If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my free Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!
WHAT IS AMERICA’S SURVIVAL WORTH?
by Sharon Rondeau
(Mar. 20, 2015) — In a newsletter issued on Friday morning by the John Bolton PAC, former United Nations Ambassador John Bolton sought donations to counter the “unprecedented surrender” in which he said the Obama regime is engaging in its negotiations with Iran over its nuclear ambitions and capabilities.
Bolton is featured frequently in both print and television media. His political action committee has recently donated $20,000 divided among three announced primary candidates who Bolton believes have committed themselves to “protecting the United States’ vital freedoms at home by securing American interests in a challenging world.”
Bolton is author of “Surrender is Not an Option: Defending America at the United Nations.” He formerly worked for the law firm of Covington & Burling, which has defended several large banks against allegations of money-laundering and other criminal enterprises. He is now employed by the Washington, DC firm Kirkland & Ellis, “a law firm serving global clients.”
He has also held positions at the U.S. State Department, U.S. Department of Justice, and for USAID.
Bolton is also a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and spoke at CPAC last month. In the foreword to a book written by Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer, Bolton described Obama as “our first post-American president.”
In the newsletter, Bolton further stated, in part:
I’ll use every dollar to launch an all-out-assault on Obama’s defeatist foreign policy.
I’m not going to give the liberal left — especially Barack Obama, John Kerry, and Hillary Clinton — the last word at this critical point in our nation’s history. I’m asking for you to take a stand with me against their embarrassment of a foreign policy. Click here now to pledge your support.
I’ve never been one for mincing words when it comes to protecting the security of America.
I will do absolutely anything to ensure that America is safe and strong, even if it means speaking the truth no matter how badly the liberals wished I remained silent.
After reading Bolton’s message, The Post & Email contacted his stated media representative, Sarah Tinsley, writing:
Good morning, Ms. Tinsley, I am a subscriber to your newsletter as editor of an online newspaper, The Post & Email. I would like to request a brief interview with Mr. Bolton at his earliest convenience to discuss various aspects of national security under Barack Hussein Obama in keeping with Mr. Bolton’s expressed concerns.
In his latest newsletter, Mr. Bolton stated that he was willing to do “anything” to keep our nation safe, and I have several questions about what that might entail.
Thank you very much for your consideration of my request.
On Friday evening, we received the following response:
From: Garrett Marquis (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Sent: Fri 3/20/15 7:00 PM
To: Sharon Rondeau (email@example.com)
I manage press for Amb. Bolton. Thank you for your request, right now the Amb. is very busy so we will have to decline the interview. Let us be in touch for the future.
Garrett Marquis I PrismGroup
(US) +1.703.239.3098 I prismstrategygroup.com
Since our request was not granted, the following is an open letter to Amb. Bolton with the questions we would have asked him had it been granted.
Dear Amb. Bolton:
In your March 20 newsletter, you stated that you are willing to do “absolutely anything to ensure that America is safe and strong,” indicating your intense disapproval of the negotiations the Obama regime has undertaken with the Iranian Republic, a nation which has murdered hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans over more than three decades.
Former CIA Director David Petraeus, who has been given a plea agreement concerning the alleged sharing of national security information with Paula Broadwell, has opined that “the biggest threat to long-term stability in Iraq isn’t the Islamic State — but instead, Iran-backed Shiite militias.”
Do Obama’s “unprecedented” actions suggest something more sinister than simply a “defeatist foreign policy?”
Since a criminal investigation spanning more than three years has found that Barack Obama’s only purported credentials are fraudulent, we do not know the true identity or background of the person making life-or-death decisions involving Iran, a major purveyor of worldwide terrorism.
Maricopa County, AZ Sheriff Joe Arpaio has termed his Cold Case Posse’s discovery of the fraudulent documents a matter of “national security” which the mainstream media, in its blind loyalty to its false god, has refused to independently investigate for the benefit of the American people.
As a result of the posse’s findings, Arpaio launched a second investigation whose results are as yet undisclosed.
Although several congressmen indicated an interest and even offered promises to expose the fraud which has maintained Obama in the White House, none kept his promise, to the detriment of the country and and its now-estranged allies.
Since Obama has lied about everything from health care to the unemployment rate to ISIS’s status as a “JV team,” is it not possible that, given the “computer-generated forgeries” of his long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration form, he is harboring something sinister and harmful to the United States within his personal history?
Have you not noticed his penchant for Islam and unwillingness to acknowledge Islamic terrorism which beheads children, buries people alive, and throws alleged homosexuals off of tall buildings to their deaths?
Would exposing Obama’s ultimate fraud not be the solution to his continued destruction of America’s military, its relationships with other countries, and resolve to protect its own citizens?
Why would the White House have presented fraudulent documentation “with the intent to deceive” if Obama were who he says he is?
Is there not something strangely foreign and faux about Obama’s “presidency?” Do his actions appear to be those of an American who loves his country, that is, the United States? Or do the forgeries prove that which many of us have sensed from the beginning: that he is a foreigner, that his “home country” is not the United States, and that he “did not have an American experience” during his formative years?
Is it possible that when Chris Matthews claimed on air in December 2007 that Obama was “born in Indonesia” and possessed “an Islamic background,” he was correct?
Rather than attempting to fight Obama on his “unprecedented” and dangerous policies which threaten the conflagration of a Third World War, would you possess the conviction, after viewing the evidence, to publicly assist in exposing the root of the problem we now face?
With the threat of a nuclear holocaust unlike anything the world has ever seen as a result of Obama’s treason against the United States, would it not be worth risking attacks from the “liberal left” by “speaking the truth” so that our children and grandchildren might survive?