DEFENDING FREE SPEECH?
by Cody Robert Judy, ©2015
If we followed the Macy’s and the mainstream media’s example of combining business and politics, we would in fact STOP their ability to function at all when it comes to not understanding the Constitution’s demands for the President to be a ‘natural born Citizen‘ which is different then the Constitution’s demands for a U.S. Senator and U.S. Representative to be a ‘Citizen‘.
They have played “dumb-down” politics for a while now, but this new trend towards ‘nixing a candidate for President’ based on words after they can’t get it straight themselves is a very dangerous road for them to take. It actually makes the media a Target of anti-American and anti-Constitutional rhetoric. People have frowned upon Palestinians hiding their military hardware in schools and hospitals and using women and children as human shields to protect those munitions of war, but it appears the tactic is employed quite easily when Univision and NBC think nothing about the little girls with their mommies wanting to watch the Miss America Pageant. They don’t care about their wishes, do they? They only care about themselves.
Who cares what Donald Trump says? Doesn’t the media think we the people still have the right to let it pass in one ear and out the other if we choose, or do they think people should start going to prison for free speech? It’s a freedom of speech issue, especially when running for U.S. President in an elected office. NBC will be broadcasting its own ruin when Mr. Trump legally starts buying advertising on their stations telling the little girls and their mommies that mean old NBC and Univision will not be broadcasting their favorite show of the year based on political free speech of a Candidate for President? Do you want to support that happening?
We used to think the mainstream media was a neutral source for equality, at least when it comes to ‘free speech,’ especially when it comes to politics, but it’s just not the case. A Gallup poll in January 2015 showed 46% of Americans registered as Independents, but where is the coverage of the United States Supreme Court case, Judy v. Obama 14-9396, that has the power with Justice to totally send Obama packing out of the White House because of the fraud of being unqualified for the Office of the President?
It is really not hard at all to understand that qualifications for President are higher then those of the qualifications for U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives; even the age and time are higher than those offices of Congress. So now, all of a sudden, the media ‘thinks’ that ‘Citizen’ and ‘natural born Citizen’ mean the same thing and the Office of the President’s qualifications have been arbitrarily lowered without a Constitutional Amendment?
Why doesn’t the media asks themselves why ‘natural born Citizen’ was even placed in the Constitution and understand that with the Office of the President, ‘more’ security was wanted, not ‘less,’ when it comes to the demands of two full American generations being the qualifications in natural born Citizen that entail “Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents?” Support that definition today on Independence Day.
They don’t like discrimination? What about the discrimination that we have that 11-year-old girls cannot marry? Do they not like that discrimination, either? What about the discrimination that eight-year-olds cannot legally get a license to drive a car? Do they not like that discrimination? You see, the media does likes discrimination and they employ it daily. Look, for instance, at their silence on Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro’s potential of being kicked out and erased from U.S. history as POTUS based on the very Justice that the Office of the President does not allow anyone except a natural born Citizen to be President- [Born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents].
Read the rest here.