Spread the love


by Sharon Rondeau

(Sep. 8, 2014) — On September 6, The Post & Email reported to its readership that obtaining documents under Tennessee’s Public Records Act had proved difficult.

The wording of the law, which can be found on the Tennessee Office of the Comptroller’s website, reads, in relevant part:

All state, county and municipal records shall, at all times during business hours, which for public hospitals shall be during the business hours of their administrative offices, be open for personal inspection by any citizen of this state, and those in charge of the records shall not refuse such right of inspection to any citizen, unless otherwise provided by state law.

Last week, Monroe County Chief Court Clerk Martha M. Cook had responded to our second request for documents under the law:

Sorry for the delay but things have been very busy around the office.  Since you are not a resident of Tennessee, I’m not required to provide you with anything but I will be kind and try to answer your questions.

I have attached a copy of Judge Ross’s oath.

We don’t have surety bonds, as county officials we are bonded but those are not on file in my office.

Regarding  the recording you will need to contact the court reporter, Denise Barnes. You may reach her at PO Box1356, Athens, Tn. 37371-1356

On Monday afternoon, the Tennessee Comptroller of the Treasury’s spokesman, John Dunn, responded to an email we had sent regarding a lack of response by two county criminal courts, writing:

Hello Sharon…

I had our Open Records Counsel Elisha Hodge weigh in on this. Attached you will find a court case which states that it is appropriate to deny an open records request to a non-Tennessee resident. Furthermore, there is no special consideration for a  member of the media. Reporters are treated just like any other person in our statute.

Thank you,

John Dunn

The referenced attachment was of the case Richard Jones v. City of Memphis, in which U.S. District Court Judge S. Thomas Anderson ordered that an out-of-state plaintiff’s requests under the Tennessee Public Records Law were properly denied by the City of Memphis and its employees because the plaintiff did not meet the “Citizens Only Requirement.”

TN Open Records Law Jones v. City of Memphis (Citizenship Provision)

Again referencing a letter we received from Tennessee Attorney Lizabeth Hale in 2012, The Post & Email then responded to Dunn:

Thank you very much, Mr. Dunn.  I was told exactly the opposite by Lizabeth Hale, an attorney working at the TN Department of Safety & Homeland Security, two years ago.  http://tn.gov/sos/pub/tar/announcements/11-52-08.pdf

I do not agree with the opinion, as I believe it is another way that Tennessee government, particularly the local courts, continues to dodge accountability.  I have never had any other state deny an Open Records request based on the fact that I was not a resident.  That actually makes what should be “open records” closed from public scrutiny.

However, I appreciate your efforts, and I will publish this to elucidate my reading audience.

Sharon Rondeau, Editor
The Post & Email

While we did not send Hale’s letter to Dunn, we located it and have made it available here:

The relevant part of the letter, which is the first paragraph following the list of items requested on page 1, states, “Per Tenn. Code Ann. § 10-7-503(a)(2)(A), records are only available to Tennessee citizens.  Your mailing address indicates you are a resident of Connecticut.  However, as a reporter, the Department will comply with the request at this time.”

When Dunn returned a call to The Post & Email on August 25, knowing that we had an out-of-state area code, he did not invoke the “Citizens Only” provision, nor did Blake Fontenay, spokesman for the Tennessee Secretary of State, either in our telephone conversation of August 25 or in subsequent emails.  In fact, Fontenay stated that he had contacted the Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts and asked someone to respond to our inquiry for copies of surety bonds covering court clerks.

As this article was being drafted, a response to an Open Records request made to Dixie County, FL arrived in our inbox just hours after it had been submitted.

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Sharon, sorry I am late in asking these questions: Does this mean that the States do NOT have to follow the First Amendment? Why has no other news organization challenged this in court? Does this mean that all press must have “live in” representatives in a State to have access to public records? Is that not discrimination against small news organizations like P&E? Just asking!
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: The wording of Tennessee’s law has been used as a reason to deny Public Records to out-of-state residents or businesses based on the wording “any citizen of this state.” In Florida, for example, the wording is that relevant, releasable documents shall be made available to “any person.” As I mentioned in the article, Tennessee is the only state which has refused The Post & Email documents because of non-residence. In the past, I have received responsive documents to FOIA requests from Illinois, Kansas, and Florida without delay.

  2. They are so embarrassed that they will go to even more levels of efforts to hide any information that could expose more. This is all being done by Democrats loyal to this coup/usurpation. It is hard to imagine how this state operated with all the corruption but what is sad is that Democrats are doing this everywhere in all states. With the black police chiefs in several large cities pushing for carry licenses, the crime has actually dropped in many cities that were formally anti-gun. So many states have followed this liberal train wreck and it has shown the results. Tennessee is a mess.