prepare a foreigner for the office of president; but as men of other lands had spilled their blood in the cause of the United States, and had assisted at every stage of the formation of their institutions, the committee of states who were charged with all unfinished business proposed, on the fourth of September, that “no person except a natural-born citizen, or a citizen of the United States at the of the adoption of this constitution, should be eligible to the office of president,” and for the foreign-born proposed a reduction of the requisite years of residence to fourteen. On the seventh of September, the modification, with the restriction as to the age of the president, was unanimously adopted.

The intentions of the qualification was indeed noticed in arguments of Congress as a “Happy Barrier” or Wall that foreign influence would indeed have to recant to in TIME, and during that time of two generations, as is mentioned in Congressional Testimony of the Judicial Committee of the House in 2000, a significant change is perpetuated in cultural loyalty. As the matter is seriously given hearing, the discovery over the eight recent attempts since even 2003 has been not to disregard the wisdom of the wall or barrier between foreign influence, as well as the incentive for the propagation of Americanism.

Of course the United States of America through the U.S. Constitution opened every single door to every single office to immigrants who become U.S. Citizens who spend some time here, and that time is graduated with responsibility of the considered Office. The Office of President simply had more TIME added to it, and it is resented by the stomping of Hell, and accusations of the devil in great fury!

Read the rest here.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.