by Sharon Rondeau

(Jul. 28, 2014) — On Monday, Atty. Stephen Pidgeon of The North American Law Center (NALC) granted The Post & Email an interview about the organization’s Articles of Impeachment made public on Friday.

NALC is associated with the U.S. Patriots Union (USPU), which was founded by JB Williams and Timothy Joseph Harrington in 2010.  Pidgeon is “lead counsel” at NALC in the area of Constitutional Law.  NALC’s stated mission begins with:

Year after year, case after case, the American people have had their rights eviscerated by the American legal system. This deliberate destruction has been under the guise of effecting a “utopian global social justice system”. In actuality, what we have are judicial activists, through their lofty positions, imposing by fiat, that which should be determined through due process. These absurd, inane and socialistic decisions, substituting personal policy preferences for Constitutional imperatives, have destroyed both the intent and spirit of the Constitution, as well as the foundation of the Rule of Law.

With a law office in Washington State, Pidgeon has experience in the fields of international law, religious freedom, and U.S. export and import laws, among other areas of expertise.

Pidgeon is associated with the Alliance Defending Freedom, which advocates for religious liberty, a right enshrined in the First Amendment to the Bill of Rights.  He produced a set of eight videos on topics including The Muslim Brotherhood and “the high crimes of Barack Obama.”  He also published “The Obama Error” in 2011, whose synopsis reads, “Here are the facts, and here is the law. The national fabric is forever torn, and the experiment in God-breathed freedom we call America is finished. When we look back to the causes of our demise, we will most certainly find the Obama error.” Many reviews of the book at said that the book was “hard to put down,” “food for thought,” and written by “one of the most courageous Christian writers.”

Before Obama was inaugurated in January 2009, Pidgeon filed a challenge to his constitutional eligibility in Washington State, which has a law that “provides for any registered voter to challenge the election of a candidate if the candidate at the time of the election was ineligible to hold office,” in Pidgeon’s own words as told to WND in late 2008.  At the time, Pidgeon stated that he believed that Obama was “born in Kenya,” which presumably would have made him ineligible for the presidency.  In speaking with Pidgeon today, he told The Post & Email that he was not sure where Obama was born, but that the “eligibility” issue is no longer front and center of the argument to remove him from office.

Earlier on Monday, Pidgeon was a guest on Erik Rush’s “Full Contact” radio program explaining the Articles of Impeachment and the direction he hopes the American people will take to see that they are implemented by the U.S. House of Representatives.

Pidgeon told The Post & Email that “the impetus for putting the North American Law Center together was to combat what has been an out-of-hand situation with certain NGOs in this country which will go unnamed and have had a tremendous amount of funding and done a tremendous amount of damage labeling free speech groups and other political action groups across the country ‘domestic terrorists’ and ‘potential domestic terrorists.'”  He said that NALC’s intention is to “fight back” and present “arguments in law to the general public.”

“I can tell you that we have done a great deal of representation in how we have addressed military issues,” Pidgeon added, which include the Rules of Engagement and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

In regard to the Articles of Impeachment directed at Obama, Pidgeon told us that there is a “legal necessity to drive the moral imperative to the House of Representatives to do the right thing.”  “We’re just not willing to listen to excuses anymore.  The representatives to the United States Congress were elected to a job.  They took an oath to support the Constitution; there is all kinds of unconstitutional and criminal activity going on right under their noses.  They have a duty to do something about it, and they need to do that duty.”

THE POST & EMAIL:  How long have you been working on the Articles of Impeachment?

ATTY. PIDGEON:  That’s an interesting question; probably since 2008.  It’s been an ongoing task detailing his high crimes and misdemeanors.  As far as the actual Articles of Impeachment, it’s been crafted over several months.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Are you able to say how big the team is with whom you are working?

ATTY. PIDGEON:  I’m not, but there is more than one of us.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Members of Congress have been mentioning Obama’s impeachment since last summer.  Reps. Blake Farenthold, Steve Stockman and Ted Yoho all mentioned it last year.  I think there are many Americans who wonder why nothing has been done before now.  Do you believe their hesitation stems from political correctness?

ATTY. PIDGEON:  No, I don’t think so.  I think it’s much more onerous than that, frankly.  It has to do with inside-the-beltway, off-the-books contractual agreements that were made between the political parties.  For instance, few Republicans know that the Republican Party entered into a 35-year stipulation to not sue the Democrats for voter fraud.  The contract between a representative or senator and his constituency that puts him in office means nothing to most of these elected personas.  The contracts that they make privately between each other’s political parties and their donors means everything to them.  I believe – and this is my opinion – that there was a contract made with one of our sovereign debt-holders, namely, Saudi Arabia, to put a Muslim in office for two terms following the George W. Bush term for eight years, and all of this was coordinated back before 1992, before George H.W. Bush lost after having a 92% approval rating.  He lost the election to Bill Clinton, and we saw two terms of Bill Clinton, a captain for the HWB cartel, hold office for eight yeas, and HWB’s son held office for eight years, and then we got a Muslim for eight years.  That’s the contractual arrangement that was made, in my opinion.  It’s a reasoned conclusion.  I don’t have any documents to support that, and there aren’t going to be any documents readily available because I assure you that they’re under client confidentiality in some law office somewhere.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Do you think Obama is a “foreign born domestic enemy,” as CDR Walter Francis Fitzpatrick, III (Ret.) claimed in his March 17, 2009 treason complaint?  Do you think he is a practicing Muslim?

ATTY. PIDGEON:  The way it stands right now, nobody can say for sure where he was born.  I’m not even sure if Obama himself knows where he was born.  I have my own problems with some of the “Kenyan-born” theory primarily because of Ann Dunham’s passport history, but that’s assuming that Ann Dunham is the mother.  That’s an assumption; there is absolutely nothing in his birth record that can be corroborated.  What little corroboration we have concerning his life is that at one point, he was known as “Barry Soetoro” and adopted by Lolo Soetoro. That much we know. It appears that he was also adopted by Ann Soetoro at that time.  That appears to be the case.  His name was Barry Soetoro, Indonesian national, Muslim of Muslim faith.  His adopted father was Muslim, his reported biological father was Muslim; his mother was married to two Muslim men, according to the story that’s being told. So he was born a Muslim, and if you’re born a Muslim, you are a Muslim under the rules of Islam.

He wears a ring that carries the Shahada.  He recited the Shahada to The New York Times in 2007 in Arabic without an accent.  He told The Muslim Brotherhood in Cairo in April 2009 in Arabic, “I am one of you.”  If people want to deny that he’s a Muslim, then go ahead.  He abolished the National Day of Prayer in order to invite imams into the White House to pray.  The New Testament says, “Ye shall know them by their fruits.”  I think it’s pretty clear what his fruit is.

THE POST & EMAIL:  People continue to ask why he isn’t taking action on the slaughter of Christians in the Middle East.

ATTY. PIDGEON:  The fact is he trained, financed, funded and armed ISIS, and he trained, financed, funded and armed Al Qaeda in Syria.  He trained, financed, armed and supplied the jihadis working in Libya.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Is there documentation of that? 

ATTY. PIDGEON:  Yes, there is.  As I said on the radio show, Walid Shoebat has a complete dossier on the documentation of what happened in Libya.  He’s not the only one; the Egyptian Supreme Court has also put together a dossier under which they were able to accuse then-ambassador to Egypt, Anne Patterson, and Hillary Clinton and indict them both for inciting terrorism inside of Egypt because of their relationship with The Muslim Brotherhood to overthrow the lawful government of the nation of Egypt.

THE POST & EMAIL:  Can they take any action on that:  for instance, try them in absentia?

ATTY. PIDGEON:  Absolutely they can.  If they try them and convict them, OK, great; now what?  I guess the answer is “Stay out of Egypt.”

THE POST & EMAIL:  Have you shared your findings, particularly those in Article I, with the Maricopa County, AZ Cold Case Posse, which declared Obama’s long-form birth certificate and Selective Service form fraudulent?

ATTY. PIDGEON:  I’ve had some discussions with Mike Zullo, and I’ve also spent some time with one of the guys who worked with the Cold Case Posse, Doug Vogt.

Editor’s Note:  The Post & Email’s interview with Atty. Pidgeon will be continued in a second installment.

Join the Conversation


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  1. Dear Mrs Rondeau: Please consider interviewing WALID SHOEBAT who will corroborate what your article here intones.

    Go to and click on CONTACT option.

    Given that this is TRUE, all that these investigators claim, then America does not really have a “PRESIDENT” but, rather, an agent of another entity, under the guise of “Chief executive” playing out the role in a kind of POLITICAL DRAG. Simultaneously, then, the goals of the enemy are realized, all with the veneer of being “sancrosanct.”

    There are many speaking of IMPEACHMENT, but could ARREST be the most legal and CONSTITUTIONAL answer?
    Mrs. Rondeau replies: I have tried to reach him previously but will contact him again.

  2. Once again I see no difference between Democrat and Republican. They even tell the same lie, both saying “we’re different”. Any fool who votes the party line is just that, a fool.

    1. Bravo! No wonder both RINO (a word O’Reilly dismisses as uncouth for some reason) and Dems deride and hurl invectives at the Tea Party. The TP is NOT a “party” but, rather, the Voice of All Good people telling the Status Quo that they are unworthy and corrupt.