by Dwight Kehoe, Editor, TPATH, ©2015
(Nov. 24, 2015) — In the beginning of our great American experiment built upon freedom and liberty the word “militia” meant something far different than what most people believe it means today. The important concept here is that there is a difference, a huge difference. Interpretation of words, phrases and intent must be made with that in mind.
During the preparation and authorization of the body and substance of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, the First Continental Congress had already been formed and George Washington had been appointed as the commander of the Continental Forces. But this was all done under the strong control of England which was, in a sense, a Central Government. That government and the fear of what all governments were capable of was all the impetus the Founders needed in their effort to provide for people’s control over the government.
The Founders understood that if the Colonies were to survive they must coalesce and be guided by certain rules. That coalescence would by nature create the entity known as a federal government. Keeping in mind that almost to a man, the Founders were part of the elite, far from living the lives of the common man. They knew, not just from history but from personal observation and experience, how quickly a central government could overpower and dominate the people. Consideration of tyrannical governments was the inspiration and the essence of every word they wrote in those documents, in their communications with each other and the writings of the Federalist Papers.
Every word they selected was chosen for its meaning, its concept and its logic. No legal document in history has ever conveyed such clear and concise intent, in as few words, as has the Bill of Rights.
For certain they imagined times changing, the rise of technology and many other issues that might force an adjustment to the Constitution. For that purpose they included the Amendment process, but made that process difficult to enact. This of course was to prevent a small number of power people or politicians from overturning the rights which they, the Founders, had espoused for all of the people.
This is leading up to, surprisingly enough, the Second Amendment, the one most vilified, the one most parsed and the one most dreaded by a powerful central government. Over the decades many so-called scholars, who were little more than leftist ideologues, have stripped and ripped those 27 words into multiple contortions of unbelievable meanderings.
All of it done for one purpose. To prevent the true meaning, the true purpose and the true intent of the Second Amendment. And why do they continuously embark on these efforts? Simple, any right afforded to the people diminishes government power, proportionately. It is no more complicated than that.
Before we go further into what was at that time considered to be a militia, let’s consider what a militia is in today’s terminology. That would be an organized, trained and armed troop of individuals that would stand ready to be employed by whomever or whatever authority regulates them. A militia could be rebels, could be supporters of a specific government or ideology, they could be anarchists or even patriots.
Some supporters of the Second Amendment, fearing that it refers to only a militia, attempt to deny that the National Guard, which is controlled by the Governors of states, are not militias. But they in fact are. They fit the old and new description. That is an organized, trained, armed and regulated group of individuals.
Returning now to our Founders. A militia at that time was considered to be made up of every able-bodied male between the ages of 18 and 35 (this number is debatable) and those people were considered to be a line of defense for their state and communities. And not just from foreign invasion and tyrannical power grabbing central governments but also to protect the communities from the many indigenous natives who were a constant threat. Note: That threat in today’s terms would include organized gangs, psychopathic murderers and Islamic terrorists, to name just a few.
Big government-supporting scholars, as referenced above, have taken the words of the Second Amendment and attempted to twist them, distort them and cloud their meaning in an effort to deny the people their right to self-defense. They prattle on about what does “bear arms” mean? What does “militia” mean, what does “self-defense” mean? Even what is meant by the term “arms.” Remind you of another man who couldn’t understand the meaning of the word “is”?
So we will now make it clear as we show you exactly what those 27 words meant at the time, which is how they should be interpreted in context to the Second Amendment or for that matter any document or writing of that time. Word meanings may have changed over the years, but the intent of the Founders never has, never will.
Here are a few pieces of the not-so-complicated puzzle:
Militia = All able-bodied males between 18 and about 35.
People = Every citizen, including all men, all women, of any age.**
Regulated = Organized, trained and under the control of a commander.
The comma (,) = A mark of punctuation used for a division in a sentence as in setting off a word, phrase, clause or idea.
The colon (:) = A mark of punctuation in a sentence used for indicating that which follows is an elaboration or summation of what precedes it.
Bear Arms = Holding or carrying of any weapon by an individual.
Right = An inalienable gift that was set forth by God.
Infringe = To violate, break, limit or undermine something.
Here now, those 27 words of the Second Amendment:
A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.
Interpretation as of the time of its construction and intended implementation:
- The first half of the Amendment declares that for a free state to remain free of outside dangers it must have a well-trained and organized force made up of all able-bodied male citizens.
- The second part of the Amendment is separated by a comma, which indicates a separate thought, idea or concept. Note they did not use a colon (:) which would have indicated an elaboration or clarification of the preceding statement. Therefore, the second half of the Second Amendment which follows a comma is in fact a separate concept from what preceded it. Hence the people and the militia are two separate entities and considered as such by the founders.
- The God-ordained right for citizens – the people – to own and to carry any weapon shall not be violated, broken or undermined by any government.***
Sharon Rondeau has operated The Post & Email since April 2010, focusing on the Obama birth certificate investigation and other government corruption news. She has reported prolifically on constitutional violations within Tennessee’s prison and judicial systems.