WITH NONDESCRIPT TEMPLATE LETTER
by Sharon Rondeau
(Nov. 19, 2014) — On November 13, a constituent wrote to his congressman, Rep. Paul Tonko (D-NY20), with the following message:
Although Obama does not fit the understanding of “natural born” that I learned in High School US History Class (I was valedictorian of my graduating class), it is perhaps even more worrisome to your constituents that he may be involved in identity fraud.
Is there merit to Attorney Taitz’ notification to Loretta Lynch?
Thanks as always,
a Constituent
On November 18, the constituent received the following response:
From: Congressman Paul Tonko <ny20ima-113@mail.house.gov>
Sent: Tue, Nov 18, 2014 12:36 PM
Subject: Responding to your message
|
November 18, 2014
Thank you for contacting me. I appreciate hearing from you on this important matter.
As always, I appreciate receiving feedback and ideas from my constituents. I will keep your views in mind going forward as I continue to represent the interest of the Capital Region in Washington, DC. Our democracy functions best when citizens are actively engaged in government decisions, and I encourage you to continue to stay involved in the political process.
Again, thank you for your correspondence. I am most appreciative. As your representative in Congress, I will continue to prioritize policies that create jobs, grow our economy and protect the middle class while responsibly reducing our deficit. Should you have additional comments or questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. My door is always open.
For up-to-date news and information about our district, please visit my website at http://tonko.house.gov and sign up for my E-Newsletter. Additionally, please consider using my social media tools: http://www.facebook.com/reppaultonko, http://twitter.com/paultonko, and http://www.youtube.com/reppaultonko.
|
On November 19, the constituent noted to The Post & Email, “Perhaps I should write back and gently tell him that he did not address one iota of my message. If this were a student’s essay on a given theme, the teacher would give it an “F” and say it was blather meant to fill up a page!”
Obama is the LSM monster,plain and simple!
What did you expect, maybe the truth fairy?
Seems a tad passive aggressive, as the response has nothing to do with the concerned constituent’s inquiry.
In plain English, it was a royal
brush off which is extremely rude…even if written in good English.
What is happening to the Democratic Party?
One hears Lies, Dismissive retorts, deceit, or, as in Obama’s response to the tragedy in Jerusalem, cliche’ empty air.
A nation needs two good parties, so it is dangerous that the Democrats are in the act of DEVOLUTION.