Spread the love

“PULLING AN OBAMA”

by Cody Robert Judy,

(Apr. 9, 2015) — What is the ‘Delivery of Death on the Devil’s Slide“? The foreboding haunt of truth that is expected but delayed so long the thief begin to actually think the truth was whatever he said it was. President Nixon said to the interviewer Frost – “Well, when the President does it, that means that it is not illegal,” trying to justify the sense of Watergate to the Nation just as Obama has tried to do dismissing the ‘natural born Citizen’ qualification clause of the United States Constitution Art. II, Sect. I, Clause 5 from his office, but the facts remain of the 44 Presidents of the United States of America all were ‘natural born Citizens’ –born in the U.S. to Citizen Parents; save those who were grandfathered in as Citizens at the time of the Adoption of the Constitution, and “Arthur” who reserved his own distinction in burning his alien documentation in 1881 sneaking in for one term after serving as Vice President.

Most Baby Boomers remember where they were when the house came crashing down around Nixon in Watergate and every ‘Gate’ in political history referencing that, and it may well be the future generations exemplar moment of truth in a teaching moment when the same happens to Obama. Indeed if “Pulling an Arthur” meant burning vital statistics to remove evidence, the future generations might remember “Pulling an Obama” as fabricating them in an identification fraud. The following tracking numbers have been identified and reported by the United States Postal Service as arriving at their destinations. Obama’s Writ of Certiorari was served to him at the White House by the designated person at the White House this morning at 4:12 AM.

Supreme Court of the United States: Tracking Number: 9114901230803814291305

April 6, 2015 , 7:46 am Delivered WASHINGTON, DC 20543

Solicitor General of the United States: Tracking Number: 9114901230803814291329
April 8, 2015 , 5:26 am Delivered WASHINGTON, DC 20530

Obama White House Tracking Number: 23082180000029539521
April 8, 2015 , 4:12 am Delivered WASHINGTON, DC 20500

Your item was delivered at 4:12 am on April 8, 2015 in WASHINGTON, DC 20500 to 20500 WH PU. The item was signed for by A SWANN. Wednesday, April 8, 2015
Signed for By: A SWANN // WASHINGTON, DC 20500 // 4:12 am

THE PRESIDENTIAL ARENA THICKENS UP

With Sen. Ted Cruz in and Sen. Marco Rubio expected to enter the Presidential Race for 2016 this next week the headlines continue to swirl with controversy about ‘natural born Citizen’; the standard and qualification for the Office of the President both Senators fail. Sen. Rand Paul announced yesterday but has already acknowledged he is not a Birther for Republicans or Democrats, meaning he is not fit to preserve, protect and defend the United States Constitution as the oath for President requires.

Already Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump are being courted for Amicus Curiaes or ‘friend of the Court’ petitions encouraging the Court to hear it based on their experiences that are relevant to the recklessness of Obama and his Administration regarding the United States Constitution.

Most reporters know as Phil Kadner does of the Chicago, Illinois Tribune that ‘The U.S. Supreme Court has never ruled on how the words “natural-born citizen” would apply to someone who is president of the United States.As everyone knows, President Barack Obama has been accused of failing to meet the natural-born test, whatever the test is. The main focus initially was on whether Obama was actually born in Hawaii or a foreign country.’

They have ignored the facts that naturalization included those of one U.S. Citizen mother who married and adopted her husband’s alienship just like marriage primarily meant the women took upon herself the man’s last name as is seen in:

U.S. Code: Title 8 – ALIENS AND NATIONALITY
8 U.S. Code § 1401 – Nationals and citizens of United States at birth
(e) ‘a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person;’

Read the rest here.

Subscribe
Notify of

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 Comments
Newest
Oldest
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Loggia
Thursday, April 9, 2015 10:48 AM

The Devil is surely “in the details.”

Stephen Hiller
Thursday, April 9, 2015 9:41 AM

The purpose of the 14th Amendment was fulfilled several generations ago. It should be repealed as no longer necessary. There are way too many laws on the books that no longer serve any purpose except for some smart lawyer to turn its meaning.

Thursday, April 9, 2015 9:11 AM

Cody;

I believe the appropriate citation for the statute of * USC that covers the birth circumstances of Teddy the son of a Cuban socialist revolutionary is found at;

8 U.S. Code § 1401

(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years: Provided, (provisos not applicable, Military & Gov’mnt Service)

However, in order to fully understand the actual effect of the 14th Amendments declaratory born citizen provision it is instructive to note the Titles used in the various parts of 8 USC Chapter 12, Subchapter III

” Part I—Nationality at Birth and Collective Naturalization (§§ 1401–1409)

If citing any part of 8 USC it would be worthwhile to seek a declaratory judgement on the FACT that the 14ths declaratory born citizen provision WAS and is a “collective naturalization provision” intended to cure the STATELESSNESS of the emancipated blacks who had lost their characters as “African Nationals” by generational separation.

It had that effect on those persons upon its Ratification, ergo, the words, “and subject to the jurisdiction thereof” must be taken to mean that no other foreign country / nation has jurisdiction on the subject of the persons citizenship status and the person would be born “Stateless” without the application of the provision.