ISIS v. ISIL

DOES IT MATTER?

by RoseAnn Salanitri, TPATH Contributor, ©2014

(Sep. 11, 2014) — To most Americans, Obama’s use of the term ISIL instead of ISIS is a bit curious. It is widely acknowledged that ISIS stands for the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria while ISIL stands for the Islamic State of Syria and the Levant.  But is the difference in the acronyms harmless or do they represent a hidden and sinister message?

Arguably America has two enemies today: one foreign and one domestic.  The foreign enemy can easily be identified as ISIS while the domestic one is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Understanding your enemy is always a smart thing to do, since it is highly unlikely that you can defeat an enemy that you do not understand. But for most Americans, trying to understand an enemy such as ISIS that has so abruptly materialized can be a daunting task, since there seems to be little history to analyze this newly-forming Caliphate. To aid in our understanding, first we need to know that a Caliphate represents a sovereign state that ideally is comprised of the entire Muslim world, which is ruled by a caliph, or a successor of Mohammed.

The alarming details we have missed concerning ISIL lie in its forgotten history that goes back to ancient times when Israel was split into two kingdoms after the death of King Solomon.  At that time, the northern kingdom of Israel was comprised of ten tribes usually referred to as the “lost tribes” or “Ephraim,” which were taken into captivity by Samaria, which quickly became part of the Assyrian Empire. The territory known as the Assyrian Empire seemed to disappear off the pages of history.  It did not.  It divided into the nations we now know as Syria, southern Turkey, Iran and Iraq – the nations we now call ISIS – not ISIL.  The distinction is important to note.

The southern kingdom that was comprised of the tribes of Judah and part of Benjamin has been labeled the “southern Levant” by archaeologists wishing to remain politically neutral and not offend the Israelis or the Palestinians. The entire southern Levant also included ancient Philistia (which name has been hijacked by the Palestinians in order to lend them credibility), Jordan, and the southern part of Lebanon.

In his bestselling book, The Harbinger, Jonathan Cahn develops a stunning comparison between the warnings sent to the northern kingdom of ancient Israel and the biblical symbolism behind the iconic images of 9/11 and the World Trade Towers. The book deals with Isaiah 9:10, which context extends to Isaiah 9:8-12.  As stunning as these comparisons may be, when Cahn wrote the book, ISIS had not made its way into the public’s eye.  If it had, chances are that his book would have been a great deal longer. Astoundingly, the patterns that developed in the history recorded in Isaiah regarding God’s warnings were not limited to warnings alone.  Closer examination of the verses reveals that a pattern also developed regarding the emergence of the same enemies – an enemy that Obama accurately calls ISIL and not ISIS.

As with all of ancient Israel’s enemies, their defeat or victory directly corresponded to Israel’s fidelity to Almighty God. If Israel repented of her apostasy, immorality and idolatry, God relented and withdrew His judgment.  This principle of repentance and relenting was also documented in the account of Jonah and Nineveh. Since today God is typecast as a namby-pamby flower child, the fear and respect He deserves is often misunderstood – especially in America. While He indeed is merciful and fast to forgive, He is also fiercely just and His justice requires either repentance or judgment. If Cahn’s analysis is correct and 9/11 was meant to serve as a wake-up call for America to repent, then we are indeed in dire straits, for America has refused to acknowledge the warning.  And waiting in the wings is the usual cast of characters just waiting for our Protector God to remove his protection and allow their wickedness to wreak havoc on our spiritually deaf and blind citizenry.

So here’s the million-dollar question:  When Obama calls this emerging caliphate ISIL instead of ISIS, is he sending a well-hidden message to the terrorists that he is acknowledging and complicit with their plans to annihilate Israel and make its land part of their caliphate – or Levant? Many kingdoms have gatekeepers; in our case our gatekeeper may be a well-disguised Islamic Trojan Horse of the highest degree. If that is the case, may God have mercy on America as our Commander-in-Chief ravages our military and opens the doors to enemies that hate us so much that they are willing to die in order to bring about our destruction.  As with ancient Israel, there is hope in repentance, but as with ancient Israel, no one seems to be listening.

Contact RoseAnn  HERE

Contact TPATH  HERE

One Response to "ISIS v. ISIL"

  1. Stephen Hiller   Thursday, September 11, 2014 at 2:48 PM

    A “sinister message” ??? Every word the imposter speaks is a sinister message. Wake up America !!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.