Obama the Usurper


by Starbeau

Who is “Barack Hussein Obama?”

(Nov. 24, 2014) — Barrack Obama has now signed his threatened executive order relative to immigration policy for large numbers that have arrived in the United States illegally.

Many members of Congress and the voting population of the United States are infuriated as shown by the November 4 election and are expressing outrage that Obama is attempting to use executive orders to circumvent Congress when the Constitution clearly states in Article I:

Article I, Section 1
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.

Barrack Obama has no authority under the Constitution to make law!

Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Minor v Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875) held:

The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first.

A plain English reading of the holding in Minor is that a natural born citizen is “a child born in the United States to citizen parents.”  That definition has never been doubted and has been cited in several Supreme Court Cases. The opinion in Minor was signed by all nine (9) justices and is legal precedent to be followed by all inferior courts since the definition of natural born citizen was used in the holding to establish that Virginia Minor was also a citizen, able to sue the United States.

The final sentence from Minor (above) states that the awarding of US citizenship to a child born within the jurisdiction of the United States, without reference to the citizenship of their parents, has raised doubts they are citizens. But never the citizenship class of  “a child born in the United States to citizen parents.” Those are the natural born citizens.

Congress, the voting population, and leaders of the nations of the world know that Barrack Obama has produced no credentials that his citizenship class is “natural born citizen”, eligible to serve the United States as President and Commander in Chief of the American Army.

Barrack Obama is ineligible to serve as President of the United States

Barrack Obama is in violation of the first two articles in the Constitution! Why are the pundits only interested in discussing Obama’s violation of Article I of the constitution and neglecting Article II?

Turning a blind eye to the the natural born citizen requirement to be eligible to serve as President is required in the Constitution as the best protection against foreign intrusion that the framers could imagine. Except for Chester Arthur who burned his records, and usurped the office, the natural born citizen clause has stood guard over our Republic for over 200 years.  But nothing Chester Arthur promised, or did, compares to what Obama set out to do and that was to fundamentally change the United States. It has not been pretty watching the disintegration of the United States at the hands of the greatest fraud and hoaxer in the history of mankind.

The only legal entity in the United States with the courage to investigate the background of Barrack Obama has been Sheriff Joseph Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona.

Mike Zullo, the lead investigator of Sheriff Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse, has promised to provide “universe-shattering” information in the very near future of their continuing investigation.

Sheriff Arpaio publicly exposed the following fraudulent *documents:
●    A forged birth certificate (a felony for forgery of a federal document)
●    A forged draft registration (a felony for forgery of a federal document)
●    A Social Security Number that fails E-verify (prima facie evidence of a stolen identity)
* For details please view the “Sheriff’s Report” at http://obamaseligibility.com/.

Why is it necessary for Obama to have fraudulent documents?

The obvious reason is that there are no genuine documents to support his place of birth, his required draft registration and his stolen Social Security number.

Why are there no photographs of Obama and his family that have not been edited to place Obama in the photo?

The conclusion is that there are no real family portraits. The photographs released have had Obama inserted.

Congress should immediately begin an investigation to determine the answers to these questions.

  1. Is Obama a citizen of the United States? – There is doubt!
  2. If Obama is a citizen, does Obama’s class of citizenship rise to the class of natural born citizen as defined in Minor v. Happersett and required in Article II, Section I, Clause 5 to be eligible to serve as President  – No.  Requires birth on US soil to citizen parents. No legitimate birth certificate exists in Hawaii or any other State. Obama states that his father was a subject of the United Kingdom and was never a US citizen, or applied for US citizenship.
  3. Is Obama in violation of Article I, Section I of the United States Constitution? Yes!
  4. Is Obama in violation of Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution? Yes

Obama was never vetted to determine his background and qualifications to serve as President. He usurped the office with the support of a lapdog media, the Democrat Party and federal judges who were very creative in their application of the Doctrine of Standing to prevent any federal court from taking jurisdiction, thereby preventing any case being tried on the merits.

During the 227 years that the natural born citizen clause has stood guard making sure that the President has sole allegiance to the United States, only Chester Arthur was able to usurp the office by burning his records.  But there is no evidence that Chester Arthur had any intent in usurping the office to “fundamentally change” the United States to a Marxist/Socialist form of government.

Congress must act to remove Obama immediately.  The violation of Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of our Constitution must be a fundamental part of the charges Obama must face, and later those who knew and turned a blind eye, allowing this monster hoax to continue as long as it has.

2 Responses to "Obama the Usurper"

  1. Stephen Hiller   Tuesday, November 25, 2014 at 8:02 AM

    “Congress must act immediately” … really? They haven’t done squat, and they’re not about to. Get over it. America is not just circling the drain, it’s being sucked down in a giant whirlpool. Mr. Gruber was right.

  2. OPOVV   Monday, November 24, 2014 at 7:55 PM

    Unfortunately, the contingent at the “Small Dog Park”, if they didn’t see it on mainstream television, it’s not a subject for discussion.
    Their operable phrase is: “You’re not a Birther, are you?”
    Which is proof positive for the existence of “Stupid Americans”. So “The Dude” was telling the Truth, after all.
    And Americans went in to a frenzied Bro-ha-ha for hearing the Truth.
    It really be funny if the end-game wasn’t a visit from The Grim Reaper.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.