WILL TRUMP’S TOUGH TALK TRANSLATE INTO ACTION?
by Cody Robert Judy, ©2015
(Aug. 3, 2015) — “It has to be one of the most painful things a Candidate has to do when running for Office, especially for President of the United States,” Cody said, as he spoke of running for President against the incumbent Mr. Obama in 2012 in the Democratic Party but Cody passed that test. Now the same burden falls on Mr. Donald Trump for the rhetoric of 2011 against Obama. As a Citizen Mr. Trump didn’t have standing, but all of that has changed now with Mr. Trump’s declaration as a Candidate for President.
They say with great knowledge comes responsibility and the Courts have said repeatedly in what Obama has credited himself with as over 200 wins in Court against the Birthers now, that you have to have ‘Standing‘ in order to challenge another Candidate’s Qualifications.
Citizens that challenged Obama based on their voting rights were denied Court Hearings on the matter due to their failure to produce what the Court asserts are legal damages. Obama’s own lawyers attested to that legal maneuver in 2008 California Case Barnett v. Obama that ended in the 9th Circuit Court from Judge Carter the former Marine many had hoped would decide the issue of Obama’s ineligibility to the Constitution’s major demands that only a ‘natural born Citizen‘ devolve upon the Office of the President and VP. Representatives and Senators endure a more minor “Citizen“ Qualifications in the Constitution.
Mr. Judy took on the burden in 2008 suing McCain/ Obama and again took the Principle to Obama in 2012 from the very beginning with State Ballot Challenges in New Hampshire and Georgia that ended through the States Supreme Courts in the United States Supreme Court in Judy v. Obama 12-5376 starting July 2, 2012 and running through the 2012 Election to Jan 7th 2013.
Many People don’t understand, Cody said, that when you run for President there is a very big burden upon you to represent the public with your standing against any illegality especially concerning the qualifications of your opponents in the race. Of course there is a lot of pressure to be civil and nice,” he referred to Reagan’s 11 Commandment- Thou shalt not speak ill of any fellow Republican, ‘but when it comes to ‘standing’ and the Constitution one much consider the duty to the oath you would take as President to ‘preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States’ from foreign and domestic enemies.’
The usurpation of the Office of the President is really the worst case scenario nightmare you can think of. Anyone not qualified is of course a usurper of that office.
The Proposed Question is: Donald Trump sues Fox News and Ted Cruz asking the court for an emergency injunction preventing Fox from allowing Cruz to participate in the Republican presidential candidate debate August 6. (Fox I seem to recall has said that only eligible candidates may participate). Courts have ruled in favor of competitive standing in the past.
[Tim Says: Fox is a private corporation. It could invite a Bufflehead duck to the debates and the courts wouldn’t care]
D- 2016 Candidate for President Cody Robert Judy replied:
The question is ‘Has Fox Entered into a ‘binding agreement’ with the Candidates on the Stage in their ‘Qualifying’ rules for the Debate?
I think they have with this list of Published Qualifiers.
http://www.politico.com/story/2015/07/fox-republican-debate-lowers-threshold-120748.html
“Although we are relaxing one component of our entry criteria – the requirement that candidates must score 1% or higher in an average of five most recent national polls – all other components of the criteria remain in effect for the 5 PM/ET debate. Participants must meet all U.S. Constitutional requirements; must announce and register a formal campaign for president; and must file all necessary paperwork with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), including financial disclosure.
Candidates at the very least are assured of these stipulations in their own appearance invitation. They come and expect a certain criteria to have been enforced as a component of their agreement to participate. The threat of violation seen as an endorsement of the Fox qualification criteria, i.e. setting the Constitutional Standard.
The reason Fox News invites their Corporation into the mix is based on the interpretation of their saying a Candidate is qualified under the Constitution demand for a natural born Citizen.
It not only becomes a liability , but a competitive insult to a Candidate to have someone on that stage who is not qualified, not to mention the ‘public interest’ of the Case which millions of Campaign Dollars might be granted or withheld as an interest.
I certainly do not think its frivolous and could prove a sticking point for Mr. Trump if he fails to do so now, and then brings it up later on.
As stated here I think Fiorina is suffering damages being held off the 9PM Primetime Debate Stage. She should take the damages to the Court and get the ruling on Cruz and Rubio who are on at 9PM while she is being held at the 5PM debate.
http://codyjudy.blogspot.com/2015/08/breaking-news-obamas-ineligibility-case.html ]
There is no doubt that Mr. Trump as a Citizen challenged Obama on his eligibility publicly, but Mr. Trump was not an official Candidate in 2012, so he had latitude in basically what he stated was a Citizens’ effort that produced Obama’s long form birth certificate after 3 long years. Here’s the Clip that showed Mr. Trump stating he was “very proud of himself for accomplishing what no one else has been able to accomplish.” Referring to this link of April 27th, 2011 Obama releasing his Long Form Birth Certificate.
Read the rest here.
ALL Citizens have Standing by virtue of the right to petition the government for redress of grievances. When elections are fixed or fraudulent, that is tantamount to voter disenfranchisement on a massive scale.
The Highest standard of citizenship is the Natural-Born Citizen. All other citizenship is of a lesser standard and level. The established definition of an NBC is “One born IN a Country of Parents who are both themselves Citizens of that country”. One must have both Jus Soli (be “of the soil” of a country by being born there) AND 100% Jus Sanquinis (be “of the Blood” of Americans). This was affirmed in Minor v Happersett at the US Supreme Court. In that case the court ruled that “there can be NO Doubt that an NBC is one born in the USA of parents who are both themselves citizens”. Virginia Minor, the Plaintiff was born in the USA. BOTH her parents were Americans. Obama,McCain,Rubio,Cruz,Santorum,Jindal and Swarzenegger are, ALL SEVEN, ineligible for the Presidency and/or the Vice-Presidency.